Skip to main content

Main menu

  • Home
  • Content
    • Current Issue
    • Early Online
    • Archive
    • Subject Collections
  • Info For
    • Authors
    • Reviewers
    • Subscribers
    • Advertisers
  • About
    • About JSWC
    • Editorial Board
    • Permissions
    • Alerts
    • RSS Feeds
    • Contact Us

User menu

  • Register
  • Subscribe
  • My alerts
  • Log in
  • My Cart

Search

  • Advanced search
Journal of Soil and Water Conservation

  • Register
  • Subscribe
  • My alerts
  • Log in
  • My Cart
Journal of Soil and Water Conservation

Advanced Search

  • Home
  • Content
    • Current Issue
    • Early Online
    • Archive
    • Subject Collections
  • Info For
    • Authors
    • Reviewers
    • Subscribers
    • Advertisers
  • About
    • About JSWC
    • Editorial Board
    • Permissions
    • Alerts
    • RSS Feeds
    • Contact Us
  • Follow SWCS on Twitter
  • Visit SWCS on Facebook
ArticleResearch Section

Simulating behavioral heterogeneity in watershed models: A systematic review of fertilizer use in SWAT studies

L. Arrueta, D. Jackson-Smith and M. Kalcic
Journal of Soil and Water Conservation May 2022, 77 (3) 249-260; DOI: https://doi.org/10.2489/jswc.2022.00055
L. Arrueta
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
D. Jackson-Smith
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
M. Kalcic
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • Article
  • Figures & Data
  • Supplemental
  • References
  • Info & Metrics
  • PDF
Loading

Abstract

Nonpoint source pollution is the primary cause of reduced water quality in the United States. This pollution results primarily from fertilizer and manure application in farmland. One of the hydrological models most widely used to predict the effect of nitrogen (N) and phosphorus (P) fertilizer application on nutrient loadings is the Soil and Water Assessment Tool (SWAT). While important advances have been made to improve the representation of biophysical processes within SWAT, modelers often fail to capture the complexity of human land management behaviors. Meanwhile, decades of social science research have demonstrated that farmers are not a homogeneous group, but rather exhibit complex and diverse behaviors. In this paper we present a systematic review of recently published papers that use SWAT to document how the modeling community typically represents fertilizer application behaviors. We compare these representations with findings from recent farmer surveys that captured information about fertilizer application rates. We found that most SWAT model applications assume that farmer field management behaviors are relatively homogeneous (e.g., all farmers behave in the same way), and that farmers generally apply fertilizer using rational agronomic or economic criteria. These simplifying assumptions conflict with the reality of farmers’ fertilizer behavior. Farmer surveys in Minnesota and Ohio show considerable variability in N and P fertilizer application rates on corn (Zea mays L.) fields following soybeans (Glycine max [L.] Merr.). The disconnect between SWAT modeling approaches and results of farmer surveys point to opportunities to better represent the heterogeneity of farmers’ fertilizer behavior in SWAT and other hydrologic models, which could improve our ability to link changes in land use and management to water quality and increase the effectiveness of conservation program interventions.

Key words
  • conservation
  • farmer behavior
  • fertilizer use
  • Soil and Water Assessment Tool (SWAT)
  • water quality
  • watershed modeling
  • © 2022 by the Soil and Water Conservation Society
View Full Text

This article requires a subscription to view the full text. If you have a subscription you may use the login form below to view the article. Access to this article can also be purchased.

Log in using your username and password

Forgot your user name or password?

Purchase access

You may purchase access to this article. This will require you to create an account if you don't already have one.
PreviousNext
Back to top

In this issue

Journal of Soil and Water Conservation: 77 (3)
Journal of Soil and Water Conservation
Vol. 77, Issue 3
May/June 2022
  • Table of Contents
  • Table of Contents (PDF)
  • About the Cover
  • Index by author
  • Front Matter (PDF)
Print
Download PDF
Article Alerts
Sign In to Email Alerts with your Email Address
Email Article

Thank you for your interest in spreading the word on Journal of Soil and Water Conservation.

NOTE: We only request your email address so that the person you are recommending the page to knows that you wanted them to see it, and that it is not junk mail. We do not capture any email address.

Enter multiple addresses on separate lines or separate them with commas.
Simulating behavioral heterogeneity in watershed models: A systematic review of fertilizer use in SWAT studies
(Your Name) has sent you a message from Journal of Soil and Water Conservation
(Your Name) thought you would like to see the Journal of Soil and Water Conservation web site.
CAPTCHA
This question is for testing whether or not you are a human visitor and to prevent automated spam submissions.
1 + 0 =
Solve this simple math problem and enter the result. E.g. for 1+3, enter 4.
Citation Tools
Simulating behavioral heterogeneity in watershed models: A systematic review of fertilizer use in SWAT studies
L. Arrueta, D. Jackson-Smith, M. Kalcic
Journal of Soil and Water Conservation May 2022, 77 (3) 249-260; DOI: 10.2489/jswc.2022.00055

Citation Manager Formats

  • BibTeX
  • Bookends
  • EasyBib
  • EndNote (tagged)
  • EndNote 8 (xml)
  • Medlars
  • Mendeley
  • Papers
  • RefWorks Tagged
  • Ref Manager
  • RIS
  • Zotero
Request Permissions
Share
Simulating behavioral heterogeneity in watershed models: A systematic review of fertilizer use in SWAT studies
L. Arrueta, D. Jackson-Smith, M. Kalcic
Journal of Soil and Water Conservation May 2022, 77 (3) 249-260; DOI: 10.2489/jswc.2022.00055
Reddit logo Twitter logo Facebook logo Mendeley logo
  • Tweet Widget
  • Facebook Like
  • Google Plus One

Jump to section

  • Article
    • Abstract
    • Introduction
    • Materials and Methods
    • Results and Discussion
    • Summary and Conclusions
    • Supplemental Material
    • Acknowledgements
    • References
  • Figures & Data
  • Supplemental
  • Info & Metrics
  • References
  • PDF

Related Articles

  • Google Scholar

Cited By...

  • No citing articles found.
  • Google Scholar

More in this TOC Section

  • Effects of economic and climatic factors on agricultural water use in arid regions
  • Sediment delivery ratios from forest road networks and harvesting operational features by physiographic region in the southeastern United States
  • Gully erosion susceptibility prediction in Mollisols using machine learning models
Show more Research Section

Similar Articles

Keywords

  • conservation
  • farmer behavior
  • fertilizer use
  • Soil and Water Assessment Tool (SWAT)
  • water quality
  • watershed modeling

Content

  • Current Issue
  • Early Online
  • Archive
  • Subject Collections

Info For

  • Authors
  • Reviewers
  • Subscribers
  • Advertisers

Customer Service

  • Subscriptions
  • Permissions and Reprints
  • Terms of Use
  • Privacy

SWCS

  • Membership
  • Publications
  • Meetings and Events
  • Conservation Career Center

© 2023 Soil and Water Conservation Society