Potential for saturated riparian buffers to treat tile drainage among 32 watersheds representing Iowa landscapes

References

1. ↵
   1. Amado A.A.,
   2. Schilling K.E.,
   3. Jones C.S.,
   4. Thomas N.,
   5. Weber L.J.

   . 2017. Estimation of tile drainage contribution to streamflow and nutrient loads at the watershed scale based on continuously monitored data. Environmental Monitoring and Assessment 189:426, https://doi.org/10.1007/s10661-017-6139-4.

   OpenUrl
2. ↵
   1. Carlisle D.M.,
   2. Falcone J.,
   3. Wolock D.M.,
   4. Meador M.R.,
   5. Norris R.H.

   . 2010. Predicting the natural flow regime: Models for assessing hydrologic alteration in streams. River Research and Applications 26:118-136.

   OpenUrlWeb of Science
3. ↵
   1. Christianson L.,
   2. Tyndall J.,
   3. Helmers M.

   . 2013. Financial comparison of seven nitrate reduction strategies for Midwestern agricultural drainage. Water Resources and Economics 2-3:30-56.

   OpenUrl
4. ↵
   1. Dosskey M.G.,
   2. Vidon P.,
   3. Gurwick N.P.,
   4. Allen C.J.,
   5. Duval T.P.,
   6. Lowrance R.

   . 2010. The role of riparian vegetation in protecting and improving chemical quality in streams. Journal American Water Resources Association 46(2):261-277.

   OpenUrl
5. ↵
   1. Groh T.A.,
   2. Gentry L.E.,
   3. David M.B.

   . 2015. Nitrogen removal and greenhouse gas emissions from constructed wetlands receiving tile drainage water. Journal of Environmental Quality 44(3):1001-1010.

   OpenUrl
6. ↵
   1. Hefting M.M.,
   2. van den Heuvel R.N.,
   3. Verhoeven J.T.A.

   . 2013. Wetlands in agricultural landscapes for nitrogen attenuation and biodiversity enhancement: Opportunities and limitations. Ecological Engineering 56:5-13.

   OpenUrlCrossRefWeb of Science
7. ↵
   1. Hoover N.L.,
   2. Bhandari A.,
   3. Soupir M.L.,
   4. Moorman T.B.

   . 2015. Woodchip denitrification bioreactors: Impacts of temperature and hydraulic retention time on nitrate removal. Journal of Environmental Quality 45(3):803-812.

   OpenUrl
8. ↵
   1. Jaynes D.B.,
   2. Isenhart T.M.

   . 2014. Reconnecting tile drainage to riparian buffer hydrology for enhanced nitrate removal. Journal of Environmental Quality 43(2):631-638.

   OpenUrlCrossRef
9. ↵
   1. Jaynes D.B.,
   2. Isenhart T.M.

   . 2019. Performance of saturated riparian buffers in Iowa, USA. Journal of Environmental Quality 48(1):289-296.

   OpenUrlCrossRef
10. ↵
    1. Kovacic D.A.,
    2. David M.B.,
    3. Gentry L.E.,
    4. Starks K.M.,
    5. Cooke R.A.

    . 2000. Effectiveness of constructed wetlands in reducing nitrogen and phosphorus export from agricultural tile drainage. Journal of Environmental Quality 29(4):1262-1274.

    OpenUrlWeb of Science
11. ↵
    1. Lenhart C.,
    2. Gordon B.,
    3. Gamble J.,
    4. Current D.,
    5. Ross N.,
    6. Herring L.,
    7. Nieber J.,
    8. Peterson H.

    . 2016. Design and hydrologic performance of a tile drainage treatment wetland in Minnesota, USA. Water 8(12):549.

    OpenUrl
12. ↵
    1. Liu X.,
    2. Zhang X.,
    3. Zhang M.

    . 2008. Major factors influencing the efficacy of vegetated buffers on sediment trapping: A review and analysis. Journal of Environmental Quality 37(5):1667-1674.

    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
13. ↵
    1. Mayer P.M.,
    2. Reynolds S.K.,
    3. McCutchen M.D.,
    4. Canfield T.J.

    . 2007. Meta-analysis of nitrogen removal in riparian buffers. Journal of Environmental Quality 36(4):1172-1180.

    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
14. ↵
    1. Moorman T.B.,
    2. Tomer M.D.,
    3. Smith D.R.,
    4. Jaynes D.B.

    . 2015. Evaluating the potential role of denitrifying woodchip bioreactors in reducing watershed-scale nitrate loads: A case study comparing three Midwestern (USA) watersheds. Ecological Engineering 75:441-448.

    OpenUrlCrossRef
15. ↵
    1. Norton E.A.

    1937. Provisional problem areas in soil conservation research in the United States. Soil Science Society of America Proceedings 1:495-504.

    OpenUrl
16. ↵
    1. Olmernik J.M.,
    2. Griffith G.E.

    . 2014. Ecoregions of the conterminous United States: Evolution of a hierarchical spatial framework. Environmental Management 54:1249-1266.

    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
17. ↵
    1. Porter S.A.,
    2. Tomer M.D.,
    3. James D.E.,
    4. Van Horn J.D.

    . 2018. Agricultural Conservation Planning Framework ArcGIS Toolbox User's Manual, Ver. 3. Ames, IA: USDA Agricultural Research Service National Laboratory for Agriculture and the Environment. www.acpf4watersheds.org.
18. ↵
    1. Schilling K.E.,
    2. Wolter C.F.,
    3. McLellan E.

    . 2015. Agro-Hydrologic Landscapes in the Upper Mississippi and Ohio River basins. Environmental Management 55:646-656.

    OpenUrl
19. ↵
    1. Schipper L.A.,
    2. Robertson W.D.,
    3. Gold A.J.,
    4. Jaynes D.B.,
    5. Cameron S.C.

    . 2010. Denitrifying bioreactors—An approach for reducing nitrate loads to receiving waters. Ecological Engineering 36(11):1532-1543.

    OpenUrlCrossRef
20. ↵
    1. Simon A.,
    2. Rinaldi M.

    . 2006. Disturbance, stream incision, and channel evolution: The roles of excess transport capacity and boundary materials in controlling channel response. Geomorphology 79:361-383.

    OpenUrlCrossRefGeoRefWeb of Science
21. ↵
    1. Tomer M.D.,
    2. Crumpton W.G.,
    3. Bingner R.L.,
    4. Kostel J.A.,
    5. James D.E.

    . 2013a. Estimating nitrate load reductions from placing constructed wetlands in a HUC-12 watershed using LiDAR data. Ecological Engineering 56:69-78.

    OpenUrlCrossRef
22. ↵
    1. Tomer M.D.,
    2. James D.E.,
    3. Sandoval-Green C.M.J.

    . 2017. Agricultural Conservation Planning Framework: 3. Land use and field boundary database development and structure. Journal of Environmental Quality 46(3):676-686.

    OpenUrl
23. ↵
    1. Tomer M.D.,
    2. Porter S.A.,
    3. James D.E.,
    4. Boomer K.M.B.,
    5. Kostel J.A.,
    6. McLellan E.

    . 2013b. Combining precision conservation technologies into a flexible framework to facilitate agricultural watershed planning. Journal of Soil and Water Conservation 68(5):113A-120A, doi:10.2489/jswc.68.5.113A.

    OpenUrlFREE Full Text
24. ↵
    1. Tomer M.D.,
    2. Porter S.A.,
    3. James D.E.,
    4. Van Horn J.D.

    . 2020a. Riparian catchments: A landscape approach to link uplands with riparian zones for agricultural and ecosystem conservation. Journal of Soil and Water Conservation, doi:10.2489/jswc.2020.1220A.

    OpenUrlCrossRef
25. ↵
    1. Tomer M.D.,
    2. Van Horn J.D.,
    3. Porter S.A.,
    4. James D.E.,
    5. Niemi J.

    . 2020b. Comparing Agricultural Conservation Planning Framework (ACPF) practice placements for runoff mitigation and controlled drainage among 32 watersheds representing Iowa landscapes. Journal of Soil and Water Conservation, doi:10.2489/jswc.2020.00001.

    OpenUrlCrossRef
26. ↵
    1. University of Northern Iowa

    . 2016. Iowa LiDAR Mapping Project. Cedar Falls, IA: University of Northern Iowa. http://www.geotree.uni.edu/lidar/.
27. ↵
    1. USDA NRCS (Natural Resources Conservation Service)

    . 2006. Land Resource Regions and Major Land Resource Areas of the United States, the Caribbean, and the Pacific Basin. USDA Handbook 296. Washington, DC: USDA Natural Resources Conservation Service.
28. ↵
    1. USDA NRCS

    . 2018. Conservation Practice Standard, Saturated Buffer, Code 604. USDA-NRCS Field Office Technical Guide. Bismarck, ND: USDA Natural Resources Conservation Service, North Dakota Office. https://efotg.sc.egov.usda.gov/references/public/ND/ND_604_Standard.pdf.