Assessment of the Soil Vulnerability Index and comparison with AnnAGNPS in two Lower Mississippi River Basin watersheds

References

1. ↵
   1. Agnew L.J.,
   2. Lyon S.,
   3. Gérard-Marchant P.,
   4. Collins V.B.,
   5. Lembo A.J.,
   6. Steenhuis T.S.,
   7. Walter M.T.

   . 2006. Identifying hydrologically sensitive areas: Bridging the gap between science and application. Journal of Environmental Management 78(1):63-76.

   OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
2. ↵
   1. Andrews S.S.,
   2. Karlen D.L.,
   3. Cambardella C.A.

   . 2004. The Soil Management Assessment Framework: A quantitative soil quality evaluation method. Soil Science Society of America Journal 68:1945-1962.

   OpenUrlCrossRefWeb of Science
3. ↵
   1. Bagnold R.A.

   1966. An approach to the sediment transport problem from general physics. USGS Professional Paper 422-J. Reston, VA: US Geological Survey.
4. ↵
   1. Bingner R.L.,
   2. Theurer F.D.,
   3. Yuan Y.

   . 2015. AnnAGNPS technical processes. Unpublished Report. Oxford, MS: USDA ARS National Sedimentation Laboratory. http://www.wcc.nrcs.usda.gov/ftpref/wntsc/H&H/AGNPS/downloads/AnnAGNPS_Technical_Documentation.pdf.
5. ↵
   1. Bosch D.,
   2. Theurer F.,
   3. Bingner R.,
   4. Felton G.,
   5. Chaubey I.

   . 1998. Evaluation of the AnnAGNPS water quality model. ASAE Paper No. 98-2195. St. Joseph, MI: American Society of Agricultural Engineers.
6. ↵
   1. Chan R.,
   2. Baffaut C.,
   3. Thompson A.,
   4. Sadler J.

   . 2016. Validating the soil vulnerability index for a claypan watershed. Catena 148:185-194.

   OpenUrl
7. ↵
   1. Lal R.,
   2. Stewart B.A.

   1. Dabney S.M.,
   2. Shields F.D. Jr..,
   3. Bingner R.L.,
   4. Kuhnle R.A.,
   5. Rigby J.R. Jr..

   2012. Watershed management for erosion and sedimentation control case study: Goodwin Creek, Panola County, MS. In Soil Water and Agronomic Productivity, Advances in Soil Science, eds. Lal R., Stewart B.A.. Boca Raton, FL: Taylor and Francis.
8. ↵
   1. Douglas-Mankin K.R.,
   2. Daggupati P.,
   3. Sheshukov A.Y.,
   4. Barnes P.L.

   . 2013. Paying for sediment: Field-scale conservation practice targeting, funding, and assessment using the Soil and Water Assessment Tool. Journal of Soil and Water Conservation 68(1):41-51, doi:10.2489/jswc.68.1.41.

   OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
9. ↵
   1. Foster G.R.,
   2. Yoder D.C.,
   3. Weesies G.A.,
   4. Toy T.J.

   . 2001. The design philosophy behind RUSLE2: Evolution of an empirical model. In Soil Erosion, 95-98. St. Joseph, MI: American Society of Agricultural and Biological Engineers.
10. ↵
    1. Gburek W.J.,
    2. Sharpley A.N.,
    3. Heathwaite L.,
    4. Folmar G.J.

    . 2000. Phosphorus management at the watershed scale: A modification of the phosphorus index. Journal of Environmental Quality 29(1):130-144.

    OpenUrlWeb of Science
11. ↵
    1. Hamlett J.M.,
    2. Miller D.A.,
    3. Day R.L.,
    4. Peterson G.W.,
    5. Baumer G.M.,
    6. Russo J.

    . 1992. Statewide GIS-based ranking of watersheds for agricultural pollution prevention. Journal of Soil and Water Conservation 47(5):399-404.

    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
12. ↵
    1. Kuhnle R.A.,
    2. Bingner R.L.,
    3. Alonso C.V.,
    4. Wilson C.G.,
    5. Simon A.

    . 2008. Conservation practice effects on sediment load in the Goodwin Creek Experimental Watershed. Journal of Soil and Water Conservation 63(6):496-503, doi:10.2489/jswc.63.6.496.

    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
13. ↵
    1. Lee S.,
    2. Sadeghi A.M.,
    3. McCarty G.W.,
    4. Baffaut C.,
    5. Lohani S.,
    6. Duriancik L.F.,
    7. Thompson A.,
    8. Yeo I.,
    9. Wallace C.

    . 2018. Assessing the suitability of the Soil Vulnerability Index (SVI) on identifying croplands vulnerable to nitrogen loss using the SWAT model. Catena 167:1-12.

    OpenUrl
14. ↵
    1. Lizotte R.E.,
    2. Yasarer L.M.W.,
    3. Locke M.A.,
    4. Bingner R.L.,
    5. Knight S.S.

    . 2017. Lake nutrient responses to integrated conservation practices in an agricultural watershed. Journal of Environmental Quality 46:330-338.

    OpenUrlCrossRef
15. ↵
    1. Locke M.A.,
    2. Knight S.S.,
    3. Smith S.,
    4. Cullum R.F.,
    5. Zablotowicz R.M.,
    6. Yuan Y.,
    7. Bingner R.L.

    . 2008. Environmental quality research in the Beasley Lake watershed, 1995 to 2007: Succession from conventional to conservation practices. Journal of Soil and Water Conservation 63(6):430-442.

    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
16. ↵
    1. Lohani S.,
    2. Baffaut C.,
    3. Thompson A.L.,
    4. Aryal N.,
    5. Bingner R.L.,
    6. Bjorneberg D.L.,
    7. Bosch D.D.,
    8. Bryant R.B,
    9. Buda A.,
    10. Dabney S.M.,
    11. Davis A.R.,
    12. Duriancik L.F.,
    13. James D.E.,
    14. King K.W.,
    15. Kleinman P.J.A.,
    16. Locke M.,
    17. McCarty G.W.,
    18. Pease L.A.,
    19. Reba M.L.,
    20. Smith D.R.,
    21. Tomer M.D.,
    22. Veith T.L.,
    23. Williams M.R.,
    24. Yasarer L.M.W.

    . 2020. Performance of the Soil Vulnerability Index with respect to slope, digital elevation model resolution, and hydrologic soil group. Journal of Soil and Water Conservation 75(1):12-27, doi:10.2489/jswc.75.1.12.

    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
17. ↵
    1. Moriasi D.N.,
    2. Gitau M.W.,
    3. Pai N.,
    4. Daggupati P.

    . 2015. Hydrologic and water quality models: Performance measures and evaluation criteria. Transactions of the ASABE 58(6):1763-1785.

    OpenUrl
18. ↵
    1. Niraula R.,
    2. Kalin L.,
    3. Srivastava P.,
    4. Anderson C.J.

    . 2013. Identifying critical source areas of nonpoint source pollution with SWAT and GWLF. Ecological Modelling 268:123-133.

    OpenUrlCrossRef
19. ↵
    1. NOAA (National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration)

    . 2017. Global Historical Climate Network Daily for Moorhead, Mississippi. Silver Spring, MD: National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration. https://www.ncdc.noaa.gov/cdo-web/datasets/GHCND/stations/GHCND:USC00226009/detail.
20. ↵
    1. Renard K.G.,
    2. Foster G.R.,
    3. Weesies G.A.,
    4. McCool D.K.,
    5. Yoder D.C.

    . 1997. Predicting soil erosion by water: A guide to conservation planning with the Revised Universal Soil Loss Equation (RUSLE). USDA Handbook No. 703:404. Washington, DC: USDA Agricultural Research Service.
21. ↵
    1. Soil Survey Staff. USDA NRCS

    . 2018a. Soil survey geographic database for Panola County, Mississippi. Available online. Washington, DC: USDA Natural Resources Conservation Service.
22. ↵
    1. Soil Survey Staff

    . 2018b. Soil survey geographic database for Sunflower County, Mississippi. Available online. Washington, DC: USDA Natural Resources Conservation Service.
23. ↵
    1. Theurer F.D.,
    2. Clarke C.D.

    . 1991. Wash load component for sediment yield modeling. In Proceedings of the 5th Federal Interagency Sedimentation Conference, March 18-21, 1991. Las Vegas, NV: Subcommittee on Sedimentation of the Interagency Advisory Committee on Water Data.
24. ↵
    1. Thompson A.L.,
    2. Baffaut C.,
    3. Lohani S.,
    4. Duriancik L.F.,
    5. Norfleet M.L.,
    6. Ingram K.

    . 2020. Purpose, development, and synthesis of the Soil Vulnerability Index for inherent vulnerability classification of cropland soils. Journal of Soil and Water Conservation 75(1):1-11, doi:10.2489/jswc.75.1.1.

    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
25. ↵
    1. Tim U.S.,
    2. Mostaghimi S.,
    3. Shanholtz V.O.

    . 1992. Identification of critical nonpoint pollution source areas using geographic information systems and water quality modeling. JAWRA Journal of the American Water Resources Association 28(5):877-887.

    OpenUrl
26. ↵
    1. Tuppad P.,
    2. Santhi C.,
    3. Wang X.,
    4. Williams J.R.,
    5. Srinivasan R.,
    6. Gowda P.H.

    . 2010. Simulation of conservation practices using the APEX model. Applied Engineering in Agriculture 26(5):779-794.

    OpenUrlCrossRef
27. ↵
    1. USDA NRCS (Natural Resources Conservation Service)

    . 2012. Assessment of the Effects of Conservation Practices on Cultivated Cropland in the Upper Mississippi River Basin. Washington, DC: USDA Natural Resources Conservation Service.
28. ↵
    1. USDA NRCS

    . 2017. Soil Climate Analysis Network (SCAN) data for site 2032, Beasley Lake, Mississippi. Washington, DC: USDA Natural Resources Conservation Service. https://wcc.sc.egov.usda.gov/nwcc/site?sitenum=2032.
29. ↵
    1. USGS (US Geological Survey)

    . 2010. Mississippi Delta Management Systems Evaluation Areas (MDMSEA). Reston, VA: US Geological Survey. https://www.usgs.gov/centers/lmg-water/science/mississippi-delta-management-systems-evaluation-areas-mdmsea?qt-science_center_objects=0#qt-science_center_objects.
30. ↵
    1. Vaze J.,
    2. Teng J.,
    3. Spencer G.

    . 2010. Impact of DEM accuracy and resolution on topographic indices. Environmental Modelling and Software 25(10):1086-1098.

    OpenUrlCrossRefWeb of Science
31. ↵
    1. White M.J.,
    2. Storm D.E.,
    3. Busteed P.R.,
    4. Stoodley S.H.,
    5. Phillips S.J.

    . 2009. Evaluating nonpoint source critical source area contributions at the watershed scale. Journal of Environmental Quality 38(4):1654-1663.

    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
32. ↵
    1. Wilson C.G.,
    2. Kuhnle R.A.,
    3. Dabney S.M.,
    4. Lerch R.N.,
    5. Huang C.H.,
    6. King K.W.,
    7. Livingston S.J.

    . 2014. Fine sediment sources in Conservation Effects Assessment Project watersheds. Journal of Soil and Water Conservation 69(5):402-413, doi:10.2489/jswc.69.5.402.

    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
33. ↵
    1. Yasarer L.M.W.,
    2. Bingner R.L.,
    3. Momm H.G.

    . 2018. Characterizing ponds in a watershed simulation and evaluating their influence on streamflow in a Mississippi watershed. Hydrological Sciences Journal 63(2):302-311.

    OpenUrl
34. ↵
    1. Yuan Y.,
    2. Locke M.A.,
    3. Bingner R.L.

    . 2008. Annualized agricultural non-point source model application for Mississippi Delta Beasley Lake watershed conservation practices assessment. Journal of Soil and Water Conservation 63(6):542-551, doi:10.2489/jswc.63.6.542.

    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text