Skip to main content

Main menu

  • Home
  • Content
    • Current Issue
    • Early Online
    • Archive
    • Subject Collections
  • Info For
    • Authors
    • Reviewers
    • Subscribers
    • Advertisers
  • About
    • About JSWC
    • Editorial Board
    • Permissions
    • Alerts
    • RSS Feeds
    • Contact Us

User menu

  • Register
  • Subscribe
  • My alerts
  • Log in
  • My Cart

Search

  • Advanced search
Journal of Soil and Water Conservation

  • Register
  • Subscribe
  • My alerts
  • Log in
  • My Cart
Journal of Soil and Water Conservation

Advanced Search

  • Home
  • Content
    • Current Issue
    • Early Online
    • Archive
    • Subject Collections
  • Info For
    • Authors
    • Reviewers
    • Subscribers
    • Advertisers
  • About
    • About JSWC
    • Editorial Board
    • Permissions
    • Alerts
    • RSS Feeds
    • Contact Us
  • Follow SWCS on Twitter
  • Visit SWCS on Facebook
Research ArticleResearch Section

Hydrologic assessment of blind inlet performance in a drained closed depression

M. Williams, S.J. Livingston, C.J. Penn and J.M. Gonzalez
Journal of Soil and Water Conservation May 2020, 75 (3) 352-361; DOI: https://doi.org/10.2489/jswc.75.3.352
M. Williams
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
S.J. Livingston
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
C.J. Penn
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
J.M. Gonzalez
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • Article
  • Figures & Data
  • References
  • Info & Metrics
  • PDF
Loading

References

  1. ↵
    1. Amado A.A.,
    2. Politano M.,
    3. Schilling K.,
    4. Weber L.
    . 2016. Investigating hydrologic connectivity of a drained prairie pothole region wetland complex using a fully integrated, physically-based model. Wetlands 38:233–245(2018), DOI:10.1007/s13157-016-0800-5.
    OpenUrlCrossRef
  2. ↵
    1. Bishop R.A.,
    2. Joens A.J.,
    3. Zohrer J.
    . 1998. Iowa's wetlands, present and future with a focus on prairie potholes. Journal of the Iowa Academy of Science 88:11-16.
    OpenUrl
  3. ↵
    1. Blann K.L.,
    2. Anderson J.L.,
    3. Sands G.R.,
    4. Vondracek B.
    . 2009. Effects of agricultural drainage on aquatic ecosystems: A review. Critical reviews in Environmental Science and Technology 39:909-1001.
    OpenUrlCrossRef
  4. ↵
    1. Clausen J.C.,
    2. Spooner J.
    . 1993. Paired watershed study design. Rep. 841-F-93-009. Washington, DC: US Environmental Protection Agency, Office of Water.
  5. ↵
    1. Dreimanis A.
    1977. Late Wisconsin glacial retreat in the Great Lakes region, North America. Annals of the New York Academy of Sciences 288:70-89.
    OpenUrlCrossRefGeoRef
  6. ↵
    1. Feyereisen G.W.,
    2. Francesconi W.,
    3. Smith D.R.,
    4. Papiernik S.K.,
    5. Krueger E.S.,
    6. Wente C.D.
    . 2015. Effect of replacing surface inlets with blind or gravel inlets on sediment and phosphorus subsurface drainage losses. Journal of Environmental Quality 44:594-604.
    OpenUrl
  7. ↵
    1. Gonzalez J.M.,
    2. Smith D.R.,
    3. Livingston S.,
    4. Warnemuende-Pappas E.,
    5. Zwonitzer M.
    . 2016. Blind inlets: Conservation practices to reduce herbicide losses from closed depressional areas. Journal of Soils and Sediments 16:1921-1932.
    OpenUrl
  8. ↵
    1. Huang S.,
    2. Young C.,
    3. Abdul-Aziz O.I.,
    4. Dahal D.,
    5. Feng M.
    . 2013. Simulating the water budget of a prairie pothole complex from LiDAR and hydrological models in North Dakota, USA. Hydrological Sciences Journal 58:1434-1444.
    OpenUrl
  9. ↵
    1. King K.W.,
    2. Fausey N.R.,
    3. Williams M.R.
    . 2014. Effect of subsurface drainage on streamflow in an agricultural headwater watershed. Journal of Hydrology 519:438-445.
    OpenUrlCrossRefGeoRef
  10. ↵
    1. King K.W.,
    2. Williams M.R.,
    3. Dick W.A.,
    4. LaBarge G.A.
    . 2016. Decreasing phosphorus loss in tile-drained landscapes using flue gas desulfurization gypsum. Journal of Environmental Quality 45:1722-1730.
    OpenUrlCrossRef
  11. ↵
    1. Laflen J.M.,
    2. Baker J.L.,
    3. Hartwig R.O.,
    4. Buchele W.F.,
    5. Johnson H.P.
    . 1978. Soil and water loss from conservation tillage systems. Transactions of the ASAE 21:881-885.
    OpenUrl
  12. ↵
    1. Lam W.V.,
    2. Macrae M.L.,
    3. English M.C.,
    4. O'Halloran I.P.,
    5. Planch J.M.,
    6. Wang Y.
    . 2016. Seasonal and event-based drivers of runoff and phosphorus export through agricultural tile drains under sandy loam soil in a cool temperate region. Hydrological Processes 30:2644-2656.
    OpenUrl
  13. ↵
    1. Li S.,
    2. Bhattarai R.,
    3. Cooke R.A.,
    4. Rendall T.,
    5. Dahal V.,
    6. Kalita P.K.
    . 2017. Assessment of surface inlets performance on sediment transport to subsurface drainage system. Applied Engineering in Agriculture 33:217-224.
    OpenUrl
  14. ↵
    1. Mausbach M.J.,
    2. Dedrick A.R.
    . 2004. The length we go: Measuring environmental benefits of conservation practices. Journal of Soil and Water Conservation 59(5):96A-103A.
    OpenUrlFREE Full Text
  15. ↵
    1. Miller T.P.,
    2. Peterson J.R.,
    3. Lenhart C.F.,
    4. Nomura Y.
    . 2012. The agricultural BMP handbook for Minnesota. Minnesota Department of Agriculture. https://wrl.mnpals.net/islandora/object/WRLrepository%3A2749.
  16. ↵
    1. Mueller M.,
    2. Wehrenberg G.
    . 1994. SWCD methodology of land use assessment. St. Paul, MN: Minnesota Pollution Control Agency.
  17. ↵
    1. Norton L.D.
    1986. Erosion-sedimentation in a closed drainage basin in northwest Indiana. Soil Science Society of America Journal 50:209-213.
    OpenUrlGeoRefWeb of Science
  18. ↵
    1. Oolman E.B.,
    2. Wilson B.N.
    2003. Sediment control practices for surface tile inlets. Applied Engineering in Agriculture 19:161-169.
    OpenUrl
  19. ↵
    1. R Development Core Team
    . 2011. R: A language and environment for statistical computing. Vienna, Austria: R Foundation for Statistical Computing.
  20. ↵
    1. Schilling K.E.,
    2. Wolter C.F.,
    3. Isenhart T.M.,
    4. Schultz R.C.
    . 2015. Tile drainage density reduces groundwater travel times and compromises riparian buffer effectiveness. Journal of Environmental Quality 44:1754-1763.
    OpenUrl
  21. ↵
    1. Shaw D.A.,
    2. Pietroniro A.,
    3. Martz L.
    . 2013. Topographic analysis for the prairie pothole region of Western Canada. Hydrological Processes 27:3105-3114.
    OpenUrlGeoRef
  22. ↵
    1. Shaw D.A.,
    2. Vanderkamp G.,
    3. Conley F.M.,
    4. Pietroniro A.,
    5. Martz L.
    . 2012. The fill-spill hydrology of prairie wetland complexes during drought and deluge. Hydrological Processes 26:3147-3156.
    OpenUrl
  23. ↵
    1. Shipitalo M.J.,
    2. Tomer M.D.
    . 2015. Quantifying the effects of alternative surface inlet protection strategies on water quality. Leopold Center Completed Grant Reports. 478. https://lib.dr.iastate.edu/leopold_grantreports/478.
  24. ↵
    1. Skaggs R.W.,
    2. Breve M.A.,
    3. Gilliam J.W.
    . 1994. Hydrologic and water quality impacts of agricultural drainage. Critical Reviews in Environmental Science and Technology 24:1-32.
    OpenUrlGeoRef
  25. ↵
    1. Smith D.R.,
    2. Francesconi W.,
    3. Livingston S.J.,
    4. Huang C.
    . 2015. Phosphorus losses from monitored fields with conservation practices in the Lake Erie Basin, USA. Ambio 44:S319-S331.
    OpenUrl
  26. ↵
    1. Smith D.R.,
    2. Livingston S.J.
    . 2013. Managing farmed closed depressional areas using blind inlets to minimize phosphorus and nitrogen losses. Soil Use and Management 29:94-102.
    OpenUrl
  27. ↵
    1. Smith D.R.,
    2. Livingston S.J.,
    3. Zuercher B.W.,
    4. Larose M.,
    5. Heathman G.C.,
    6. Huang C.
    . 2008. Nutrient losses from row crop agriculture in Indiana. Journal of Soil and Water Conservation 63(6):396-409, doi:10.2489/jswc.63.6.396.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  28. ↵
    1. Tomer M.D.,
    2. Wilson C.G.,
    3. Moorman T.B.,
    4. Cole K.J.,
    5. Heer D.,
    6. Isenhart T.M.
    . 2010. Source-pathway separation of multiple contaminants during a rainfall-runoff event in an artificially drained agricultural watershed. Journal of Environmental Quality 39:882-895.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  29. ↵
    1. USDA NRCS (Natural Resources Conservation Service)
    . 2010. Conservation practice standard: Underground outlet. Washington, DC: USDA Natural Resources Conservation Service. https://www.nrcs.usda.gov/Internet/FSE_DOCUMENTS/nrcs143_025875.pdf.
  30. ↵
    1. van der Valk A.G.,
    2. Pederson R.L.
    . 2003. The SWANCC decision and its implications for prairie potholes. Wetlands 23:590-596.
    OpenUrlCrossRef
  31. ↵
    1. Williams M.R.,
    2. King K.W.,
    3. Fausey N.R.
    . 2015. Drainage water management effects on tile discharge and water quality. Agricultural Water Management 148:43-51.
    OpenUrl
  32. ↵
    1. Wilson B.N.,
    2. Nguyen H.V.,
    3. Singh U.B.,
    4. Morgan S.,
    5. Van Buren P.,
    6. Mickelson D.,
    7. Jahnke E.,
    8. Hansen B.
    . 1999. Evaluations of alternative designs for surface inlets using prototype studies. Report 417121. St. Paul, MN: Minnesota Department of Agriculture.
PreviousNext
Back to top

In this issue

Journal of Soil and Water Conservation: 75 (3)
Journal of Soil and Water Conservation
Vol. 75, Issue 3
May/June 2020
  • Table of Contents
  • About the Cover
  • Index by author
  • Front Matter (PDF)
Print
Download PDF
Article Alerts
Sign In to Email Alerts with your Email Address
Email Article

Thank you for your interest in spreading the word on Journal of Soil and Water Conservation.

NOTE: We only request your email address so that the person you are recommending the page to knows that you wanted them to see it, and that it is not junk mail. We do not capture any email address.

Enter multiple addresses on separate lines or separate them with commas.
Hydrologic assessment of blind inlet performance in a drained closed depression
(Your Name) has sent you a message from Journal of Soil and Water Conservation
(Your Name) thought you would like to see the Journal of Soil and Water Conservation web site.
CAPTCHA
This question is for testing whether or not you are a human visitor and to prevent automated spam submissions.
2 + 8 =
Solve this simple math problem and enter the result. E.g. for 1+3, enter 4.
Citation Tools
Hydrologic assessment of blind inlet performance in a drained closed depression
M. Williams, S.J. Livingston, C.J. Penn, J.M. Gonzalez
Journal of Soil and Water Conservation May 2020, 75 (3) 352-361; DOI: 10.2489/jswc.75.3.352

Citation Manager Formats

  • BibTeX
  • Bookends
  • EasyBib
  • EndNote (tagged)
  • EndNote 8 (xml)
  • Medlars
  • Mendeley
  • Papers
  • RefWorks Tagged
  • Ref Manager
  • RIS
  • Zotero
Request Permissions
Share
Hydrologic assessment of blind inlet performance in a drained closed depression
M. Williams, S.J. Livingston, C.J. Penn, J.M. Gonzalez
Journal of Soil and Water Conservation May 2020, 75 (3) 352-361; DOI: 10.2489/jswc.75.3.352
del.icio.us logo Digg logo Reddit logo Twitter logo CiteULike logo Facebook logo Google logo Mendeley logo
  • Tweet Widget
  • Facebook Like
  • Google Plus One

Jump to section

  • Article
    • Abstract
    • Introduction
    • Materials and Methods
    • Results and Discussion
    • Summary and Conclusions
    • Acknowledgements
    • Footnotes
    • References
  • Figures & Data
  • Info & Metrics
  • References
  • PDF

Related Articles

  • No related articles found.
  • Google Scholar

Cited By...

  • Quantifying the impacts of the Conservation Effects Assessment Project watershed assessments: The first fifteen years
  • Google Scholar

More in this TOC Section

  • Erosion and sediment delivery in southern Iowa watersheds: Implications for conservation planning
  • Impact of no-tillage on water purification and retention functions of soil
  • Risk, cost-share payments, and adoption of cover crops and no-till
Show more Research Section

Similar Articles

Keywords

  • infiltration
  • pothole
  • surface inlet
  • surface runoff
  • tile drainage
  • tile riser

Content

  • Current Issue
  • Early Online
  • Archive
  • Subject Collections

Info For

  • Authors
  • Reviewers
  • Subscribers
  • Advertisers

Customer Service

  • Subscriptions
  • Permissions and Reprints
  • Terms of Use
  • Privacy

SWCS

  • Membership
  • Publications
  • Meetings and Events
  • Conservation Career Center

© 2021 Soil and Water Conservation Society