Conservation tillage effects in the Atlantic Coastal Plain: An APEX examination

References

1. ↵
   1. Baffaut C.,
   2. Nelson N.O.,
   3. Lory J.A.,
   4. Senaviratne G.M.M.M.A.,
   5. Bhandari A.B.,
   6. Udawatta R.P.

   . 2017. Multisite evaluation of APEX for water quality: I. Best professional judgement parameterization. Journal of Environmental Quality 46:1323-1331, doi:10.2134/jeq2016.06.0226.

   OpenUrlCrossRef
2. ↵
   1. Bosch D.D.,
   2. Potter T.L.,
   3. Strickland T.C.,
   4. Hubbard R.K.

   . 2015. Dissolved nitrogen, chloride, and potassium loss from fields in conventional and conservation tillage. Transactions of the ASABE 58(6):1559-1571, doi:10.13031/trans.58.11223.

   OpenUrlCrossRef
3. ↵
   1. Bosch D.D.,
   2. Potter T.L.,
   3. Truman C.C.,
   4. Bednarz C.,
   5. Strickland T.C.

   . 2005. Surface runoff and lateral subsurface flow as a response to conservation tillage and soil-water conditions. Transactions of the ASABE 48(6):2137-2144.

   OpenUrl
4. ↵
   1. Bosch D.D.,
   2. Truman C.C.,
   3. Potter T.L.,
   4. West L.T.,
   5. Strickland T.C.,
   6. Hubbard R.K.

   . 2012. Tillage and slope position impact on field-scale hydrologic processes in the South Atlantic Coastal Plain. Agricultural Water Management 111(2012):40-52.

   OpenUrlCrossRef
5. ↵
   1. Brakensiek D.L.,
   2. Osborn H.B.,
   3. Rawls W.J.

   . 1979. Field Manual for Research in Agricultural Hydrology. USDA Agricultural Handbook 224. Washington, DC: USDA.
6. ↵
   1. Duriancik L.F.,
   2. Bucks D.,
   3. Dobrowolski J.P.,
   4. Drewes T.,
   5. Eckles S.D.,
   6. Jolley L.,
   7. Kellog R.L.,
   8. Lund D.,
   9. Makuch J.R.,
   10. O'Neill M.P.,
   11. Rewa C.A.,
   12. Walbridge M.R.,
   13. Parry R.,
   14. Weltz M.A.

   . 2008. The first five years of the Conservation Effects Assessment Project. Journal of Soil and Water Conservation 63(6):185A-197A, doi:10.2489/jswc.63.6.185A.

   OpenUrlFREE Full Text
7. ↵
   1. Endale D.,
   2. Bosch D.D.,
   3. Potter T.L.,
   4. Strickland T.C.

   . 2014. Sediment loss and runoff from cropland in a Southeast Atlantic Coastal Plain landscape. Transactions of the ASABE 57(6):1611-1626, doi:10.13031/trans.57.10554.

   OpenUrlCrossRef
8. ↵
   1. Endale D.M.,
   2. Potter T.L.,
   3. Strickland T.C.,
   4. Bosch D.D.

   . 2017. Sediment-bound total organic carbon and total organic nitrogen losses from conventional and strip tillage cropping systems. Soil and Tillage Research 171(2017):25-34, doi.org/10.1016/j.still.2017.04.004.

   OpenUrl
9. ↵
   1. Federal Inter-Agency Sedimentation Project

   . 1940. Field Practice and Equipment Used in Sampling Suspended Sediment. Federal Inter-Agency Sedimentation Project, Report No. 1. Iowa City, IA: University of Iowa.
10. ↵
    1. Gassman P.W.,
    2. Osei E.,
    3. Saleh A.,
    4. Rodecap J.,
    5. Norvell S.,
    6. Williams J.R.

    . 2006. Alternative practices for sediment and nutrient loss control on livestock farms. Agricultural Ecosystems and the Environment 117(2-3):135-144.

    OpenUrl
11. ↵
    1. Gassman P.W.,
    2. Williams J.R.,
    3. Benson V.W.,
    4. Izaurralde R.C.,
    5. Hauck L.M.,
    6. Jones C.A.,
    7. Atwood J.D.,
    8. Kiniry J.R.,
    9. Flowers J.D.

    . 2004. Historical development and applications of the EPIC and APEX models. Presented at the annual American Society of Agricultural Engineering Meeting, Ottawa, Ontario, Canada. Paper 042097. Ames, IA: Center for Agricultural and Rural Development, Iowa State University.
12. ↵
    1. Gassman P.W.,
    2. Williams J.R.,
    3. Wang X.,
    4. Saleh A.,
    5. Osei E.,
    6. Hauck L.M.,
    7. Izaurralde R.C.,
    8. Flowers J.D.

    . 2010. Invited review article: The Agricultural Policy/Environmental eXtender (APEX) model: An emerging tool for landscape and watershed environmental analyses. Transactions of the ASABE 53:711-740, doi:10.13031/2013.30078.

    OpenUrlCrossRef
13. ↵
    1. Gettel M.,
    2. Gulliver J.S.,
    3. Kayhanian M.,
    4. DeGroot G.,
    5. Brand J.,
    6. Mohsenic O.,
    7. Erickson A.J.

    . 2011. Improving suspended sediment measurements by automatic samplers. Journal of Environmental Monitoring 13:2703-2709, doi:10.1039/c1em10258c.

    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
14. ↵
    1. Gupta H.V.,
    2. Sorooshian S.,
    3. Yapo P.O.

    . 1999. Status of automatic calibration for hydrologic models: Comparison with multilevel expert calibration. Journal of Hydrologic Engineering 4(2):135-143.

    OpenUrlCrossRef
15. ↵
    1. Hargreaves G.H.,
    2. Samani Z.A.

    . 1985. Reference crop evapotranspiration from temperature. Applied Engineering in Agriculture 1(2):96-99.

    OpenUrlCrossRef
16. ↵
    1. Harmel R.D.,
    2. Cooper R.J.,
    3. Slade R.L.,
    4. Haney R.L.,
    5. Arnold J.G.

    . 2006a. Cumulative uncertainty in measured streamflow and water quality data for small watersheds. Transactions of the ASAE 49(3):689-701.

    OpenUrl
17. ↵
    1. Harmel R.D.,
    2. King K.W.,
    3. Haggard B.E.,
    4. Wren D.G.,
    5. Sheridan J.M.

    . 2006b. Practical guidance for discharge and water quality data collection on small watersheds. Transactions of the ASAE 49(4):937-948.

    OpenUrl
18. ↵
    1. Harmel R.D.,
    2. Smith P.K.

    . 2007. Consideration of measurement uncertainty in the evaluation of goodness-of-fit in hydrologic and water quality modeling. Journal of Hydrology 337(3-4):326-336.

    OpenUrlCrossRefWeb of Science
19. ↵
    1. Harmel R.D.,
    2. Smith D.R.,
    3. King K.W.,
    4. Slade R.M.

    . 2009. Estimating storm discharge and water quality data uncertainty: A software tool for monitoring and modeling applications. Environmental Modelling and Software 24(7):832-842.

    OpenUrl
20. ↵
    1. Kuichling E.

    1889. The relation between the rainfall and the discharge of sewers in populous districts. Transactions of the American Society of Civil Engineers 20:1-56.

    OpenUrl
21. ↵
    1. Mausbach M.J.,
    2. Dedrick A.R.

    . 2004. The length we go—Measuring environmental benefits of conservation practices. Journal of Soil and Water Conservation 59(5):96A-103A.

    OpenUrlFREE Full Text
22. ↵
    1. Moriasi D.N.,
    2. Arnold J.G.,
    3. Van Liew M.W.,
    4. Bingner R.L.,
    5. Harmel R.D.,
    6. Veith T.L.

    . 2007. Model evaluation guidelines for systematic quantification of accuracy in watershed simulations. Transactions of the ASABE 50:885-900, doi:10.13031/2013.23153.

    OpenUrlCrossRefWeb of Science
23. ↵
    1. Mudgal A.,
    2. Baffaut C.,
    3. Anderson S.H.,
    4. Sadler E.J.,
    5. Thompson A.L.

    . 2010. APEX model assessment of variable landscapes on runoff and dissolved herbicides. Transactions of the ASABE 53(4):1047-1058.

    OpenUrl
24. ↵
    1. Nair S.S.,
    2. King K.W.,
    3. Witter J.D.,
    4. Sohngen B.L.,
    5. Fausey N.R.

    . 2011. Importance of crop yield in calibrating watershed water quality simulation tools. Journal of the American Water Resources Association 47(6):1285-1297.

    OpenUrl
25. ↵
    1. Nash J.E.,
    2. Sutcliffe J.V.

    . 1970. River flow forecasting through conceptual models: Part 1. A discussion of principles. Journal of Hydrology 10:282-290, doi:10.1016/0022-1694(70)90255-6.

    OpenUrlCrossRefGeoRef
26. ↵
    1. Nearing M.A.

    1998. Why soil erosion models over-predict small soil losses and under-predict large soil losses. Catena 32:15-22.

    OpenUrlGeoRef
27. ↵
    1. OECD (Organization for Economic Cooperation and Development)

    . 2011. Evaluation of Agricultural Policy Reforms in the United States. Paris: OECD Publishing. http://dx.doi.org/10.1787/9789264096721-en.
28. ↵
    1. Plotkin S.,
    2. Wang X.,
    3. Potter T.L.,
    4. Bosch D.D.,
    5. Williams J.R.,
    6. Hesketh E.S.,
    7. Bagdon J.K.

    . 2013. APEX calibration and validation of water and herbicide transport under U.S. Southern Atlantic Coastal Plain conditions. Transactions of the ASABE 56(1):43-60.

    OpenUrl
29. ↵
    1. Potter T.L.,
    2. Bosch D.D.,
    3. Strickland T.C.

    . 2015. Tillage impact on herbicide loss by surface runoff and lateral subsurface flow. Science of the Total Environment 530-531(2015):357-366, DOI:10.1016/j.scitotenv.2015.05.079.

    OpenUrlCrossRef
30. ↵
    1. Potter T.L.,
    2. Truman C.C.,
    3. Bosch D.D.,
    4. Bednarz C.

    . 2004. Fluometuron and pendimethalin runoff from strip and conventionally tilled cotton in the south Atlantic coastal plain. Journal of Environmental Quality 33(6):2122-2131, doi.org/10.2134/jeq2004.2122.

    OpenUrlPubMedWeb of Science
31. ↵
    1. Ramirez-Avila J.J.,
    2. Radcliffe D.E.,
    3. Osmond D.,
    4. Bolster C.,
    5. Sharpley A.,
    6. Ortega-Achury S.L.,
    7. Forsberg A.,
    8. Oldham J.L.

    . 2017. Evaluation of the APEX model to simulate runoff quality from agricultural fields in the southern region of the United States. Journal of Environmental Quality 46:1357-1364, doi:10.2134/jeq2017.07.0258.

    OpenUrlCrossRef
32. ↵
    1. Senaviratne G.M.M.M.A.,
    2. Baffaut C.,
    3. Lory J.A.,
    4. Udawatta R.P.,
    5. Nelson N.O.,
    6. Williams J.R.,
    7. Anderson S.H.

    . 2018. Improved APEX model simulation of buffer water quality benefits at field scale. Transactions of the ASABE 61(2):603-616, doi.org/10.13031/trans.12655.

    OpenUrl
33. ↵
    1. Sobol I.M.

    1993. Sensitivity estimates for nonlinear mathematical models. Mathematical Modeling and Computational Experiment 1(4):407-414.

    OpenUrl
34. ↵
    1. Strickland T.C.,
    2. Potter T.L.,
    3. Truman C.C.,
    4. Franklin D.H.,
    5. Bosch D.D.,
    6. Hawkins G.L.

    . 2012. Results of rainfall simulation to estimate sediment-bound carbon and nitrogen loss from an Atlantic Coastal Plain (USA) ultisol. Soil and Tillage Research 122(2012):12-21, doi:10.1016/j.still.2012.02.004.

    OpenUrlCrossRef
35. ↵
    1. USDA NRCS (Natural Resources Conservation Service)

    . 2004. Chapter 10: Estimation of direct runoff from storm rainfall: Part 630. Hydrology. In NRCS National Engineering Handbook. Washington, DC: USDA Natural Resources Conservation Service. http://directives.sc.egov.usda.gov/viewerFS.aspx?hid=21422.
36. ↵
    1. Wang X.,
    2. Williams J.R.,
    3. Gassman P.W.,
    4. Baffaut C.,
    5. Izaurralde R.C.,
    6. Jeong J.,
    7. Kiniry J.R.

    . 2012. EPIC and APEX: Model use, calibration, and validation. Transactions of the ASABE 55:1447-1462, doi:10.13031/2013.42253.

    OpenUrlCrossRef
37. ↵
    1. Wang X.,
    2. Yen H.,
    3. Liu Q.,
    4. Liu J.

    . 2014. An auto-calibration tool for the Agricultural Policy Environmental eXtender (APEX) model. Transactions of the ASABE 57(4):1087-1098, DOI:10.13031/trans.57.10601.

    OpenUrlCrossRef
38. ↵
    1. Singh V.P.

    1. Williams J.R.

    1995. The EPIC model. In Computer Models of Watershed Hydrology, ed. Singh V.P., 909-1000. Highlands Ranch, CO: Water Resources Publications.
39. ↵
    1. Singh V.P.,
    2. Frevert D.K.

    1. Williams J.R.,
    2. Izaurralde R.C.

    . 2006. The APEX Model. In Watershed Models, ed. Singh V.P., Frevert D.K., 437-482. Boca Raton, FL: CRC Press.
40. ↵
    1. Zambrano-Bigiarini M.

    2017. HydroGOF: Goodness-of-fit functions for comparison of simulated and observed hydrological time series. R package version 0.3-10. http://hzambran.github.io/hydroGOF/. DOI:10.5281/zenodo.840087.

    OpenUrlCrossRef