Research ArticleResearch Section

Communicating with farmers about conservation practices: Lessons learned from a systematic review of survey studies

L. Witzling, D. Wald and E. Williams
Journal of Soil and Water Conservation September 2021, 76 (5) 424-434; DOI: https://doi.org/10.2489/jswc.2021.00145

References

    1. Adusumilli, N., and
    2. H. Wang
    . 2018. Analysis of soil management and water conservation practices adoption among crop and pasture farmers in humid-south of the United States. International Soil and Water Conservation Research 6:79-86.
    OpenUrl
  2. ↵
    1. Adusumilli, N., and
    2. H. Wang
    . 2019. Conservation adoption among owners and tenant farmers in the southern United Sates. Agriculture 9(53).
  3. ↵
    1. J. Kuhl and
    2. J. Beckmann
    1. Ajzen, I.
    1985. From Intentions to Actions: A Theory of Planned Behavior. In Action-control: From Cognition to Behavior, eds. J. Kuhl and J. Beckmann, 11-39. Berlin: Springer-Verlag.
    1. Andrews, A.C.,
    2. R.A. Clawson,
    3. B.A. Gramig, and
    4. L. Raymond
    . 2013. Why do farmers adopt conservation tillage? An experimental investigation of framing effects. Journal of Soil and Water Conservation 68(6):501-511. https://doi.org/10.2489/jswc.68.6.501.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  5. ↵
    1. Arbuckle, J.G., Jr..
    2013a. Clean water state revolving fund loans and landowner investments in agricultural best managing practices in Iowa. Journal of the American Water Resources Association 49(1):67-75.
    OpenUrl
  6. ↵
    1. Arbuckle, J.G., Jr..
    2013b. Farmer support for extending conservation compliance beyond soil erosion: Evidence from Iowa. Journal of Soil and Water Conservation 68(2):99-109. https://doi.org/10.2489/jswc.68.2.99.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  7. ↵
    1. Arbuckle, J.G.,
    2. Jr., and
    3. G. Roesch-McNally
    . 2015. Cover crop adoption in Iowa: The role of perceived practice characteristics. Journal of Soil and Water Conservation 70(6): 418-429. https://doi.org/10.2489/jswc.70.6.418.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  8. ↵
    1. Bates, H., and
    2. J.G. Arbuckle, Jr..
    2017. Understanding predictors of nutrient management practice diversity in midwestern agriculture. Journal of Extension 55(6).
  9. ↵
    1. Baumgart-Getz, A.,
    2. L.S. Prokopy, and
    3. K. Floress
    . 2012. Why farmers adopt best management practice in the United States: A meta-analysis of the adoption literature. Journal of Environmental Management 96(1):17-25.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
    1. Bishop, C.P.,
    2. C.R. Shumway, and
    3. P.R. Wandschneider
    . 2010. Agent heterogeneity in adoption of anaerobic digestion technology: Integrating economic, diffusion, and behavioral innovation theories. Land Economics 86(3):585-608.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  11. ↵
    1. Boyer, T.A.,
    2. B. Tong, and
    3. L.D. Sanders
    . 2018. Soil and water conservation method adoption in a highly erosive watershed: The case of Southwest Oklahoma’s Fort Cobb watershed. Journal of Environmental Planning and Management 61(10):1828-1849.
    OpenUrl
  12. ↵
    1. Camaj, L., and
    2. D.H. Weaver
    . 2013. Need for orientation and attribute agenda-setting during a U.S. election campaign. International Journal of Communication 7:1442-1463.
    OpenUrl
  13. ↵
    1. Camblor, M.-P., and
    2. C.-M.I. Alcover
    . 2019. Integrating distrust antecedents and consequences in organizational life. Revista Psicologia: Organizações e Trabalho 35:17-26.
    OpenUrl
    1. Campbell, J.T.,
    2. T.M. Koontz, and
    3. J.E. Bonnell
    . 2011. Does collaboration promote grass-roots behavior change? Farmer adoption of best management practices in two watersheds. Society & Natural Resources 24(11):1127-1141.
    OpenUrl
  15. ↵
    1. Carter, A.
    2019. “We don’t equal even just one man”: Gender and social control in conservation adoption. Society & Natural Resources 32(8):893-910.
    OpenUrl
  16. ↵
    1. Christianson, L.,
    2. T. Knoot,
    3. D. Larsen,
    4. J. Tyndall, and
    5. M. Helmers
    . 2013. Adoption potential of nitrate mitigation practices: An ecosystem services approach. International Journal of Agricultural Sustainability 12(4). DOI:10.1080/14735903.2013.835604.
    OpenUrlCrossRef
  17. ↵
    1. Corbett, J.B.
    2002. Motivations to participate in riparian improvement programs: Applying the theory of planned behavior. Science Communication 23:243-263.
    OpenUrlCrossRefWeb of Science
  18. ↵
    1. Darby, H.,
    2. P. Halteman, and
    3. D. Heleba
    . 2015. Effectiveness of nutrient management plans on Vermont dairy farms. Journal of Extension 53(2).
  19. ↵
    1. Denny, R.C.H.,
    2. S.T. Marquart-Pyatt, and
    3. M. Houser
    . 2019. Understanding the past and present and predicting the future: Farmers’ use of multiple nutrient best management practices in the Upper Midwest. Society and Natural Resources 32(7):807-826.
    OpenUrl
    1. Doll, J.E., and
    2. R.D. Jackson
    . 2009. Wisconsin farmer attitudes regarding native grass use in grazing systems. Journal of Soil and Water Conservation 64(4):276-285. https://doi.org/10.2489/jswc.64.4.276.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  21. ↵
    1. Druschke, C.G., and
    2. S. Secchi
    . 2014. The impact of gender on agricultural conservation knowledge and attitudes in an Iowa watershed. Journal of Soil and Water Conservation 69(2):95-106. https://doi.org/10.2489/jswc.69.2.95.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  22. ↵
    1. Eanes, F.R.,
    2. A.S. Singh,
    3. B.R. Bulla,
    4. P. Ranjan,
    5. L.S. Prokopy,
    6. M. Fales,
    7. B. Wickerham, and
    8. P.J. Doran
    . 2017. Midwestern US farmers perceive crop advisers as conduits of information on agricultural conservation practices. Environmental Management 60:974-988.
    OpenUrl
  23. ↵
    1. Ervin, D.E.,
    2. E.H. Breshears,
    3. G.B. Frisvold,
    4. T. Hurley,
    5. K.E. Dentzman,
    6. J.L. Gunsolus,
    7. R.A. Jussaume,
    8. M.D.K. Owen,
    9. J.K. Norsworthy,
    10. M. Mahmud Al Mamun, and
    11. W. Everman
    . 2019. Farmer attitudes toward cooperative approaches to herbicide resistance management: A common pool ecosystem service challenge. Ecological Economics 157:237-245.
    OpenUrl
  24. ↵
    1. Fereday, J., and
    2. E. Muir-Cochrane
    . 2006. Demonstrating rigor using thematic analyses: A hybrid approach of inductive and deductive coding and theme development. International Journal of Qualitative Methods 5(1).
    1. Gaines-Day, H.R., and
    2. C. Gratton
    . 2017. Understanding barriers to participation in cost-share programs for pollinator conservation by Wisconsin (USA) cranberry growers. Insects 8:1-13.
    OpenUrl
    1. Hillis, V.,
    2. M. Lubell, and
    3. M. Hoffman
    . 2018. Sustainability partnerships and viticulture management in California. Journal of Environmental Management 217:214-225.
    OpenUrl
  27. ↵
    1. Horton, C.C.,
    2. T.R. Peterson,
    3. P. Banerjee, and
    4. M.J. Peterson
    . 2016. Credibility and advocacy in conservation science. Conservation Biology 30(1):23–32.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  28. ↵
    1. Houser, M.,
    2. S.T. Marquart-Pyatt,
    3. R.C.H. Denny,
    4. A. Reimer, and
    5. D. Stuart
    . 2019. Farmers, information, and nutrient management in the US Midwest. Journal of Soil and Water Conservation 74(3):269-280. https://doi.org/10.2489/jswc.74.3.269.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  29. ↵
    1. Hunt, K.P., and
    2. D.M. Wald
    . 2020. The role of scientific source credibility and goodwill in public skepticism toward GM foods. Environmental Communication 14(7):971-986. https://doi.org/10.1080/17524032.2020.1725086.
    OpenUrl
  30. ↵
    1. Jackson-Smith, D.,
    2. S. Ewing,
    3. C. Jones,
    4. A. Sigler, and
    5. A. Armstrong
    . 2018. The road less traveled: Assessing the impacts of farmer and stakeholder participation in groundwater nitrate pollution research. Journal of Soil and Water Conservation 73(6): 610-622. https://doi.org/10.2489/jswc.73.6.610.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  31. ↵
    1. Kahlor, L.,
    2. S. Dunwoody,
    3. R.J. Griffin, and
    4. K. Neuwirth
    . 2006. Seeking and processing information about impersonal risk. Science Communication 28(2):163-194.
    OpenUrlCrossRefWeb of Science
  32. ↵
    1. Kasu, B.B.,
    2. J. Jacquet,
    3. A. Junod,
    4. S. Kumar, and
    5. T. Wang
    . 2019. Rationale and motivation of agricultural producers in adopting crop rotation in the Norther Great Plains, USA. International Journal of Agricultural Sustainability 17(4):287-297.
    OpenUrl
  33. ↵
    1. Kim, J-K., and
    2. J.E. Grunig
    . 2011. Problem solving and communicative action: A situational theory of problem solving. Journal of Communication 61(1):120-149.
    OpenUrlCrossRef
    1. Lambert, D.M.,
    2. B.C. English,
    3. D.C. Harper,
    4. S.L. Larkin,
    5. J.A. Larson,
    6. D.F. Mooney,
    7. R.K. Roberts,
    8. M. Velandia, and
    9. J.M. Reeves
    . 2014. Adoption and frequency of precision soil testing in cotton production. Journal of Agricultural and Resources Economics 39(1):106-123.
    OpenUrl
    1. Lawley, C.,
    2. E. Lichtenberg, and
    3. D. Parker
    . 2009. Biases in nutrient management planning. Land Economics 85(1):186-200.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  36. ↵
    1. Lee, D.,
    2. J.G. Arbuckle,
    3. Z. Zhu, and
    4. L. Nowatzke
    . 2018. Conditional causal mediation analysis of factors associated with cover crop adoption in Iowa, USA. Water Resources Research 54:9566-9584.
    OpenUrl
  37. ↵
    1. Lemke, A.M.,
    2. T.T. Lindenbaum,
    3. M.E. Perry,
    4. T.H.T. Herbert, and
    5. J.R. Herkert
    . 2010. Effects of outreach on the awareness and adoption of conservation practices by farmers in two agricultural watersheds of the Mackinaw River, Illinois. Journal of Soil and Water Conservation 65(5):304-315. https://doi.org/10.2489/jswc.65.5.304.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  38. ↵
    1. Liu, T.,
    2. R.J.F. Bruins, and
    3. M.T. Heberling
    . 2018. Factors influencing farmers’ adoption of best management practices: A review and synthesis. Sustainability 10(2):432.
    OpenUrl
    1. Lowry, C.J., and
    2. D.C. Brainard
    . 2017. Organic farmer perceptions of reduced tillage: A Michigan farmer survey. Renewable Agriculture and Food Systems 34(2):103-115.
    OpenUrl
    1. Lubell, M.N.,
    2. B.B. Cutts,
    3. L.M. Roche,
    4. M. Hamilton,
    5. J.D. Derner,
    6. E. Kachergis, and
    7. K.W. Tate
    . 2013. Conservation program participation and adaptive rangeland decision-making. Rangeland Ecology & Management 66(2):609-620.
    OpenUrl
    1. Mahler, R.L.,
    2. B. Shafii,
    3. W.L. Pan, and
    4. D. Wysocki
    . 2014 Importance of soil fertility, soil sampling, and fertilizer recommendations in the inland Pacific Northwest. Communications in Soil Science and Plant Analysis 45(22):2979-2991.
    OpenUrl
  42. ↵
    1. Mase, A.S.,
    2. N.L. Babin,
    3. L.S. Prokopy, and
    4. K.D. Genskow
    . 2015. Trust in sources of soil and water quality information: Implications for environmental outreach and education. Journal of the American Water Resources Association 51(6):1656-1666.
    OpenUrl
  43. ↵
    1. Mase, A.S.,
    2. B.M. Gramig, and
    3. L.S. Prokopy
    . 2017. Climate change beliefs, risk perceptions, and adaptation behavior among Midwestern U.S. crop farmers. Climate Risk Management 15:8-17.
    OpenUrl
  44. ↵
    1. Mattia, C.M.,
    2. S.T. Lovell, and
    3. A. Davis
    . 2018. Identifying barriers and motivators for adoption of multifunctional perennial cropping systems by landowners in the Upper Sangamon River Watershed, Illinois. Agroforestry Systems 92:1155-1169.
    OpenUrl
  45. ↵
    1. McCann, L.M.J.
    2009. Transaction costs of environmental policies and returns to scale: The case of comprehensive nutrient management plans. Review of Agricultural Economics 31(3):561-573.
    OpenUrlCrossRefWeb of Science
    1. Morton, L.W.,
    2. J. Hobbs,
    3. J.G. Arbuckle, and
    4. A. Loy
    . 2015. Upper Midwest climate variations: Farmer responses to excess water risks. Journal of Environmental Quality 44:810-822.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  47. ↵
    1. Morton, L.M., and
    2. C.Y. Weng
    . 2009. Getting to better water quality outcomes: The promise and challenge of the citizen effect. Agriculture and Human Values 26:83-94.
    OpenUrl
  48. ↵
    1. Moore, E.H., and
    2. I.D. Rutherford
    . 2020. Researching agricultural environmental behaviour: Improving the reliability of self-reporting. Journal of Rural Studies. doi:10.1016/j.jrurstud.2020.04.012.
    OpenUrlCrossRef
  49. ↵
    1. Munn, M.D.,
    2. J.W. Frey,
    3. A.J. Tesoriero,
    4. R.W. Black,
    5. J.H. Duff,
    6. K. Lee,
    7. T.R. Maret,
    8. C.A. Mebane,
    9. I.R. Waite, and
    10. R.B. Zelt
    . 2018. Understanding the Influence of Nutrients on Stream Ecosystems in Agricultural Landscapes (Circular 1437). Reston, VA: US Geological Survey. https://pubs.usgs.gov/circ/1437/cir1437.pdf.
  50. ↵
    1. Pape, A., and
    2. L.S. Prokopy
    . 2017. Delivering on the potential of formal farmer networks: Insights from Indiana. Journal of Soil and Water Conservation 72(5):463-470. https://doi.org/10.2489/jswc.72.5.463.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
    1. Paudel, K.P.,
    2. N. Devkota, and
    3. Y. Tan
    . 2016. Best management practices adoption to mitigate non-point source pollution. A conditional frailty model. China Agricultural Economic Review 8(4):534-552.
    OpenUrl
  52. ↵
    1. Perry, V., and
    2. M.A. Davenport
    . 2020. An inductive framework of self-efficacy to understand and support farmers in conservation agriculture. Journal of Soil and Water Conservation 75(2):198-208. https://doi.org/10.2489/jswc.75.2.198.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  53. ↵
    1. Perry-Hill, R., and
    2. L.S. Prokopy
    . 2014. Comparing different types of rural landowners: Implications for conservation practice adoption. Journal of Soil and Water Conservation 69(3):266-278. https://doi.org/10.2489/jswc.69.3.266.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
    1. Pokhrel, B.K.,
    2. K.P. Paudel, and
    3. E. Segarra
    . Factors affecting the choice, intensity, and allocation or irrigation strategies by U.S. cotton farmers. Water 10(6).
  55. ↵
    1. Porter, P.A.,
    2. R.B. Mitchell, and
    3. K.J. Moore
    . 2015. Reducing hypoxia in the Gulf of Mexico: Reimagining a more resilient agricultural landscape in the Mississippi River Watershed. Journal of Soil and Water Conservation 70(3):63-68A. https://doi.org/10.2489/jswc.70.3.63A.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  56. ↵
    1. Prokopy, L.S.,
    2. K. Floress,
    3. J.G. Arbuckle,
    4. S.P. Church,
    5. F.R. Eanes,
    6. Y. Gao,
    7. B.M. Gramig,
    8. P. Ranjan, and
    9. A.S. Singh
    . 2019. Adoption of agricultural conservation practices in the United States: Evidence from 35 years of quantitative literature. Journal of Soil and Water Conservation 74(5):520-534. https://doi.org/10.2489/jswc.74.5.520.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  57. ↵
    1. Ranjan, P.,
    2. S.P. Church,
    3. K. Floress, and
    4. L.S. Prokopy
    . 2019. Synthesizing conservation motivations and barriers: What have we learned from qualitative studies of farmers’ behaviors in the United States? Society and Natural Resources 32(11):1171-1199.
    OpenUrl
    1. Rhodes, T.K.,
    2. F.X. Aguilar,
    3. S. Jose, and
    4. M. Gold
    . 2018. Factors influencing the adoption of riparian forest buffers in the Tuttle Creek Reservoir watershed of Kansas, USA. Agroforestry Systems 97:739-757.
    OpenUrl
    1. Roesch-McNally, G.E.,
    2. J.G. Arbuckle, and
    3. J.C. Tyndall
    . 2017. What would farmers do? Adaptation intentions under a Corn Belt climate change scenario. Agriculture and Human Values 34:333-346.
    OpenUrl
  60. ↵
    1. D.W. Stacks and
    2. M.B. Salwon
    1. Rogers, E.M.,
    2. A. Singhal, and
    3. M.A. Quinal
    . 2009. Diffusion of Innovations. In An Integrated Approach to Communication Theory and Research, eds. D.W. Stacks and M.B. Salwon, 418-434. New York: Routledge.
  61. ↵
    1. Ruttan, V.W.
    1996. What happened to technology adoption-diffusion research? Sociologia Ruralis 36(1):51-73.
    OpenUrlCrossRefWeb of Science
  62. ↵
    1. Slater, M.D.
    1996. Theory and method in health audience segmentation. Journal of Health Communication 1(3):267-283.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  63. ↵
    1. Stuart, D.,
    2. R.C.H. Denny,
    3. A.P. Reimer, and
    4. S. Marquart-Pyatt
    . 2018. Farmer selection of sources of information for nitrogen management in the US Midwest: Implications for environmental programs. Land Use Policy 70:289-297.
    OpenUrl
  64. ↵
    1. Ulrich-Schad, J.D.,
    2. S. García de Jalón,
    3. N. Babin,
    4. A. Pape, and
    5. L.S. Prokopy
    . 2017. Measuring and understanding agricultural producers’ adoption of nutrient best management practices. Journal of Soil and Water Conservation 72(5):506-518. https://doi.org/10.2489/jswc.72.5.506.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  65. ↵
    1. USDA NRCS (Natural Resources Conservation Service)
    . 2012. Regional boundaries, State Offices & Centers. Washington, DC: USDA NRCS. https://www.nrcs.usda.gov/wps/portal/nrcs/detail/national/about/org/?cid=nrcs143_021421.
  66. ↵
    1. USEPA (US Environmental Protection Agency)
    . 2019. Success Stories from the Hypoxia Task Force (HTF). Washington, DC: USEPA. https://www.epa.gov/ms-htf/success-stories-hypoxia-task-force-htf.
  67. ↵
    1. Valdivia, C.,
    2. C. Barbieri, and
    3. M.A. Gold
    . 2012. Between forestry and farming: Policy and environmental implications of the barriers to agroforestry adoption. Canadian Journal of Agricultural Economics 60:155-175.
    OpenUrlCrossRef
  68. ↵
    1. Varble, S.,
    2. S. Secchi, and
    3. C. Gottschalk Druschke
    . 2016. An examination of growing trends in land tenure and conservation practice adoption: Results from a farmer survey in Iowa 2016. Environmental Management 57:318-330.
    OpenUrl
  69. ↵
    1. Wang, T.
    2019. Evaluating Extension program impacts through comparison of knowledge and behavior of Extension clientele versus others. Journal of Extension 57(4).
    1. Wang, T.,
    2. B.B. Kasu,
    3. J. Jacquet, and
    4. S. Kumar
    . 2019. Tailoring Extension efforts for promotion of diversified crop rotation systems. Journal of Extension 57(2).
    1. Weber, C., and
    2. L. McCann
    . 2015. Adoption of nitrogen-efficient technologies by U.S. corn farmers. Journal of Environmental Quality 44(2):391-401.
    OpenUrl
    1. Williamson, J.M.
    2011. The role of information and prices in the nitrogen fertilizer management decision: New evidence from the Agricultural Resource Management Survey. Journal of Agricultural and Resource Economics 36(3):552-572.
    OpenUrl
  73. ↵
    1. Witzling, L.,
    2. B. Shaw, and
    3. M.S. Amato
    . 2015. Incorporating information exposure into a theory of planned behavior model to enrich understanding of proenvironmental behavior. Science Communication 37(5):551-574.
    OpenUrlCrossRef
    1. Zhong, H., and
    2. W. Hu
    . 2019. Revisiting motivations for on-farm environmental practices: Opportunity wage and community effect. Journal of Environmental Management 249.
    1. Zhong, H.,
    2. P. Qing, and
    3. W. Hu
    . 2016. Farmers’ willingness to participate in best management practices in Kentucky. Journal of Environmental Planning and Management 59(6)1015-1039.
    OpenUrl
Back to top

In this issue

Print
Download PDF
Article Alerts
Email Article
Citation Tools
Request Permissions
Communicating with farmers about conservation practices: Lessons learned from a systematic review of survey studies
L. Witzling, D. Wald, E. Williams
Journal of Soil and Water Conservation Sep 2021, 76 (5) 424-434; DOI: 10.2489/jswc.2021.00145
Reddit logo Twitter logo Facebook logo Mendeley logo

Jump to section

Keywords