Skip to main content

Main menu

  • Home
  • Content
    • Current Issue
    • Early Online
    • Archive
    • Subject Collections
  • Info For
    • Authors
    • Reviewers
    • Subscribers
    • Advertisers
  • About
    • About JSWC
    • Editorial Board
    • Permissions
    • Alerts
    • RSS Feeds
    • Contact Us

User menu

  • Register
  • Subscribe
  • My alerts
  • Log in
  • My Cart

Search

  • Advanced search
Journal of Soil and Water Conservation

  • Register
  • Subscribe
  • My alerts
  • Log in
  • My Cart
Journal of Soil and Water Conservation

Advanced Search

  • Home
  • Content
    • Current Issue
    • Early Online
    • Archive
    • Subject Collections
  • Info For
    • Authors
    • Reviewers
    • Subscribers
    • Advertisers
  • About
    • About JSWC
    • Editorial Board
    • Permissions
    • Alerts
    • RSS Feeds
    • Contact Us
  • Follow SWCS on Twitter
  • Visit SWCS on Facebook
Research ArticleSPECIAL RESEARCH SECTION: RESEARCH INTRODUCTION

Improving the ability to include freshwater wetland plants in process-based models

A.S. Williams, D.M. Mushet, M. Lang, G.W. McCarty, J.A. Shaffer, S. Njambi Kahara, M.-V.V. Johnson and J.R. Kiniry
Journal of Soil and Water Conservation November 2020, 75 (6) 704-712; DOI: https://doi.org/10.2489/jswc.2020.00089
A.S. Williams
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
D.M. Mushet
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
M. Lang
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
G.W. McCarty
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
J.A. Shaffer
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
S. Njambi Kahara
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
M.-V.V. Johnson
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
J.R. Kiniry
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • Article
  • Figures & Data
  • References
  • Info & Metrics
  • PDF
Loading

References

  1. ↵
    1. Atwood, J.D.,
    2. D. Moffitt,
    3. M.L. Norfleet,
    4. A.D. King, and
    5. J. Lemunyon
    . 2009. Transforming Survey Data to APEX Model Input Files. USDA NRCS Report. Washington, DC: USDA Natural Resources Conservation Service.
  2. ↵
    1. Boer, M., and
    2. M. Stafford Smith
    . 2003. A plant functional approach to the prediction of changes in Australian rangeland vegetation under grazing and fire. Journal of Vegetation Science 14:333-344.
    OpenUrl
  3. ↵
    1. Brauman, K.A.,
    2. G.C. Daily,
    3. T.K. e. Duarte, and
    4. H.A. Mooney
    . 2007. The nature and value of ecosystem services: An overview highlighting hydrologic services. Annual Review of Environment and Resources 32:67-98.
    OpenUrlCrossRefWeb of Science
  4. ↵
    1. Byun, C.,
    2. S. de Blois,
    3. J. Brisson, and
    4. W. Cornwell
    . 2013. Plant functional group identity and diversity determine biotic resistance to invasion by an exotic grass. Journal of Ecology 101:128-139.
    OpenUrlCrossRefWeb of Science
  5. ↵
    1. Chavez, J.C.,
    2. J. Enciso,
    3. M.N. Meki,
    4. J. Jeong, and
    5. V.P. Singh
    . 2018. Simulation of energy sorghum under limited irrigation levels using the EPIC model. Transactions of the ASABE 61:121-131.
    OpenUrl
  6. ↵
    1. Esralew, R.A.,
    2. L. Flint,
    3. J.H. Thorne,
    4. R. Boynton, and
    5. A. Flint
    . 2016. A framework for effective use of hydroclimate models in climate-change adaptation planning for managed habitats with limited hydrologic response data. Environmental Management 58:60-75.
    OpenUrl
  7. ↵
    1. Euliss Jr., N.H.,
    2. L.M. Smith,
    3. S. Liu,
    4. M. Feng,
    5. D.M. Mushet,
    6. R.F. Auch, and
    7. T.R. Loveland
    . 2010. The need for simultaneous evaluation of ecosystem services and land use change. Environmental Science and Technology 44:7761-7763.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  8. ↵
    1. Gordon, L.J.,
    2. C.M. Finlayson, and
    3. M. Falkenmark
    . 2010. Managing water in agriculture for food production and other ecosystem services. Agricultural Water Management 97:512-519.
    OpenUrlCrossRefWeb of Science
  9. ↵
    1. Guo, T.,
    2. B.A. Engel,
    3. G. Shao,
    4. J.G. Arnold,
    5. R. Srinivasan, and
    6. J.R. Kiniry
    . 2015. Functional approach to simulating short-rotation woody crops in process-based models. BioEnergy Research 8:1598-1613.
    OpenUrl
  10. ↵
    1. Isaac, R.,
    2. W. Johnson, and
    3. Y. Kalra
    . 1998. Elemental determination by inductively coupled plasma atomic emission spectrometry, 165-170. In Handbook and Reference Methods for Plant Analysis. New York: CRC Press.
  11. ↵
    1. Johnson, M.V.V.,
    2. M.L. Norfleet,
    3. J.D. Atwood,
    4. K.D. Behrman,
    5. J.R. Kiniry,
    6. J.G. Arnold,
    7. M.J. White, and
    8. J. Williams
    . 2015. The Conservation Effects Assessment Project (CEAP): A national scale natural resources and conservation needs assessment and decision support tool. IOP Conference Series: Earth and Environmental Science 25:012012.
    OpenUrl
  12. ↵
    1. Kim, S.M.,
    2. J. Jeong,
    3. D. Keesee, and
    4. J.R. Kiniry
    . 2018b. Development, growth, and biomass simulations of two common wetland tree species in Texas. Environmental Monitoring and Assessment 190: 521.
    OpenUrl
  13. ↵
    1. Kim, S.,
    2. J. Jeong, and
    3. J.R. Kiniry
    . 2018a. Simulating the productivity of desert woody shrubs in southwestern Texas. In Arid Environments and Sustainability. DOI:10.5772/intechopen.73703.
    OpenUrlCrossRef
  14. ↵
    1. Kiniry, J.R.,
    2. J. Briggs,
    3. J. Englert,
    4. M. Weltz,
    5. K. Jensen,
    6. D. Tilley,
    7. M. Stannard,
    8. A. Young-Mathews,
    9. T. Blanke,
    10. M. Smither-Kopperl,
    11. S. Winslow, and
    12. D. Goodson
    . 2014. Plant parameters for plant functional groups of western rangelands to enable process-based simulation modeling. American Journal of Experimental Agriculture 4:746-766.
    OpenUrl
  15. ↵
    1. Kiniry, J.R.,
    2. B.L. Burson,
    3. G.W. Evers,
    4. J.R. Williams,
    5. H. Sanchez,
    6. C. Wade,
    7. J.W. Featherston, and
    8. J. Greenwade
    . 2007. Coastal bermudagrass, bahiagrass, and native range simulation at diverse sites in Texas. Agronomy Journal 99.
  16. ↵
    1. Kiniry, J.R.,
    2. M.V.V. Johnson,
    3. B.C. Venuto, and
    4. B.L. Burson
    . 2013. Novel application of ALMANAC: Modelling a functional group, exotic warm-season perennial grasses. American Journal of Experimental Agriculture 3:631-650.
    OpenUrl
  17. ↵
    1. Kiniry, J.R.,
    2. S. Kim,
    3. A.S. Williams,
    4. T.R. Lock, and
    5. R.L. Kallenbach
    . 2018. Simulating bimodal tall fescue growth with a degree-day-based process-oriented plant model. Grass and Forage Science https://doi.org/10.1111/gfs.12346.
  18. ↵
    1. Kiniry, J.R.,
    2. J.M. Muscha,
    3. M.K. Petersen,
    4. R.W. Kilian, and
    5. L.J. Metz
    . 2017. Short duration, perennial grasses in low rainfall site in Montana deriving growth parameters and simulating with a process-based model. Journal of Experimental Agriculture International 15:1-13.
    OpenUrl
  19. ↵
    1. Kiniry, J.R.,
    2. J.R. Williams,
    3. P.W. Gassman, and
    4. P. Debaeke
    . 1992. General process-oriented model for two competing plant species. Transactions of the ASAE 35:801-810.
    OpenUrlWeb of Science
  20. ↵
    1. Liu, Y.,
    2. W. Yang,
    3. H. Shao,
    4. Z. Yu, and
    5. J. Lindsay
    . 2018. Development of an integrated modelling system for evaluating water quantity and quality effects of individual wetlands in an agricultural watershed. Water 10.
  21. ↵
    1. Matchett, E.L., and
    2. J.P. Fleskes
    . 2017. Projected impacts of climate, urbanization, water management, and wetland restoration on waterbird habitat in California’s Central Valley. PLoS One 12: e0169780.
    OpenUrl
  22. ↵
    1. Meki, M.N.,
    2. J.R. Kiniry,
    3. A.H. Youkhana,
    4. S.E. Crow,
    5. R.M. Ogoshi,
    6. M.H. Nakahata,
    7. R. Tirado-Corbalá,
    8. R.G. Anderson,
    9. J. Osorio, and
    10. J. Jeong
    . 2015. Two-year growth cycle sugarcane crop parameter attributes and their application in modeling. Agronomy Journal 107:1310.
    OpenUrl
  23. ↵
    1. Meki, M.N.,
    2. R.M. Ogoshi,
    3. J.R. Kiniry,
    4. S.E. Crow,
    5. A.H. Youkhana,
    6. M.H. Nakahata, and
    7. K. Littlejohn
    . 2017. Performance evaluation of biomass sorghum in Hawaii and Texas. Industrial Crops and Products 103:257-266.
    OpenUrl
  24. ↵
    1. Monsi, M., and
    2. T. Saeki
    . 1953. The light factor in plant communities and its significance for dry matter production. Japanese Journal of Botany 14:22-52.
    OpenUrl
  25. ↵
    1. Muler, A.L.,
    2. C.A. Canham,
    3. E.J.B. van Etten,
    4. W.D. Stock, and
    5. R.H. Froend
    . 2018. Using a functional ecology approach to assist plant selection for restoration of Mediterranean woodlands. Forest Ecology and Management 424:1-10.
    OpenUrl
  26. ↵
    1. NOAA (National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration)
    . 2018. Climate Data Online Search. Asheville, NC: US National Centers for Environmental Information. http://ncdc.noaa.gov/cdo-web/search.
  27. ↵
    1. Osorio, J.,
    2. J. Jeong,
    3. K. Bieger, and
    4. J. Arnold
    . 2014. Influence of potential evapotranspiration on the water balance of sugarcane fields in Maui, Hawaii. Journal of Water Resource and Protection 06:852-868.
    OpenUrl
  28. ↵
    1. Pattison-Williams, J.K.,
    2. J.W. Pomeroy,
    3. P. Badiou, and
    4. S. Gabor
    . 2018. Wetlands, flood control and ecosystem services in the Smith Creek Drainage Basin: A case study in Saskatchewan, Canada. Ecological Economics 147:36-47.
    OpenUrl
  29. ↵
    1. Pokorny, M.L.,
    2. R.L. Sheley,
    3. C.A. Zabinski,
    4. R.E. Engel,
    5. T.J. Svejcar, and
    6. J.J. Borkowski
    . 2005. Plant functional group diversity as a mechanism for invasion reisitance. Restoration Ecology 13:448-459.
    OpenUrl
  30. ↵
    1. Potter, S.R.,
    2. S. Andrews,
    3. J.D. Atwood,
    4. R.L. Kellogg,
    5. J. Lemunyon,
    6. L. Norfleet, and
    7. D. Oman
    . 2006. Model Simulation of Soil Loss, Nutrient Loss, and Change in Soil Organic Carbon Associated with Crop Production. USDA NRCS Report. Washington, DC: USDA Natural Resources Conservation Service.
  31. ↵
    1. Rezaeianzadeh, M.,
    2. L. Kalin, and
    3. M. Hantush
    . 2018. An integrated approach for modeling wetland water level: Application to a headwater wetland in coastal Alabama, USA. Water 10.
  32. ↵
    1. Scanlon, B.R.,
    2. R.C. Reedy,
    3. D.A. Stonestrom,
    4. D.E. Prudic, and
    5. K.F. Dennehy
    . 2005. Impact of land use and land cover change on groundwater recharge and quality in the southwestern US. Global Change Biology 11:1577-1593.
    OpenUrlCrossRefWeb of Science
  33. ↵
    1. Schilling, K.E., and
    2. J.R. Kiniry
    . 2007. Estimation of evapotranspiration by reed canarygrass using field observations and model simulations. Journal of Hydrology 337:356-363.
    OpenUrl
  34. ↵
    1. Sizo, A.,
    2. B. Noble, and
    3. S. Bell
    . 2015. Futures analysis of urban land use and wetland change in Saskatoon, Canada: An application in strategic environmental assessment. Sustainability 7:811-830.
    OpenUrl
  35. ↵
    1. Smith, L.M.,
    2. W.R. Effland,
    3. K.D. Behrman, and
    4. M.-V.V. Johnson
    . 2015. Assessing the effects of USDA conservation programs on ecosystem services provided by wetlands. National Wetlands Newsletter 37:10-14.
    OpenUrl
  36. ↵
    1. Smith, W.D.,
    2. G.L. Rollins, and
    3. R. Shinn
    . 1995. A Guide to Wetland Habitat Management in the Central Valley. Sacramento, CA: California Department of Fish and Game.
  37. ↵
    1. US Fish and Wildlife Service
    . 2009. Sacramento, Delevan, Colusa, and Sutter National Wildlife Refuges Final Comprehensive Conservation Plan and Environmental Assessment. Washington, DC: US Fish and Wildlife Service Pacific Southwest Region Refuge Planning Office and Sacramento National Wildlife Refuge Complex.
  38. ↵
    1. USDA NRCS (Natural Resources Conservation Service)
    . 2014. Water Quality Effects and Placement of Pasture BMPs in the Spring Creek Watershed (Centre County, PA). USDA NRCS Science Note. Washington, DC: USDA Natural Resources Conservation Service.
  39. ↵
    1. USDA NRCS
    . 2018a. Estimating the Effects of Wetland Conservation Practices in Croplands Approaches for Modeling in the CEAP-Cropland Assessment. USDA NRCS Science Note. Washington, DC: USDA Natural Resources Conservation Service.
  40. ↵
    1. USDA NRCS
    . 2018b. The PLANTS Database. National Plant Data Team, Greensboro, NC 27401-4901 USA. Washington, DC: USDA Natural Resources Conservation Service. http://plants.usda.gov.
  41. ↵
    1. USDA NRCS
    . 2018c. Soil Survey Staff, Web Soil Survey. Washington, DC: USDA Natural Resources Conservation Service. http://websoilsurvey.nrcs.usda.gov.
  42. ↵
    1. Visser, J., and
    2. S. Duke-Sylvester
    . 2017. LaVegMod v2: Modeling coastal vegetation dynamics in response to proposed coastal restoration and protection projects in Louisiana, USA. Sustainability 9.
  43. ↵
    1. Voldseth, R.A.,
    2. W.C. Johnson,
    3. T. Gilmanov,
    4. G.R. Guntenspergen, and
    5. B.V. Millett
    . 2007. Model estimation of land-use effects on water levels of northern prairie wetlands. Ecological Applications 17:527-540.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
  44. ↵
    1. Wang, X.,
    2. P. Gassman,
    3. J. Williams,
    4. S. Potter, and
    5. A. Kemanian
    . 2008. Modeling the impacts of soil management practices on runoff, sediment yield, maize productivity, and soil organic carbon using APEX. Soil and Tillage Research 101:78-88.
    OpenUrlCrossRef
  45. ↵
    1. Wang, E.,
    2. C. Xin,
    3. J.R. Williams, and
    4. C. Xu
    . 2006. Predicting soil erosion for alternative land uses. Journal of Environmental Quality 35:459-67.
    OpenUrlCrossRefGeoRefPubMedWeb of Science
  46. ↵
    1. Williams, A.S.,
    2. J.R. Kiniry,
    3. D. Mushet,
    4. L.M. Smith,
    5. S. McMurry,
    6. K. Attebury,
    7. M. Lang,
    8. G.W. McCarty,
    9. J.A. Shaffer,
    10. W.R. Effland, and
    11. M.-V.V. Johnson
    . 2017. Model parameters for representative wetland plant functional groups. Ecosphere 8.
  47. ↵
    1. Wolski, P., and
    2. M. Murray-Hudson
    . 2008. ‘Alternative futures’ of the Okavango Delta simulated by a suite of global climate and hydro-ecological models. Water SA 34:605-610.
    OpenUrl
PreviousNext
Back to top

In this issue

Journal of Soil and Water Conservation: 75 (6)
Journal of Soil and Water Conservation
Vol. 75, Issue 6
November/December 2020
  • Table of Contents
  • Table of Contents (PDF)
  • About the Cover
  • Index by author
  • Front Matter (PDF)
Print
Download PDF
Article Alerts
Sign In to Email Alerts with your Email Address
Email Article

Thank you for your interest in spreading the word on Journal of Soil and Water Conservation.

NOTE: We only request your email address so that the person you are recommending the page to knows that you wanted them to see it, and that it is not junk mail. We do not capture any email address.

Enter multiple addresses on separate lines or separate them with commas.
Improving the ability to include freshwater wetland plants in process-based models
(Your Name) has sent you a message from Journal of Soil and Water Conservation
(Your Name) thought you would like to see the Journal of Soil and Water Conservation web site.
CAPTCHA
This question is for testing whether or not you are a human visitor and to prevent automated spam submissions.
1 + 0 =
Solve this simple math problem and enter the result. E.g. for 1+3, enter 4.
Citation Tools
Improving the ability to include freshwater wetland plants in process-based models
A.S. Williams, D.M. Mushet, M. Lang, G.W. McCarty, J.A. Shaffer, S. Njambi Kahara, M.-V.V. Johnson, J.R. Kiniry
Journal of Soil and Water Conservation Nov 2020, 75 (6) 704-712; DOI: 10.2489/jswc.2020.00089

Citation Manager Formats

  • BibTeX
  • Bookends
  • EasyBib
  • EndNote (tagged)
  • EndNote 8 (xml)
  • Medlars
  • Mendeley
  • Papers
  • RefWorks Tagged
  • Ref Manager
  • RIS
  • Zotero
Request Permissions
Share
Improving the ability to include freshwater wetland plants in process-based models
A.S. Williams, D.M. Mushet, M. Lang, G.W. McCarty, J.A. Shaffer, S. Njambi Kahara, M.-V.V. Johnson, J.R. Kiniry
Journal of Soil and Water Conservation Nov 2020, 75 (6) 704-712; DOI: 10.2489/jswc.2020.00089
del.icio.us logo Digg logo Reddit logo Twitter logo CiteULike logo Facebook logo Google logo Mendeley logo
  • Tweet Widget
  • Facebook Like
  • Google Plus One

Jump to section

  • Article
    • Abstract
    • Materials and Methods
    • Results and Discussion
    • Summary and Conclusions
    • Disclaimer
    • Acknowledgements
    • References
  • Figures & Data
  • Info & Metrics
  • References
  • PDF

Related Articles

  • No related articles found.
  • Google Scholar

Cited By...

  • APEX simulation: Water quality of Sacramento Valley wetlands impacted by waterfowl droppings
  • Wetlands in agricultural landscapes-- Significant findings and recent advances from CEAP-Wetlands
  • Google Scholar

More in this TOC Section

  • Development of a novel framework for modeling field-scale conservation effects of depressional wetlands in agricultural landscapes
  • Wetlands in agricultural landscapes— Significant findings and recent advances from CEAP-Wetlands
Show more SPECIAL RESEARCH SECTION: RESEARCH INTRODUCTION

Similar Articles

Keywords

  • ALMANAC
  • functional groups
  • modeling
  • plants
  • wetlands

Content

  • Current Issue
  • Early Online
  • Archive
  • Subject Collections

Info For

  • Authors
  • Reviewers
  • Subscribers
  • Advertisers

Customer Service

  • Subscriptions
  • Permissions and Reprints
  • Terms of Use
  • Privacy

SWCS

  • Membership
  • Publications
  • Meetings and Events
  • Conservation Career Center

© 2021 Soil and Water Conservation Society