Skip to main content

Main menu

  • Home
  • Content
    • Current Issue
    • Early Online
    • Archive
    • Subject Collections
  • Info For
    • Authors
    • Reviewers
    • Subscribers
    • Advertisers
  • About
    • About JSWC
    • Editorial Board
    • Permissions
    • Alerts
    • RSS Feeds
    • Contact Us

User menu

  • Register
  • Subscribe
  • My alerts
  • Log in
  • My Cart

Search

  • Advanced search
Journal of Soil and Water Conservation

  • Register
  • Subscribe
  • My alerts
  • Log in
  • My Cart
Journal of Soil and Water Conservation

Advanced Search

  • Home
  • Content
    • Current Issue
    • Early Online
    • Archive
    • Subject Collections
  • Info For
    • Authors
    • Reviewers
    • Subscribers
    • Advertisers
  • About
    • About JSWC
    • Editorial Board
    • Permissions
    • Alerts
    • RSS Feeds
    • Contact Us
  • Follow SWCS on Twitter
  • Visit SWCS on Facebook
Research ArticleResearch Section

What drives voluntary adoption of farming practices that can abate nutrient pollution?

Z.R. Luther, S.M. Swinton and B. Van Deynze
Journal of Soil and Water Conservation September 2020, 75 (5) 640-650; DOI: https://doi.org/10.2489/jswc.2020.00184
Z.R. Luther
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
S.M. Swinton
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
B. Van Deynze
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • Article
  • Figures & Data
  • References
  • Info & Metrics
  • PDF
Loading

References

  1. ↵
    1. Abadi Ghadim A.K.,
    2. Pannell D.J.
    . 1999. A conceptual framework of adoption of an agricultural innovation. Agricultural Economics 21:145-154.
    OpenUrlCrossRef
  2. ↵
    1. Baumgart-Getz A.,
    2. Prokopy L.S.,
    3. Floress K.
    . 2012. Why farmers adopt best management practice in the United States: A meta-analysis of the adoption literature. Journal of Environmental Management 96:17-25.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
  3. ↵
    1. Besley T.,
    2. Case A.
    . 1993. Modeling technology adoption in developing countries. American Economic Review 83:396-402.
    OpenUrlWeb of Science
  4. ↵
    1. Chouinard H.H.,
    2. Paterson T.,
    3. Wandschneider P.R.,
    4. Ohler A.M.
    . 2008. Will farmers trade profits for stewardship? Heterogeneous motivations for farm practice selection. Land Economics 84(1):66-82.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  5. ↵
    1. Claassen R.,
    2. Horowitz J.,
    3. Duquette E.,
    4. Ueda K.
    . 2014. Additionality in U.S. Agricultural Conservation and Regulatory Offset Programs. Economic Research Report 170. Washington, DC: USDA Economic Research Service.
  6. ↵
    1. Conley T.G.,
    2. Udry C.R.
    . 2010. Learning about a new technology: Pineapple in Ghana. American Economic Review 100:35-69.
    OpenUrlCrossRef
  7. ↵
    1. Daberkow S.G.,
    2. McBride W.D.
    . 2003. Farm and operator characteristics affecting the awareness and adoption of precision agriculture technologies in the US. Precision Agriculture 4:163-177.
    OpenUrlCrossRef
  8. ↵
    1. Feder G.,
    2. Just R.E.,
    3. Zilberman D.
    . 1985. Adoption of agricultural innovations in developing countries: A survey. Economic Development and Cultural Change 33:255-298.
    OpenUrlCrossRefWeb of Science
  9. ↵
    1. Feder G.,
    2. Umali D.L.
    . 1993. The adoption of agricultural innovations: A Review. Technological Forecasting and Social Change 43:215-239.
    OpenUrlCrossRefWeb of Science
  10. ↵
    1. Finger R.,
    2. Swinton S.M.,
    3. El-Benni N.,
    4. Walter A.M.
    . 2019. Precision farming at the nexus of agricultural production and the environment. Annual Review of Resource Economics 11:313-335.
    OpenUrl
  11. ↵
    1. Fleming P.
    2017. Agricultural cost sharing and water quality in the Chesapeake Bay: Estimating indirect effects of environmental payments. American Journal of Agricultural Economics 99:1208-1227.
    OpenUrl
  12. ↵
    1. Gebremedhin B.,
    2. Swinton S.M.
    . 2003. Investment in soil conservation in Ethiopia: The role of land tenure security and public programs. Agricultural Economics 29:69-84.
    OpenUrlCrossRefWeb of Science
  13. ↵
    1. Greiner R.,
    2. Gregg D.
    . 2011. Farmers' intrinsic motivations, barriers to the adoption of conservation practices and effectiveness of policy instruments: Emperical evidence from northern Australia. Land Use Policy 28:257-265.
    OpenUrlCrossRef
  14. ↵
    1. Hunecke C.,
    2. Engler A.,
    3. Jara-Rojas R.,
    4. Poortvliet P.M.
    . 2017. Understanding the role of social capital in adoption decisions: An application to irrigation technology. Agricultural Systems 153:221-231.
    OpenUrl
  15. ↵
    1. King K.W.,
    2. Williams M.R.,
    3. Macrae M.L.,
    4. Fausey N.R.,
    5. Frankenberger J.,
    6. Smith D.R.,
    7. Kleinman P.J.,
    8. Brown L.C.
    . 2015. Phosphorus transport in agricultural subsurface drainage: A review. Journal of Environmental Quality 44:467-485.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  16. ↵
    1. Knowler D.,
    2. Bradshaw B.
    . 2007. Farmers' adoption of conservation agriculture: A review and synthesis of recent research. Food Policy 32:25-48.
    OpenUrlCrossRefWeb of Science
  17. ↵
    1. Krause M.A.,
    2. Deuson R.R.,
    3. Baker T.G.,
    4. Preckel P.V.,
    5. Lowenberg-DeBoer J.,
    6. Reddy K.C.,
    7. Maliki K.
    . 1990. Risk sharing versus low-cost credit systems for international development. American Journal of Agricultural Economics 72:911-922.
    OpenUrlCrossRef
  18. ↵
    1. Lichtenberg E.,
    2. Smith-Ramirez R.
    . 2011. Slippage in conservation cost sharing. American Journal of Agricultural Economics 93:1-17.
    OpenUrlCrossRefWeb of Science
  19. ↵
    1. Mascia M.B.,
    2. Mills M.
    . 2018. When conservation goes viral: The diffusion of innovative biodiversity conservation policies and practices. Conservation Letters 11(3):e12442.
    OpenUrl
  20. ↵
    1. Maybery D.,
    2. Crase L.,
    3. Gullifer C.
    . 2005. Categorising farming values as economic, conservation and lifestyle. Journal of Economic Psychology 26:59-72.
    OpenUrlCrossRefWeb of Science
  21. ↵
    1. Mezzatesta M.,
    2. Newburn D.,
    3. Woodward R.
    . 2013. Additionality and the adoption of farm conservation practices. Land Economics 89:722-742.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  22. ↵
    1. Micheels E.T.,
    2. Nolan J.F.
    . 2016. Examining the effects of absorptive capacity and social capital on the adoption of agricultural innovations: A Canadian Prairie case study. Agricultural Systems 145:127-138.
    OpenUrl
  23. ↵
    1. Newton J.
    2019. EQIP and CSP Conservation Programs in the 2018 Farm Bill. Washington, DC: American Farm Bureau Federation. https://www.fb.org/market-intel/eqip-and-csp-conservation-programs-in-the-2018-farm-bill.
  24. ↵
    1. Pannell D.J.,
    2. Marshall G.R.,
    3. Barr N.,
    4. Curtis A.,
    5. Vanclay F.,
    6. Wilkinson R.
    . 2006. Understanding and promoting adoption of conservation practices by rural landholders. Australian Journal of Experimental Agriculture 46:1407-1424.
    OpenUrlCrossRefWeb of Science
  25. ↵
    1. Pierpaoli E.,
    2. Carli G.,
    3. Pignatti E.,
    4. Canavari M.
    . 2013. Drivers of precision agriculture technologies adoption: A literature review. Procedia Technology 8:61-69.
    OpenUrl
  26. ↵
    1. Pimentel D.,
    2. Harvey C.,
    3. Resosudarmo P.,
    4. Sinclair K.,
    5. Kurz D.,
    6. McNair M.,
    7. Crist S.,
    8. Shpritz L.,
    9. Fitton L.,
    10. Saffouri R.,
    11. Blair R.
    . 1995. Environmental and economic costs of soil erosion and conservation benefits. Science 267:1117-1123.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  27. ↵
    1. Prokopy L.S.,
    2. Floress K.,
    3. Arbuckle J.G.,
    4. Church S.P.,
    5. Eanes F.R.,
    6. Gao Y.,
    7. Gramig B.M.,
    8. Ranjan P.,
    9. Singh A.S.
    . 2019. Adoption of agricultural conservation practices in the United States: Evidence from 35 years of quantitative literature. Journal of Soil and Water Conservation 74(5):520-534, doi:10.2489/jswc.74.5.520.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  28. ↵
    1. Prokopy L.S.,
    2. Floress K.,
    3. Klotthor-Weinkauf D.,
    4. Baumgart-Getz A.
    . 2008. Determinants of agricultural best management practice adoption: Evidence from the literature. Journal of Soil and Water Conservation 63:300-311, doi:10.2489/jswc.63.5.300.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  29. ↵
    1. Ranjan P.,
    2. Church S.P.,
    3. Floress K.,
    4. Prokopy L.S.
    . 2019. Synthesizing conservation motivations and barriers: What have we learned from qualitative studies of farmers' behaviors in the United States? Society & Natural Resources 32(11):1171-1199.
    OpenUrl
  30. ↵
    1. Roesch-McNally G.,
    2. Arbuckle J.G.,
    3. Tyndall J.C.
    . 2018. Soil as social-ecological feedback: Examining the “ethic” of soil stewardship among Corn Belt farmers. Rural Sociology 83(1):145-173.
    OpenUrl
  31. ↵
    1. Schimmelpfennig D.E.
    2016. Farm Profits and Adoption of Precision Agriculture. Economic Research Report 217. Washington, DC: USDA Economic Research Service. http://www.ers.usda.gov/publications/pub-details/?pubid=80325.
  32. ↵
    1. Selman M.,
    2. Greenhalgh S.
    . 2009. Eutrophication: Policies, actions, and strategies to address nutrient pollution. Washington, DC: World Resources Institute. https://www.wri.org/publication/eutrophication-policies-action-and-strategies-address-nutrient-pollution.
  33. ↵
    1. Solon G.,
    2. Haider S.J.,
    3. Wooldridge J.M.
    . 2015. What are we weighting for? Journal of Human Resources 50:301-316.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  34. ↵
    1. Traxler G.,
    2. Byerlee D.
    . 1993. A joint-product analysis of the adoption of modern cereal varieties in developing countries. American Journal of Agricultural Economics 75:981-989.
    OpenUrlCrossRefWeb of Science
  35. ↵
    1. Wachenheim C.J.,
    2. Lesch W.C.
    . 2014. Understanding landowner decision drivers regarding conversation through research. Western Economics Forum 13(2):21-28.
    OpenUrl
  36. ↵
    1. Wardynski F.
    2015. Cover crops as a livestock feed. East Lansing, MI: Michigan State University Extension. https://www.canr.msu.edu/news/cover_crops_as_a_livestock_feed.
  37. ↵
    1. Yeboah F.K.,
    2. Lupi F.,
    3. Kaplowitz M.D.
    . 2015. Agricultural landowners' willingness to participate in a filter strip program for watershed protection. Land Use Policy 49:75-85.
    OpenUrlCrossRef
PreviousNext
Back to top

In this issue

Journal of Soil and Water Conservation: 75 (5)
Journal of Soil and Water Conservation
Vol. 75, Issue 5
September/October 2020
  • Table of Contents
  • Table of Contents (PDF)
  • About the Cover
  • Index by author
  • Front Matter (PDF)
Print
Download PDF
Article Alerts
Sign In to Email Alerts with your Email Address
Email Article

Thank you for your interest in spreading the word on Journal of Soil and Water Conservation.

NOTE: We only request your email address so that the person you are recommending the page to knows that you wanted them to see it, and that it is not junk mail. We do not capture any email address.

Enter multiple addresses on separate lines or separate them with commas.
What drives voluntary adoption of farming practices that can abate nutrient pollution?
(Your Name) has sent you a message from Journal of Soil and Water Conservation
(Your Name) thought you would like to see the Journal of Soil and Water Conservation web site.
CAPTCHA
This question is for testing whether or not you are a human visitor and to prevent automated spam submissions.
2 + 4 =
Solve this simple math problem and enter the result. E.g. for 1+3, enter 4.
Citation Tools
What drives voluntary adoption of farming practices that can abate nutrient pollution?
Z.R. Luther, S.M. Swinton, B. Van Deynze
Journal of Soil and Water Conservation Sep 2020, 75 (5) 640-650; DOI: 10.2489/jswc.2020.00184

Citation Manager Formats

  • BibTeX
  • Bookends
  • EasyBib
  • EndNote (tagged)
  • EndNote 8 (xml)
  • Medlars
  • Mendeley
  • Papers
  • RefWorks Tagged
  • Ref Manager
  • RIS
  • Zotero
Request Permissions
Share
What drives voluntary adoption of farming practices that can abate nutrient pollution?
Z.R. Luther, S.M. Swinton, B. Van Deynze
Journal of Soil and Water Conservation Sep 2020, 75 (5) 640-650; DOI: 10.2489/jswc.2020.00184
del.icio.us logo Digg logo Reddit logo Twitter logo CiteULike logo Facebook logo Google logo Mendeley logo
  • Tweet Widget
  • Facebook Like
  • Google Plus One

Jump to section

  • Article
    • Abstract
    • Introduction
    • Materials and Methods
    • Results and Discussion
    • Summary and Conclusions
    • Acknowledgements
    • References
  • Figures & Data
  • Info & Metrics
  • References
  • PDF

Related Articles

  • No related articles found.
  • Google Scholar

Cited By...

  • No citing articles found.
  • Google Scholar

More in this TOC Section

  • Erosion and sediment delivery in southern Iowa watersheds: Implications for conservation planning
  • Impact of no-tillage on water purification and retention functions of soil
  • Risk, cost-share payments, and adoption of cover crops and no-till
Show more Research Section

Similar Articles

Keywords

  • agriculture
  • conservation practices
  • nutrient pollution
  • precision agriculture
  • technology adoption

Content

  • Current Issue
  • Early Online
  • Archive
  • Subject Collections

Info For

  • Authors
  • Reviewers
  • Subscribers
  • Advertisers

Customer Service

  • Subscriptions
  • Permissions and Reprints
  • Terms of Use
  • Privacy

SWCS

  • Membership
  • Publications
  • Meetings and Events
  • Conservation Career Center

© 2021 Soil and Water Conservation Society