Why do farmers care about rented land? Investigating the context of farmland tenure

References

1. ↵
   1. AWI (Bundesanstalt für Agrarwirtschaft - Federal Institute of Agricultural Economics) and BMLFUW (Austrian Federal Ministry of Agriculture, Forestry, Environment and Water Management)

   . 2018. Betriebe in der Stichprobe. Grüner Bericht 2018: Tabellenteil. https://agraroekonomik.at/index.php?id=gruenerbericht.
2. ↵
   1. Baumgart-Getz, A.,
   2. L.S. Prokopy, and
   3. K. Floress

   . 2012. Why farmers adopt best management practices in the United States: A meta-analysis of the adoption literature. Journal of Environmental Management 96(1):17–25.

   OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
3. ↵
   1. Bigelow, D.,
   2. A. Borchers, and
   3. T. Hubbs

   . 2016. United States Department of Agriculture: U.S. Farmland Ownership, Tenure, and Transfer. Washington, DC: USDA Economic Research Service. https://www.ers.usda.gov/publications/pub-details/?pubid=74675.
4. ↵
   1. BMLFUW

   . 2002. Grüner Bericht 2001: Bericht über die Lage der Österreichischen Landwirtschaft 2001. Vienna: Austrian Federal Ministry of Agriculture, Forestry, Environment and Water Management.
5. ↵
   1. BMLFUW

   . 2013. Grüner Bericht 2013. Bericht über die Situation der Österreichischen Land- und Forstwirtschaft. Vienna: Austrian Federal Ministry of Agriculture, Forestry, Environment and Water Management.
6. ↵
   1. BMLFUW

   . 2015. Agri-Environmental Programme ÖPUL 2015: Agriculture, Environment and Nature. Vienna: Austrian Federal Ministry of Agriculture, Forestry, Environment and Water Management.
7. ↵
   1. BMLFUW

   . 2017. Grüner Bericht 2017: Bericht über die Situation der Österreichischen Land- und Forstwirtschaft im Jahr 2016.” Vienna: Austrian Federal Ministry of Agriculture, Forestry, Environment and Water Management.
8. ↵
   1. BMLFUW

   . 2018. Einkommensermittlung für den Grünen Bericht: Methodenbeschreibung. Vienna: Austrian Federal Ministry of Agriculture, Forestry, Environment and Water Management.
9. ↵
   1. BMLFUW

   . 2019. Grüner Bericht 2019: die Situation der Österreichischen Land- und Forstwirtschaft. Vienna: Austrian Federal Ministry of Agriculture, Forestry, Environment and Water Management.
10. ↵
    1. Bryan, J.,
    2. B.J. Deaton, and
    3. A. Weersink

    . 2015. Do landlord-tenant relationships influence rental contracts for farmland or the cash rental rate? Land Economics 91(4):650–63.

    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
11. ↵
    1. Carlisle, L.

    2016. Factors influencing farmer adoption of soil health practices in the United States: A narrative review. Agroecology and Sustainable Food Systems 40(6):583–613.

    OpenUrl
12. ↵
    1. Carolan, M.S.

    2005. Barriers to the adoption of sustainable agriculture on rented land: An examination of contesting social fields. Rural Sociology 70(3):387–413.

    OpenUrlCrossRefWeb of Science
13. ↵
    1. Carolan, M.S.,
    2. D. Mayerfeld,
    3. M.M. Bell, and
    4. R. Exner

    . 2004. Rented land: Barriers to sustainable agriculture. Journal of Soil and Water Conservation 59(4):70A-75A.

    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
14. ↵
    1. Ciaian, P.,
    2. A. Kancs,
    3. J. Swinnen, and
    4. K. Van Herck

    . 2012a. Institutional Factors Affecting Agricultural Land Markets. Factor Markets Working Paper No. 16. Brussels: Centre for European Policy Studies.
15. ↵
    1. Ciaian, P.,
    2. A. Kancs,
    3. J. Swinnen, and
    4. K. Van Herck

    . 2012b. Key Issues and Developments in Farmland Rental Markets in EU Member States and Candidate Countries. Factor Markets Working Paper No. 13. Brussels: Centre for European Policy Studies.
16. ↵
    1. Ciaian, P.,
    2. A. Kancs,
    3. J. Swinnen, and
    4. K. Van Herck

    . 2012c. Key Issues and Developments in Farmland Sales Markets in the EU Member States and Candidate Countries. Factor Markets Working Paper No. 12. Brussels: Centre for European Policy Studies.
17. ↵
    1. Ciaian, P.,
    2. A. Kancs,
    3. J. Swinnen, and
    4. K. Van Herck

    . 2012d. Rental Market Regulations for Agricultural Land in EU Member States and Candidate Countries. Factor Markets Working Paper No. 15. Brussels: Centre for European Policy Studies.
18. ↵
    1. Ciaian, P.,
    2. A. Kancs,
    3. J. Swinnen, and
    4. K. Van Herck

    . 2012e. Sales Market Regulations for Agricultural Land in EU Member States and Candidate Countries. Factor Markets Working Paper No. 14. Brussels: Centre for European Policy Studies.
19. ↵
    1. Cole, J.D., and
    2. B. Johnson

    . 2002. Soil conservation practices on leased land: A two-state study. Journal of Soil and Water Conservation 57(2):100–105.

    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
20. ↵
    1. Deaton, B.J.,
    2. C. Lawley, and
    3. K. Nadella

    . 2018. Renters, landlords, and farmland stewardship. Agricultural Economics 49(4):521–31.

    OpenUrl
21. ↵
    1. Derr, D.A.

    1987. Integrating soil conservation practices into farmland leasing arrangements. Journal of Soil and Water Conservation 42(5):356–58.

    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
22. ↵
    1. Dillman, D.A., and
    2. J.E. Carlson

    . 1982. Influence of absentee landlords on soil erosion control practices. Journal of Soil and Water Conservation 37(1):37–41.

    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
23. ↵
    1. Dillman, D.A.,
    2. G. Phelps,
    3. R. Tortora,
    4. K. Swift,
    5. J. Kohrell,
    6. J. Berck, and
    7. B.L. Messer

    . 2009. Response rate and measurement differences in mixed-mode surveys using mail, telephone, interactive voice response (IVR) and the internet. Social Science Research 38(1):1–18.

    OpenUrlCrossRef
24. ↵
    1. Dowle, M., and
    2. A. Srinivasan

    . 2019. Data.Table: Extension of ‘data.Frame’. https://cran.r-project.org/package=data.table.
25. ↵
    1. Eisenhardt, K.M.

    1989. Agency theory: An assessment and review. Academy of Management Review 14(1):57–74.

    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
26. ↵
    1. Ervin, D.E.

    1982. Soil erosion control on owner-operated and rented cropland. Journal of Soil and Water Conservation 37(5):285–88.

    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
27. ↵
    1. European Commission

    . 2020. FADN Public Database. Agriculture and Rural Development: Farm Accountancy Data Network. Brussels: European Commission. https://ec.europa.eu/agriculture/rica/database/database_en.cfm.
28. ↵
    1. Eurostat. 2018

    . Eurostat Database–Agriculture. Brussels: European Commission. http://ec.europa.eu/eurostat/data/database.
29. ↵
    1. FAO (Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations), and ITPS (Intergovernmental Technical Panel on Soils)

    . 2015. The Status of the World’s Soil Resources–Main Report. Rome: Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations.
30. ↵
    1. Faul, F.,
    2. E. Erdfelder,
    3. A. Lang, and
    4. A. Buchner

    . 2007. G*Power 3: A flexible statistical power analysis program for the social, behavioral, and biomedical sciences. Behavior Research Methods 39(2):175–91.

    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
31. ↵
    1. Fenske, J.

    2011. Land tenure and investment incentives: Evidence from West Africa. Journal of Development Economics 95(2):137–56.

    OpenUrlCrossRef
32. ↵
    1. Fraser, E.D.G.

    2004. Land tenure and agricultural management: Soil conservation on rented and owned fields in southwest British Columbia. Agriculture and Human Values 21(1):73–79.

    OpenUrl
33. ↵
    1. Grammatikopoulou, I.,
    2. S. Myyrä, and
    3. E. Pouta

    . 2013. The proximity of a field plot and land-use choice: Implications for land consolidation. Journal of Land Use Science 8(4):383–402.

    OpenUrl
34. ↵
    1. Grimm, P.

    2010. Social Desirability Bias. In Wiley International Encyclopedia of Marketing. Chichester, UK: John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.
35. ↵
    1. Higgins, D.,
    2. T. Balint,
    3. H. Liversage, and
    4. P. Winters

    . 2018. Investigating the impacts of increased rural land tenure security: A systematic review of the evidence. Journal of Rural Studies 61(July):34–62.

    OpenUrl
36. ↵
    1. Hofer, O., and
    2. P. Gmeiner

    . 2012. Vergleich der Agrarstrukturerhebung 2010 mit den INVEKOS-Daten 2010. Vienna: Lebensministerium und Bundesanstalt für Bergbauernfragen. https://gruenerbericht.at/cm4/jdownload/send/20-spezielle-studien/513-vergleich-agrarstrukturerhebung-invekos-2010.
37. ↵
    1. Holzer, G.,
    2. M. Jilch, and
    3. H. Wilfinger

    . 2013. Pachten und Verpachten in Österreich. 4. Ed. Vienna: NWV Neuer Wissenschaftlicher Verlag.
38. ↵
    1. van Huylenbroeck,
    2. G.,
    3. V. Vandermeulen,
    4. E. Mettepenningen, and
    5. A. Verspecht

    . 2007. Multifunctionality of agriculture: A review of definitions, evidence and instruments. Living Reviews in Landscape Research 1.
39. ↵
    1. C. Bailey,
    2. L. Jensen, and
    3. E. Ransom

    1. Jackson-Smith, D., and
    2. P. Petrzelka

    . 2014. Land Ownership in American Agriculture. In Rural America in a Globalizing World, ed. C. Bailey, L. Jensen, and E. Ransom, 51–68. Morgantown, WV: West Virginia University Press.
40. ↵
    1. Kahneman, D.

    2011. Thinking Fast and Slow. New York: Farrar Straus & Giroux.
41. ↵
    1. Knowler, D., and
    2. B. Bradshaw

    . 2007. Farmers’ adoption of conservation agriculture: A review and synthesis of recent research. Food Policy 32(1):25–48.

    OpenUrlCrossRefWeb of Science
42. ↵
    1. Lastra-Bravo, X.B.,
    2. C. Hubbard,
    3. G. Garrod, and
    4. A. Tolón-Becerra

    . 2015. What drives farmers’ participation in EU agri-environmental schemes?: Results from a qualitative meta-analysis. Environmental Science & Policy 54:1–9.

    OpenUrl
43. ↵
    1. Lawry, S.,
    2. C. Samii,
    3. R. Hall,
    4. A. Leopold,
    5. D. Hornby, and
    6. F. Mtero

    . 2014. The impact of land property rights interventions on investment and agricultural productivity in developing countries: A systematic review. Campbell Systematic Reviews 10(1):1–104.

    OpenUrl
44. ↵
    1. Lee, L.K.

    1980. Landownership conservation. American Journal of Agricultural Economics 62(5):1070–76.

    OpenUrlCrossRef
45. ↵
    1. Lee, L.K, and
    2. W.H. Stewart

    . 1983. Landownership and the adoption of minimum tillage. American Journal of Agricultural Economics 65(2):256–64.

    OpenUrlCrossRef
46. ↵
    1. Leonhardt, H.,
    2. M. Penker, and
    3. K. Salhofer

    . 2019. Do farmers care about rented land? A multi-method study on land tenure and soil conservation. Land Use Policy 82(March):228–39.

    OpenUrl
47. ↵
    1. Lichtenberg, E.

    2007. Tenants, landlords, and soil conservation. American Journal of Agricultural Economics 89(2):294–307.

    OpenUrlCrossRefWeb of Science
48. ↵
    1. Mayring, P.

    2015. Qualitative Inhaltsanalyse, 12th edition. Weinheim und Basel: Beltz Verlag.
49. ↵
    1. McNemar, Q.

    1947. Note on the sampling error of the difference between correlated proportions or percentages. Psychometrika 12(2):153–57.

    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
50. ↵
    1. Montanarella, L., and
    2. R. Vargas

    . 2012. Global governance of soil resources as a necessary condition for sustainable development. Current Opinion in Environmental Sustainability 4(5):559–64.

    OpenUrl
51. ↵
    1. Myyrä, S.,
    2. E. Ketoja,
    3. M. Yli-Halla, and
    4. K. Pietola

    . 2005. Land improvements under land tenure insecurity: The case of pH and phosphate in Finland. Land Economics 81(4):557–69.

    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
52. ↵
    1. Nickerson, R.S.

    1998. Confirmation bias: A ubiquitous phenomenon in many guises. Review of General Psychology 2(2):175–220.

    OpenUrlCrossRef
53. ↵
    1. Oliva, J.,
    2. A. Bernhardt,
    3. H. Reisinger,
    4. M. Domenig, and
    5. H. Krammer

    . 2009. Klärschlamm: Materialien Zur Abfallwirtschaft. Klagenfurt: Umweltbundesamt.
54. ↵
    1. Oskam, A.J., and
    2. S. Feng

    . 2008. Sustainable land use under different institutional settings. NJAS–Wageningen Journal of Life Sciences 55(4):295–306.

    OpenUrl
55. ↵
    1. Perry, G.M., and
    2. L.J. Robinson

    . 2001. Evaluating the influence of personal relationships on land sale prices: A case study in Oregon. Land Economics 77(3):385–98.

    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
56. ↵
    1. Petrzelka, P., and
    2. A. Armstrong

    . 2015. Absentee landowners of agricultural land: Influences upon land management decision making and information usage. Journal of Soil and Water Conservation 70(5):303–12, https://doi.org/10.2489/jswc.70.5.303.

    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
57. 1. Petrzelka, P.,
    2. Z. Ma, and
    3. S. Malin

    . 2013. The elephant in the room: Absentee landowner issues in conservation and land management. Land Use Policy 30(1):157–66.

    OpenUrlCrossRef
58. ↵
    1. Place, F.

    2009. Land tenure and agricultural productivity in Africa: A comparative analysis of the economics literature and recent policy strategies and reforms. World Development 37(8):1326–36.

    OpenUrlCrossRef
59. ↵
    1. Prokopy, L.S.,
    2. K. Floress,
    3. J.G. Arbuckle,
    4. S.P. Church,
    5. F.R. Eanes,
    6. Y. Gao,
    7. B.M. Gramig,
    8. P. Ranjan, and
    9. A.S. Singh

    . 2019. Adoption of agricultural conservation practices in the United States: Evidence from 35 years of quantitative literature. Journal of Soil and Water Conservation 74(5):520–34, https://doi.org/10.2489/jswc.74.5.520.

    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
60. ↵
    1. Prokopy, L.S.,
    2. K. Floress,
    3. D. Klotthor-Weinkauf, and
    4. A. Baumgart-Getz

    . 2008. Determinants of agricultural best management practice adoption: Evidence from the literature. Journal of Soil and Water Conservation 63(5):300–311, https://doi.org/10.2489/jswc.63.5.300.

    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
61. ↵
    1. R Core Team

    . 2018. R: A Language and Environment for Statistical Computing. Vienna, Austria: R Foundation for Statistical Computing. https://www.r-project.org/.
62. ↵
    1. Ranjan, P.,
    2. S.P. Church,
    3. K. Floress, and
    4. L.S. Prokopy

    . 2019a. Synthesizing conservation motivations and barriers: What have we learned from qualitative studies of farmers’ behaviors in the United States? Society and Natural Resources 32(11):1171–99.

    OpenUrl
63. ↵
    1. Ranjan, P.,
    2. C.B. Wardropper,
    3. F.R. Eanes,
    4. S.M.W. Reddy,
    5. S.C. Harden,
    6. Y.J. Masuda, and
    7. L.S. Prokopy

    . 2019b. Understanding barriers and opportunities for adoption of conservation practices on rented farmland in the US. Land Use Policy 80(January):214–23.

    OpenUrl
64. ↵
    1. Schickele, R., and
    2. J.P. Himmel

    . 1938. Socio-economic phases of soil conservation in the Tarkio Creek area. Iowa Agricultural Experiment Station Bulletin 241. Ames, IA: Iowa State University.
65. ↵
    1. Sklenicka, P.,
    2. K. Janeckova Molnarova,
    3. M. Salek,
    4. P. Simova,
    5. J. Vlasak,
    6. P. Sekac, and
    7. V. Janovska

    . 2015. Owner or tenant: Who adopts better soil conservation practices? Land Use Policy 47:253–61.

    OpenUrl
66. ↵
    1. Sklenicka, P.,
    2. V. Janovska,
    3. M. Salek,
    4. J. Vlasak, and
    5. K. Molnarova

    . 2014. The farmland rental paradox: Extreme land ownership fragmentation as a new form of land degradation. Land Use Policy 38. Elsevier Ltd:587–93.
67. ↵
    1. Soule, M.J.,
    2. A. Tegene, and
    3. K.D. Wiebe

    . 2000. Land tenure and the adoption of conservation practices. American Journal of Agricultural Economics 82(4):993–1005.

    OpenUrlCrossRefWeb of Science
68. ↵
    1. Statistik Austria

    . 2010. Land- und Forstwirtschaftliche Besitzverhältnisse 1995/1999/2010. Agrarstrukturerhebung.
69. ↵
    1. Stern, M.J.,
    2. I. Bilgen, and
    3. D.A. Dillman

    . 2014. The state of survey methodology. Field Methods 26(3):284–301.

    OpenUrlCrossRef
70. ↵
    1. Taylor, M.R., and
    2. A.M. Featherstone

    . 2018. The value of social capital in farmland leasing relationships. Agricultural Finance Review 78(4):489–96.

    OpenUrl
71. ↵
    1. Tukey, J.W.

    1949. Comparing individual means in the analysis of variance. Biometrics 5(2):99.

    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
72. ↵
    1. Ulrich-Schad, J.D.,
    2. N. Babin,
    3. Z. Ma, and
    4. L.S. Prokopy

    . 2016. Out-of-state, out of mind? Non-operating farmland owners and conservation decision making. Land Use Policy 54(July):602–13.

    OpenUrl
73. ↵
    1. Varble, S.,
    2. S. Secchi, and
    3. C. Gottschalk Druschke

    . 2016. An examination of growing trends in land tenure and conservation practice adoption: Results from a farmer survey in Iowa. Environmental Management 57(2):318–30.

    OpenUrl
74. ↵
    1. van Vuuren,
    2. W., and
    3. P. Ysselstein

    . 1986. Relationship between land tenure and soil productivity. Canadian Journal of Soil Science 66:357–66.

    OpenUrl
75. ↵
    1. Walmsley, A., and
    2. P. Sklenička

    . 2017. Various effects of land tenure on soil biochemical parameters under organic and conventional farming—implications for soil quality restoration. Ecological Engineering 107(October):137–43.

    OpenUrl
76. ↵
    1. Wauters, E., and
    2. E. Mathijs

    . 2014. The adoption of farm level soil conservation practices in developed countries: A meta-analytic review. International Journal of Agricultural Resources, Governance and Ecology 10(1):78–102.

    OpenUrl
77. ↵
    1. Wickham, H.

    2016. Ggplot2: Elegant Graphics for Data Analysis. New York: Springer-Verlag.
78. ↵
    1. Zimmermann, A., and
    2. W. Britz

    . 2016. European farms’ participation in agri-environmental measures. Land Use Policy 50(January):214–28.

    OpenUrl