Development of deficit irrigation program for improving the water use efficiency, growth, and yield of groundnut in the semiarid tropical region of India

References

1. ↵
   1. Abou Kheira, A.A.

   2009. Macromanagement of deficit-irrigated peanut with sprinkler irrigation. Agricultural Water Management 96:1409–1420.

   OpenUrl
2. ↵
   1. Ahmed, B.M., and
   2. Y.M. Mohamed

   . 2014. Evaluation of full and deficit irrigation on two sunflower hybrids under semi-arid environment of Gezira, Sudan. Journal of Agri-Food and Applied Sciences 2(3):53–59.

   OpenUrl
3. ↵
   1. Ali, S.,
   2. A. Jan,
   3. P. Zhang,
   4. M.N. Khan,
   5. T. Cai,
   6. T. Wei,
   7. X. Ren,
   8. Q. Jia,
   9. Q. Han, and
   10. Z. Jia

   . 2016. Effects of ridge-covering mulches on soil water storage and maize production under simulated rainfall in semiarid regions of China. Agricultural Water Management 178:1–11.

   OpenUrl
4. ↵
   1. Ananthi, K.,
   2. H. Vijayaraghavan,
   3. M. Karuppaiya, and
   4. T. Anand

   . 2013. Drought-induced changes in chlorophyll stability index, relative water content and yield of cotton genotypes. Insight Botany 3(1):1–5.

   OpenUrl
5. ↵
   1. Ardestani, G.H., and
   2. A.H.S. Rad

   . 2012. Impact of regulated deficit irrigation on the physiological characteristics of two rapeseed varieties as affected by different potassium rates. African Journal of Biotechnology 11(24):6510–6519.

   OpenUrl
6. ↵
   1. Barrs, H.D., and
   2. P.E. Weatherley

   . 1962. A re-examination of the relative turgidity technique for estimating water deficits in leaves. Australian Journal of Biological Sciences 15:413–428.

   OpenUrl
7. ↵
   1. Basile, D.V.,
   2. M.R. Basile,
   3. Q.Y. Li, and
   4. W.A. Corpe

   . 1985. Vitamin B12-stimulated growth and development of Jungermannia leiantha Grolle and Gymnocoleainflata (Huds.) Dum. (Hepaticae). Bryologist 88:77–81.

   OpenUrlCrossRef
8. ↵
   1. Bates, L.S.,
   2. R.P. Waldren, and
   3. I.D. Teare

   . 1973. Rapid determination of free proline for water-stress studies. Plant and Soil 39:205–207.

   OpenUrlCrossRefWeb of Science
9. ↵
   1. Bilibio, C.,
   2. J.D.A. Carvalho,
   3. O. Hensel, and
   4. U. Richter

   . 2011. Effect of different levels of water deficit on rapeseed (Brassica napus L.) crop. Ciência e Agrotecnologia 35(4):672–684.

   OpenUrl
10. ↵
    1. Capra, A.,
    2. S. Consoli, and
    3. B. Scicolone

    . 2008. Water management strategies under deficit irrigation. Journal of Agricultural Engineering 4:27–34.

    OpenUrl
11. ↵
    1. Chai, Q.,
    2. Y. Gan,
    3. C. Zhao,
    4. H.L. Xu,
    5. R.M. Waskom,
    6. Y. Niu, and
    7. K.H.M. Siddique

    . 2016. Regulated deficit irrigation for crop production under drought stress: A review. Agronomy for Sustainable Development 36:3.

    OpenUrl
12. ↵
    1. Chun, S.C.,
    2. M. Paramasivan, and
    3. M. Chandrasekaran

    . 2018. Proline accumulation influenced by osmotic stress in arbuscular mycorrhizal symbiotic Plants. Frontiers in Microbiology 9:2525.

    OpenUrl
13. ↵
    1. Dağdelen, N.,
    2. H. Basal,
    3. E. Yılmaz,
    4. T. Gürbüz, and
    5. S., Akcay

    . 2009. Different irrigation regimes affect cotton yield, water use efficiency and fibre quality in western Turkey. Agricultural Water Management 96:111–120.

    OpenUrl
14. 1. Dakshinamurthi, C., and
    2. R.P. Gupta

    . 1968. Practices in Soil Physics. New Delhi, India: Indian Agricultural Research Institute.
15. ↵
    1. Du, T.,
    2. S. Kang,
    3. J. Zhang, and
    4. F. Li

    . 2008. Water use and yield response of cotton to alternate partial root-zone drip irrigation in the arid area of north-west China. Irrigation Science 26:147–159.

    OpenUrlCrossRefWeb of Science
16. ↵
    1. English, M.

    2002. Irrigation advisory services for optimum use of limited water. 18th Commission on Irrigation & Drainage (ICID) Congress, Montreal, Canada. http://www.ipcinfo.org/fileadmin/user_upload/faowater/docs/ias/paper23.pdf.
17. ↵
    1. English, M., and
    2. S.N. Raja

    . 1996. Perspectives on deficit irrigation. Agricultural Water Management 32:1–14.

    OpenUrlCrossRefWeb of Science
18. ↵
    1. FAO (Food and Agriculture Organization)

    . 1978. Effective rainfall in irrigated agriculture (Irrigation and Drainage Paper 25). Rome: Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations.
19. ↵
    1. FAO

    . 1998. Crop evapotranspiration: Guidelines for computing crop water requirements (Irrigation and Drainage Paper 56). Rome: Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations.
20. ↵
    1. FAO

    . 2002. Deficit irrigation practices. Water Report 22. Rome: Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations. http://large.stanford.edu/courses/2016/ph241/lsm2/docs/wr22e.pdf.
21. ↵
    1. FAO

    . 2012. Crop yield response to water. Irrigation and Drainage Paper 66. Rome: Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations. www.fao.org/docrep/016/i2800e/i2800e.pdf.
22. ↵
    1. Fereres, E., and
    2. A.M. Soriano

    . 2007. Deficit irrigation for reducing agricultural water use. Special issue on integrated approaches to sustain and improve plant production under drought stress. Journal of Experimental Botany 58:147–159.

    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
23. ↵
    1. Geerts, S., and
    2. D. Raes

    . 2009. Deficit irrigation as an on-farm strategy to maximize crop water productivity in dry areas. Agricultural Water Management 96(9):1275–1284.

    OpenUrlCrossRefWeb of Science
24. ↵
    1. Gomez, K.A., and
    2. A.A. Gomez

    . 1984. Statistical Procedures for Agricultural Research, 680 p. New Delhi, India: John Wiley.
25. ↵
    1. Green, P.N., and
    2. I.J. Bousfield

    . 1983. Emendation of Methylobacterium Patt, Cole, and Hanson 1976; Methylobacteriumrhodinum (Heumann, 1962) comb. nov.corrig.; Methylobacteriumradiotolerans (Ito and Iizuka 1971) comb. nov.corrig.; and Methylobacteriummesophilicum (Austin and Goodfellow 1979) comb. nov. International Journal of Systematic and Evolutionary Bacteriology 33(4):875877.

    OpenUrl
26. ↵
    1. Hargreaves, G., and
    2. Z. Samani

    . 1984. Economic considerations of deficit irrigation. Journal of Irrigation and Drainage Engineering 110(4):343–358.

    OpenUrl
27. ↵
    1. Haro, R.J.,
    2. J.L. Dardanelli,
    3. M.E. Otegui, and
    4. D.J. Collino

    . 2008. Seed yield determination of peanut crops under water deficit: Soil strength effects on pod set, the source-sink ratio and radiation use efficiency. Field Crop Research 109:24–33.

    OpenUrl
28. ↵
    1. Hassan, F.A.S.,
    2. S. Bazaid, and
    3. E.F. Ali

    . 2013. Effect of deficit irrigation on growth, yield and volatile oil content on Rosmarinus officinalis L. plant. Journal of Medicinal Plants Studies 1(3):12–21.

    OpenUrl
29. ↵
    1. Hayat, Q.,
    2. S. Hayat,
    3. M. Irfan, and
    4. A. Ahmad

    . 2010. Effect of exogenous salicylic acid under changing environment: A review. Environmental and Experimental Botany 68(1):14–25.

    OpenUrlCrossRef
30. ↵
    1. Holland, M.A.

    1997. Occam’s razor applied to hormonology: Are cytokinins produced by plants? Plant Physiology 115:865–868.

    OpenUrlPubMedWeb of Science
31. ↵
    1. Humphries, E.C.

    1956. Mineral Components and Ash Analysis. In Modern Methods of Plant Analysis, 468–502. Berlin: Springer–Verlag.
32. ↵
    1. Ivanova, E.G.,
    2. N.V. Doronina, and
    3. Y.A. Trotsenko

    . 2001. Aerobic methylobacteria are capable of synthesizing auxins. Microbiology 70:392–397.

    OpenUrlCrossRefWeb of Science
33. ↵
    1. Jackson, K.L.

    1973. Soil Chemical Analysis. 2nd Indian Reprint. New Delhi: Prentice Hall of India Pvt. Ltd.
34. ↵
    1. James, L.D., and
    2. R.R. Lee

    . 1971. Economics of Water Resources Planning, 325 p. New York: McGraw-Hill. http://ufdc.ufl.edu/UF00103123/00001/3j.
35. ↵
    1. Jongrungklang, N.,
    2. B. Toomsan,
    3. N. Vorasoot,
    4. S. Jogloy,
    5. K.J. Boote,
    6. G. Hoogenboom, and
    7. A. Patanothai

    . 2011. Rooting traits of peanut genotypes with different yield responses to pre-flowering drought stress. Field Crop Research 120:262–270.

    OpenUrl
36. ↵
    1. Kazemeini, S.A.,
    2. M. Edalat, and
    3. A. Shekoofa

    . 2009. Interaction effects of deficit irrigation and row spacing on sunflower (Helianthus annuus L.) growth, seed yield and oil yield. African Journal of Agricultural Research 4(11):1165–1170.

    OpenUrl
37. ↵
    1. Kirda, C.

    2002. Deficit irrigation scheduling based on plant growth stages showing water stress tolerance. In Deficit Irrigation Practice. Water Report 22. Rome: FAO.
38. 1. Kirnak, H.,
    2. E. Dogan, and
    3. H. Turkoglu

    . 2010. Effect of drip irrigation intensity on soybean seed yield and quality in the semi-arid Harran plain, Turkey. Spanish Journal of Agricultural Research 8(4):1208–1217.

    OpenUrl
39. ↵
    1. Koenig, R.L.,
    2. R.O. Morris, and
    3. J.C. Polacco

    . 2002. tRNA is the source of low-level trans-Zeatin production in Methylobacterium spp. Journal of Bacteriology 184:1832–1842.

    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
40. ↵
    1. Latimer, G.W.

    2016. Official Methods of Analysis of AOAC International. Rockville, MD: AOAC International.
41. ↵
    1. Lee, H.S.,
    2. M. Madhaiyan,
    3. C.W. Kim,
    4. S.J. Choi,
    5. K.Y. Chung, and
    6. T.M. Sa

    . 2006. Physiological enhancement of early growth of rice seedlings (Oryza sativa L.) by production of phytohormone of N₂-fixing methylotrophic isolates. Biology and Fertility of Soils 42:402–408.

    OpenUrl
42. ↵
    1. Madhaiyan, M.,
    2. S. Poonguzhali,
    3. M. Senthilkumar,
    4. S. Seshadri,
    5. H. Chung,
    6. J. Yang,
    7. S. Sundaram, and
    8. T.M. Sa

    . 2004. Growth promotion and induction of systemic resistance in rice cultivar Co-47 (Oryza sativa L.) by Methylobacterium spp. Botanical Bulletin of Academia Sinica Taipei 45(4):315–324.

    OpenUrl
43. ↵
    1. Madhaiyan, M.,
    2. S. Poonguzhali,
    3. S.P. Sundaram, and
    4. T. Sa

    . 2006. A new sight into foliar applied methanol influencing phylloplane methylotrophic dynamics and growth promotion of cotton (Gossypium hirsutum L.) and sugarcane (Saccharum officinarum L.). Environmental and Experimental Botany 57(1-2):168–176.

    OpenUrlCrossRef
44. ↵
    1. Mannocchi, F., and
    2. P. Mecarelli

    . 1994. Optimization analysis of deficit irrigation systems. Journal of Irrigation and Drainage Engineering 120(3):484–503.

    OpenUrl
45. ↵
    1. Mirabad, A.A.,
    2. M. Lotfi, and
    3. M.R. Roozban

    . 2013. Impact of water-deficit stress on growth, yield and sugar content of cantaloupe (Cucumis melo L.). International Journal of Agriculture and Crop Sciences 5(22):2778–2782.

    OpenUrl
46. ↵
    1. Murty, K.S., and
    2. S.K. Majumdar

    . 1962. Modification of the technique for determination of chlorophyll stability index in relation to studies of drought resistance in rice. Current Science 31:470–471.

    OpenUrl
47. 1. Olsen, S.R.

    1954. Estimation of available phosphorus in soil by extraction with sodium bicarbonate. USDA Circular No. 939. Washington, DC: USDA.
48. ↵
    1. Padalia, M.R., and
    2. C.C. Patel

    . 1980. Length and width method for estimation of leaf area of groundnut. Indian Journal of Agricultural Sciences 50:880–882.

    OpenUrl
49. 1. Piper, C.S.

    1966. Soil and Plant Analysis. Mumbai: Harora Publishers.
50. ↵
    1. Rao, R.N.,
    2. S. Singh,
    3. M.V.K. Sivakumar,
    4. K.L. Srivastava, and
    5. J.H. Williams

    . 1985. Effect of water deficit at different growth phases of peanut. I. Yield responses. Agronomy Journal 77:782–786.

    OpenUrl
51. ↵
    1. Reddy, T.Y.,
    2. V.R. Reddy, and
    3. V. Anbumozhi

    . 2003. Physiological responses of groundnut (Arachis hypogaea L.) to drought stress and its amelioration: A critical review. Plant Growth Regulators 41:75–88.

    OpenUrl
52. ↵
    1. Rodrigues, C.G., and
    2. S.L. Pereira

    . 2009. Assessing economic impacts of deficit irrigation as related to water productivity and water costs. Biosystems Engineering 103:536–551.

    OpenUrlCrossRef
53. ↵
    1. Rosegrant, M.W.,
    2. X. Cai, and
    3. S.A. Cline

    . 2002a. Global water outlook to 2025: Averting an impending crisis. Washington, DC: International Food Policy Research Institute.
54. ↵
    1. Rosegrant, M.W.,
    2. X. Cai, and
    3. S.A. Cline

    . 2002b. World water and food to 2025: Dealing with scarcity. Washington, DC: International Food Policy Research Institute.
55. ↵
    1. Saddique, Q.,
    2. D.L. Liu,
    3. B. Wang,
    4. P. Feng,
    5. J. He,
    6. A. Ajaz,
    7. J. Ji,
    8. J. Xu,
    9. C. Zhang, and
    10. H. Cai

    . 2020. Modelling future climate change impacts on winter wheat yield and water use: A case study in Guanzhong Plain, Northwestern China. European Journal of Agronomy 119:126113.

    OpenUrl
56. ↵
    1. Sampathkumar, T.,
    2. B.J. Pandian,
    3. P. Jeyakumar, and
    4. P. Manickasundaram

    . 2014. Effect of deficit irrigation on yield, relative leaf water content, leaf proline accumulation and chlorophyll stability index of cotton-maize cropping sequence. Experimental Agriculture 50(3):407–425.

    OpenUrl
57. ↵
    1. Sampathkumar, T.,
    2. B.J. Pandian,
    3. M.V. Rangaswamy,
    4. P. Manickasundaram, and
    5. P. Jeyakumar

    . 2013. Influence of deficit irrigation on growth, yield and yield parameters of cotton–maize cropping sequence. Agricultural Water Management 130:90–102.

    OpenUrl
58. ↵
    1. Songsri, P.,
    2. S. Jogloy,
    3. C.C. Holbrook,
    4. T. Kesmala,
    5. N. Vorasoot,
    6. C. Akkasaeng, and
    7. A. Patanothai

    . 2009. Association of root, specific leaf area and SPAD chlorophyll meter reading to water use efficiency of peanut under different available soil water. Agricultural Water Management 96:790–798.

    OpenUrl
59. 1. Stanford, G., and
    2. L. English

    . 1949. Use of flame photometer in rapid soil test for K and Ca. Agronomy Journal 41:446–447.

    OpenUrl
60. 1. Subbiah, B.V., and
    2. G.E. Asija

    . 1956. A rapid procedure for the estimation of available nitrogen in soil. Current Science 25:259.

    OpenUrl
61. ↵
    1. Suleiman, A.A.,
    2. C.M. Tojo Soler, and
    3. G. Hoogenboom

    . 2007. Evaluation of FAO-56 crop coefficient procedures for deficit irrigation management of cotton in a humid climate. Agricultural Water Management 91(1-3):33–42.

    OpenUrl
62. ↵
    1. Surendar, K.K.,
    2. D. Durga Devi,
    3. I. Ravi,
    4. P. Jeyakumar, and
    5. K. Velayudham

    . 2013. Water stress affects plant relative water content, soluble protein, total chlorophyll content and yield of ratoon banana. International Journal of Horticulture 3(17):96–103.

    OpenUrl
63. ↵
    1. Surendran, U.,
    2. B. Anagha,
    3. P. Raja,
    4. V. Kumar,
    5. K. Rajan, and
    6. M. Jayakumar

    . 2019. Analysis of drought from humid, semiarid and arid regions of India using DrinC model with different drought indices. Water Resources Management 33:1521–1540.

    OpenUrl
64. ↵
    1. Surendran, U.,
    2. V. Kumar,
    3. S. Ramasubramoniam, and
    4. P. Raja

    . 2017. Development of drought indices for semi-arid region using drought indices calculator (DrinC): A case study from Madurai district, a semi-arid region in India. Water Resources Management 31:3593–3605.

    OpenUrl
65. ↵
    1. Tabatabaei, S.A.,
    2. V. Rafiee,
    3. E. Shakeri, and
    4. M. Salmani

    . 2012. Responses of sunflower (Helianthus annuus L.) to deficit irrigation at different growth stages. International Journal of Agricultural Research Review 2(5):624–629.

    OpenUrl
66. ↵
    1. TNAU (Tamil Nadu Agricultural University)

    . 2012. Crop Production Guide 2012. Tamil Nau, India: Department of Agriculture, Government of Tamil Nadu, Chennai, and TNAU, Coimbatore.
67. ↵
    1. Valipour, M.,
    2. S.M. Bateni,
    3. M.A. Gholami Sefidkouhi,
    4. M. Raeini-Sarjaz, and
    5. V.P. Singh

    . 2020. Complexity of forces driving trend of reference evapotranspiration and signals of climate change. Atmosphere 11:1081.

    OpenUrl
68. ↵
    1. Vijayalakshmi, R.

    2003. Fertigation through microsprinkler irrigation and land configuration in groundnut. PhD Thesis, Department of Agronomy, Agricultural College and Research Institute, Tamil Nadu Agricultural University, Madurai, India.
69. 1. Walkley, A., and
    2. I.A. Black

    . 1934. An examination of the digestion method for determining soil organic matter and proposed modification of the chromic acid titration method. Soil Science 37:29–34.

    OpenUrlCrossRef
70. ↵
    1. WHO (World Health Organization)

    . 2009. Protecting health from climate change: Connecting science, policy and people. Geneva: World Health Organization. http://whqlibdoc.who.int/publications/2009/9789241598880_eng.pdf.
71. ↵
    1. Wright, G.C.,
    2. K.T. Hubick, and
    3. G.D. Farquhar

    . 1991. Physiological analysis of peanut cultivar response to timing and duration of drought stress. Australian Journal of Agricultural Research 42:453–470.

    OpenUrlCrossRefWeb of Science
72. ↵
    1. Xiao, D.,
    2. D.L. Liu,
    3. B. Wang,
    4. P. Feng,
    5. H. Bai, and
    6. J. Tang

    . 2020. Climate change impact on yields and water use of wheat and maize in the North China Plain under future climate change scenarios. Agricultural Water Management 238:106238.

    OpenUrl
73. ↵
    1. Yaseen, R.,
    2. J. Shafi,
    3. W. Ahmad,
    4. M.S. Rana,
    5. M. Salim, and
    6. S.A. Qaisrani

    . 2014. Effect of deficit irrigation and mulch on soil physical properties, growth and yield of maize. Environment and Ecology Research 2(3):122–137.

    OpenUrl