Article Figures & Data
Figures
- Figure 1
Normal precipitation map (1980 to 2010) of Nebraska with highlighted cities/towns where the survey events were conducted. Black boundaries around each site define the county borders.
- Figure 2
Cover crop acreage (in acres) annually planted by respondents from the surveys conducted at different locations in Nebraska.
- Figure 3
Challenges in cover crop adoption. Ratings are from 1 (least challenging) to 5 (most challenging).
- Figure 4
Incentives that drive soil health management adoption. Ratings are from 1 (no value as an incentive) to 5 (high value as an incentive).
- Figure 5
Factors that impact the application rates of nitrogen (N), phosphorus (P), and potassium (K). Ratings are from 1 (no impact) to 5 (most impact).
- Figure 6
(a) Word cloud generated based on the producers’ comments on the cover crop adoption challenges and benefits. (b) Words were categorized based on a sentimental lexicon to show positive (bottom) and negative sentiments (top) associated with the cover crop adoption.
Tables
- Table 2
Ranking and Index Scoring (IS) for the challenges in the adoption of cover crop (CC).
- Table 3
Ranking index of the motivation associated with soil health management.
- Table 4
Ranking Index of the factors that impact the application rates of nitrogen (N), phosphorus (P), and potassium (K).
In this issue
Jump to section
Related Articles
Cited By...
- No citing articles found.