Research ArticleResearch Section

“How can you put a price on the environment?” Farmer perspectives on stewardship and payment for ecosystem services

A.C. White, J.W. Faulkner, D.S. Conner, V.E. Méndez and M.T. Niles
Journal of Soil and Water Conservation May 2022, 77 (3) 270-283; DOI: https://doi.org/10.2489/jswc.2022.00041

References

  1. ↵
    1. Akers, J.F., and
    2. M. Yasué
    . 2019. Motivational crowding in payments for ecosystem service schemes: A global systematic review. Conservation and Society 17(4):377.
    OpenUrl
  2. ↵
    1. Baumgart-Getz, A.,
    2. L.S. Prokopy, and
    3. K. Floress
    . 2012. Why farmers adopt best management practice in the United States: A meta-analysis of the adoption literature. Journal of Environmental Management 96(1):17–25.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
  3. ↵
    1. Bergquist, M.,
    2. A. Nilsson,
    3. N. Harring, and
    4. S. Jagers
    . 2021. Determinants for accepting climate change mitigation policies: A meta-analysis. Research Square. doi:10.21203/rs.3.rs-333840/v1.
    OpenUrlCrossRef
  4. ↵
    1. Brugger, J., and
    2. M. Crimmins
    . 2015. Designing institutions to support local-level climate change adaptation: Insights from a case study of the US Cooperative Extension System. Weather, Climate, and Society 7(1):18–38.
    OpenUrl
  5. ↵
    1. Carlisle, L.
    2016. Factors influencing farmer adoption of soil health practices in the United States: A narrative review. Agroecology and Sustainable Food Systems 40(6):583–613.
    OpenUrl
  6. ↵
    1. Carolan, M.S.
    2006. Social change and the adoption and adaptation of knowledge claims: Whose truth do you trust in regard to sustainable agriculture?. Agriculture and Human Values 23(3):325–339.
    OpenUrl
  7. ↵
    1. Chan, K.M.,
    2. E. Anderson,
    3. M. Chapman,
    4. K. Jespersen, and
    5. P. Olmsted
    . 2017. Payments for ecosystem services: Rife with problems and potential—for transformation towards sustainability. Ecological Economics 140:110–122.
    OpenUrl
  8. ↵
    1. Chan, K.M.,
    2. R.K. Gould, and
    3. U. Pascual
    . 2018. Editorial overview: Relational values: What are they, and what’s the fuss about?. Current Opinion in Environmental Sustainability 35:A1–A7.
    OpenUrl
  9. ↵
    1. Chapman, M.,
    2. T. Satterfield,
    3. H. Wittman, and
    4. K. Chan
    . 2020. A payment by any other name: Is Costa Rica’s PES a payment for services or a support for stewards?. World Development 129:104900.
    OpenUrl
  10. ↵
    1. Cohen, S.,
    2. B.G. Glaser, and
    3. A.L. Strauss
    . 1969. The discovery of grounded theory: Strategies for qualitative research. Book review. The British Journal of Sociology 20(2):227–227.
    OpenUrlCrossRef
  11. ↵
    1. Conner, D.,
    2. J. Miller,
    3. A. Zia,
    4. Q. Wang, and
    5. H. Darby
    . 2016. Conjoint analysis of farmers’ response to conservation incentives. Sustainability (Switzerland) 8(7):684.
    OpenUrl
  12. ↵
    1. Dolan, K.
    2015. The importance of inter-agency collaboration and public engagement in the development of the implementation plan for the nonpoint source-focused Vermont Lake Champlain phosphorus TMDL. Vermont Journal of Environmental Law 17(4):633–687.
    OpenUrl
  13. ↵
    1. Duncan, E.W.,
    2. D.L. Osmond,
    3. A.L. Shober,
    4. L. Starr,
    5. P. Tomlinson,
    6. J.L. Kovar,
    7. T.B. Moorman,
    8. H.M. Peterson,
    9. N.M. Fiorellino, and
    10. K. Reid
    . 2019. Phosphorus and soil health management practices. Agricultural and Environmental Letters 4(1):190014. https://doi.org/10.2134/ael2019.04.0014.
    OpenUrl
  14. ↵
    1. Easton, Z.M., and
    2. J.W. Faulkner
    . 2016. Communicating climate change to agricultural audiences. Virginia Cooperative Extension Publication BSE-203P. Petersburg, VA: Virginia State University. http://pubs.ext.vt.edu/BSE/BSE-203/BSE-203-PDF.pdf.
  15. ↵
    1. Fishbein, M., and
    2. I. Ajzen
    . 2011. Predicting and Changing Behavior: The Reasoned Action Approach. New York: Psychology Press.
  16. ↵
    1. Flora, C.B.,
    2. J.L. Flora, and
    3. S.P. Gasteyer
    . 2018. Rural Communities: Legacy + Change. Oxfordshire, UK: Routledge.
  17. ↵
    1. Foley, J.A.,
    2. R. DeFries,
    3. G.P. Asner,
    4. C. Barford,
    5. G. Bonan,
    6. S.R. Carpenter,
    7. F.S. Chapin,
    8. M.T. Coe,
    9. G.C. Daily,
    10. H.K. Gibbs,
    11. J.H. Helkowski,
    12. T. Holloway,
    13. E.A. Howard,
    14. C.J. Kucharik,
    15. C. Monfreda,
    16. J.A. Patz,
    17. I.C. Prentice,
    18. N. Ramankutty, and
    19. P.K. Snyder
    . 2005. Global consequences of land use. Science 309(5734):570–574.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
    1. Freire, P.
    1972. Pedagogy of the Oppressed, translation by M. Bergman Ramos. New York: Herder.
  19. ↵
    1. Gould, R.K., and
    2. N.K. Lincoln
    . 2017. Expanding the suite of cultural ecosystem services to include ingenuity, perspective, and life teaching. Ecosystem Services 25:117–127.
    OpenUrl
  20. ↵
    1. Gronewold, K.L.,
    2. A. Burnett, and
    3. M. Meister
    . 2012. Farmers’ cynicism toward nature and distrust of the government: Where does that leave conservation buffer programs? Applied Environmental Education and Communication 11(1):18–24.
    OpenUrl
    1. Guest, G.,
    2. E. Namey, and
    3. K. McKenna
    . 2017. How many focus groups are enough? Building an evidence base for nonprobability sample sizes. Field Methods 29(1):3–22.
    OpenUrlCrossRef
  22. ↵
    1. Hall, J., and
    2. J. Pretty
    . 2008. Then and now: Norfolk farmers’ changing relationships and linkages with government agencies during transformations in land management. Journal of Farm Management 13(6):393–418.
    OpenUrl
  23. ↵
    1. Hammond Wagner, C.,
    2. J. Gourevitch,
    3. K. Horner,
    4. E. Kinnebrew,
    5. R. Maden,
    6. E. Recchia,
    7. A. White,
    8. A. Wiegman,
    9. T. Ricketts, and
    10. E. Roy
    . 2019. Payment for Ecosystem Services for Vermont. Issue Paper 19-01. Burlington, VT: Gund Institute for Environment.
  24. ↵
    1. Hirons, M.,
    2. C. Comberti, and
    3. R. Dunford
    . 2016. Valuing cultural ecosystem services. Annual Review of Environment and Resources 41(1):545–574.
    OpenUrl
  25. ↵
    1. Kandel, S., and
    2. N. Cuéllar
    . 2011. Compensation for Ecosystem Services: Directions, Potentials and Pitfalls for Rural Communities. San Salvador, El Salvador: Salvadoran Research Program on Development and Environment.
  26. ↵
    1. Kindon, S.,
    2. R. Pain, and
    3. M. Kesby
    . 2007. Participatory action research approaches and methods: Connecting people, participation and place. Oxfordshire, UK: Routledge.
  27. ↵
    1. Kinzig, A.P.,
    2. C. Perrings,
    3. F.S. Chapin,
    4. S. Polasky,
    5. V.K. Smith,
    6. D. Tilman, and
    7. B.L. Turner
    . 2011. Paying for ecosystem services: Promise and peril. Science 334(6056):603–604.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  28. ↵
    1. Kemp, B.,
    2. P. Doton,
    3. L. Gervais,
    4. H. Darby, and
    5. J. Carter
    . 2019. A proposal to explore how to value agriculture ecosystem services in Vermont. Proposal to the legislature from the Champlain Valley Farmer Coalition, Farmer Watershed Alliance, Connecticut River Watershed Farmer Alliance and University of Vermont Extension.
    1. Lal, R.
    2008. Carbon sequestration. Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences 363(1492):815–830.
    OpenUrlCrossRefGeoRefPubMed
  30. ↵
    1. Lamarque, P.,
    2. P. Meyfroidt,
    3. B. Nettier, and
    4. S. Lavorel
    . 2014. How ecosystem services knowledge and values influence farmers’ decision-making. PLoS ONE 9(9):e107572. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0107572.
    OpenUrlCrossRef
  31. ↵
    1. Leopold, A.
    1949. A Sand County Almanac. New York: Oxford University Press.
  32. ↵
    1. Liu, T.,
    2. R.J.F. Bruins, and
    3. M.T. Heberling
    . 2018. Factors influencing farmers’ adoption of best management practices: A review and synthesis. Sustainability (Switzerland)10(2):432.
    OpenUrl
  33. ↵
    1. Luck, G.W.,
    2. K.M. Chan,
    3. U. Eser,
    4. E. Gómez-Baggethun,
    5. B. Matzdorf,
    6. B. Norton, and
    7. M.B. Potschin
    . 2012. Ethical considerations in on-ground applications of the ecosystem services concept. BioScience 62(12):1020–1029.
    OpenUrlCrossRefWeb of Science
  34. ↵
    1. Ma, S.,
    2. S.M. Swinton,
    3. F. Lupi, and
    4. C. Jolejole-Foreman
    . 2012. Farmers’ willingness to participate in payment-for-environmental-services programmes. Journal of Agricultural Economics 63(3):604–626.
    OpenUrlCrossRefWeb of Science
  35. ↵
    1. Marrow, A.J.
    1977. The Practical Theorist: The Life and Work of Kurt Lewin. New York: Teachers College Press.
  36. ↵
    1. Masciandaro, G.,
    2. C. Macci,
    3. E. Peruzzi, and
    4. S. Doni
    . 2018. Soil carbon in the world: Ecosystem services linked to soil carbon in forest and agricultural soils. In The Future of Soil Carbon,1–38. Cambridge, MA: Academic Press.
  37. ↵
    1. Méndez, V.E.,
    2. C.M. Bacon,
    3. R. Cohen, and
    4. S.R. Gliessman
    . 2015. Agroecology: A Transdisciplinary, Participatory and Action-Oriented Approach. Boca Raton, FL: CRC Press.
  38. ↵
    1. Meyfroidt, P.
    2013. Environmental cognitions, land change, and social-ecological feedbacks: An overview. Journal of Land Use Science 8(3):341–367.
    OpenUrl
  39. ↵
    1. Miller, B.W.,
    2. S.C. Caplow, and
    3. P.W. Leslie
    . 2012. Feedbacks between conservation and social-ecological systems. Conservation Biology 26(2):218–227.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
  40. ↵
    1. Mills, J.,
    2. P. Gaskell,
    3. J. Ingram,
    4. J. Dwyer,
    5. M. Reed, and
    6. C. Short
    . 2017. Engaging farmers in environmental management through a better understanding of behaviour. Agriculture and Human Values 34(2):283–299.
    OpenUrl
    1. Minasny, B.,
    2. B. Malone,
    3. A. McBratney,
    4. D. Angers,
    5. D. Arrouays,
    6. A. Chambers,
    7. V. Chaplot,
    8. Z. Chen,
    9. K. Cheng,
    10. B. Das, and
    11. D.J. Field
    . 2017. Soil carbon 4 per mille. Geoderma 292:59–86.
    OpenUrlCrossRef
  42. ↵
    1. Nickerson, R.S.
    1998. Confirmation bias: A ubiquitous phenomenon in many guises. Review of General Psychology 2(2):175–220.
    OpenUrlCrossRef
  43. ↵
    1. Niles, M.T.,
    2. C. Horner,
    3. R. Chintala, and
    4. J. Tricarico
    , 2019. A review of determinants for dairy farmer decision making on manure management strategies in high-income countries. Environmental Research Letters 14(5):053004.
    OpenUrl
    1. Niles, M.
    n.d. Farmer Perspectives of Government Regulations: Benefits, Challenges and Opportunities. Burlington, VT: College of Agriculture and Life Science, University of Vermont. https://c16533b5-62f9-4464-83c5-1fc5a1ccd9bc.filesusr.com/ugd/64f510_876da5aced994329a359ecc5b4247577.pdf.
  45. ↵
    1. van Noordwijk, M., and
    2. B. Leimona
    . 2010. Principles for fairness and efficiency in enhancing environmental services in Asia: Payments, compensation, or co-investment? Ecology and Society 15(4):17.
    OpenUrl
  46. ↵
    1. Oldekop, J.A.,
    2. G. Holmes,
    3. W. Harris, and
    4. K. Evans
    . 2016. A global assessment of the social and conservation outcomes of protected areas. Conservation Biology 30(1):133–141.
    OpenUrl
  47. ↵
    1. Page, G., and
    2. B. Bellotti
    . 2015. Farmers value on-farm ecosystem services as important, but what are the impediments to participation in PES schemes? Science of the Total Environment 515:12–19.
    OpenUrl
  48. ↵
    1. Power, A.G.
    2010. Ecosystem services and agriculture: Tradeoffs and synergies. Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences 365(1554):2959–2971.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  49. ↵
    1. Prokopy, L.S.,
    2. K. Floress,
    3. J. Arbuckle,
    4. S. Church,
    5. F. Eanes,
    6. Y. Gao,
    7. B. Gramig,
    8. P. Ranjan, and
    9. A.S. Singh
    . 2019. Adoption of agricultural conservation practices in the United States: Evidence from 35 years of quantitative literature. Journal of Soil and Water Conservation 74(5):520–534. https://doi.org/10.2489/jswc.74.5.520.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  50. ↵
    1. Ranjan, P.,
    2. S.P. Church,
    3. K. Floress, and
    4. L.S. Prokopy
    . 2019. Synthesizing conservation motivations and barriers: What have we learned from qualitative studies of farmers’ behaviors in the United States?. Society and Natural Resources 32(11):1171–1199.
    OpenUrl
  51. ↵
    1. Risbey, J.,
    2. M. Kandlikar,
    3. H. Dowlatabadi, and
    4. D. Graetz
    . 1999. Scale, context, and decision making in agricultural adaptation to climate variability and change. Mitigation and Adaptation Strategies for Global Change 4(2):137–165.
    OpenUrl
  52. ↵
    1. Rode, J., E. Gómez-Baggethun, and
    2. T. Krause
    . 2015. Motivation crowding by economic incentives in conservation policy: A review of the empirical evidence. Ecological Economics 117:270–282.
    OpenUrl
  53. ↵
    1. Rodríguez-Cruz, L.A., and
    2. M.T. Niles
    . 2021. Awareness of climate change’s impacts and motivation to adapt are not enough to drive action: A look of Puerto Rican farmers after Hurricane Maria. PloS One 16(1):e0244512.
    OpenUrl
  54. ↵
    1. Roesch-McNally, G.,
    2. J.G. Arbuckle, and
    3. J.C. Tyndall
    . 2018. Soil as social-ecological feedback: Examining the “ethic” of soil stewardship among Corn Belt farmers. Rural Sociology 83(1):145–173.
    OpenUrl
    1. Roesch-Mcnally, G.E.,
    2. A. Basche,
    3. J. Arbuckle,
    4. J. Tyndall,
    5. F. Miguez,
    6. T. Bowman, and
    7. R. Clay
    . 2018. The trouble with cover crops: Farmers’ experiences with overcoming barriers to adoption. Renewable Agriculture and Food Systems 33(4):322–333.
    OpenUrl
  56. ↵
    1. Rogers, E.
    2003. Diffusion of Innovations, 5th edition. New York: Free Press.
  57. ↵
    1. Rosa, H.,
    2. S. Kandel, and
    3. L. Dimas
    . 2003. Compensation for environmental services and rural communities: Lessons from the Americas and key issues for strengthening community strategies. San Salvador, El Salvador: Fundación PRISMA.
  58. ↵
    1. Ross, C.,
    2. V. Grubinger,
    3. A. Nihart,
    4. E. Chapin,
    5. N. Everhart,
    6. L. Gleason,
    7. N. Richardson,
    8. P. Costello,
    9. E. Kahler, and
    10. A. Asch
    . 2018. A 2018 Exploration of the Future of Vermont Agriculture: Ideas to seed a conversation and a call to action. Burlington, VT: UVM Extension and Vermont Housing and Conservation Board. https://www.uvm.edu/sites/default/files/media/Future-of-VT-Ag-Report-2018-Final_5.pdf.
  59. ↵
    1. Salzman, J.,
    2. G. Bennett,
    3. N. Carroll,
    4. A. Goldstein, and
    5. M. Jenkins
    . 2018. The global status and trends of Payments for Ecosystem Services. Nature Sustainability 1(3):136–144.
    OpenUrl
  60. ↵
    1. Sevoian, N.
    2016. Working Lands Enterprise Initiative Webinar - Chapter 1. VTAgriculture. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=0ZmNuzFkLS0.
  61. ↵
    1. Schwartz, S.H.
    1977. Normative influences on altruism. Advances in Experimental Social Psychology 10:221–279.
    OpenUrlCrossRef
  62. ↵
    1. Scoones, I.
    1998. Sustainable Rural Livelihoods: A Framework for Analysis. IDS Working Paper 72, Brighton, UK: The Institute of Development Studies.
  63. ↵
    1. Scoones, I., and
    2. J. Thompson
    . 1994. Beyond Farmer First: Rural People’s Knowledge, Agricultural Research and Extension Practice. London: Intermediate Technology Publications.
  64. ↵
    1. Sharpley, A.,
    2. B. Foy, and
    3. P. Withers
    . 2000. Practical and innovative measures for the control of agricultural phosphorus losses to water: An overview. Journal of Environmental Quality 29(1):1–9.
    OpenUrlWeb of Science
  65. ↵
    1. Sherman, M.
    2009. Imagining Vermont: Vision and Values for the Future. Full Report of the Council of the Future of Vermont. Montpelier, VT: Vermont Council on Rural Development. https://www.vtrural.org/sites/default/files/content/futureofvermont/documents/Imagining_Vermont_FULL_Report1.pdf.
  66. ↵
    1. Shortle, J.S.,
    2. M. Ribaudo,
    3. R. Horan, and
    4. D. Blandford
    . 2012. Reforming agricultural nonpoint pollution policy in an increasingly budget-constrained environment. Environmental Science and Technology 46(3):1316–1325.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  67. ↵
    1. Sikder, O.,
    2. R.E. Smith,
    3. P. Vivo, and
    4. G. Livan
    . 2020. A minimalistic model of bias, polarization and misinformation in social networks. Scientific Reports 10(1):1–11.
    OpenUrl
  68. ↵
    1. Smith, H.F., and
    2. C. Sullivan
    . 2014. Ecosystem services within agricultural landscapes-farmers’ perceptions. Ecological Economics 98:72–80.
    OpenUrl
  69. ↵
    1. Sorice, M.G.,
    2. C.J. Donlan,
    3. K.J. Boyle,
    4. W. Xu, and
    5. S. Gelcich
    . 2018. Scaling participation in payments for ecosystem services programs. PLoS ONE 13(3):e0192211.
    OpenUrl
  70. ↵
    1. Swinton, S.M.,
    2. F. Lupi,
    3. G. Robertson, and
    4. S. Hamilton
    . 2007. Ecosystem services and agriculture: Cultivating agricultural ecosystems for diverse benefits. Ecological Economics 64(2):245–252.
    OpenUrlCrossRefWeb of Science
  71. ↵
    1. Teixeira, H.M.,
    2. A. Vermue,
    3. I. Cardoso,
    4. M. Peña Claros, and
    5. F. Bianchi
    . 2018. Farmers show complex and contrasting perceptions on ecosystem services and their management. Ecosystem Services 33:44–58.
    OpenUrl
  72. ↵
    1. Toffolini, Q.,
    2. M.H. Jeuffroy,
    3. P. Mischler,
    4. J. Pernel, and
    5. L. Prost
    . 2017. Farmers’ use of fundamental knowledge to re-design their cropping systems: Situated contextualisation processes. NJAS - Wageningen Journal of Life Sciences 80:37–47.
    OpenUrl
  73. ↵
    1. USDA NASS (National Agricultural Statistics Service)
    . 2017. 2017 Census of Agriculture – State Data: Vermont. Washington, DC: USDA NASS.
  74. ↵
    1. USDA NASS
    . 2014. Farms and Farmland: Numbers, Acreage, Ownership, and Use. 2012 Census of Agriculture Highlights. Publication ACH12-13/September 2014. Washington, DC: USDA NASS. https://www.nass.usda.gov/Publications/Highlights/2014/Highlights_Farms_and_Farmland.pdf.
  75. ↵
    1. USEPA (US Environmental Protection Agency)
    . 2016. Phosphorus TMDLs for Vermont segments of Lake Champlain. Boston, MA: USEPA Region 1.
  76. ↵
    1. VAAFM (Vermont Agency of Agriculture, Food and Markets)
    . 2018. Vermont required agricultural practices rules for the agricultural nonpoint source pollution control problem. Montpelier, VT: Vermont Agency of Agriculture, Food and Markets Water Quality Division. https://agriculture.vermont.gov/sites/agriculture/files/documents/RAPFINALRULE12-21-2018_WEB.pdf.
  77. ↵
    1. VAAFM
    . 2020. Soil conservation practices and payment for ecosystem services working group report. Prepared for the Vermont General Assembly in Accordance with Act No. 83, Section 3 (2019). Report. Montpelier, VT: Vermont Agency of Agriculture, Food and Markets.
    1. VAAFM
    . N.d. Vermont pay-for-performance program overview. Montpelier, VT: Vermont Agency of Agriculture, Food and Markets. https://agriculture.vermont.gov/sites/agriculture/files/documents/VPFP_Overview_FAQs.pdf.
  79. ↵
    1. van Riper, C.,
    2. A. Landon,
    3. A. Kidd,
    4. P. Bitterman,
    5. L. Fitzgerald,
    6. E. Granek,
    7. S. Ibarra,
    8. D. Iwaniec,
    9. C. Raymond, and
    10. D. Toledo
    . 2017. Incorporating sociocultural phenomena into ecosystem service valuation: The importance of critical pluralism. BioScience 67(3):233–244.
    OpenUrl
  80. ↵
    1. Vesterby, M., and
    2. K. Krupa
    . 2001. Major Uses of Land in the United States. Statistical Bulletin No. 973. Washington, DC: Resource Economics Division, Economic Research Service, USDA.
  81. ↵
    1. Wejnert, B.
    2002. Integrating models of diffusion of innovations: A conceptual framework. Annual Reviews of Sociology 28:297–326.
    OpenUrl
  82. ↵
    1. Wood, B.A.,
    2. H. Blair,
    3. D. Gray,
    4. P. Kemp,
    5. P. Kenyon,
    6. S. Morris, and
    7. A. Sewell
    . 2014. Agricultural science in the wild: A social network analysis of farmer knowledge exchange. PLoS ONE 9(8):e105203. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0105203.
    OpenUrl
  83. ↵
    1. Wynne-Jones, S.
    2013. Ecosystem service delivery in Wales: Evaluating farmers’ engagement and willingness to participate. Journal of Environmental Policy and Planning 15(4):493–511.
    OpenUrl
  84. ↵
    1. Zhang, W.,
    2. T. Ricketts,
    3. C. Kremen,
    4. K. Carney, and
    5. S. Swinton
    . 2007. Ecosystem services and dis-services to agriculture. Ecological Economics 64(2):253–260.
    OpenUrlCrossRefWeb of Science
Back to top

In this issue

Print
Download PDF
Article Alerts
Email Article
Citation Tools
Request Permissions
“How can you put a price on the environment?” Farmer perspectives on stewardship and payment for ecosystem services
A.C. White, J.W. Faulkner, D.S. Conner, V.E. Méndez, M.T. Niles
Journal of Soil and Water Conservation May 2022, 77 (3) 270-283; DOI: 10.2489/jswc.2022.00041
Reddit logo Twitter logo Facebook logo Mendeley logo

Jump to section

Keywords