Overcoming barriers to program participation for interested farmers

References

1. ↵
   1. Arbuckle, J.G.

   2013. Farmer support for extending conservation compliance beyond soil erosion: Evidence from Iowa. Journal of Soil and Water Conservation 68(2):99–109. https://doi.org/10.2489/jswc.68.2.99.

   OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
2. ↵
   1. Armstrong, A.,
   2. E.J. Ling,
   3. R. Stedman, and
   4. P. Kleinman

   . 2011. Adoption of the Conservation Reserve Enhancement Program in the New York City watershed: The role of farmer attitudes. Journal of Soil and Water Conservation 66(5):337–344. https://doi.org/10.2489/jswc.66.5.337.

   OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
3. ↵
   1. Burnett, E.,
   2. R.S. Wilson,
   3. A. Heeren, and
   4. J. Martin

   . 2018. Farmer adoption of cover crops in the western Lake Erie basin. Journal of Soil and Water Conservation 73(2):143–155. https://doi.org/10.2489/jswc.73.2.143.

   OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
4. ↵
   1. Claassen, R.,
   2. L. Hansen,
   3. M. Peters,
   4. V. Breneman,
   5. M. Weinberg,
   6. A. Cattaneo,
   7. P. Feather,
   8. D. Gadsby,
   9. D. Hellerstein,
   10. J.W. Hopkins,
   11. P. Johnston,
   12. M. Morehart, and
   13. M. Smith

   . 2001. Agri-Environmental Policy at the Crossroads: Guideposts on a Changing Landscape. Washington, DC: USDA Economic Research Service.
5. ↵
   1. Damianos, D., and
   2. N. Giannakopoulos

   . 2002. Farmers’ participation in agri-environmental schemes in Greece. British Food Journal 104(3/4/5):261–273. https://doi.org/10.1108/00070700210425705.

   OpenUrlCrossRef
6. ↵
   1. Davidson, E.A.,
   2. M.B. David,
   3. J.N. Galloway,
   4. C.L. Goodale,
   5. R. Haeuber,
   6. J.A. Harrison,
   7. R.W. Howarth,
   8. D.B. Jaynes,
   9. R.R. Lowrance,
   10. Nolan B. Thomas,
   11. J.L. Peel,
   12. R.W. Pinder,
   13. E. Porter,
   14. C.S. Snyder,
   15. A.R. Townsend, and
   16. M.H. Ward

   . 2011. Excess nitrogen in the U.S. environment: Trends, risks, and solutions. Issues in Ecology (15).
7. ↵
   1. Dillman, D.A.,
   2. J. Smyth, and
   3. L.M. Christian

   . 2014. Internet, Mail, Mixed-Mode Surveys: The Tailored Design Method, 4th edition. Hoboken, NJ: Wiley Publishing. https://doi.org/10.1016/S1462-9011(03)00036-4.
8. ↵
   1. Dowd, B.,
   2. D. Press, and
   3. M. Huertos

   . 2008. Agricultural nonpoint source water pollution policy: The case of California’s Central Coast. Agriculture, Ecosystems and Environment 128(3):151–161. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.agee.2008.05.014.

   OpenUrlCrossRef
9. ↵
   1. Dupont, D.P.

   2010. Cost-sharing incentive programs for source water protection: The Grand River’s rural water quality program. Canadian Journal of Agricultural Economics/Revue Canadienne d’agroeconomie 58(4):481–496. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1744-7976.2010.01197.x.

   OpenUrl
10. ↵
    1. Esseks, J.D., and
    2. S.E. Kraft

    . 1988. Why eligible landowners did not participate in the first four sign-ups of the Conservation Reserve Program. Journal of Soil and Water Conservation 43(3):251–256.

    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
11. ↵
    1. Falconer, K., and
    2. C. Saunders

    . 2002. Transaction costs for SSSIs and policy design. Land Use Policy 19(2):157–166. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0264-8377(02)00007-8.

    OpenUrlCrossRefWeb of Science
12. ↵
    1. Floress, K.,
    2. S. García de Jalón,
    3. S.P. Church,
    4. N. Babin,
    5. J.D. Ulrich-Schad, and
    6. L.S. Prokopy

    . 2017. Toward a theory of farmer conservation attitudes: Dual interests and willingness to take action to protect water quality. Journal of Environmental Psychology 53:73–80. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jenvp.2017.06.009.

    OpenUrl
13. ↵
    1. Franks, J.

    2003. Revised agri-environment policy objectives: Implications for scheme design. Journal of Environmental Planning and Management 46(3):443–466.

    OpenUrl
14. ↵
    1. Frondel, M.,
    2. P. Lehmann, and
    3. F. Wätzold

    . 2012. The impact of information on landowners’ participation in voluntary conservation programs: Theoretical considerations and empirical evidence from an agri-environment program in Saxony, Germany. Land Use Policy 29:388–394. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.landusepol.2011.08.003.

    OpenUrl
15. ↵
    1. GLRI (Great Lakes Restoration Initiative)

    . 2021. Great Lakes Restoration Initiative (GLRI). Washington, DC: US Environmental Protection Agency. https://www.epa.gov/great-lakes-funding/great-lakes-restoration-initiative-glri.
16. ↵
    1. Greiner, R.

    2015. Motivations and attitudes influence farmers’ willingness to participate in biodiversity conservation contracts. Agricultural Systems 137(July):154–165. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.agsy.2015.04.005.

    OpenUrl
17. ↵
    1. Greiner, R., and
    2. D. Gregg

    . 2011. Farmers’ intrinsic motivations, barriers to the adoption of conservation practices and effectiveness of policy instruments: Empirical evidence from northern Australia. Land Use Policy 28(1):257–265. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.landusepol.2010.06.006.

    OpenUrlCrossRef
18. ↵
    1. Hart, M.R.,
    2. B.F. Quin, and
    3. M.L. Nguyen

    . 2004. Phosphorus runoff from agricultural land and direct fertilizer effects: A review. Journal of Environmental Quality 33(6):1954–1972. https://doi.org/10.2134/jeq2004.1954.

    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
19. ↵
    1. Hayes, A.F.

    2013. Introduction to Mediation, Moderation, and Conditional Process Analysis: A Regression-Based Approach, 1st edition. New York: The Guilford Press.
20. ↵
    1. Johnson, P.O., and
    2. J. Neyman

    . 1936. Tests of certain linear hypotheses and their application to some educational problems. Statistical Research Memoirs 1:57–93.

    OpenUrl
21. ↵
    1. Kraft, S.E.,
    2. C. Lant, and
    3. K. Gillman

    . 1996. WQIP: An assessment of its chances for acceptance by farmers. Journal of Soil and Water Conservation November 51(6):494–498.

    OpenUrl
22. ↵
    1. Lambert, D.M.,
    2. P. Sullivan,
    3. R. Claassen, and
    4. L. Foreman

    . 2007. Profiles of US farm households adopting conservation-compatible practices. Land Use Policy 24(1):72–88. https://doi.org/10.1016/J.LANDUSEPOL.2005.12.002.

    OpenUrlCrossRef
23. ↵
    1. Lewis, W.M.,
    2. W.A. Wurtsbaugh, and
    3. H.W. Paerl

    . 2011. Rationale for control of anthropogenic nitrogen and phosphorus to reduce eutrophication of inland waters. Environmental Science and Technology 45(24):10300–10305. https://doi.org/10.1021/es202401p.

    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
24. ↵
    1. Lichtenberg, E.

    2014. Conservation, the Farm Bill, and U.S. Agri-Environmental Policy. In Choices, Quarter 3, Vol. 29. http://choicesmagazine.org/choices-magazine/theme-articles/3rd-quarter-2014/conservation-the-farm-bill-and-us-agri-environmental-policy.
25. ↵
    1. Lobley, M., and
    2. C. Potter

    . 1998. Environmental Stewardship in UK agriculture: A comparison of the environmentally sensitive area programme and the Countryside Stewardship Scheme in South East England. Geoforum 29(4):413–432. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0016-7185(98)00019-0.

    OpenUrlCrossRef
26. ↵
    1. Luzar, E.J., and
    2. A. Diagne

    . 1999. Participation in the next generation of agriculture conservation programs: The role of environmental attitudes. The Journal of Socio-Economics 28(3):335–349.

    OpenUrl
27. ↵
    1. Lynch, L., and
    2. S.J. Lovell

    . 2003. Combining spatial and survey data to explain participation in agricultural land preservation programs. Land Economics 79(2):259–276. https://doi.org/10.2307/3146870.

    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
28. ↵
    1. McGuire, J.M.,
    2. L.W. Morton,
    3. J.G. Arbuckle, and
    4. A.D. Cast

    . 2015. Farmer identities and responses to the social-biophysical environment. Journal of Rural Studies 39:145–155. https://doi.org/10.1016/J.JRURSTUD.2015.03.011.

    OpenUrl
29. ↵
    1. Morris, C., and
    2. C. Potter

    . 1995. Recruiting the new conservationists: Farmers’ adoption of agri-environmental schemes in the U.K. Journal of Rural Studies 11(1):51–63. https://doi.org/10.1016/0743-0167(94)00037-A.

    OpenUrlCrossRefWeb of Science
30. ↵
    1. Prokopy, L.S.,
    2. K. Floress,
    3. J.G. Arbuckle,
    4. S.P. Church,
    5. F.R. Eanes,
    6. Y. Gao,
    7. B.M. Gramig,
    8. P. Ranjan, and
    9. A.S. Singh

    . 2019. Adoption of agricultural conservation practices in the United States: Evidence from 35 years of quantitative literature. Journal of Soil and Water Conservation 74(5):520–534. https://doi.org/10.2489/jswc.74.5.520.

    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
31. ↵
    1. Reimer, A.

    2015. Ecological modernization in U.S. agri-environmental programs: Trends in the 2014 Farm Bill. Land Use Policy 47(September):209–217. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.landusepol.2015.04.013.

    OpenUrlCrossRef
32. ↵
    1. Reimer, A.P.,
    2. B.M. Gramig, and
    3. L.S. Prokopy

    . 2013. Farmers and conservation programs: Explaining differences in Environmental Quality Incentives Program applications between states. Journal of Soil and Water Conservation 68(2):110–119. https://doi.org/10.2489/jswc.68.2.110.

    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
33. ↵
    1. Reimer, A., and
    2. L.S. Prokopy

    . 2014. Farmer Participation in U.S. Farm Bill Conservation Programs. Environmental Management 53(2):318–332. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00267-013-0184-8.

    OpenUrlPubMed
34. ↵
    1. Roesch-McNally, G.E.,
    2. J.G. Arbuckle, and
    3. J.C. Tyndall

    . 2017. What would farmers do? Adaptation intentions under a Corn Belt climate change scenario. Agriculture and Human Values 34(2):333–346. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10460-016-9719-y.

    OpenUrl
35. ↵
    1. Ruto, E., and
    2. G. Garrod

    . 2009. Investigating farmers’ preferences for the design of agri-environment schemes: A choice experiment approach. Journal of Environmental Planning and Management 52(5):631–647. https://doi.org/10.1080/09640560902958172.

    OpenUrl
36. ↵
    1. Thomas, J.K., and
    2. J. Thigpen

    . 1996. A social exchange explanation of participation in the U.S Farm Program. Journal of Rural Social Sciences 12(1).
37. ↵
    1. US Congressional Research Service

    . 2020. Agricultural Conservation: A Guide to Programs. (R40763; August 19, 2020), by Megan Stubbs. Washington, DC: US Congressional Research Service. https://crsreports.congress.gov.
38. ↵
    1. USDA

    . 2018. FY 2018 USDA Budget Summary. Washington. DC: USDA. https://doi.org/https://www.usda.gov/sites/default/files/documents/USDA-Budget-Summary-2018.pdf.
39. ↵
    1. USDA

    . 2019. FY 2019 USDA Budget Summary. Washington, DC: USDA.
40. ↵
    1. Vanslembrouck, I.,
    2. G. Van Huylenbroeck, and
    3. W. Verbeke

    . 2002. Determinants of the fillingness of Belgian Farmers to participate in agri-environmental measures. Journal of Agricultural Economics 53(3):489–511.

    OpenUrlCrossRef
41. ↵
    1. Wilson, G.A.

    1997. Factors influencing farmer participation in the Environmentally Sensitive Areas scheme. Journal of Environmental Management 50(1):67–93. https://doi.org/10.1006/JEMA.1996.0095.

    OpenUrlCrossRef
42. ↵
    1. Wilson, G.A., and
    2. K. Hart

    . 2001. Farmer participation in agri-environmental schemes: Towards conservation-oriented thinking? Sociologia Ruralis 41(2):254–274. https://doi.org/10.1111/1467-9523.00181.

    OpenUrlCrossRefWeb of Science
43. ↵
    1. Yeboah, F.K.,
    2. F. Lupi, and
    3. M.D. Kaplowitz

    . 2015. Agricultural landowners’ willingness to participate in a filter strip program for watershed protection. Land Use Policy 49:75–85. https://doi.org/10.1016/J.LANDUSEPOL.2015.07.016.

    OpenUrlCrossRef