Skip to main content

Main menu

  • Home
  • Content
    • Current Issue
    • Early Online
    • Archive
    • Subject Collections
  • Info For
    • Authors
    • Reviewers
    • Subscribers
    • Advertisers
  • About
    • About JSWC
    • Editorial Board
    • Permissions
    • Alerts
    • RSS Feeds
    • Contact Us

User menu

  • Register
  • Subscribe
  • My alerts
  • Log in
  • My Cart

Search

  • Advanced search
Journal of Soil and Water Conservation

  • Register
  • Subscribe
  • My alerts
  • Log in
  • My Cart
Journal of Soil and Water Conservation

Advanced Search

  • Home
  • Content
    • Current Issue
    • Early Online
    • Archive
    • Subject Collections
  • Info For
    • Authors
    • Reviewers
    • Subscribers
    • Advertisers
  • About
    • About JSWC
    • Editorial Board
    • Permissions
    • Alerts
    • RSS Feeds
    • Contact Us
  • Follow SWCS on Twitter
  • Visit SWCS on Facebook
Research ArticleResearch Section

Estimates of soil erosion and best management practice effectiveness at forestry stream crossings in North Carolina

A.J. Lang, W.A. Coats, T.A. Gerow and W.A. Swartley
Journal of Soil and Water Conservation May 2022, 77 (3) 292-304; DOI: https://doi.org/10.2489/jswc.2022.00110
A.J. Lang
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
W.A. Coats
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
T.A. Gerow Jr
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
W.A. Swartley
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • Article
  • Figures & Data
  • References
  • Info & Metrics
  • PDF
Loading

Article Figures & Data

Figures

  • Tables
  • Figure 1
    • Download figure
    • Open in new tab
    • Download powerpoint
    Figure 1

    Approximate locations of sampled stream crossing sites (117 tracts) and counties within North Carolina’s ecoregions.

Tables

  • Figures
    • View popup
    • Download powerpoint
    Table 1

    North Carolina Forest Service Forestry Best Management Practices (BMP) implementation survey questions for stream crossings and approach ways to stream crossings.

    Table 1
    • View popup
    • Download powerpoint
    Table 2

    Distribution of stream crossing type and access method by ecoregion.

    Table 2
    • View popup
    • Download powerpoint
    Table 3

    Distribution of best management practice (BMP) implementation scores for stream crossings by ecoregion. Letters in the median column signify no significant differences using Steel-Dwass All Pairs test at α = 0.05.

    Table 3
    • View popup
    • Download powerpoint
    Table 4

    Distribution of best management practice (BMP) implementation scores for 220 stream crossings by ecoregion and stream crossing type. Values no followed by the same letter within a column specific to an ecoregion are significantly different using the Steel-Dwass All Pairs test at α = 0.05.

    Table 4
    • View popup
    • Download powerpoint
    Table 5

    Distribution of best management practice (BMP) implementation scores for 220 stream crossings by ecoregion and access method. Values not followed by the same letter within a column specific to an ecoregion are significantly different using the Steel-Dwass All Pairs test at α = 0.05.

    Table 5
    • View popup
    • Download powerpoint
    Table 6

    Summary statistics for Universal Soil Loss Equation estimates of erosion rates for 220 stream crossings by region and crossing type. Values not followed by the same letter within a column specific to an ecoregion are significantly different using the Steel-Dwass All Pairs test at α = 0.05.

    Table 6
    • View popup
    • Download powerpoint
    Table 7

    Summary statistics for Universal Soil Loss Equation estimates of erosion rates for 220 stream crossings by ecoregion and access method. Values not followed by the same letter within a column specific to an ecoregion are significantly different using the Steel-Dwass All Pairs test at α = 0.05.

    Table 7
    • View popup
    • Download powerpoint
    Table 8

    Summary statistics for erosion rates and best management practice (BMP) effectiveness for 220 stream crossings by ecoregion. Values not followed by the same letter within a column are significantly different using the Steel-Dwass All Pairs test at α = 0.05.

    Table 8
    • View popup
    • Download powerpoint
    Table 9

    Modeled erosion quantity for 220 stream crossings as observed and modified to hypothetical “no-BMP” scenario.

    Table 9
PreviousNext
Back to top

In this issue

Journal of Soil and Water Conservation: 77 (3)
Journal of Soil and Water Conservation
Vol. 77, Issue 3
May/June 2022
  • Table of Contents
  • Table of Contents (PDF)
  • About the Cover
  • Index by author
  • Front Matter (PDF)
Print
Download PDF
Article Alerts
Sign In to Email Alerts with your Email Address
Email Article

Thank you for your interest in spreading the word on Journal of Soil and Water Conservation.

NOTE: We only request your email address so that the person you are recommending the page to knows that you wanted them to see it, and that it is not junk mail. We do not capture any email address.

Enter multiple addresses on separate lines or separate them with commas.
Estimates of soil erosion and best management practice effectiveness at forestry stream crossings in North Carolina
(Your Name) has sent you a message from Journal of Soil and Water Conservation
(Your Name) thought you would like to see the Journal of Soil and Water Conservation web site.
CAPTCHA
This question is for testing whether or not you are a human visitor and to prevent automated spam submissions.
18 + 1 =
Solve this simple math problem and enter the result. E.g. for 1+3, enter 4.
Citation Tools
Estimates of soil erosion and best management practice effectiveness at forestry stream crossings in North Carolina
A.J. Lang, W.A. Coats, T.A. Gerow, W.A. Swartley
Journal of Soil and Water Conservation May 2022, 77 (3) 292-304; DOI: 10.2489/jswc.2022.00110

Citation Manager Formats

  • BibTeX
  • Bookends
  • EasyBib
  • EndNote (tagged)
  • EndNote 8 (xml)
  • Medlars
  • Mendeley
  • Papers
  • RefWorks Tagged
  • Ref Manager
  • RIS
  • Zotero
Request Permissions
Share
Estimates of soil erosion and best management practice effectiveness at forestry stream crossings in North Carolina
A.J. Lang, W.A. Coats, T.A. Gerow, W.A. Swartley
Journal of Soil and Water Conservation May 2022, 77 (3) 292-304; DOI: 10.2489/jswc.2022.00110
del.icio.us logo Digg logo Reddit logo Twitter logo Facebook logo Google logo Mendeley logo
  • Tweet Widget
  • Facebook Like
  • Google Plus One

Jump to section

  • Article
    • Abstract
    • Introduction
    • Materials and Methods
    • Results and Discussion
    • Summary and Conclusions
    • References
  • Figures & Data
  • Info & Metrics
  • References
  • PDF

Related Articles

  • No related articles found.
  • Google Scholar

Cited By...

  • No citing articles found.
  • Google Scholar

More in this TOC Section

  • Phytoremediation and high rainfall combine to improve soil and plant health in a North America Northern Great Plains saline sodic soil
  • Combining a saltation impact sensor and a wind tunnel to explore wind erosion processes–A case study in the Zhundong mining area, Xinjiang, China
  • Physicochemical properties of biochar derived from wood of Gliricidia sepium based on the pyrolysis temperature and its applications
Show more Research Section

Similar Articles

Keywords

  • best management practices
  • forest operations
  • North Carolina
  • soil erosion
  • stream crossings
  • Universal Soil Loss Equation

Content

  • Current Issue
  • Early Online
  • Archive
  • Subject Collections

Info For

  • Authors
  • Reviewers
  • Subscribers
  • Advertisers

Customer Service

  • Subscriptions
  • Permissions and Reprints
  • Terms of Use
  • Privacy

SWCS

  • Membership
  • Publications
  • Meetings and Events
  • Conservation Career Center

© 2022 Soil and Water Conservation Society