Skip to main content

Main menu

  • Home
  • Content
    • Current Issue
    • Early Online
    • Archive
    • Subject Collections
  • Info For
    • Authors
    • Reviewers
    • Subscribers
    • Advertisers
  • About
    • About JSWC
    • Editorial Board
    • Permissions
    • Alerts
    • RSS Feeds
    • Contact Us

User menu

  • Register
  • Subscribe
  • My alerts
  • Log in
  • My Cart

Search

  • Advanced search
Journal of Soil and Water Conservation

  • Register
  • Subscribe
  • My alerts
  • Log in
  • My Cart
Journal of Soil and Water Conservation

Advanced Search

  • Home
  • Content
    • Current Issue
    • Early Online
    • Archive
    • Subject Collections
  • Info For
    • Authors
    • Reviewers
    • Subscribers
    • Advertisers
  • About
    • About JSWC
    • Editorial Board
    • Permissions
    • Alerts
    • RSS Feeds
    • Contact Us
  • Follow SWCS on Twitter
  • Visit SWCS on Facebook
Research ArticleResearch Section

Assessing soil resilience across an agricultural land retirement chronosequence

S.L. Pey and H.A.S. Dolliver
Journal of Soil and Water Conservation March 2020, 75 (2) 191-197; DOI: https://doi.org/10.2489/jswc.75.2.191
S.L. Pey
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
H.A.S. Dolliver
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • Article
  • Figures & Data
  • References
  • Info & Metrics
  • PDF
Loading

References

  1. ↵
    1. Allison V.J.,
    2. Miller R.M.,
    3. Jastrow J.D.,
    4. Matamala R.,
    5. Zak D.R.
    . 2005. Changes in soil microbial community structure in a tallgrass prairie chronosequence. Soil Science Society of America Journal 69:1412-1421.
    OpenUrlWeb of Science
  2. ↵
    1. Baer S.G.,
    2. Rice C.W.,
    3. Blair J.M.
    . 2000. Assessment of soil quality in fields with short and long term enrollment in the CRP. Journal of Soil and Water Conservation 55(2):142-146.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  3. ↵
    1. Bodhinayake W.,
    2. Si B.C.
    . 2004. Near-saturated surface soil hydraulic properties under different land uses in the St. Denis National Wildlife Area, Saskatchewan, Canada. Hydrological Processes 18:2835-2850.
    OpenUrlGeoRef
  4. ↵
    1. Buckley D.H.,
    2. Schmidt T.M.
    . 2001. The structure of microbial communities in soil and the lasting impact of cultivation. Microbial Ecology 42:11-21.
    OpenUrlPubMedWeb of Science
  5. ↵
    1. Burke I.C.,
    2. Yonker C.M.,
    3. Parton W.J.,
    4. Cole C.V.,
    5. Schimel D.S.,
    6. Flach K.
    . 1989. Texture, climate, and cultivation effects on soil organic matter content in U.S. grassland soils. Soil Science Society of America Journal 53:800-805.
    OpenUrlCrossRefWeb of Science
  6. ↵
    1. Cullum R.F.,
    2. Locke M.A.,
    3. Knight S.S.
    . 2010. Effects of Conservation Reserve Program on runoff and lake water quality in an oxbow lake watershed. Journal of Environmental Application and Science 5(3):318-328.
    OpenUrl
  7. ↵
    1. Delgado-Baquerizo M.,
    2. Eldridge D.J.,
    3. Maestre F.T.,
    4. Karunaratne S.B.,
    5. Traivedi P.,
    6. Reich P.B.,
    7. Singh B.K.
    . 2017. Climate legacies drive global soil carbon stocks in terrestrial ecosystems. Science Advances 3(4):e1602008.
    OpenUrlFREE Full Text
  8. ↵
    1. Gebhart D.L.,
    2. Johnson H.B.,
    3. Mayeux H.S.,
    4. Polley H.W.
    . 1994. The CRP increases organic carbon. Journal of Soil and Water Conservation 49(5):488-492.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  9. ↵
    1. Grandy S.A.,
    2. Robertson G.P.
    . 2007. Land-use intensity effects on soil organic carbon accumulation rates and mechanisms. Ecosystems 10:58-73.
    OpenUrl
  10. ↵
    1. Harden J.W.
    1982. A quantitative index of soil development from field descriptions: Examples from a chronosequence in central California. Geoderma 28(1):1-28.
    OpenUrlCrossRefGeoRefWeb of Science
  11. ↵
    1. Hellerstein D.M.
    2017. The US Conservation Reserve Program: The evolution of an enrollment mechanism. Land Use Policy 63:601-610.
    OpenUrl
  12. ↵
    1. Huang X.,
    2. Skidmore E.L.,
    3. Tibke G.L.
    . 2002. Soil quality of two Kansas soils as influenced by the Conservation Reserve Program. Journal of Soil and Water Conservation 57(6):344-350.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  13. ↵
    1. Jangid K.,
    2. Williams M.A.,
    3. Franzluebbers A.J.,
    4. Schmidt T.M.,
    5. Coleman D.C.,
    6. Whitman W.B.
    . 2011. Landuse history has a stronger impact on soil microbial community compositions than aboveground vegetation and soil properties. Soil Biology and Biochemistry 43:2184-2193.
    OpenUrl
  14. ↵
    1. Karlen D.L.,
    2. Rosek M.J.,
    3. Gardner J.C.,
    4. Allan D.L.,
    5. Alms M.J.,
    6. Bezdicek D.F.,
    7. Flock M.,
    8. Huggins D.R.,
    9. Miller B.S.,
    10. Staben M.L.
    . 1999. Conservation Reserve Program effects on soil quality indicators. Journal of Soil and Water Conservation 54(1):439-444.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  15. ↵
    1. Klute A.
    1. Kemper W.D.,
    2. Rosenau R.C.
    . 1986. Aggregate stability and size distribution. In Methods of Soil Analysis, 2nd edition, ed. Klute A., 425-442. Madison, WI: American Society of Agronomy.
  16. ↵
    1. Knops M.H.,
    2. Tilman D.
    . 2000. Dynamics of soil nitrogen and carbon accumulation for 61 years after agricultural abandonment. Ecology 81:88-98.
    OpenUrlCrossRefWeb of Science
  17. ↵
    1. Li C.,
    2. Fultz L.M.,
    3. Moore-Kucera J.,
    4. Acosta-Martinez V.,
    5. Kakarla M.,
    6. Weindorf D.C.
    . 2018. Soil microbial community restoration in Conservation Reserve Program semi-arid grasslands. Soil Biology and Biochemistry 118:166-177.
    OpenUrl
  18. ↵
    1. Matamala R.,
    2. Jastrow J.D.,
    3. Miller R.M.,
    4. Garten C.T.
    . 2008. Temporal changes in C and N stocks of restored prairie: Implications for C sequestration strategies. Ecological Applications 18(6):1470-1488.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
  19. ↵
    1. McKinley V.L.,
    2. Peacock A.D.,
    3. White D.C.
    . 2005. Microbial community PLFA and PHB responses to ecosystem restoration in tallgrass prairie soil. Soil Biology and Biochemistry 37:1946-1958.
    OpenUrlCrossRef
  20. ↵
    1. Munson S.M.,
    2. Lauenroth W.K.,
    3. Burke I.C.
    . 2012. Soil carbon and nitrogen recovery on semiarid Conservation Reserve Program lands. Journal of Arid Environments 29:25-31.
    OpenUrl
  21. ↵
    1. Pagliai M.,
    2. Vignozzi N.,
    3. Pellegrini S.
    . 2004. Soil structure and the effect of management practices. Soil and Tillage Research 79:131-143.
    OpenUrl
  22. ↵
    1. Phillips R.L.,
    2. Eken M.R.,
    3. West M.S.
    . 2015. Soil organic carbon beneath croplands and re-established grasslands in the North Dakota Prairie Pothole Region. Environmental Management 55:1191-199.
    OpenUrl
  23. ↵
    1. Rosenzweig S.T.,
    2. Carson M.A.,
    3. Baer S.G.,
    4. Blair J.M.
    . 2016. Changes in soil properties, microbial biomass and fluxes of C and N in soil following post-agricultural grassland restoration. Applied Soil Ecology 100:186-194.
    OpenUrl
  24. ↵
    1. Ruan L.,
    2. Robertson G.P.
    . 2013. Initial nitrous oxide, carbon dioxide, and methane costs of converting conservation reserve program grassland to row crops under no-till vs. conventional tillage. Global Change Biology 19(8):2478-2489.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
  25. ↵
    1. Schaetzl R.J.,
    2. Barrett L.R.,
    3. Winkler J.A.
    . 1994. Choosing models for soil chronofunctions and fitting them to data. European Journal of Soil Science 45(2):219-232.
    OpenUrlGeoRef
  26. ↵
    1. Schwartz R.C.,
    2. Evett S.R.,
    3. Unger P.W.
    . 2003. Soil hydraulic properties of cropland compared with reestablished and native grassland. Geoderma 116:47-60.
    OpenUrlCrossRefGeoRefWeb of Science
  27. ↵
    1. Seybold C.A.,
    2. Herrick J.E.,
    3. Brejda J.J.
    . 1999. Soil resilience: A fundamental component of soil quality. Soil Science 164(4):224-234.
    OpenUrlCrossRef
  28. ↵
    1. Sokal R.R.,
    2. Rohlf F.J.
    . 1969. Biometry: The principles and practice of statistics in biological research. New York: W.H. Freeman and Company.
  29. ↵
    1. Strudley M.W.,
    2. Green T.R.,
    3. Ascough J.C.
    . 2008. Tillage effects on soil hydraulic properties in space and time: State of science. Soil and Tillage Research 99:4-48.
    OpenUrlCrossRefWeb of Science
  30. ↵
    1. Lal R.,
    2. Follett R.F.
    1. Unger P.W.
    2009. Soil total carbon content, aggregation, bulk density and penetration resistance of croplands and nearby grasslands. In Soil Carbon Sequestration and the Greenhouse Effect, eds. Lal R., Follett R.F., 123-140. SSSA Special Publication 57. Madison, WI: Soil Science Society of America.
  31. ↵
    1. USDA FSA (Farm Service Agency)
    . 2018. Conservation Reserve Program status, end of July. Washington, DC: USDA Farm Service Agency.
  32. ↵
    1. Wadsworth W.B.
    1984. Comment and reply on “Improper use of regression equations in earth sciences.” Geology 12(2):126.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  33. ↵
    1. Williams G.P.
    1983. Improper use of regression equations in earth sciences. Geology 11(4):195-197.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  34. ↵
    1. Yu M.,
    2. Zhang L.,
    3. Xu X.,
    4. Feger K.,
    5. Wang Y.,
    6. Liu W.,
    7. Schwärzel K.
    . 2015. Impact of land-use changes on soil hydraulic properties of Calcaric Regosols on the Loess Plateau, NW China. Journal of Plant Nutrition and Soil Science 178:486-498.
    OpenUrl
PreviousNext
Back to top

In this issue

Journal of Soil and Water Conservation: 75 (2)
Journal of Soil and Water Conservation
Vol. 75, Issue 2
March/April 2020
  • Table of Contents
  • About the Cover
  • Index by author
  • Front Matter (PDF)
Print
Download PDF
Article Alerts
Sign In to Email Alerts with your Email Address
Email Article

Thank you for your interest in spreading the word on Journal of Soil and Water Conservation.

NOTE: We only request your email address so that the person you are recommending the page to knows that you wanted them to see it, and that it is not junk mail. We do not capture any email address.

Enter multiple addresses on separate lines or separate them with commas.
Assessing soil resilience across an agricultural land retirement chronosequence
(Your Name) has sent you a message from Journal of Soil and Water Conservation
(Your Name) thought you would like to see the Journal of Soil and Water Conservation web site.
CAPTCHA
This question is for testing whether or not you are a human visitor and to prevent automated spam submissions.
11 + 0 =
Solve this simple math problem and enter the result. E.g. for 1+3, enter 4.
Citation Tools
Assessing soil resilience across an agricultural land retirement chronosequence
S.L. Pey, H.A.S. Dolliver
Journal of Soil and Water Conservation Mar 2020, 75 (2) 191-197; DOI: 10.2489/jswc.75.2.191

Citation Manager Formats

  • BibTeX
  • Bookends
  • EasyBib
  • EndNote (tagged)
  • EndNote 8 (xml)
  • Medlars
  • Mendeley
  • Papers
  • RefWorks Tagged
  • Ref Manager
  • RIS
  • Zotero
Request Permissions
Share
Assessing soil resilience across an agricultural land retirement chronosequence
S.L. Pey, H.A.S. Dolliver
Journal of Soil and Water Conservation Mar 2020, 75 (2) 191-197; DOI: 10.2489/jswc.75.2.191
del.icio.us logo Digg logo Reddit logo Twitter logo Facebook logo Google logo Mendeley logo
  • Tweet Widget
  • Facebook Like
  • Google Plus One

Jump to section

  • Article
    • Abstract
    • Introduction
    • Materials and Methods
    • Results and Discussion
    • Summary and Conclusions
    • Acknowledgements
    • References
  • Figures & Data
  • Info & Metrics
  • References
  • PDF

Related Articles

  • No related articles found.
  • Google Scholar

Cited By...

  • No citing articles found.
  • Google Scholar

More in this TOC Section

  • Phytoremediation and high rainfall combine to improve soil and plant health in a North America Northern Great Plains saline sodic soil
  • Combining a saltation impact sensor and a wind tunnel to explore wind erosion processes–A case study in the Zhundong mining area, Xinjiang, China
  • Cover crops may exacerbate moisture limitations on South Texas dryland farms
Show more Research Section

Similar Articles

Keywords

  • chronosequence
  • Conservation Reserve Program
  • land retirement
  • soil quality
  • soil resilience

Content

  • Current Issue
  • Early Online
  • Archive
  • Subject Collections

Info For

  • Authors
  • Reviewers
  • Subscribers
  • Advertisers

Customer Service

  • Subscriptions
  • Permissions and Reprints
  • Terms of Use
  • Privacy

SWCS

  • Membership
  • Publications
  • Meetings and Events
  • Conservation Career Center

© 2022 Soil and Water Conservation Society