A spatial analysis of high and low farmer participation in the USDA Natural Resources Conservation Service Conservation Technical Assistance program in West Virginia

References

1. ↵
   1. Asrat, P.,
   2. K. Belay, and
   3. D. Hamito

   . 2004. Determinants of farmers’ willingness to pay for soil conservation practices in the southeastern highlands of Ethiopia. Land Degradation & Development 15:423-438.

   OpenUrl
2. ↵
   1. Baumgart-Getz, A.,
   2. L.S. Prokopy, and
   3. K. Floress

   . 2012. Why farmers adopt best management practice in the United States: A meta-analysis of the adoption literature. Journal of Environmental Management 96:17-25.

   OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
3. ↵
   1. Burton, R.J.F.

   2012. Understanding farmers’ aesthetic preference for tidy agricultural landscapes: A Bourdieusian perspective. Landscape Research 37:51-71.

   OpenUrlCrossRefWeb of Science
4. ↵
   1. Burton, J.F.,
   2. C. Kuczera, and
   3. G. Schwarz

   . 2008. Exploring farmers’ cultural resistance to voluntary agri-environmental schemes. European Society for Rural Sociology 48:16-37.

   OpenUrl
5. ↵
   1. Charlton, M., and
   2. A.S. Fotheringham

   . 2009. Geographic weighted regression: A white paper. Science Foundation Ireland 1-14.
6. ↵
   1. Colombo, S.,
   2. J. Calatrava-Requena, and
   3. N. Hanley

   . 2003. The economic benefits of soil erosion control: An application of the contingent valuation method in the Alto Genil basin of southern Spain. Journal of Soil and Water Conservation 58(6):367-371.

   OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
7. ↵
   1. Cox, C.

   2007. US Agriculture Conservation Policy & Programs: History, Trends, and Implications. In US Agriculture Policy and the 2007 Farm Bill. Stanford, CA: Stanford University.
8. ↵
   1. Dark, S.J., and
   2. D. Bram

   . 2007. The modifiable areal unit problem (MUAP) in physical geography. Progress in Physical Geography 31(5):471-479.

   OpenUrlCrossRefGeoRef
9. ↵
   1. Djoukeng, H.G.,
   2. C.M. Tankou, and
   3. A. Degre

   . 2015. Siltation and pollution of rivers in the western highlands of Cameroon: A consequence of farmland erosion and runoff. International Journal of Agricultural Research and Review 3:206-212.

   OpenUrl
10. ↵
    1. Enshayan, K.,
    2. D. Stinner, and
    3. B. Stinner

    . 1992. Farmer to farmer. Journal of Soil and Water Conservation 47(2):127-130.

    OpenUrlFREE Full Text
11. ↵
    1. ESRI (Environmental Systems Research Institute)

    . 2009. Regression analysis basics. Redlands, CA: Environmental Systems Research Institute, Inc. http://webhelp.esri.com/arcgisdesktop/9.3/index.cfm?TopicName=Regression_analysis_basics.
12. ↵
    1. ESRI

    . 2016a. ArcGIS Desktop Help: Release 10.3. Redlands, CA: Environmental Systems Research Institute, Inc.
13. ↵
    1. ESRI

    . 2016b. Interpolation. Redlands, CA: Environmental Systems Research Institute, Inc. https://support.esri.com/en/other-resources/gis-dictionary/term/interpolation.
14. ↵
    1. Fotheringham, A.S.,
    2. C. Brundson, and
    3. M.E. Charlton

    . 2002. Geographically Weighted Regression: The Analysis of Spatially Varying Relationships. Chichester, UK: Wiley.
15. ↵
    1. Fotheringham, A.S., and
    2. D.W.S. Wong

    . 1991. The modifiable areal unit problem in multivariate statistical analysis. Environment and Planning A 23:1025-1044.

    OpenUrlCrossRef
16. ↵
    1. Frame, N.T.

    1940. West Virginia Agriculture and Rural Life. Inwood, WV: USDA Bureau of Agricultural Economics.
17. ↵
    1. Gebremariam, G.G., and
    2. A.K. Edriss

    . 2012. Value of soil conservation practices in Adwa Woreda, Ethiopia: A contingent valuation study. Journal of Economics and Sustainable Development 3(13):97-107.

    OpenUrl
18. ↵
    1. Getis, A.

    2007. Reflections on spatial autocorrelation. Regional Science and Urban Economics 37:491-496.

    OpenUrlCrossRef
19. ↵
    1. Greiner, R., and
    2. D. Gregg

    . 2011. Farmers’ intrinsic motivations, barriers to the adoption of conservation practices and effectiveness of policy instruments: Empirical evidence from northern Australia. Land Use Policy 28:257-265.

    OpenUrlCrossRef
20. ↵
    1. Holt-Giménez, E.

    2006. Campesino a Campesino: Voices from Latin America’s Farmer to Farmer Movement for Sustainable Agriculture. Oakland, CA: Food First Books.
21. ↵
    1. Horrigan, L.,
    2. R.S. Lawrence, and
    3. P. Walker

    . 2002. How sustainable agriculture can address the environmental and human health harms of industrial agriculture. Environmental Health Perspectives 110:445-456.

    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
22. ↵
    1. Jacobs, C.

    2007. Measuring Success in Communities: Understanding the Community Capitals Framework. South Dakota State University Extension Extra 1-2. Brookings, SD: South Dakota State University Extension.
23. ↵
    1. Jelinski, D.E., and
    2. J. Wu

    . 1996. The modfiable areal unit problem and implications for landscape ecology. Landscape Ecology 11:129-140.

    OpenUrlCrossRefWeb of Science
24. ↵
    1. Knowler, D., and
    2. B. Bradshaw

    . 2007. Farmers’ adoption of conservation agriculture: A review and synthesis of recent research. ScienceDirect 32:25-48.

    OpenUrl
25. ↵
    1. Kretzmann, J.P., and
    2. J.L. McKnight

    . 1993. Building Communities from the Inside Out: A Path Toward Finding and Mobilizing a Community’s Assets. Skokie, IL: ACTA Publications.
26. ↵
    1. Krueger, W.C.,
    2. M.A. Sanderson,
    3. J.B. Cropper,
    4. M. Miller-Goodman,
    5. C.E. Kelley,
    6. R.D. Pieper,
    7. P.L. Shaver,
    8. M.J. Trlica,
    9. V.G. Allen,
    10. D. Fisher,
    11. M. Havstad, and
    12. P.L. Sims

    . 2002. Environmental Impacts of Livestock on U.S. Grazing Lands. Council for Agricultural Science and Technology 22:1-16.

    OpenUrl
27. ↵
    1. Lambert, D.,
    2. P. Sullivan,
    3. R. Claassen, and
    4. L. Foreman

    . 2006. Conservation-Compatible Practices and Programs: Who Participates? USDA Economic Research Service 14:1-43.

    OpenUrl
28. ↵
    1. LeSage, J.P.

    1999. The Theory and Practice of Spatial Econometrics. Department of Economics: University of Toledo. Toledo, OH: University of Toledo.
29. ↵
    1. Loomis, R.S.

    1984. Traditional Agriculture in America. Annual Review of Ecology and Systematics 15:449-478.

    OpenUrl
30. ↵
    1. Lubell, M.N.,
    2. B.B. Cutts,
    3. L.M. Roche,
    4. M. Hamilton,
    5. J.D. Derner,
    6. E. Kachergis, and
    7. K.W. Tate

    . 2013. Conservation program participation and adaptive rangeland decision-making. Rangeland Ecology & Management 66:609-620.

    OpenUrl
31. ↵
    1. Luzar, J.E., and
    2. K.J. Cosse

    . 1998. Willingness to pay or intention to pay: The attitude-behavior relationship in contingent valuation. Journal of Socio-Economics 27(3):427-444.

    OpenUrl
32. ↵
    1. Ma, S.,
    2. S.M. Swinton,
    3. F. Lupi, and
    4. C.B. Jolejole

    . 2010. Why Farmers Opt Not to Enroll in Payment-for-Environmental-Services Programs. Paper presented at the Agricultural & Applied Economic Association’s 2010 AAEA, CAES & WAEA Joint Annual Meeting, Denver, Colorado, July 25-27, 2010.
33. ↵
    1. Mariola, M.J.

    2005. Losing ground: Farmland preservation, economic utilitarianism, and the erosion of the agrarian ideal. Agriculture and Human Values 22:209-223.

    OpenUrl
34. ↵
    1. Matson, P.A.,
    2. W.J. Parton,
    3. A.G. Power, and
    4. M.J. Swift

    . 1997. Agricultural intensification and ecosystem properties. Science 277:504-509.

    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
35. ↵
    1. NASDA (National Association of State Departments of Agriculture)

    . 2017. West Virginia Department of Agriculture. http://www.nasda.org/organizations/west-virginia-department-of-agriculture.
36. ↵
    1. NASDA (National Association of State Departments of Agriculture)

    . 2018. Conservation: Voluntary. Locally-Led. Incentive-Based. Farm Bill: Securing our Future. Arlington, VA: National Association of State Departments of Agriculture. https://www.nasda.org/organizations/west-virginia-department-of-agriculture.
37. ↵
    1. Oliver, M.D.

    2011. An Evaluation of West Virginia’s Non-Industrial Private Forest Landowner Participation in Conservation Easements. Master’s thesis, West Virginia University.
38. 1. Oliver, M.D.

    2019. An Assessment of Farmer Participation in the United States Department of Agriculture, Natural Resources Conservation Services’ Conservation Technical Assistance Program in West Virginia. PhD dissertation, West Virginia University.
39. ↵
    1. Oliver, M.D., and
    2. K.A. Gazal

    . 2021. Modeling likelihood of farmer participation in the USDA NRCS Conservation Technical Assistance Program in West Virginia. Journal of Soil and Water Conservation. DOI:10.2489/jswc.2021.00001.

    OpenUrlCrossRef
40. ↵
    1. Oliver, M.D., and
    2. M. Stout

    . 2020. Examining Natural Resource Management through a Community Development Theoretical Lens. Working paper, Journal of Community Development, London, England, UK.
41. ↵
    1. N. Wrigley

    1. Openshaw, S., and
    2. P. Taylor

    . 1979. A million or so correlation coefficients: Three experiments on the modifiable area unit problem. In Statistical Applications in the Spatial Sciences, ed. N. Wrigley. London: Pion.
42. ↵
    1. Perry-Hill, R., and
    2. L.S. Prokopy

    . 2014. Comparing different types of rural landowners: Implications for conservation practice adoption. Journal of Soil and Water Conservation 69(3):266-278. https://doi.org/10.2489/jswc.69.3.266.

    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
43. ↵
    1. Prokopy, L.S.,
    2. K. Floress,
    3. J.G. Arbuckle,
    4. S.P. Church,
    5. F.R. Eanes,
    6. Y. Gao,
    7. B.M. Gramig,
    8. P. Ranjan, and
    9. A.S. Singh

    . 2019. Adoption of agricultural conservation practices in the United States: Evidence from 35 years of quantitative literature. Journal of Soil and Water Conservation 74(5):520-534. https://doi.org/10.2489/jswc.74.5.520.

    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
44. ↵
    1. Prokopy, L.S.,
    2. K. Floress,
    3. D. Klotthor-Weinkauf, and
    4. A. Baumgart-Getz

    . 2008. Determinants of agricultural best management practice adoption: Evidence from the literature. Journal of Soil and Water Conservation 63(5):300-311. https://doi.org/10.2489/jswc.63.5.300.

    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
45. ↵
    1. Prokopy, L.S.,
    2. D. Towery, and
    3. N. Batin

    . 2014. Adoption of Agricultural Conservation Practices: Insights from Research and Practice. Purdue Extension FNR-488-W:1-8. West Lafayette, IN: Purdue University.
46. ↵
    1. Reimer, A.,
    2. A. Thompson,
    3. L.S. Prokopy,
    4. J.G. Arbuckle,
    5. K. Genskow,
    6. D. Jackson-Smith,
    7. G. Lynne,
    8. L. McCann,
    9. L. Wright Morton, and
    10. P. Nowak

    . 2014. People, place, behavior, and context: A research agenda for expanding our understanding of what motivates farmers’ conservation behaviors. Journal of Soil and Water Conservation 69(2):57A-61A. https://doi.org/10.2489/jswc.69.2.57A.

    OpenUrlFREE Full Text
47. ↵
    1. Ryan, R.L.,
    2. D.L. Erickson, and
    3. R. De Young

    . 2003. Farmers’ motivations for adopting conservation practices along riparian zones in a mid-western agricultural watershed. Journal of Environmental Planning and Management 46(1):19-37.

    OpenUrlCrossRef
48. ↵
    1. Schmitzberger, I.,
    2. Th. Wrbka,
    3. B. Steurer,
    4. G. Aschenbrenner,
    5. J. Peterseil, and
    6. H.G. Zechmeister

    . 2005. How farming styles influence biodiversity maintenance in Austrian agricultural landscapes. Agriculture, Ecosystems and Environment 108:274-290.

    OpenUrl
49. ↵
    1. Scott, L.M., and
    2. M.V. Janikas

    . 2010. Spatial Statistics in ArcGIS. In Handbook of Applied Spatial Analysis. Heidelberg, Germany: Springer.
50. ↵
    1. Sosa, B.S.,
    2. A.M. Roque Jaime,
    3. D. Rocio Avila Lozano, and
    4. P.M. Rosset

    . 2013. Agroecological Revolution: The Farmer-to-Farmer Movement of the ANAP in Cuba. Ciudad de la Habana, Cuba: The National Association of Small Farmers, La Via Campesina.
51. ↵
    1. Sperow, C.

    2012. Agriculture. In The West Virginia Encyclopedia. http://www.wvencyclopedia.org/articles/166.
52. ↵
    1. Stubbs, M.

    2010. Technical Assistance for Agricultural Conservation. Congressional Research Service 7-5700:1-29. Washington, DC: Congressional Research Service.
53. ↵
    1. Stubbs, M.

    2014. Conservation Provisions in the 2014 Farm Bill (P.L. 113-79). Congressional Research Service 1-34. Washington, DC: Congressional Research Service.
54. ↵
    1. The Cultural Landscape Foundation

    . 2017. About Cultural Landscapes. Washington, DC: The Cultural Landscape Foundation. http://tclf.org/places/about-cultural-landscapes.
55. ↵
    1. Tscharntke, T.,
    2. Y. Clough,
    3. T.C. Wanger,
    4. L. Jackson,
    5. I. Motzke,
    6. I. Perfecto,
    7. J. Vandermeer, and
    8. A. Whitbread

    . 2012. Global food security, biodiversity conservation and the future of agricultural intensification. Biological Conservation 151:53-59.

    OpenUrlCrossRefWeb of Science
56. ↵
    1. USDA

    . 2018. FY 2018 Budget Summary. Washington, DC: USDA. https://www.usda.gov/sites/default/files/documents/USDA-Budget-Summary-2018.pdf.
57. ↵
    1. USDA NASS (National Agricultural Statistics Service)

    . 2012. Census of Agriculture. Washington, DC: USDA. https://www.agcensus.usda.gov/.
58. ↵
    1. USDA NASS-WV (West Virginia Office)

    . 2017. 2017 Agricultural Statistics. West Virginia Annual Bulletin No. 48. Charleston, WV: USDA National Agricultural Statistics Service, West Virginia Department of Agriculture.
59. ↵
    1. USDA NIFA (National Institute of Food and Agriculture)

    . n.d. AgrAbility. Washington, DC: USDA National Institute of Food and Agriculture. https://nifa.usda.gov/program/agrability.
60. ↵
    1. USDA NRCS (Natural Resources Conservation Service)

    . 2010. Conservation Technical Assistance Program. Washington, DC: USDA Natural Resources Conservation Service. https://directives.sc.egov.usda.gov/.
61. ↵
    1. USDA NRCS

    . 2014. National Planning Procedures Handbook (NPPH), Edition 1. USDA Natural Resources Conservation Service. Title 180 – National Planning Procedures Handbook. Washington, DC: USDA Natural Resources Conservation Service.
62. ↵
    1. USEPA (US Environmental Protection Agency)

    . 2017. EPA’s Environmental Quality Index Supports Public Health. Washington, DC: US Environmental Protection Agency. https://www.epa.gov/healthresearch/epas-environmental-quality-index-supports-public-health.
63. ↵
    1. Westlund, H.

    2013. A brief history of time, space and growth: Waldo Tobler’s first law of geography revisited. The Annals of Regional Science 51:917-924.

    OpenUrl
64. ↵
    1. Yang, T.-C.

    2018. Modifiable Areal Unit Problem. University Park, PA: The Pennsylvania State University. http://web.pop.psu.edu/projects/help_archive/help.pop.psu.edu/gia-resources/giatips/MAUP.pdf/at_download/MAUP.pdf.
65. ↵
    1. Zhou, X.,
    2. M.J. Helmers,
    3. M. Al-Kaisi, and
    4. H.M. Hanna

    . 2009. Cost-effectiveness and cost-benefit analysis of conservation management practices for sediment reduction in an Iowa agricultural watershed. Journal of Soil and Water Conservation 64(5):314-323. https://doi.org/10.2489/jswc.64.5.314.

    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
66. ↵
    1. Zimmerman, B.R.

    2018. Regulatory and Financial Influence of Federal Government Activities on Local Economies: A Three Essay Approach. PhD dissertation, West Virginia University.