Skip to main content

Main menu

  • Home
  • Content
    • Current Issue
    • Early Online
    • Archive
    • Subject Collections
  • Info For
    • Authors
    • Reviewers
    • Subscribers
    • Advertisers
  • About
    • About JSWC
    • Editorial Board
    • Permissions
    • Alerts
    • RSS Feeds
    • Contact Us

User menu

  • Register
  • Subscribe
  • My alerts
  • Log in
  • My Cart

Search

  • Advanced search
Journal of Soil and Water Conservation

  • Register
  • Subscribe
  • My alerts
  • Log in
  • My Cart
Journal of Soil and Water Conservation

Advanced Search

  • Home
  • Content
    • Current Issue
    • Early Online
    • Archive
    • Subject Collections
  • Info For
    • Authors
    • Reviewers
    • Subscribers
    • Advertisers
  • About
    • About JSWC
    • Editorial Board
    • Permissions
    • Alerts
    • RSS Feeds
    • Contact Us
  • Follow SWCS on Twitter
  • Visit SWCS on Facebook
Research ArticleResearch Section

Assessment of the Soil Vulnerability Index and comparison with AnnAGNPS in two Lower Mississippi River Basin watersheds

L.M.W. Yasarer, S. Lohani, R.L. Bingner, M.A. Locke, C. Baffaut and A.L. Thompson
Journal of Soil and Water Conservation January 2020, 75 (1) 53-61; DOI: https://doi.org/10.2489/jswc.75.1.53
L.M.W. Yasarer
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
S. Lohani
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
R.L. Bingner
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
M.A. Locke
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
C. Baffaut
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
A.L. Thompson
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • Article
  • Figures & Data
  • References
  • Info & Metrics
  • PDF
Loading

Article Figures & Data

Figures

  • Tables
  • Figure 1
    • Download figure
    • Open in new tab
    • Download powerpoint
    Figure 1

    Location of Beasley Lake (BL) and Goodwin Creek (GC) watersheds in Mississippi; hydrologic soil group distribution in GC (top) and BL (bottom) watersheds.

  • Figure 2
    • Download figure
    • Open in new tab
    • Download powerpoint
    Figure 2

    Soil Vulnerability Index (SVI) runoff potential results using LiDAR digital elevation model (DEM) for Goodwin Creek (GC; top) and Beasley Lake (BL; bottom) watersheds. Results are shown for historically cultivated land use only. Boxes in each watershed indicate areas examined further in figures 4 (GC) and 5 (BL).

  • Figure 3
    • Download figure
    • Open in new tab
    • Download powerpoint
    Figure 3

    Area of cropland within each Soil Vulnerability Index (SVI) category in the Goodwin Creek watershed in 1937, 1982, 1996, and 2004. In 1937 to 1982 the majority of cropland was in the SVI “high” category, but through time this land was removed from cultivation.

  • Figure 4
    • Download figure
    • Open in new tab
    • Download powerpoint
    Figure 4

    (a) Aerial image from 1979 and (b) image overlaid with the Soil Vulnerability Index (SVI) runoff classification. Areas highlighted in pink are rated high within the SVI classification system, and within many of these areas evidence of erosional gullies and cropland degradation are observed in the aerial image (identified with asterisk [*] to indicate degraded cropland). Location of box within the Goodwin Creek watershed is shown in figure 2.

  • Figure 5
    • Download figure
    • Open in new tab
    • Download powerpoint
    Figure 5

    (a and b) Aerial image from 1992 (c and d) overlaid with Soil Vulnerability Index (SVI) runoff classification for two areas in the Beasley Lake watershed: (a and c) north of the lake and (b and d) south of the lake. Areas highlighted in pink are rated high in the SVI and appear to coincide with many of the drainage pathways within the watershed. Land north of the lake was converted to Conservation Reserve Program in 2003. Location of boxes are shown in figure 2.

Tables

  • Figures
  • Table 1
  • Table 2
  • Table 3
  • Table 4
  • Table 5
  • Table 6
PreviousNext
Back to top

In this issue

Journal of Soil and Water Conservation: 75 (1)
Journal of Soil and Water Conservation
Vol. 75, Issue 1
January/February 2020
  • Table of Contents
  • About the Cover
  • Index by author
  • Front Matter (PDF)
Print
Download PDF
Article Alerts
Sign In to Email Alerts with your Email Address
Email Article

Thank you for your interest in spreading the word on Journal of Soil and Water Conservation.

NOTE: We only request your email address so that the person you are recommending the page to knows that you wanted them to see it, and that it is not junk mail. We do not capture any email address.

Enter multiple addresses on separate lines or separate them with commas.
Assessment of the Soil Vulnerability Index and comparison with AnnAGNPS in two Lower Mississippi River Basin watersheds
(Your Name) has sent you a message from Journal of Soil and Water Conservation
(Your Name) thought you would like to see the Journal of Soil and Water Conservation web site.
CAPTCHA
This question is for testing whether or not you are a human visitor and to prevent automated spam submissions.
18 + 1 =
Solve this simple math problem and enter the result. E.g. for 1+3, enter 4.
Citation Tools
Assessment of the Soil Vulnerability Index and comparison with AnnAGNPS in two Lower Mississippi River Basin watersheds
L.M.W. Yasarer, S. Lohani, R.L. Bingner, M.A. Locke, C. Baffaut, A.L. Thompson
Journal of Soil and Water Conservation Jan 2020, 75 (1) 53-61; DOI: 10.2489/jswc.75.1.53

Citation Manager Formats

  • BibTeX
  • Bookends
  • EasyBib
  • EndNote (tagged)
  • EndNote 8 (xml)
  • Medlars
  • Mendeley
  • Papers
  • RefWorks Tagged
  • Ref Manager
  • RIS
  • Zotero
Request Permissions
Share
Assessment of the Soil Vulnerability Index and comparison with AnnAGNPS in two Lower Mississippi River Basin watersheds
L.M.W. Yasarer, S. Lohani, R.L. Bingner, M.A. Locke, C. Baffaut, A.L. Thompson
Journal of Soil and Water Conservation Jan 2020, 75 (1) 53-61; DOI: 10.2489/jswc.75.1.53
del.icio.us logo Digg logo Reddit logo Twitter logo Facebook logo Google logo Mendeley logo
  • Tweet Widget
  • Facebook Like
  • Google Plus One

Jump to section

  • Article
    • Abstract
    • Introduction
    • Materials and Methods
    • Results and Discussion
    • Summary and Conclusions
    • Acknowledgements
    • Footnotes
    • References
  • Figures & Data
  • Info & Metrics
  • References
  • PDF

Related Articles

  • No related articles found.
  • Google Scholar

Cited By...

  • Mapping the Soil Vulnerability Index across broad spatial extents to guide conservation efforts
  • Soil Vulnerability Index assessment as a tool to explain annual constituent loads in a nested watershed
  • Assessing cultivated cropland inherent vulnerability to sediment and nutrient losses with the Soil Vulnerability Index
  • Purpose, development, and synthesis of the Soil Vulnerability Index for inherent vulnerability classification of cropland soils
  • Performance of the Soil Vulnerability Index with respect to slope, digital elevation model resolution, and hydrologic soil group
  • Google Scholar

More in this TOC Section

Research Section

  • Smart control of agricultural water wells in western Iran: Application of the Q-methodology
  • Soil health through farmers’ eyes: Toward a better understanding of how farmers view, value, and manage for healthier soils
  • Policy process and problem framing for state Nutrient Reduction Strategies in the US Upper Mississippi River Basin
Show more Research Section

Special Research Section: Soil Vulnerability Index

  • Evaluation of the Soil Vulnerability Index for artificially drained cropland across eight Conservation Effects Assessment Project watersheds
  • Purpose, development, and synthesis of the Soil Vulnerability Index for inherent vulnerability classification of cropland soils
  • Performance of the Soil Vulnerability Index with respect to slope, digital elevation model resolution, and hydrologic soil group
Show more Special Research Section: Soil Vulnerability Index

Similar Articles

Keywords

  • AnnAGNPS
  • conservation targeting
  • Mississippi
  • sediment yield
  • Soil Vulnerability Index
  • SVI

Content

  • Current Issue
  • Early Online
  • Archive
  • Subject Collections

Info For

  • Authors
  • Reviewers
  • Subscribers
  • Advertisers

Customer Service

  • Subscriptions
  • Permissions and Reprints
  • Terms of Use
  • Privacy

SWCS

  • Membership
  • Publications
  • Meetings and Events
  • Conservation Career Center

© 2023 Soil and Water Conservation Society