Most agricultural soils are depleted of their soil organic matter (SOM) reserves. A severe loss of SOM content may degrade soil functionality, its capacity for provisioning of essential ecosystem services, and soil health. Therefore, restoration of SOM content in soils of agroecosystems may reverse the degradation trends, enhance ecosystem services (Banwart et al. 2015), and advance Sustainable Development Goals of the United Nations. (Lal et al. 2018a). Increase in SOM content may also partially replace the use of chemical fertilizers and supplemental irrigation, while restoring the environment.
Some critical questions to be objectively addressed regarding the restoration of SOM include the following:
Is there a critical limit or range of SOM content for soils of temperate and tropical climates below which the crop yield declines?
If such a limit/range can be established, what are its principal determinants?
Can an increase in SOM content of a severely depleted soil lead to increase in crop yield under both nutrient/water limiting and sufficient conditions?
Can any positive impact of increase in SOM content be masked by use of chemical fertilizers and supplemental irrigation?
Is restoration of SOM content a resource-saving (i.e., land, water, energy) option?
Therefore, the objective of this article is to deliberate the impacts of SOM content on crop yield under diverse climate, soil, land use, and management systems.
SOIL ORGANIC MATTER CONTENT AND SOIL HEALTH
Healthy soils are important to growing healthy crops, raising healthy animals, and supporting a healthy human population through nutritionally balanced diets and environmentally healthy habitats. Favorable SOM content is critical to attaining such a vital interconnectivity. The importance of SOM content to crop yield has been known to ancient civilizations for millennia (Manlay et al. 2007), and to soil scientists for at least two centuries (Feller et al. 2012). In the modern era, Allison (1973) vividly described the significance of SOM content to crop production, which paved the way for a growing interest in the study of global terrestrial soil organic carbon (SOC) sequestration (Feller and Bernoux 2008; Lal et al. 2018b), and processes affecting its stabilization (Six et al. 2006; Dungait et al. 2013; Paul 2016).
SOM content affects crop yield through its role in enhancing and sustaining soil quality (Reeves 1997) and soil health (Lal 2016). SOM content is intricately interlinked with other physical, chemical, and biological properties and processes. A long-term study in eastern Europe (the Czech Republic, Slovakia, and Poland) indicated that regular applications of organic manure and of manure plus chemical fertilizers optimized soil quality, stabilized crop yield, and enhanced adaptation to climate change (Menšík et al. 2019).
SOM content is a critical indicator of soil health through positive impact on soil properties and processes (Doran and Zeiss 2000). In the context of agronomic productivity, two key properties impacted by SOM content are (1) plant available water capacity (PAWC) and (2) plant available essential nutrients, especially nitrogen (N).
Plant Available Water Capacity. SOM content affects aggregation (Kemper and Koch 1966), porosity and pore size distribution, and relative proportion of retention pores that retain water at field moisture capacity. For the 50-year period between 1940 and 1990, the general consensus among soil physicists had been that SOC increases water retention both at field capacity and at permanent wilting point with no net gains in PAWC (Feustal and Byers 1936; Baver 1940; Petersen et al. 1968).
Presently, however, there are two views about the impact of SOM content on PAWC: (1) that it has minor or no impact, and (2) that it has a major impact. In UK soils, Gregory et al. (2009) reported that reduction in SOM content from 7% to 3% can reduce soil water retention by up to 10%. Similar observations on decline of water retention by decrease in SOM content were reported by Johnston et al. (2008). Decline in PAWC by reduction in SOM content is partly attributed to decline in aggregate stability. Bauer and Black (1992) reported that the loss of soil productivity by erosion in the northern Great Plains may be due to decline in nutrients and biological activity rather than from a decline in PAWC. On the basis of meta-analysis of 60 published studies, Minasny and McBratney (2018) reported that increase in SOM content has a small effect on PAWC.
However, there are others who have reported a strong effect of SOM content on PAWC (Bouyoucos 1939; Salter and Haworth 1961; Salter and Williams 1963; Petersen et al. 1968; Bryant 2015). Hudson (1994) reported highly significant positive correlations between SOM content and PAWC for a range of soil textural groups and concluded that in all textural groups, as SOM content increased from 0.5% to 3%, PAWC of soil more than doubled. Williams et al. (2016) recommended investing in restoration of SOM content to enhance PAWC and mitigate downside risks and volatility in rainfed corn (Zea mays L.) in the United States. In Sierra Nevada, California, United States, Ankenbauer and Loheide II (2017) reported that increase in water retention by SOM contributes as much as 8.8 cm (3.46 in) to transpiration, or 35 additional water stress–free days. Even if the increase in PAWC by increase in SOM content is small, it may be of critical importance to crop growth between periods of rainfall, especially in dryland farming (Johnston 1986).
Plant Available Nutrients. Increase in SOM content can also affect crop yield by supplying plant nutrients, especially under nutrient-limiting environments, and with low inputs of chemical fertilizers. Bauer and Black (1992) attributed the decline in productivity of degraded soils to decline in nutrients. Schjønning et al. (2018) reported a positive effect of SOM on reduction of mineral N needed to obtain the potential crop yield and concluded that SOM does add to crop production other than what can be attributed to nutrient supply capacity.
It is the nutrient supplying capacity of SOM upon its decomposition that has raised the question of hoarding/saving it versus using it (Janzen 2006). If the hoarding versus saving role of SOM is attributed to different fractions (fast cycling versus slower cycling) (Wood et al. 2016), then such a differential response of different fractions would resolve this seemingly apparent conflict. In the United Kingdom, Johnston et al. (2008) observed that the loss of SOM content can reduce the exchange of some essential plant nutrients (N, phosphorus [P], and sulfur [S]), and increase of SOM content can supply N, P, and S for plant growth (Johnston 1986). SOM content also affects nutrient supply by increasing the cation exchange capacity, especially in soils of the tropics (Ramos et al. 2018). A severe loss of SOM can also lead to release of some toxic elements because of decline in chelation and adsorption capacity of soil (Griffiths et al. 2005; Gregory et al. 2015). Under semi-arid environments in China, Liu and Zhou (2017) concluded that chemical fertilizers alone are not sufficient for achieving high yield, and they recommended that adding manure is essential to improving soil fertility. Synergistic effects of manuring and chemical fertilizers on wheat (Triticum aestivum L.)/cereal yield have also been reported by others (Arrieche-Luna and Ruiz-Dager 2010; Aula et al. 2016).
SOIL ORGANIC MATTER CONTENT AND CROP YIELD
Because of numerous complex and interacting factors, it is also difficult to establish a direct cause-effect relationship between crop yield and SOM content. Under field conditions, where crop yield is affected by numerous factors including biotic and abiotic stresses, the direct cause-effect relationship is also confounded by the mutual enhancement of crop yield and the SOM content. The data in table 1 on cotton (Gossypium hirsutum L.) yield from a long-term experiment in Auburn, Alabama, United States, is a pertinent example of the complexities involved. Apparently, the SOC content and cotton yield (from 1986 to 1995) are highly correlated (see figure 1). However, the beneficial effects of rotation, cover cropping, and fertilizer N use cannot be isolated from those of the increase in SOC content, and such effects must be accounted for. A global meta-analysis performed by Oldfield et al. (2019) indicated potential yield increases of 10% ± 11% for maize and 23% ± 37% for wheat with increase in SOM content. Oldfield and colleagues concluded that enhancing SOM stocks in degraded soils, and in those where a large yield gap exists, can narrow the yield gap. These yield increases amount to abridging the yield gap of 30% for maize and 55% for wheat, while also reducing the fertilizer inputs by 5% to 7%. Oldfield and colleagues also observed that higher concentrations of SOC are associated with greater crop yields up to an SOC concentration of 2%, and that led to decreased inputs of fertilizer and irrigation. In Denmark, Ghaley et al. (2018) concluded that SOC level had a significant effect on grain yield of wheat and aboveground biomass at only 0 to 100 kg N ha−1 (0 to 89.2 lb N ac−1), and its effect decreased with increasing rates of N. Further, PAWC was also positively correlated with SOC content. It increased with increase in SOC content up until 0.7%, and PAWC increase was small for the 0.7% to 2.0% SOC range (Ghaley et al. 2018). In contrast, several studies have suggested no effects of SOM content on crop yield (Oelofse et al. 2015; Wei et al. 2016; Hijbeek et al. 2017) and have supported the hypothesis that it is difficult to separate the effects of SOM on crop yield from those of nutrients (Murphy 2015) and other parameters.
Effect of soil organic carbon (SOC) concentration on yield of cotton in the Old Rotation Experiment, Auburn, Alabama, United States (adapted from Reeves [1997]).
Effect of soil organic carbon (SOC) concentration on yield of cotton in the Old Rotation Experiment, Auburn, Alabama, United States (adapted from Reeves [1997]).
THRESHOLD LEVEL OF SOIL ORGANIC MATTER CONTENT IN ARABLE LANDS
It may be difficult to establish a quantitative evidence for a critical threshold (Körschens et al. 1998; Reynolds et al. 2007; Gregory et al. 2015) of SOM content for the diverse global soils and growing conditions. Furthermore, the range of an adequate level of SOM may differ among soils, climates, management, and farming systems. However, a value of 2% of SOC content (SOC is about 50% of SOM) in the root zone has been suggested for soils of temperate climates (Greenland 1975; Hamblin and Davies 1977; Johnston 1986; Loveland and Webb 2003; Oldfield et al. 2019), and 1.1% for soils of the tropics (Aune and Lal 1997). A few researchers argue that the threshold level may be less than 1% of SOC in some stable soils (Šeremešić et al. 2011). Others opine that it would be difficult to obtain the maximum crop yield in soil with SOC levels of less than 1% (Kay and Angers 1999). Therefore, the threshold SOC level may be a soil/site-specific parameter, which must be established and managed because soil functionality can decline without an adequate level of SOC content (Liu et al. 2005; Gregory et al. 2015).
The threshold level and response of crop yield to SOM content also depend on the type and degree of soil degradation (figure 2). Rather than the simple process of decline in soil physical properties and processes (i.e., aggregation, crusting, compaction, erosion, drought, and unfavorable temperature and moisture regimes), chemical characteristics (i.e., acidification, alkalization, sodication, pollution, and elemental toxicity), and biological parameters (i.e., reduction in SOM content and turnover, in activity and species diversity of soil biota, decline in microbial biomass C, and reduction in ability of the soil to suppress pests and pathogens), the cascading effect of degradation may lead to destabilization of SOM content even in the subsoil (Rumpel and Kögel-Knabner 2011).
Different types of soil degradation with adverse impacts on soil organic matter (SOM) content.
Figure 3 provides a conceptual basis of crop yield response to changes in SOM content in (1) depleted soil being restored, and (2) soils with a high SOM content being degraded. The graphic response in figure 3a, with and without inputs of amendment, indicates impact on yield by the nutrient supply capacity of SOM content. The graphic response in figure 3b indicates the importance of SOM on PAWC and structural tilth effects. The yield response levels off at the threshold level that varies among soils: climate, texture, and with/without input of amendment (e.g., fertilizers or manure). Note the threshold below which the yield decline is lower with than without application of amendments (figure 3a) and lower with fine-textured than that in course-textured soils (figure 3b).
In the scenario of soils with a high antecedent SOC content and depleting, the threshold level below which yield begins to decline is also lower with than without amendment (figure 3c), and lower in fine-textured than course-textured soils (figure 3d). Thus, a critical threshold can be highly soil/site specific and depends on a range of inherent and managerial factors. Sustainable management of SOM content also has benefits toward saving/replacement of N and other fertilizers (Schjønning et al. 2018; Hijbeek et al. 2018), along with saving of some irrigation water (Williams et al. 2016; Ankenbauer and Loheide II 2017).
Hypothetical crop yield response curves to changing soil organic matter (SOM) content. (a and b) Soils depleted of their SOM content and being restored: (a) yield response with and without amendment, and (b) yield response of coarse textured and heavy textured soils. (c and d) Soils with a high antecedent SOM content and being depleted: (c) yield response with and without amendment and (d) yield response of fine versus coarse textured soils.
CONCLUSIONS
Synthesis of the available literature shows the following:
Increase in SOM content of depleted/degraded soils can have a positive effect on crop yield.
The critical/threshold level of SOC may be about 2% in soils of the temperate zone and ~1% for those of the tropics.
The positive yield response may be due to increase in PAWC of coarse textured soils, and due to N availability at low rates of N.
Input of nitrogenous fertilizers and irrigation water can be saved by increasing SOM content.
Fertilizer and irrigation can mask the positive effects of SOM content.
Additional research is needed to establish critical limits/ranges of SOM content for diverse soils, climates, and ecoregions.
- © 2020 by the Soil and Water Conservation Society
REFERENCES
In this issue
Jump to section
Related Articles
Cited By...
- No citing articles found.