Improving the ability to include freshwater wetland plants in process-based models

References

1. ↵
   1. Atwood, J.D.,
   2. D. Moffitt,
   3. M.L. Norfleet,
   4. A.D. King, and
   5. J. Lemunyon

   . 2009. Transforming Survey Data to APEX Model Input Files. USDA NRCS Report. Washington, DC: USDA Natural Resources Conservation Service.
2. ↵
   1. Boer, M., and
   2. M. Stafford Smith

   . 2003. A plant functional approach to the prediction of changes in Australian rangeland vegetation under grazing and fire. Journal of Vegetation Science 14:333-344.

   OpenUrl
3. ↵
   1. Brauman, K.A.,
   2. G.C. Daily,
   3. T.K. e. Duarte, and
   4. H.A. Mooney

   . 2007. The nature and value of ecosystem services: An overview highlighting hydrologic services. Annual Review of Environment and Resources 32:67-98.

   OpenUrlCrossRefWeb of Science
4. ↵
   1. Byun, C.,
   2. S. de Blois,
   3. J. Brisson, and
   4. W. Cornwell

   . 2013. Plant functional group identity and diversity determine biotic resistance to invasion by an exotic grass. Journal of Ecology 101:128-139.

   OpenUrlCrossRefWeb of Science
5. ↵
   1. Chavez, J.C.,
   2. J. Enciso,
   3. M.N. Meki,
   4. J. Jeong, and
   5. V.P. Singh

   . 2018. Simulation of energy sorghum under limited irrigation levels using the EPIC model. Transactions of the ASABE 61:121-131.

   OpenUrl
6. ↵
   1. Esralew, R.A.,
   2. L. Flint,
   3. J.H. Thorne,
   4. R. Boynton, and
   5. A. Flint

   . 2016. A framework for effective use of hydroclimate models in climate-change adaptation planning for managed habitats with limited hydrologic response data. Environmental Management 58:60-75.

   OpenUrl
7. ↵
   1. Euliss Jr., N.H.,
   2. L.M. Smith,
   3. S. Liu,
   4. M. Feng,
   5. D.M. Mushet,
   6. R.F. Auch, and
   7. T.R. Loveland

   . 2010. The need for simultaneous evaluation of ecosystem services and land use change. Environmental Science and Technology 44:7761-7763.

   OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
8. ↵
   1. Gordon, L.J.,
   2. C.M. Finlayson, and
   3. M. Falkenmark

   . 2010. Managing water in agriculture for food production and other ecosystem services. Agricultural Water Management 97:512-519.

   OpenUrlCrossRefWeb of Science
9. ↵
   1. Guo, T.,
   2. B.A. Engel,
   3. G. Shao,
   4. J.G. Arnold,
   5. R. Srinivasan, and
   6. J.R. Kiniry

   . 2015. Functional approach to simulating short-rotation woody crops in process-based models. BioEnergy Research 8:1598-1613.

   OpenUrl
10. ↵
    1. Isaac, R.,
    2. W. Johnson, and
    3. Y. Kalra

    . 1998. Elemental determination by inductively coupled plasma atomic emission spectrometry, 165-170. In Handbook and Reference Methods for Plant Analysis. New York: CRC Press.
11. ↵
    1. Johnson, M.V.V.,
    2. M.L. Norfleet,
    3. J.D. Atwood,
    4. K.D. Behrman,
    5. J.R. Kiniry,
    6. J.G. Arnold,
    7. M.J. White, and
    8. J. Williams

    . 2015. The Conservation Effects Assessment Project (CEAP): A national scale natural resources and conservation needs assessment and decision support tool. IOP Conference Series: Earth and Environmental Science 25:012012.

    OpenUrl
12. ↵
    1. Kim, S.M.,
    2. J. Jeong,
    3. D. Keesee, and
    4. J.R. Kiniry

    . 2018b. Development, growth, and biomass simulations of two common wetland tree species in Texas. Environmental Monitoring and Assessment 190: 521.

    OpenUrl
13. ↵
    1. Kim, S.,
    2. J. Jeong, and
    3. J.R. Kiniry

    . 2018a. Simulating the productivity of desert woody shrubs in southwestern Texas. In Arid Environments and Sustainability. DOI:10.5772/intechopen.73703.

    OpenUrlCrossRef
14. ↵
    1. Kiniry, J.R.,
    2. J. Briggs,
    3. J. Englert,
    4. M. Weltz,
    5. K. Jensen,
    6. D. Tilley,
    7. M. Stannard,
    8. A. Young-Mathews,
    9. T. Blanke,
    10. M. Smither-Kopperl,
    11. S. Winslow, and
    12. D. Goodson

    . 2014. Plant parameters for plant functional groups of western rangelands to enable process-based simulation modeling. American Journal of Experimental Agriculture 4:746-766.

    OpenUrl
15. ↵
    1. Kiniry, J.R.,
    2. B.L. Burson,
    3. G.W. Evers,
    4. J.R. Williams,
    5. H. Sanchez,
    6. C. Wade,
    7. J.W. Featherston, and
    8. J. Greenwade

    . 2007. Coastal bermudagrass, bahiagrass, and native range simulation at diverse sites in Texas. Agronomy Journal 99.
16. ↵
    1. Kiniry, J.R.,
    2. M.V.V. Johnson,
    3. B.C. Venuto, and
    4. B.L. Burson

    . 2013. Novel application of ALMANAC: Modelling a functional group, exotic warm-season perennial grasses. American Journal of Experimental Agriculture 3:631-650.

    OpenUrl
17. ↵
    1. Kiniry, J.R.,
    2. S. Kim,
    3. A.S. Williams,
    4. T.R. Lock, and
    5. R.L. Kallenbach

    . 2018. Simulating bimodal tall fescue growth with a degree-day-based process-oriented plant model. Grass and Forage Science https://doi.org/10.1111/gfs.12346.
18. ↵
    1. Kiniry, J.R.,
    2. J.M. Muscha,
    3. M.K. Petersen,
    4. R.W. Kilian, and
    5. L.J. Metz

    . 2017. Short duration, perennial grasses in low rainfall site in Montana deriving growth parameters and simulating with a process-based model. Journal of Experimental Agriculture International 15:1-13.

    OpenUrl
19. ↵
    1. Kiniry, J.R.,
    2. J.R. Williams,
    3. P.W. Gassman, and
    4. P. Debaeke

    . 1992. General process-oriented model for two competing plant species. Transactions of the ASAE 35:801-810.

    OpenUrlWeb of Science
20. ↵
    1. Liu, Y.,
    2. W. Yang,
    3. H. Shao,
    4. Z. Yu, and
    5. J. Lindsay

    . 2018. Development of an integrated modelling system for evaluating water quantity and quality effects of individual wetlands in an agricultural watershed. Water 10.
21. ↵
    1. Matchett, E.L., and
    2. J.P. Fleskes

    . 2017. Projected impacts of climate, urbanization, water management, and wetland restoration on waterbird habitat in California’s Central Valley. PLoS One 12: e0169780.

    OpenUrl
22. ↵
    1. Meki, M.N.,
    2. J.R. Kiniry,
    3. A.H. Youkhana,
    4. S.E. Crow,
    5. R.M. Ogoshi,
    6. M.H. Nakahata,
    7. R. Tirado-Corbalá,
    8. R.G. Anderson,
    9. J. Osorio, and
    10. J. Jeong

    . 2015. Two-year growth cycle sugarcane crop parameter attributes and their application in modeling. Agronomy Journal 107:1310.

    OpenUrl
23. ↵
    1. Meki, M.N.,
    2. R.M. Ogoshi,
    3. J.R. Kiniry,
    4. S.E. Crow,
    5. A.H. Youkhana,
    6. M.H. Nakahata, and
    7. K. Littlejohn

    . 2017. Performance evaluation of biomass sorghum in Hawaii and Texas. Industrial Crops and Products 103:257-266.

    OpenUrl
24. ↵
    1. Monsi, M., and
    2. T. Saeki

    . 1953. The light factor in plant communities and its significance for dry matter production. Japanese Journal of Botany 14:22-52.

    OpenUrl
25. ↵
    1. Muler, A.L.,
    2. C.A. Canham,
    3. E.J.B. van Etten,
    4. W.D. Stock, and
    5. R.H. Froend

    . 2018. Using a functional ecology approach to assist plant selection for restoration of Mediterranean woodlands. Forest Ecology and Management 424:1-10.

    OpenUrl
26. ↵
    1. NOAA (National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration)

    . 2018. Climate Data Online Search. Asheville, NC: US National Centers for Environmental Information. http://ncdc.noaa.gov/cdo-web/search.
27. ↵
    1. Osorio, J.,
    2. J. Jeong,
    3. K. Bieger, and
    4. J. Arnold

    . 2014. Influence of potential evapotranspiration on the water balance of sugarcane fields in Maui, Hawaii. Journal of Water Resource and Protection 06:852-868.

    OpenUrl
28. ↵
    1. Pattison-Williams, J.K.,
    2. J.W. Pomeroy,
    3. P. Badiou, and
    4. S. Gabor

    . 2018. Wetlands, flood control and ecosystem services in the Smith Creek Drainage Basin: A case study in Saskatchewan, Canada. Ecological Economics 147:36-47.

    OpenUrl
29. ↵
    1. Pokorny, M.L.,
    2. R.L. Sheley,
    3. C.A. Zabinski,
    4. R.E. Engel,
    5. T.J. Svejcar, and
    6. J.J. Borkowski

    . 2005. Plant functional group diversity as a mechanism for invasion reisitance. Restoration Ecology 13:448-459.

    OpenUrl
30. ↵
    1. Potter, S.R.,
    2. S. Andrews,
    3. J.D. Atwood,
    4. R.L. Kellogg,
    5. J. Lemunyon,
    6. L. Norfleet, and
    7. D. Oman

    . 2006. Model Simulation of Soil Loss, Nutrient Loss, and Change in Soil Organic Carbon Associated with Crop Production. USDA NRCS Report. Washington, DC: USDA Natural Resources Conservation Service.
31. ↵
    1. Rezaeianzadeh, M.,
    2. L. Kalin, and
    3. M. Hantush

    . 2018. An integrated approach for modeling wetland water level: Application to a headwater wetland in coastal Alabama, USA. Water 10.
32. ↵
    1. Scanlon, B.R.,
    2. R.C. Reedy,
    3. D.A. Stonestrom,
    4. D.E. Prudic, and
    5. K.F. Dennehy

    . 2005. Impact of land use and land cover change on groundwater recharge and quality in the southwestern US. Global Change Biology 11:1577-1593.

    OpenUrlCrossRefWeb of Science
33. ↵
    1. Schilling, K.E., and
    2. J.R. Kiniry

    . 2007. Estimation of evapotranspiration by reed canarygrass using field observations and model simulations. Journal of Hydrology 337:356-363.

    OpenUrl
34. ↵
    1. Sizo, A.,
    2. B. Noble, and
    3. S. Bell

    . 2015. Futures analysis of urban land use and wetland change in Saskatoon, Canada: An application in strategic environmental assessment. Sustainability 7:811-830.

    OpenUrl
35. ↵
    1. Smith, L.M.,
    2. W.R. Effland,
    3. K.D. Behrman, and
    4. M.-V.V. Johnson

    . 2015. Assessing the effects of USDA conservation programs on ecosystem services provided by wetlands. National Wetlands Newsletter 37:10-14.

    OpenUrl
36. ↵
    1. Smith, W.D.,
    2. G.L. Rollins, and
    3. R. Shinn

    . 1995. A Guide to Wetland Habitat Management in the Central Valley. Sacramento, CA: California Department of Fish and Game.
37. ↵
    1. US Fish and Wildlife Service

    . 2009. Sacramento, Delevan, Colusa, and Sutter National Wildlife Refuges Final Comprehensive Conservation Plan and Environmental Assessment. Washington, DC: US Fish and Wildlife Service Pacific Southwest Region Refuge Planning Office and Sacramento National Wildlife Refuge Complex.
38. ↵
    1. USDA NRCS (Natural Resources Conservation Service)

    . 2014. Water Quality Effects and Placement of Pasture BMPs in the Spring Creek Watershed (Centre County, PA). USDA NRCS Science Note. Washington, DC: USDA Natural Resources Conservation Service.
39. ↵
    1. USDA NRCS

    . 2018a. Estimating the Effects of Wetland Conservation Practices in Croplands Approaches for Modeling in the CEAP-Cropland Assessment. USDA NRCS Science Note. Washington, DC: USDA Natural Resources Conservation Service.
40. ↵
    1. USDA NRCS

    . 2018b. The PLANTS Database. National Plant Data Team, Greensboro, NC 27401-4901 USA. Washington, DC: USDA Natural Resources Conservation Service. http://plants.usda.gov.
41. ↵
    1. USDA NRCS

    . 2018c. Soil Survey Staff, Web Soil Survey. Washington, DC: USDA Natural Resources Conservation Service. http://websoilsurvey.nrcs.usda.gov.
42. ↵
    1. Visser, J., and
    2. S. Duke-Sylvester

    . 2017. LaVegMod v2: Modeling coastal vegetation dynamics in response to proposed coastal restoration and protection projects in Louisiana, USA. Sustainability 9.
43. ↵
    1. Voldseth, R.A.,
    2. W.C. Johnson,
    3. T. Gilmanov,
    4. G.R. Guntenspergen, and
    5. B.V. Millett

    . 2007. Model estimation of land-use effects on water levels of northern prairie wetlands. Ecological Applications 17:527-540.

    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
44. ↵
    1. Wang, X.,
    2. P. Gassman,
    3. J. Williams,
    4. S. Potter, and
    5. A. Kemanian

    . 2008. Modeling the impacts of soil management practices on runoff, sediment yield, maize productivity, and soil organic carbon using APEX. Soil and Tillage Research 101:78-88.

    OpenUrlCrossRef
45. ↵
    1. Wang, E.,
    2. C. Xin,
    3. J.R. Williams, and
    4. C. Xu

    . 2006. Predicting soil erosion for alternative land uses. Journal of Environmental Quality 35:459-67.

    OpenUrlCrossRefGeoRefPubMedWeb of Science
46. ↵
    1. Williams, A.S.,
    2. J.R. Kiniry,
    3. D. Mushet,
    4. L.M. Smith,
    5. S. McMurry,
    6. K. Attebury,
    7. M. Lang,
    8. G.W. McCarty,
    9. J.A. Shaffer,
    10. W.R. Effland, and
    11. M.-V.V. Johnson

    . 2017. Model parameters for representative wetland plant functional groups. Ecosphere 8.
47. ↵
    1. Wolski, P., and
    2. M. Murray-Hudson

    . 2008. ‘Alternative futures’ of the Okavango Delta simulated by a suite of global climate and hydro-ecological models. Water SA 34:605-610.

    OpenUrl