Skip to main content

Main menu

  • Home
  • Content
    • Current Issue
    • Early Online
    • Archive
    • Subject Collections
  • Info For
    • Authors
    • Reviewers
    • Subscribers
    • Advertisers
  • About
    • About JSWC
    • Editorial Board
    • Permissions
    • Alerts
    • RSS Feeds
    • Contact Us

User menu

  • Register
  • Subscribe
  • My alerts
  • Log in
  • My Cart

Search

  • Advanced search
Journal of Soil and Water Conservation

  • Register
  • Subscribe
  • My alerts
  • Log in
  • My Cart
Journal of Soil and Water Conservation

Advanced Search

  • Home
  • Content
    • Current Issue
    • Early Online
    • Archive
    • Subject Collections
  • Info For
    • Authors
    • Reviewers
    • Subscribers
    • Advertisers
  • About
    • About JSWC
    • Editorial Board
    • Permissions
    • Alerts
    • RSS Feeds
    • Contact Us
  • Follow SWCS on Twitter
  • Visit SWCS on Facebook
Research ArticleResearch Section

Water quality and land cover in the Coastal Plain Little River watershed, Georgia, United States

D.D. Bosch, O. Pisani, A.W. Coffin and T.C. Strickland
Journal of Soil and Water Conservation May 2020, 75 (3) 263-277; DOI: https://doi.org/10.2489/jswc.75.3.263
D.D. Bosch
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
O. Pisani
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
A.W. Coffin
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
T.C. Strickland
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • Article
  • Figures & Data
  • References
  • Info & Metrics
  • PDF
Loading

Abstract

Despite efforts to improve water quality in US watersheds, recent assessments of water quality trends in these watersheds indicate concentrations of nitrogen (N) and phosphorus (P) show minimal changes in the majority of studied streams across the nation. Moreover, results of the US Geological Survey (USGS) National Water-Quality Assessment (NAWQA) indicate that nutrient concentrations in streams and groundwater in basins with significant agriculture or urban development are substantially greater than naturally occurring or background levels. Long-term hydrologic and water quality data from watersheds are a key component to building an understanding that will dictate what and where changes in watershed management need to be made to achieve improvements in water quality. Forty-one years of hydrologic and water quality data from the Little River Experimental Watershed (LREW) were assembled to evaluate trends in streamflow quantity and quality from the LREW and relationships to changes in land cover and management. Concentrations and loads of chloride (Cl), ammonium-N (NH4-N), nitrate plus nitrite-N (NO3-N), total kjeldahl N (TKN), total P (TP), and dissolved molybdate reactive P (DMRP) from 1974 to 2014 were determined. In general, concentrations of N and P have remained low and stable, with some increases observed from 1980 to 1999. In contrast, Cl concentration appears to be steadily increasing, possibly due to increased fertilization in the LREW. Flow-weighted mean concentrations were 0.21 mg L−1 y−1 for NO3-N, 0.08 mg L−1 y−1 for NH4-N, 1.41 mg L−1 y−1 for TKN, 9.30 mg L−1 y−1 for Cl, 0.15 mg L−1 y−1 for TP, and 0.03 mg L−1 y−1 for DMRP. Average annual loads were 0.64 kg ha−1 y−1 for NO3-N, 0.25 kg ha−1 y−1 for NH4-N, 4.47 kg ha−1 y−1 for TKN, 29.54 kg ha−1 y−1 for Cl, 0.46 kg ha−1 y−1 for TP, and 0.10 kg ha−1 y−1 for DMRP. The low nutrient loading in the watershed is attributed to the dense riparian buffers within the LREW, which have been shown to be effective for reducing N loading to the stream. Due to (1) small variations in nutrient concentrations and loads, (2) large variability in precipitation, (3) large variability in streamflow, and (4) small variations in land cover, no clear relationships among changes in land cover and management and nutrient loads were found. Loading rates of N and P, although somewhat influenced by changes in concentration, are largely dictated by changes in streamflow volume in the LREW.

    Key words
  • land cover
  • riparian buffers
  • watersheds
  • water quality
  • © 2020 by the Soil and Water Conservation Society
View Full Text
PreviousNext
Back to top

In this issue

Journal of Soil and Water Conservation: 75 (3)
Journal of Soil and Water Conservation
Vol. 75, Issue 3
May/June 2020
  • Table of Contents
  • About the Cover
  • Index by author
  • Front Matter (PDF)
Print
Download PDF
Article Alerts
Sign In to Email Alerts with your Email Address
Email Article

Thank you for your interest in spreading the word on Journal of Soil and Water Conservation.

NOTE: We only request your email address so that the person you are recommending the page to knows that you wanted them to see it, and that it is not junk mail. We do not capture any email address.

Enter multiple addresses on separate lines or separate them with commas.
Water quality and land cover in the Coastal Plain Little River watershed, Georgia, United States
(Your Name) has sent you a message from Journal of Soil and Water Conservation
(Your Name) thought you would like to see the Journal of Soil and Water Conservation web site.
CAPTCHA
This question is for testing whether or not you are a human visitor and to prevent automated spam submissions.
3 + 1 =
Solve this simple math problem and enter the result. E.g. for 1+3, enter 4.
Citation Tools
Water quality and land cover in the Coastal Plain Little River watershed, Georgia, United States
D.D. Bosch, O. Pisani, A.W. Coffin, T.C. Strickland
Journal of Soil and Water Conservation May 2020, 75 (3) 263-277; DOI: 10.2489/jswc.75.3.263

Citation Manager Formats

  • BibTeX
  • Bookends
  • EasyBib
  • EndNote (tagged)
  • EndNote 8 (xml)
  • Medlars
  • Mendeley
  • Papers
  • RefWorks Tagged
  • Ref Manager
  • RIS
  • Zotero
Request Permissions
Share
Water quality and land cover in the Coastal Plain Little River watershed, Georgia, United States
D.D. Bosch, O. Pisani, A.W. Coffin, T.C. Strickland
Journal of Soil and Water Conservation May 2020, 75 (3) 263-277; DOI: 10.2489/jswc.75.3.263
del.icio.us logo Digg logo Reddit logo Twitter logo CiteULike logo Facebook logo Google logo Mendeley logo
  • Tweet Widget
  • Facebook Like
  • Google Plus One

Jump to section

  • Article
    • Abstract
    • Introduction
    • Materials and Methods
    • Results and Discussion
    • Summary and Conclusions
    • Acknowledgements
    • Footnotes
    • References
  • Figures & Data
  • Info & Metrics
  • References
  • PDF

Related Articles

  • No related articles found.
  • Google Scholar

Cited By...

  • Quantifying the impacts of the Conservation Effects Assessment Project watershed assessments: The first fifteen years
  • Google Scholar

More in this TOC Section

  • Temporally downscaling precipitation intensity factors for Köppen climate regions in the United States
  • Agronomic and environmental performance of dairy farms in a warmer, wetter climate
  • Runoff nutrient losses from tall fescue pastures varying in endophyte association, fertilization, and harvest management
Show more RESEARCH SECTION

Similar Articles

Keywords

  • land cover
  • riparian buffers
  • watersheds
  • water quality

Content

  • Current Issue
  • Early Online
  • Archive
  • Subject Collections

Info For

  • Authors
  • Reviewers
  • Subscribers
  • Advertisers

Customer Service

  • Subscriptions
  • Permissions and Reprints
  • Terms of Use
  • Privacy

SWCS

  • Membership
  • Publications
  • Meetings and Events
  • Conservation Career Center

© 2021 Soil and Water Conservation Society