Hydrologic assessment of blind inlet performance in a drained closed depression

References

1. ↵
   1. Amado A.A.,
   2. Politano M.,
   3. Schilling K.,
   4. Weber L.

   . 2016. Investigating hydrologic connectivity of a drained prairie pothole region wetland complex using a fully integrated, physically-based model. Wetlands 38:233–245(2018), DOI:10.1007/s13157-016-0800-5.

   OpenUrlCrossRef
2. ↵
   1. Bishop R.A.,
   2. Joens A.J.,
   3. Zohrer J.

   . 1998. Iowa's wetlands, present and future with a focus on prairie potholes. Journal of the Iowa Academy of Science 88:11-16.

   OpenUrl
3. ↵
   1. Blann K.L.,
   2. Anderson J.L.,
   3. Sands G.R.,
   4. Vondracek B.

   . 2009. Effects of agricultural drainage on aquatic ecosystems: A review. Critical reviews in Environmental Science and Technology 39:909-1001.

   OpenUrlCrossRef
4. ↵
   1. Clausen J.C.,
   2. Spooner J.

   . 1993. Paired watershed study design. Rep. 841-F-93-009. Washington, DC: US Environmental Protection Agency, Office of Water.
5. ↵
   1. Dreimanis A.

   1977. Late Wisconsin glacial retreat in the Great Lakes region, North America. Annals of the New York Academy of Sciences 288:70-89.

   OpenUrlCrossRefGeoRef
6. ↵
   1. Feyereisen G.W.,
   2. Francesconi W.,
   3. Smith D.R.,
   4. Papiernik S.K.,
   5. Krueger E.S.,
   6. Wente C.D.

   . 2015. Effect of replacing surface inlets with blind or gravel inlets on sediment and phosphorus subsurface drainage losses. Journal of Environmental Quality 44:594-604.

   OpenUrl
7. ↵
   1. Gonzalez J.M.,
   2. Smith D.R.,
   3. Livingston S.,
   4. Warnemuende-Pappas E.,
   5. Zwonitzer M.

   . 2016. Blind inlets: Conservation practices to reduce herbicide losses from closed depressional areas. Journal of Soils and Sediments 16:1921-1932.

   OpenUrl
8. ↵
   1. Huang S.,
   2. Young C.,
   3. Abdul-Aziz O.I.,
   4. Dahal D.,
   5. Feng M.

   . 2013. Simulating the water budget of a prairie pothole complex from LiDAR and hydrological models in North Dakota, USA. Hydrological Sciences Journal 58:1434-1444.

   OpenUrl
9. ↵
   1. King K.W.,
   2. Fausey N.R.,
   3. Williams M.R.

   . 2014. Effect of subsurface drainage on streamflow in an agricultural headwater watershed. Journal of Hydrology 519:438-445.

   OpenUrlCrossRefGeoRef
10. ↵
    1. King K.W.,
    2. Williams M.R.,
    3. Dick W.A.,
    4. LaBarge G.A.

    . 2016. Decreasing phosphorus loss in tile-drained landscapes using flue gas desulfurization gypsum. Journal of Environmental Quality 45:1722-1730.

    OpenUrlCrossRef
11. ↵
    1. Laflen J.M.,
    2. Baker J.L.,
    3. Hartwig R.O.,
    4. Buchele W.F.,
    5. Johnson H.P.

    . 1978. Soil and water loss from conservation tillage systems. Transactions of the ASAE 21:881-885.

    OpenUrl
12. ↵
    1. Lam W.V.,
    2. Macrae M.L.,
    3. English M.C.,
    4. O'Halloran I.P.,
    5. Planch J.M.,
    6. Wang Y.

    . 2016. Seasonal and event-based drivers of runoff and phosphorus export through agricultural tile drains under sandy loam soil in a cool temperate region. Hydrological Processes 30:2644-2656.

    OpenUrl
13. ↵
    1. Li S.,
    2. Bhattarai R.,
    3. Cooke R.A.,
    4. Rendall T.,
    5. Dahal V.,
    6. Kalita P.K.

    . 2017. Assessment of surface inlets performance on sediment transport to subsurface drainage system. Applied Engineering in Agriculture 33:217-224.

    OpenUrl
14. ↵
    1. Mausbach M.J.,
    2. Dedrick A.R.

    . 2004. The length we go: Measuring environmental benefits of conservation practices. Journal of Soil and Water Conservation 59(5):96A-103A.

    OpenUrlFREE Full Text
15. ↵
    1. Miller T.P.,
    2. Peterson J.R.,
    3. Lenhart C.F.,
    4. Nomura Y.

    . 2012. The agricultural BMP handbook for Minnesota. Minnesota Department of Agriculture. https://wrl.mnpals.net/islandora/object/WRLrepository%3A2749.
16. ↵
    1. Mueller M.,
    2. Wehrenberg G.

    . 1994. SWCD methodology of land use assessment. St. Paul, MN: Minnesota Pollution Control Agency.
17. ↵
    1. Norton L.D.

    1986. Erosion-sedimentation in a closed drainage basin in northwest Indiana. Soil Science Society of America Journal 50:209-213.

    OpenUrlGeoRefWeb of Science
18. ↵
    1. Oolman E.B.,
    2. Wilson B.N.

    2003. Sediment control practices for surface tile inlets. Applied Engineering in Agriculture 19:161-169.

    OpenUrl
19. ↵
    1. R Development Core Team

    . 2011. R: A language and environment for statistical computing. Vienna, Austria: R Foundation for Statistical Computing.
20. ↵
    1. Schilling K.E.,
    2. Wolter C.F.,
    3. Isenhart T.M.,
    4. Schultz R.C.

    . 2015. Tile drainage density reduces groundwater travel times and compromises riparian buffer effectiveness. Journal of Environmental Quality 44:1754-1763.

    OpenUrl
21. ↵
    1. Shaw D.A.,
    2. Pietroniro A.,
    3. Martz L.

    . 2013. Topographic analysis for the prairie pothole region of Western Canada. Hydrological Processes 27:3105-3114.

    OpenUrlGeoRef
22. ↵
    1. Shaw D.A.,
    2. Vanderkamp G.,
    3. Conley F.M.,
    4. Pietroniro A.,
    5. Martz L.

    . 2012. The fill-spill hydrology of prairie wetland complexes during drought and deluge. Hydrological Processes 26:3147-3156.

    OpenUrl
23. ↵
    1. Shipitalo M.J.,
    2. Tomer M.D.

    . 2015. Quantifying the effects of alternative surface inlet protection strategies on water quality. Leopold Center Completed Grant Reports. 478. https://lib.dr.iastate.edu/leopold_grantreports/478.
24. ↵
    1. Skaggs R.W.,
    2. Breve M.A.,
    3. Gilliam J.W.

    . 1994. Hydrologic and water quality impacts of agricultural drainage. Critical Reviews in Environmental Science and Technology 24:1-32.

    OpenUrlGeoRef
25. ↵
    1. Smith D.R.,
    2. Francesconi W.,
    3. Livingston S.J.,
    4. Huang C.

    . 2015. Phosphorus losses from monitored fields with conservation practices in the Lake Erie Basin, USA. Ambio 44:S319-S331.

    OpenUrl
26. ↵
    1. Smith D.R.,
    2. Livingston S.J.

    . 2013. Managing farmed closed depressional areas using blind inlets to minimize phosphorus and nitrogen losses. Soil Use and Management 29:94-102.

    OpenUrl
27. ↵
    1. Smith D.R.,
    2. Livingston S.J.,
    3. Zuercher B.W.,
    4. Larose M.,
    5. Heathman G.C.,
    6. Huang C.

    . 2008. Nutrient losses from row crop agriculture in Indiana. Journal of Soil and Water Conservation 63(6):396-409, doi:10.2489/jswc.63.6.396.

    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
28. ↵
    1. Tomer M.D.,
    2. Wilson C.G.,
    3. Moorman T.B.,
    4. Cole K.J.,
    5. Heer D.,
    6. Isenhart T.M.

    . 2010. Source-pathway separation of multiple contaminants during a rainfall-runoff event in an artificially drained agricultural watershed. Journal of Environmental Quality 39:882-895.

    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
29. ↵
    1. USDA NRCS (Natural Resources Conservation Service)

    . 2010. Conservation practice standard: Underground outlet. Washington, DC: USDA Natural Resources Conservation Service. https://www.nrcs.usda.gov/Internet/FSE_DOCUMENTS/nrcs143_025875.pdf.
30. ↵
    1. van der Valk A.G.,
    2. Pederson R.L.

    . 2003. The SWANCC decision and its implications for prairie potholes. Wetlands 23:590-596.

    OpenUrlCrossRef
31. ↵
    1. Williams M.R.,
    2. King K.W.,
    3. Fausey N.R.

    . 2015. Drainage water management effects on tile discharge and water quality. Agricultural Water Management 148:43-51.

    OpenUrl
32. ↵
    1. Wilson B.N.,
    2. Nguyen H.V.,
    3. Singh U.B.,
    4. Morgan S.,
    5. Van Buren P.,
    6. Mickelson D.,
    7. Jahnke E.,
    8. Hansen B.

    . 1999. Evaluations of alternative designs for surface inlets using prototype studies. Report 417121. St. Paul, MN: Minnesota Department of Agriculture.