An inductive framework of self-efficacy to understand and support farmers in conservation agriculture

References

1. ↵
   1. Abrahamse W.,
   2. Steg L.

   2013. Social influence approaches to encourage resource conservation: A meta-analysis. Global Environmental Change 23(6):1773–1785. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.gloenvcha.2013.07.029.

   OpenUrlCrossRefWeb of Science
2. ↵
   1. Ajzen I.

   1991. The theory of planned behavior. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes 50:179–211.

   OpenUrlCrossRefWeb of Science
3. ↵
   1. Armstrong A.,
   2. Stedman R.C.

   . 2012. Landowner willingness to implement riparian buffers in a transitioning watershed. Landscape and Urban Planning 105(3):211–220. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.landurbplan.2011.12.011.

   OpenUrlCrossRef
4. ↵
   1. Atwell R.,
   2. Schulte L.,
   3. Westphal L.

   . 2009. Linking resilience theory and diffusion of innovations theory to understand the potential for perennials in the U.S. Corn Belt. Ecology and Society 14(1):30.

   OpenUrl
5. ↵
   1. Bandura A.

   1990. Perceived self-efficacy in the exercise of personal agency. Journal of Applied Sport Psychology 2(2):128–163.

   OpenUrlCrossRef
6. ↵
   1. Bandura A.

   2012. On the functional properties of perceived self-efficacy revisited. Journal of Management 38(1):9–44. https://doi.org/10.1177/0149206311410606.

   OpenUrlCrossRefWeb of Science
7. ↵
   1. Burton R.J.F.

   2004. Seeing through the ‘Good Farmer's’ eyes: Towards developing an understanding of the social symbolic value of ‘productivist’ behaviour. Sociologia Ruralis 44(2):195–215. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-9523.2004.00270.x.

   OpenUrlCrossRefWeb of Science
8. ↵
   1. BWSR (Minnesota Board of Water and Soil Resources)

   . 2016. One Watershed, One Plan. St. Paul, MN: Board of Water and Soil Resources. https://bwsr.state.mn.us/one-watershed-one-plan.
9. ↵
   1. Cattaneo L.B.,
   2. Chapman A.R.

   . 2010. The process of empowerment: A model for use in research and practice. American Psychologist 65(7):646–659. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0018854.

   OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
10. ↵
    1. Charmaz K.

    2006. Constructing Grounded Theory. London and Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publications.
11. ↵
    1. Cleveland M.,
    2. Kalamas M.,
    3. Laroche M.

    . 2005. Shades of green: Linking environmental locus of control and pro-environmental behaviors. Journal of Consumer Marketing 22(4):198–212. https://doi.org/10.1108/07363760510605317.

    OpenUrlCrossRef
12. ↵
    1. Corbin J.M.,
    2. Strauss A.L.

    . 2008. Basics of Qualitative Research: Techniques and Procedures for Developing Grounded Theory, 3rd edition. Los Angeles, CA: Sage Publications, Inc.
13. ↵
    1. Dollinger D.,
    2. Lundeen B.,
    3. Stroom K.,
    4. Streitz A.,
    5. Monson B.,
    6. Nelson S.,
    7. Parson K.,
    8. Butzer A.,
    9. Richter D.

    . 2013. Mustinka River Watershed Monitoring and Assessment Report (No. wq-ws3-09020102b). Saint Paul, MN: Minnesota Pollution Control Agency. https://www.pca.state.mn.us/sites/default/files/wq-ws3-09020102b.pdf.
14. ↵
    1. Eagly J.S.,
    2. Chaiken S.

    . 1993. The Psychology of Attitudes. Orlando, FL: Harcourt Brace Jovanovich, Inc.
15. ↵
    1. Eccles J.S.,
    2. Wigfield A.

    . 2002. Motivational beliefs, values, and goals. Annual Review of Psychology 53(1):109–132. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev.psych.53.100901.135153.

    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
16. ↵
    1. Fielding K.S.,
    2. Terry D.J.,
    3. Masser B.M.,
    4. Hogg M.A.

    . 2008. Integrating social identity theory and the theory of planned behaviour to explain decisions to engage in sustainable agricultural practices. British Journal of Social Psychology 47(1):23–48. https://doi.org/10.1348/014466607X206792.

    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
17. ↵
    1. Fishbein M.,
    2. Ajzen I.

    . 2011. Predicting and Changing Behavior: The Reasoned Action Approach. New York: Taylor and Francis.
18. ↵
    1. Greiner R.,
    2. Patterson L.,
    3. Miller O.

    . 2009. Motivations, risk perceptions and adoption of conservation practices by farmers. Agricultural Systems 99(2–3):86–104. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.agsy.2008.10.003.

    OpenUrlCrossRef
19. ↵
    1. Harland P.,
    2. Staats H.,
    3. Wilke H.A.M.

    . 2007. Situational and personality factors as direct or personal norm mediated predictors of pro-environmental behavior: Questions derived from norm-activation theory. Basic and Applied Social Psychology 29(4):323–334. https://doi.org/10.1080/01973530701665058.

    OpenUrlCrossRef
20. ↵
    1. Lynne G.D.,
    2. Rola L.R.

    . 1988. Improving attitude-behavior prediction models with economic variables: Farmer actions toward soil conservation. The Journal of Social Psychology 128(1):19–28. https://doi.org/10.1080/00224545.1988.9711680.

    OpenUrlCrossRef
21. ↵
    1. Markowitz E.M.

    2013. Efficacy: A brief overview with an eye towards implications and measurement. Washington, DC: FrameWorks Institute.
22. ↵
    1. Minnesota Pollution Control Agency

    . 2011. Wild Rice River. St. Paul, MN: Minnesota Pollution Control Agency. https://www.pca.state.mn.us/water/watersheds/wild-rice-river/.
23. ↵
    1. Minnesota Pollution Control Agency

    . 2020. Draft 2020 Impaired Waters List. St. Paul, MN: Minnesota Pollution Control Agency. https://www.pca.state.mn.us/water/minnesotas-impaired-waters-list.
24. ↵
    1. Minnesota Pollution Control Agency and RRWMB (Red River Watershed Management Board)

    . 2006. State of the Red River of the North: Assessment of the 2003/2004 Water Quality Data for the Red River and its Major Minnesota Tributaries. Detroit Lakes, MN: Minnesota Pollution Control Agency. http://www.pca.state.mn.us/index.php/view-document.html?gid=6039.
25. ↵
    1. Newhouse N.

    1990. Implications of attitude and behavior research for environmental conservation. The Journal of Environmental Education 22(1):26–32. https://doi.org/10.1080/00958964.1990.9943043.

    OpenUrl
26. ↵
    1. Olson B.,
    2. Davenport M.A.

    . 2017. An inductive model of farmer conservation decision making for nitrogen management. Landscape Journal 36(1):59–73. https://doi.org/10.3368/lj.36.1.59.

    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
27. ↵
    1. Petrzelka P.,
    2. Korsching P.F.,
    3. Malia J.E.

    . 1996. Farmers' attitudes and behavior toward sustainable agriculture. The Journal of Environmental Education 28(1):38–44. https://doi.org/10.1080/00958964.1996.9942814.

    OpenUrl
28. ↵
    1. Prokopy L.S.,
    2. Floress K.,
    3. Klotthor-Weinkauf D.,
    4. Baumgart-Getz A.

    . 2008. Determinants of agricultural best management practice adoption: Evidence from the literature. Journal of Soil and Water Conservation 63(5):300–311, doi: 10.2489/jswc.63.5.300.

    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
29. ↵
    1. Red River Basin Commission

    . 2005. Red River Basin Natural Resources Framework Plan. Fargo and Winnipeg: Red River Basin Commission.
30. ↵
    1. Salamon S.,
    2. Farnsworth R.,
    3. Bullock D.,
    4. Yusuf R.

    . 1997. Family factors affecting adoption of sustainable farming systems. Journal of Soil and Water Conservation 52(4):265–271.

    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
31. ↵
    1. Sassenrath G.F.,
    2. Halloran J.M.,
    3. Archer D.,
    4. Raper R.L.,
    5. Hendrickson J.,
    6. Vadas P.,
    7. Hanson J.

    . 2010. Drivers impacting the adoption of sustainable agricultural management practices and production systems of the northeast and southeast United States. Journal of Sustainable Agriculture 34(6):680–702. https://doi.org/10.1080/10440046.2010.493412.

    OpenUrl
32. ↵
    1. Soule M.

    2001. Soil management and the farm typology: Do small family farms manage soil and nutrient resources differntly than large family farms? Agricultural and Resource Economic Review 30(2):179–188.

    OpenUrl
33. ↵
    1. Sulemana I.,
    2. James H.S. Jr..

    2014. Farmer identity, ethical attitudes and environmental practices. Ecological Economics 98:49–61. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecolecon.2013.12.011.

    OpenUrl
34. ↵
    1. Sutherland L.-A.,
    2. Burton R.J.F.

    . 2011. Good farmers, good neighbours? The role of cultural capital in social capital development in a Scottish farming community. Sociologia Ruralis 51(3):238–255. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-9523.2011.00536.x.

    OpenUrlCrossRef
35. ↵
    1. Tavernier E.M.,
    2. Tolomeo V.

    . 2004. Farm typology and sustainable agriculture: Does size matter? Journal of Sustainable Agriculture 24(2):33–46. https://doi.org/10.1300/J064v24n02_05.

    OpenUrl
36. ↵
    1. Wilson R.S.,
    2. Schlea D.A.,
    3. Boles C.M.W.,
    4. Redder T.M.

    . 2018. Using models of farmer behavior to inform eutrophication policy in the Great Lakes. Water Research 139:38–46. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.watres.2018.03.065.

    OpenUrl
37. ↵
    1. Zimmerman B.J.

    2000. Self-Efficacy: An essential motive to learn. Contemporary Educational Psychology 25(1):82–91. https://doi.org/10.1006/ceps.1999.1016.

    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science