Skip to main content

Main menu

  • Home
  • Content
    • Current Issue
    • Early Online
    • Archive
    • Subject Collections
  • Info For
    • Authors
    • Reviewers
    • Subscribers
    • Advertisers
  • About
    • About JSWC
    • Editorial Board
    • Permissions
    • Alerts
    • RSS Feeds
    • Contact Us

User menu

  • Register
  • Subscribe
  • My alerts
  • Log in
  • My Cart

Search

  • Advanced search
Journal of Soil and Water Conservation

  • Register
  • Subscribe
  • My alerts
  • Log in
  • My Cart
Journal of Soil and Water Conservation

Advanced Search

  • Home
  • Content
    • Current Issue
    • Early Online
    • Archive
    • Subject Collections
  • Info For
    • Authors
    • Reviewers
    • Subscribers
    • Advertisers
  • About
    • About JSWC
    • Editorial Board
    • Permissions
    • Alerts
    • RSS Feeds
    • Contact Us
  • Follow SWCS on Twitter
  • Visit SWCS on Facebook
Research ArticleResearch Section

Physicochemical properties of biochar derived from wood of Gliricidia sepium based on the pyrolysis temperature and its applications

S. Wakamiya, Y. Kurimoto, H. Sugimoto, Y. Aoki, S. Kato, M. Ogasawara, N. Kanazawa, N. Hosokawa, A. Hayakawa, T. Takahashi and Y. Ishikawa
Journal of Soil and Water Conservation May 2022, 77 (3) 322-330; DOI: https://doi.org/10.2489/jswc.2022.00083
S. Wakamiya
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Y. Kurimoto
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
H. Sugimoto
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Y. Aoki
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
S. Kato
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
M. Ogasawara
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
N. Kanazawa
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
N. Hosokawa
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
A. Hayakawa
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
T. Takahashi
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Y. Ishikawa
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • Article
  • Figures & Data
  • Supplemental
  • References
  • Info & Metrics
  • PDF
Loading

Abstract

Biochar (BC) represents biomass such as wood, grass, and manure, decomposed by pyrolysis typically produced under conditions of limited oxygen (O2) and low to moderate temperatures (<600°C). The application of BC to improve physicochemical properties of soil and boost plant growth is increasingly gaining attention. Most studies reporting the underlying mechanisms of BC-based soil improvement describe changes in water holding capacity based on the difference in the type of soil and intrinsic properties of the BCs. The physical and chemical properties of BC itself depend considerably on the pyrolysis temperature and the feedstock used for its production. Previous studies that investigated changes in soil physical properties due to pyrolysis at temperatures ranging between 200°C and 300°C described changes in soil water retention. In this study, we used Gliricidia sepium, a fast growth legume tree, as the feedstock for producing BC. The objective of this study was to evaluate the effects of a wide range of pyrolysis temperatures (300°C to 800°C) on the physicochemical properties of BC derived from G. sepium wood, and thereafter evaluate the effect on soil physical properties in a pot incubation test with BC produced at 400°C and 800°C in sandy soil. The physicochemical properties of BCs generated from G. sepium wood changed considerably as the pyrolysis temperature increased. A significant increase in the carbon (C)/nitrogen (N) ratio and pH of the BC was observed at elevated pyrolysis temperatures, which may be attributed to the high total C content of the generated ash. Biochar produced at 400°C showed the most promising results by enhancing the soil fertility based on its low bulk density and high cation exchange capacity. The water holding index is significantly negatively correlated to soil bulk density so the low bulk density of produced at 400°C helps improve the water holding capacity of sandy soil in this study. Consequently, BC produced at 400°C is the most promising soil conditioner for elevating soil fertility and the water holding index. Hence, it is suggested that BC produced at 400°C can improve agricultural production and can contribute energy biomass production on oligotrophic lands consequently reducing the chances of land degradation.

key words
  • biochar
  • Gliricidia sepium
  • physical and chemical properties
  • pyrolysis
  • temperature
  • water holding capacity

Introduction

Biochar (BC) is a general term for biomass products of thermal decomposition, such as wood, grass, and manure under conditions of low oxygen (O2) and temperature (Lehmann and Joseph 2009). The application of BC for improving soil fertility has recently gained attention. First, the application of BC to soil increases carbon (C) sequestration and has the potential to mitigate the adverse effects of climate change. BC can remain in the soil for a long time without undergoing excessive degradation suggesting its utility for C sequestration (Lehmann et al. 2006; Lehmann 2007). Fang et al. (2014) reported that BC synthesized from Eucalyptus saligna at 550°C had an estimated residence time of 610 years in an entisol incubated at 20°C for 12 months. BC application to soil allows C sequestration as soil organic C, and a sequestration based on an increase in the vegetation on highly weathered soil (Lorenz and Lal 2014). Lal (2016) stated that no-till farming and agroforestry combined with BC application can help mitigate climate change and improve soil conservation and food security. The formula for calculating the amount of greenhouse gases absorbed following the application of BC to soil is listed in the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change guidelines for national greenhouse gas inventories (Calvo Buendia et al. 2019).

Secondly, BC amendment can improve soil chemical and physical properties and enhance the plant growth (van Zwieten et al. 2010). The addition of BC to acidic soil increases the soil pH and decreases aluminum (Al) saturation, the two common major constraints influencing agricultural production in humid tropical regions (Glaser et al. 2002). Furthermore, BC application increases soil cation exchange capacity (CEC) (van Zwieten et al. 2010) and decreases nutrient leaching from agricultural soil (Lehmann et al. 2003). Moreover, application of BC has a positive influence on soil physical properties, such as bulk density (BD) and water holding capacity (WHC). Soil WHC following BC application is particularly improved both directly and indirectly. Ulyett et al. (2014) reported that the high surface area of BC produced from deciduous mixed wood chips contributed directly to improving WHC of sandy loam soils. Furthermore, soil pore distribution was altered by switchgrass (Panicum virgatum L.) BC application, and indirectly improved the soil WHC of loamy sand and silt loam soils (Novak et al. 2012). Obia et al. (2016) reported that maize (Zea mays L.) cob-based BC applications induced soil aggregation and improved WHC of sand, sandy loam, and loamy sand soil types. Most studies attempting to discern the specific mechanism by which BC improves soil WHC have based their observations on the difference in soil types and intrinsic characteristics such as porosity and hydrophobicity of the BCs used in the study (Li et al. 2021).

The physical and chemical properties of BC itself depend considerably on the feedstock and pyrolysis temperature, respectively (Kloss et al. 2012; Kim et al. 2012). Kloss et al. (2012) reported high salt and ash content in wheat (Triticum aestivum L.) straw-derived BC compared to Populus sp. and spruce (Picea) woodchip-derived BC. Gaskin et al. (2008) reported that the C content in poultry litter-based BC was a meager 40% when compared to that of pine (Pinus) chip-derived BC with 78% C content. Previous studies included limited pyrolysis temperature-based experimental conditions, mainly within the range of 100°C to 300°C, with a few studies including temperatures of 600°C to 700°C and 900°C (Wang et al. 2019), 400°C to 500°C (Gaskin et al. 2008), and 300°C to 500°C (Kim et al. 2012). Previous studies have not taken into account the physical properties of the soil supplemented with BCs, and this aspect requires more in-depth investigations (Haidi et al. 2016).

In this study, we used the fast-growing legume tree Gliricidia sepium as the starting material for synthesizing BC. G. sepium is commonly used as a hedge around houses and farms, while its leaves are used as animal feed (Stewart et al. 1996). Its fast growth makes it a promising starting material for biomass power generation commonly used in the South and Southeast Asia (Ratnasiri 2008). Furthermore, it is anticipated that G. sepium can be planted for biomass power generation on land that is less productive thus avoiding competition with other food chain systems. In Indonesia, the oligotrophic lands currently cultivating biomass, such as G. sepium, are estimated to be around 3.5 million ha (Jaung et al. 2018).

A total of 11.98 million Mg of fresh poultry manure was estimated to be produced in 2017 in United States of America (Hoover et al. 2019). The manure has traditionally been applied to surrounding crop and pasturelands to recycle nutrients. Poultry litter’s effectiveness on crop yield is influenced by soil properties, tillage, application practice, and crop species (Lin et al. 2018). According to Bohara et al. (2019), the application of poultry litter along with pinewood BC could benefit crop production by improving soil WHC.

The objective of this study was to evaluate the effect of a wide range of pyrolysis temperatures (300°C to 800°C) on the physicochemical properties of BC derived from G. sepium wood and to also evaluate the effects of its application on the physical properties (such as WHC) of sandy soil along with poultry manure. To the best of our knowledge, this is the first study evaluating BC from G. sepium produced at different pyrolysis temperatures.

Materials and Methods

Biochar Production. A biomass plantation of G. sepium in Sri Lanka was thinned in March of 2017 to provide the feedstock for the BC used in this study. Approximately 50 mm diameter stems were cut into 50 to 100 mm long chips, dried at 80°C for 1 week, and then pyrolyzed in a custom-made electronic furnace under O2 limited conditions. The maximum temperature points used in this study were 300°C, 400°C, 600°C, and 800°C, for samples BC300, BC400, BC600, and BC800, respectively.

The heating rate was 1°C min−1, and the maximum temperature was maintained for 3 hours. After cooling to room temperature (20°C), the BC samples were crushed and sieved to produce a homogenous sample composed of 2 mm fragments for the incubation tests and the remaining tests. Nonpyrolyzed chips (feedstock) for comparison with the BC samples were used as controls.

Molecular and Physical Characteristics of Biochar. The BC yields were calculated based on the mass change before and after charring. The BC samples and feedstock were finely crushed, and the BC300, BC400, BC600, and feedstock powders were analyzed using Fourier-transform infrared spectroscopy (FT-IR) and solid-state 13C nuclear magnetic resonance (NMR). The surface area (SA) of all the powdered samples was determined using a method by the Brunauer–Emmett– Teller-N2 SA analysis. The FT-IR absorbance was measured from 4,000 to 400 cm–1 with 32 scans per sample and 4 cm–1 resolution (Nicolet6700, ThermoFisher Scientific, USA). The 13CNMR (JNM-ECA500, JEOL, Japan) was performed using the MAS/DD method at 10 kHz with 320 cumulative scans. SA was measured using a surface area analyzer (Autosorb iQ, Quantachrome, USA). Feedstock and BC were dried in a 105°C oven to determine the BD, and then packed into a 100 cm–3 core, followed by BD calculations of each sample. All analyses were conducted at Akita Prefectural University laboratories with the exception of NMR analyses which were conducted at Akita University.

Chemical Characteristics of Biochar. The pH was measured by boiling the BC with ion exchange water (3g:100 mL) in a glass beaker for 5 min and measuring the pH of the solution using a pH meter (LAQUA-74BW, Horiba, Japan). Ash content was measured by weighing 5 g of BC into a porcelain crucible, heating to 300°C for one hour, 400°C for one hour, or 500°C for four hours in a muffle furnace, followed by sample ignition at 800°C for one hour in the same furnace. Total C and nitrogen (N) content of the feedstock and BC samples were measured using an elemental analyzer (Sumigraph NC-22, SCAS, Japan). Water extractable cations were removed by suspending 5 g of BC first in 200 mL of ion exchange water and then in 80% methanol with continuous shaking for one hour. After percolation, feedstock and BC samples were dried at 105°C for 24 hours, followed by assessment of exchangeable cations (potassium [K], sodium [Na], calcium [Ca], and magnesium [Mg]) and CEC using the semi-micro Schollenberger method (Sparks et al. 1996). Available phosphorus (AP) in the feedstock, as well as the BC samples were measured using the Truog method (Sparks et al. 1996). All analyses were conducted in laboratories at Akita Prefectural University.

Water Holding Capacity in Sandy Soil after Incubation with Biochar. Table 1 outlines the data from the WHC experiments. Samples BC400 and BC800 were used since they had minimum BD and maximum SA, respectively, as shown in table 2. Sandy soil was collected in March of 2018 from a pine forest floor on the coastal sand dunes located in Akita, Japan, which consisted of 93.9% sand, 1.3% silt, and 6.1% clay: the soil was classified as an entisol. The soil pH (H2O) was 6.35, the total C content was 0.161%, the total N content was 0.00962%, and the CEC was 4.13 cmolc kg–1. Sandy soil (400 g) and 6.0 g (1.5% w w–1) or 12 g (3.0% w w–1) of BC400 or BC800 were mixed thoroughly. In addition, we also evaluated the effect of organic matter by mixing 400 g of sandy soil and 12 g (3.0% w w–1) of BC400 and 1.0 g (0.25% w w–1) or 2.0 g (0.50% w w–1) of poultry manure. The poultry manure was purchased as a commercial product from a local agricultural supplier. Properties of the poultry manure were as follows: the pH (H2O) was 8.35, the total C content was 14.2%, the total N content was 4.67%, and the CEC was 19.2 cmolc kg–1. A control plot for analysis of samples without BCs was established (NN0: no BC, 0 % manure; NN2: no BC; and NN5: no BC, 0.5 % manure in table 1). The mixtures were poured into pots with an outer diameter, height, and volume of 114 mm, 92 mm, and 400 mL, respectively (AP pot No. 4, Apple Wear, Inc., Osaka, Japan). The pots were incubated outdoors in a field at Akita Prefectural University for 96 days (from September 15 to December 20, 2019). The total amount of rainfall and the mean temperature during the incubation were 721 mm and 12.4°C, respectively.

View this table:
  • View inline
  • View popup
  • Download powerpoint
Table 1

Summary of treatment conditions.

View this table:
  • View inline
  • View popup
  • Download powerpoint
Table 2

Yield and physical properties of feedstock and biochar.

Soil sample cores (100 mL) were collected after an incubation period of 96 days. Volumetric water content was determined using the sand column method while the moisture tension was calculated as log10(h × 102) = 0 to 1.5, and 1.8 to 3.0, respectively, as detected by the pressure plate method where h is a column of water (m). After the log10(h × 102) 3.0 measurement, the cores were heated to 105°C for 24 hours in a drying oven followed by soil BD estimations of each sample. To obtain a synthetic description of water retention, the WHC was estimated using equation 1, which calculates the water holding index (WHI) as the average volumetric water content at an interval of log10(h× 102) 0.6 to 3.0 after the integral retention index (Terribile et al. 2018): Embedded Image (1)

where, hi and θi mean column of water (m) and water content (%) at measure procedure of i (I = 1 to 9) as presented in table S1. Higher values of WHI are representative of better soil WHCs. All analyses were conducted in laboratories at Akita Prefectural University.

Statistical Analysis. All statistical analyses were performed using EZR (Version 1.00, Saitama Medical Center, Jichi Medical University, Saitama, Japan) (Kanda 2013), a graphical user interface for R (The R Foundation for Statistical Computing, Vienna, Austria). More precisely, it is a modified version of R Commander designed to add statistical functions frequently used in biostatistics (Kanda 2013). One-way analysis of variance was performed to evaluate the physical and chemical properties of the BC samples. A multiple linear regression was performed to predict WHI and soil BD based changes exerted by BC, pyrolysis temperature, and application of poultry manure.

Results and Discussion

Molecular Characteristics of Feedstock and Biochars. FT-IR spectra of BC300, BC400, BC600, and feedstock powders are shown in figure 1. A pyrolysis temperature of 300°C results in a considerable disappearance in the peak around 1,000 cm–1, indicating losses of cellulose, lignin, and hemicellulose (Cheng et al. 2006; Kloss et al. 2012), which are the main components of G. sepium. The O-H stretch peak also disappeared around 3,300 cm–1 (Kloss et al. 2012). The carboxylic-C stretch peak at 1,600 cm–1 is visible in the BC400 sample (Belimov et al. 2015), but is absent in the BC600 sample. The clear peak around 2,400 cm–1 is representative of atmospheric carbon dioxide (CO2). The 13C NMR spectra of BC300, BC400, BC600, and feedstock powders are shown in figure 2. A pyrolysis temperature of 300°C resulted in the disappearance of the O-alkyl (75 ppm) and di-O-alkyl (105 ppm) from cellulose (Baldock and Smernik 2002; Novak et al. 2009; Kim et al. 2012). In the BC300 and BC400 samples, a broad peak was observed around 129 ppm, which may be attributed to the presence of the aromatic C (Chun et al. 2004; Novak et al. 2009; Kim et al. 2012; Wu et al. 2012). The decrease of the peak around 129 ppm in the BC600 sample suggests that the structure of the aromatic group was disrupted.

Figure 1
  • Download figure
  • Open in new tab
  • Download powerpoint
Figure 1

Fourier-transform infrared spectroscopy (FT-IR) spectra of feedstock and biochar produced at 300°C (BC300), 400°C (BC400), and 600°C (BC600).

Figure 2
  • Download figure
  • Open in new tab
  • Download powerpoint
Figure 2

The carbon-13 (13C) nuclear magnetic resonance (NMR) spectra of feedstock and biochar produced at pyrolysis temperatures of 300°C (BC300), 400°C (BC400), and 600°C (BC600).

Physical Properties of Feedstock and Biochars. Table 2 shows the physical properties of the feedstock and BC samples. Increasing pyrolysis temperatures decreased the yield of BC, while the SA considerably increased as the pyrolysis temperature increased from 400°C to 600°C, and 600°C to 800°C. The change in BD was negligible with BC400 (0.153 g cm−3) having the lowest BD.

Chemical Properties of Feedstock and Biochars. Chemical properties of the feedstock and BC samples are presented in table 3. Total C, ash, and the C/N ratio significantly increased with an increase in the pyrolysis temperature (p < 0.0001, p < 0.0001, and p < 0.0001, respectively). The total N concentration of BC400 was the highest, and the total N concentration significantly decreased with an increase in the pyrolysis temperature above BC400 (p < 0.0001). The pH value significantly increased with the increase in the pyrolysis temperature (p < 0.0001) and was alkaline. The pH of BC800 was measured to be 10.5. Similarly, AP significantly increased with an increase in the pyrolysis temperature (p < 0.0001) although the increase was statistically significant only at the highest temperature. The CEC value significantly increased up to 400°C (44.5 cmolc kg–1) and decreased thereafter (p = 0.0437). The exchangeable K, Na, and Mg values at BC800 were maximum. The concentration of Ca increased up to pyrolysis temperatures of 600°C, decreasing thereafter.

View this table:
  • View inline
  • View popup
  • Download powerpoint
Table 3

Chemical properties of biochars (n = 3).

Water Holding Capacity in Sandy Soil after Incubation with Biochar. Table 4 shows the results of the WHI and soil BD analyses, and table 5 shows the results of multiple linear regressions. Increasing the application of BC (p < 0.001) and manure (p < 0.01) significantly increased WHI. Compared to the NN0 treatment (no addition of BC or manure shown in table 1), the value of WHI of L35 (added 3.0% w w–1 of BC400 with 0.50% w w–1 of manure) increased by 6.1% (table 5). There were no significant differences in WHI among treatments using different pyrolysis temperatures. Soil BD was significantly decreased by BC applications (p < 0.01) and significantly increased after manure applications (p < 0.001) (table 5). The application of BC400 resulted in significantly lower soil BD when compared to BC800 (p < 0.05) (table 5). Our results showed that WHI was strongly negatively correlated to soil BD (r = –0.625, p < 0.05) (figure 3).

Figure 3
  • Download figure
  • Open in new tab
  • Download powerpoint
Figure 3

Correlation between soil bulk density and water holding index of feedstock and biochar (BC) produced at 400°C (BC400) and 800°C (BC800).

View this table:
  • View inline
  • View popup
  • Download powerpoint
Table 4

Soil water holding index (WHI) and soil bulk density (BD) (n = 3).

View this table:
  • View inline
  • View popup
  • Download powerpoint
Table 5

Summary of multiple linear regressions of water holding indices (WHI) and soil bulk densities (BD) by some biochar and poultry manure properties.

Discussion. Soil degradation is caused by mining, over-grazing, and over-cultivation, which leads to a decrease in agricultural productivity (United Nations Convention to Combat Desertification 2017); therefore, sustainable agriculture is pertinent. The use of BC in agriculture is important for improving soil health, which enhances the agricultural productivity (Spokas et al. 2012), but also since it contributes to soil C sequestration which ameliorates global warming (Azzi et al. 2021). Our study revealed that BC contributed to the improvement of soil physical properties, especially to soil WHC.

The use of local feedstocks for BC materials for integrated BC research is essential (Amonette et al. 2021). Although, G. sepium is an exotic species, it is widely used as fuelwood, construction poles, crop supports, green manure, fodder, and bee forages (Simons and Stewart 1994). Previous studies on G. sepium mainly focused on biofuel production (Fakinle et al. 2017; Jaung et al. 2018) and its utilization as a suitable candidate of agroforestry systems (Szott et al. 1991; Rao and Mathuva 2000). This study reports on the physicochemical properties in BC derived from G. sepium.

The physical and chemical properties of BC change considerably with increases in the pyrolysis temperature. The FT-IR and NMR spectra indicate the degradation of the main components of G. sepium, which consists of cellulose, lignin, and hemicellulose at temperatures of 250°C to 300°C (figures 1 and 2).

Biochar yields decreased by pyrolysis due to the decomposition and volatilization of aliphatic and aromatic compounds (table 2). High yields of BC can be economical, but there are trade-offs between BC yield and BC C sequestration in soil. Brunn et al. (2011) reported the highest C sequestration occurred in BC samples pyrolyzed at 500°C. The increase in SA is most likely due to the volatilization of aliphatic and aromatic compounds at temperatures up to 600°C. Beyond that point, O2 activation may contribute to an increase in SA at 800°C (table 2). The decrease in BC mass represented by yield is more pronounced than the shrinkage of BC as represented by the SA data up to 400°C. This relationship is probably reversed above 400°C, contributing to changes in BD (table 2). Total C and ash increased with increases in the pyrolysis temperatures (table 3), and N significantly volatilized at high temperatures (>600°C) (table 3). The carbonates in ash were mainly alkaline in nature, which resulted in an alkaline BC (Yuan et al. 2011).

Acid carboxyl groups probably increased in BC300 compared to the feedstock, which subsequently decreased (Cheng et al. 2006; Kloss et al. 2012) and directly affected the CEC (Wu et al. 2012). Our results, that the CEC value significantly increased up to 400°C and decreased thereafter, are in agreement with those of Yuan et al. (2011), which showed a decrease in CEC and carboxyl groups in BCs derived from maize and soybean (Glycine max [L.] Merr.) straw and pyrolyzed at 700°C. The CEC values of Gliricidia-derived BC are higher than those of other woody-derived BCs pyrolyzed at 400°C. Kloss et al. (2012) reported CEC values of BC made from spruce and poplar (Populus) of 7.35 cmolc kg–1 and 14.4 cmolc kg–1, respectively. Mukherjee et al. (2011) reported averaged CEC values of 16.2 and 21.0 cmolc kg–1 for BC made from oak (Quercus), pine, and grass pyrolyzed at 400°C and 650°C, respectively. Singh et al. (2010) showed the CEC of Eucalyptus-derived BC to be 7.3 cmolc kg–1. Biochar made from Gliricidia had higher pH values than other woody-derived BCs due to its high ash content (Singh et al. 2010; Mukherjee et al. 2011; Kloss et al. 2012). Our results indicate that Gliricidia is a promising feedstock for BC generation at lower temperatures since it improves the chemical properties of soil by increasing the alkalinity and the CEC. Matovic (2011) reported the need for a low BC application rate (less than 5% w w–1); however, the strategy is inadequate for improving the overall fertility of the soil. Nevertheless, BC addition aids in enhancing the rhizosphere soil fertility and contributes to enhancing plant growth (Elad et al. 2011).

The BD of BCs was significantly changed by pyrolysis temperatures (table 2), but no significant correlation between WHI and pyrolysis temperature was observed (table 5). Our results showed that WHI was strongly related to soil BD (r = -0.625, p & 0.05) (figure 1), whereas soil BD was significantly influenced by a change in pyrolysis temperature. The use of BC decreased soil BD and likely altered soil pore distribution as BC underwent decomposition and redistribution allowing the water to be physically held in the new soil pores occurring between decomposed BC and soil particles. Furthermore, the SA of BCs increased with an increase in pyrolysis temperatures (table 2). The SA of BC800 was 161 times that of BC400 (table 2), but the WHI of soil treated with BC400 tended to be greater than that of soil treated with BC800 (table 4). In contrast, the BD of soil treated with BC400 was significantly lower than that of the soil treated with BC800 (table 4, figure 3). Consequently, the low BD of BC contributed to improving the WHC of sandy soil.

The decrease in soil BD following BC application induced an increase in soil WHC and is consistent with the results reported in previous studies. Novak et al. (2012) measured the WHC of ultisol replenished with BC derived from switchgrass, peanut (Arachis hypogaea) hulls, or pecan (Carya illinoinensis) shells. The surface areas of the three BCs varied by up to a factor of 555 resulting in a decrease in soil BD and a significant increase in soil WHC. Basso et al. (2013) incubated sandy soil with BC derived from the pyrolysis of red oak (Quercus rubra) wood at 500°C and measured the soil BD and WHC for 91 days. The soil BD of untreated soil increased, whereas the soil BD of BC-treated soil remained unchanged with an increase in the WHC.

Ulyett et al. (2014) argued that the large SA of BC helped improve soil WHC; however, the present study and that of Novak et al. (2012) indicated that the SA of BC does not affect soil WHC. The application of BC with a high SA helps in improving soil WHC based on the size of the BC pores (Novak et al. 2012). Future studies aimed at measuring pore size distribution will help understand the relationships between the physical properties of BC and soil WHC. Obia et al. (2016) attributed improved soil WHC following BC application to accelerated soil aggregation. The incorporation of organic matter induces soil aggregation (Wortmann and Shapiro 2008). However, soil aggregation was not observed in the present study (data unreported) due to the low content of total C of the sandy soil (0.161%), which suggested the number of microorganisms present in the soil was very low; this may play an important role in soil aggregation. The reason that soil BD increased even when adding poultry manure in the present study could be due to low content of total C. Composted manure application decreases soil BD as well as increases SOC (Adekiya 2019; Khaliq and Abbasi 2015), although the present study shows the opposite effect of poultry manure concerning soil BD. Sufficient SOC accumulation by future continuous application of poultry manure can change the tendency of soil BD changes.

Poultry manure application significantly increased the WHI (table 5). Contrary to our results, addition of both poultry litter and pine wood BC significantly increased the soil WHC while the water available to plants was increased by pine tree-derived BC and decreased by poultry litter, which may be attributed to the strong bonds formed between poultry litter and water (Bohara et al. 2019). The difference of poultry manure on WHI between our result and Bohara et al. (2019) may be attributed to the degree of weathering while poultry litter is stocked.

In this study, BC400 generated high CEC and the highest WHI, making it a promising soil conditioner for plant production. For integrated BC research, mechanistic research using local feedstock BC is important across various climates, soil types, and vegetative conditions (Amonette et al. 2021). Biochar made from G. sepium may be an important candidate in South and Southeast Asian countries where the species abundance is widespread.

This study describes the change in the physicochemical properties of BC and soil physical properties after the introduction of BC for short incubation periods focusing on the pyrolysis temperature used for the synthesis of the BC. Assessing long-term monitoring of the effect of BC application was requested for one of future research directions (Zhang et al. 2021). For our research, long-term monitoring will be also needed to clarify the long-term effect of this type of BC.

Summary and Conclusions

The physical and chemical properties of BCs generated from G. sepium wood changed considerably as the pyrolysis temperatures were increased resulting in an increase in the C/N ratio and pH of the BC, which may be attributed to an increase in total C and ash. The effect of BC on the fertility of the soil moisture condition may not be attributed to the high SA, but rather on its low BD, which may help in improving the WHC of the sandy soil. The improved soil water content is a result of interactions between BC and sandy soil rather than the porosity of the BC itself; therefore, it is necessary to consider the physical characteristics of the soil in addition to that of the BC itself for field applications. In this study, BC400 had the highest WHI, which may be attributed to low BD, and high CEC, while its high yield makes it a promising soil conditioner. Since the effect of BCs on soils are long-lasting, future studies monitoring the long-term effects of BC are important. Our group intends to conduct long-term studies monitoring the effects of G. sepium–derived BC.

Supplemental Material

The supplementary material for this article is available in the online journal at https://doi.org/10.2489/jswc.2022.00083.

Acknowledgements

We appreciate Suguru Mizusawa, visiting researcher of Akita Prefectural University, for daily management of the experimental facilities. The authors would like to thank Enago (www.enago.com) for the manuscript review and editing support. This work was partly supported by the President Supporting fund of Akita Prefectural University in the fiscal year 2018.

  • Received May 17, 2021.
  • Revision received October 26, 2021.
  • Accepted October 26, 2021.
  • © 2022 by the Soil and Water Conservation Society

references

  1. ↵
    1. Adekiya, A.O.
    2019. Green manures and poultry feather effects on soil characteristics, growth, yield, and mineral contents of tomato. Scientia Horticulturae 257:108721.
    OpenUrl
  2. ↵
    1. Amonette, J.E.,
    2. H. Blanco-Canqui,
    3. C. Hassebrook,
    4. D.A. Laird,
    5. R. Lal,
    6. J. Lehmann, and
    7. D. Page-Dumroese
    . 2021. Integrated biochar research: A roadmap. Journal of Soil and Water Conservation 76(1):24A-29A. https://doi.org/10.2489/jswc.2021.1115A.
  3. ↵
    1. Azzi, E.S.,
    2. E. Karltun, and
    3. C. Sundberg
    . 2021. Assessing the diverse environmental effects of biochar systems: An evaluation framework. Journal of Environmental Management 286(February):112154. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jenvman.2021.112154.
    OpenUrl
  4. ↵
    1. Baldock, J.A., and
    2. R.J. Smernik
    . 2002. Chemical composition and bioavailability of thermally altered Pinus resinosa (Red pine) wood. Organic Geochemistry 33(9):1093–1109.
    OpenUrlCrossRef
  5. ↵
    1. Basso, A.S.,
    2. F.E. Miguez,
    3. D.A. Laird,
    4. R. Horton, and
    5. M. Westgate
    . 2013. Assessing potential of biochar for increasing water-holding capacity of sandy soils. GCB Bioenergy 5(2):132–143.
    OpenUrl
  6. ↵
    1. Belimov, A.A.,
    2. I.V. Puhalsky,
    3. V.I. Safronova,
    4. A.I. Shaposhnikov,
    5. M.A. Vishnyakova,
    6. E.V. Semenova,
    7. N.Y. Zinovkina,
    8. N.M. Makarova,
    9. W. Wenzel, and
    10. I.A. Tikhonovich
    . 2015. Role of plant genotype and soil conditions in symbiotic plant-microbe interactions for adaptation of plants to cadmium-polluted soils. Water, Air and Soil Pollution 226(8):1–15.
    OpenUrl
  7. ↵
    1. Bohara, H.,
    2. S. Dodla,
    3. J.J. Wang,
    4. M. Darapuneni,
    5. B.S. Acharya,
    6. S. Magdi, and
    7. K. Pavuluri
    . 2019. Influence of poultry litter and biochar on soil water dynamics and nutrient leaching from a very fine sandy loam soil. Soil and Tillage Research 189:44–51.
    OpenUrl
    1. Bruun, E.W.,
    2. H. Hauggaard-Nielsen,
    3. N. Ibrahim,
    4. H. Egsgaard,
    5. P. Ambus,
    6. P.A. Jensen, and
    7. K. Dam-Johansen
    . 2011. Influence of fast pyrolysis temperature on biochar labile fraction and short-term carbon loss in a loamy soil. Biomass and Bioenergy 35(3):1182–1189.
    OpenUrl
  8. ↵
    1. Calvo Buendia, E.,
    2. K. Tanabe,
    3. A. Kranjc,
    4. J. Baasansuren,
    5. M. Fukuda,
    6. S. Ngarize,
    7. A. Osako,
    8. Y. Pyrozhenko,
    9. P. Shermanau, and
    10. S. Federici
    . 2019. 2019 Refinement to the 2006 IPCC Guidelines for National Greenhouse Gas Inventories. Switzerland: Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change.
  9. ↵
    1. Cheng, C.H.,
    2. J. Lehmann,
    3. J.E. Thies,
    4. S.D. Burton, and
    5. M.H. Engelhard
    . 2006. Oxidation of black carbon by biotic and abiotic processes. Organic Geochemistry 37(11):1477–1488.
    OpenUrlCrossRef
  10. ↵
    1. Chun, Y.,
    2. G. Sheng,
    3. G.T. Chiou, and
    4. B. Xing
    . 2004. Compositions and sorptive properties of crop residue-derived chars. Environmental Science and Technology 38(17):4649–4655.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  11. ↵
    1. Elad, Y.,
    2. E. Cytryn,
    3. Y. Meller Harel,
    4. B. Lew, and
    5. E. Graber
    . 2011. The Biochar Effect: Plant resistance to biotic stresses. Phytopathologia Mediterranea 50(1):335–349.
    OpenUrl
  12. ↵
    1. Fakinle, B.S.,
    2. O.B. Okedere,
    3. O. Seriki,
    4. A.J. Adesanmi, and
    5. J.A. Sonibare
    . 2017. An estimation of a trace gaseous emission factor from combustion of common fuelwood species in South-western Nigeria. Energy Sources, Part A: Recovery, Utilization and Environmental Effects 39(12):1298– 1306.
    OpenUrl
  13. ↵
    1. Fang, Y.,
    2. B. Singh,
    3. B.P. Singh, and
    4. E. Krull
    . 2014. Biochar carbon stability in four contrasting soils. European Journal of Soil Science 65(1):60–71.
    OpenUrl
  14. ↵
    1. Gaskin, J.W.,
    2. C. Steiner,
    3. K. Harris,
    4. K.C. Das, and
    5. B. Bibens
    . 2008. Effect of low-temperature pyrolysis conditions on biochar for agricultural use. Transactions of the ASABE 51(6):2061–2069.
    OpenUrl
  15. ↵
    1. Glaser, B.,
    2. J. Lehmann, and
    3. W. Zech
    . 2002. Ameliorating physical and chemical properties of highly weathered soils in the tropics with charcoal - A review. Biology and Fertility of Soils 35(4):219–230.
    OpenUrl
  16. ↵
    1. Haidi, L.,
    2. Y. Yunfeng,
    3. L. Yan,
    4. W. Xiaohua,
    5. M. Hongliang,
    6. G. Ren, and
    7. Y. Yusheng
    . 2016. Effects of fir (Cunninghamia Lanceolata) litter and its biochar on soil microbial community structure. Acta Pedologica Sinica 53(3):790–799.
    OpenUrl
  17. ↵
    1. Hoover, N.L.,
    2. J.Y. Law,
    3. L.A.M. Long,
    4. R.S. Kanwar, and
    5. M.L. Soupir
    . 2019. Long-term impact of poultry manure on crop yield, soil and water quality, and crop revenue. Journal of Environmental Management 252:109582.
    OpenUrl
  18. ↵
    1. Jaung, W.,
    2. E. Wiraguna,
    3. B. Okarda,
    4. Y. Artati,
    5. C.S. Goh,
    6. R. Syahru,
    7. B. Leksono,
    8. L.B. Prasetyo,
    9. S.M. Lee, and
    10. H. Baral
    . 2018. Spatial assessment of degraded lands for biofuel production in Indonesia. Sustainability 10(12):4595.
    OpenUrl
  19. ↵
    1. Kanda, Y.
    2013. Investigation of the freely available easy-to-use software “EZR” for medical statistics. Bone Marrow Transplantation 48(3):452–458.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  20. ↵
    1. Khaliq, A., and
    2. M.K. Abbasi
    . 2015. Improvements in the physical and chemical characteristics of degraded soils supplemented with organic–inorganic amendments in the Himalayan region of Kashmir, Pakistan. Catena 126:209–219.
    OpenUrl
  21. ↵
    1. Kim, K.H.,
    2. J.Y. Kim,
    3. T.S. Cho, and
    4. J.W. Choi
    . 2012. Influence of pyrolysis temperature on physicochemical properties of biochar obtained from the fast pyrolysis of pitch pine (Pinus rigida). Bioresource Technology 118:158–162.
    OpenUrlPubMed
  22. ↵
    1. Kloss, S.,
    2. F. Zehetner,
    3. A. Dellantonio,
    4. R. Hamid,
    5. F. Ottner,
    6. V. Liedtke,
    7. M. Schwanninger,
    8. M.H. Gerzabek, and
    9. G. Soja
    . 2012. Characterization of slow pyrolysis biochars: Effects of feedstocks and pyrolysis temperature on biochar properties. Journal of Environmental Quality 41(4):990– 1000.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  23. ↵
    1. Lal, R.
    2016. Beyond COP21: Potential and challenges of the “4 per Thousand” initiative. Journal of Soil and Water Conservation 71(1):20A–25A. https://doi.org/10.2489/jswc.71.1.20A.
    OpenUrlFREE Full Text
  24. ↵
    1. Lehmann, J.
    2007. A handful of carbon. Nature 447(7141):143–144.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  25. ↵
    1. Lehmann, J.,
    2. J.P. Da Silva,
    3. C. Steiner,
    4. T. Nehls,
    5. W. Zech, and
    6. B. Glaser
    . 2003. Nutrient availability and leaching in an archaeological Anthrosol and a ferralsol of the Central Amazon Basin: Fertilizer, manure and charcoal amendments. Plant and Soil 249(2):343–357.
    OpenUrlCrossRef
  26. ↵
    1. Lehmann, J.,
    2. J. Gaunt, and
    3. M. Rondon
    . 2006. Bio-char sequestration in terrestrial ecosystems – A review. Mitigation and Adaptation Strategies for Global Change 11(2):403–427.
    OpenUrl
  27. ↵
    1. Lehmann, J., and
    2. S. Joseph
    . 2009. Biochar for environmental management: Science and technology. Biochar for Environmental Management: Science and Technology 1st ed. London: Routledge.
  28. ↵
    1. Li, L.,
    2. Y.J. Zhang,
    3. A. Novak,
    4. Y. Yang, and
    5. J. Wang
    . 2021. Role of biochar in improving sandy soil water retention and resilience to drought. Water (Switzerland) 13(4):407. https://doi.org/10.3390/w13040407.
    OpenUrl
  29. ↵
    1. Lin, Y.,
    2. D. B. Watts,
    3. E. Van Santen, and
    4. G. Cao
    . 2018. Influence of poultry litter on crop productivity under different field conditions: A meta-analysis. Agronomy Journal 110(3):807–818.
    OpenUrl
  30. ↵
    1. Lorenz, K., and
    2. R. Lal
    . 2014. Biochar application to soil for climate change mitigation by soil organic carbon sequestration. Journal of Plant Nutrition and Soil Science 177(5):651–670.
    OpenUrl
  31. ↵
    1. Matovic, D.
    2011. Biochar as a viable carbon sequestration option: Global and Canadian perspective. Energy 36(4):2011–2016.
    OpenUrl
  32. ↵
    1. Mukherjee, A.,
    2. A.R. Zimmerman, and
    3. W. Harris
    . 2011. Surface chemistry variations among a series of laboratory-produced biochars. Geoderma 163(3–4):247–255.
    OpenUrl
  33. ↵
    1. Novak, J.M.,
    2. W.J. Busscher,
    3. D.W. Watts,
    4. J.E. Amonette,
    5. J.A. Ippolito,
    6. I.M. Lima,
    7. J. Gaskin, et al
    . 2012. Biochars impact on soil-moisture storage in an ultisol and two aridisols. Soil Science 177(5):310–320.
    OpenUrlCrossRef
  34. ↵
    1. Novak, J.M.,
    2. I. Lima,
    3. B. Xing,
    4. J.W. Gaskin,
    5. C. Steiner,
    6. K.C. Das,
    7. M. Ahmedna, et al
    . 2009. Characterization of designer biochar produced at different temperatures and their effects on a loamy sand. Annals of Environmental Science 3:195–206.
    OpenUrl
  35. ↵
    1. Obia, A.,
    2. J. Mulder,
    3. V. Martinsen,
    4. G. Cornelissen, and
    5. T. Børresen
    . 2016. In situ effects of biochar on aggregation, water retention and porosity in light-textured tropical soils. Soil and Tillage Research 155:35–44.
    OpenUrlCrossRef
  36. ↵
    1. Rao, M.R., and
    2. M.N. Mathuva
    . 2000. Legumes for improving maize yields and income in semi-arid Kenya. Agriculture, Ecosystems and Environment 78(2):123–137.
    OpenUrl
  37. ↵
    1. Ratnasiri, J.
    2008. Alternative energy - Prospects for Sri Lanka. Journal of the National Science Foundation of Sri Lanka 36(Special Issue):89–114.
    OpenUrl
  38. ↵
    1. R.C. Gutteridge and
    2. H.M. Shelton
    1. Simons, A.J., and
    2. J.L. Stewart
    . 1994. Gliricidia sepium-a multipurpose forage tree legume. In Forage Tree Legumes in Tropical Agriculture, eds. R.C. Gutteridge and H.M. Shelton. UK: CAB International.
  39. ↵
    1. Singh, B.P.,
    2. B.J. Hatton,
    3. B. Singh,
    4. A.L. Cowie, and
    5. A. Kathuria
    . 2010. Influence of biochars on nitrous oxide emission and nitrogen leaching from two contrasting soils. Journal of Environmental Quality 39(4):1224–1235.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  40. ↵
    1. Sparks, D.L.,
    2. A.L. Page,
    3. P.A. Helmke.
    4. R.H. Loeppert,
    5. P.N. Soltanpour,
    6. M.A. Tabatabai,
    7. C.T. Johnston, and
    8. M.E. Sumner
    . 1996. Methods of Soil Analysis. Part 3, Chemical Methods. Madison, WI: Soil Science Society of America and American Society of Agronomy.
  41. ↵
    1. Spokas, K.A.,
    2. K.B. Cantrell,
    3. J.M. Novak,
    4. D.W. Archer,
    5. J.A. Ippolito,
    6. H.P. Collins,
    7. A.A. Boateng, et al
    . 2012. Biochar: A synthesis of its agronomic impact beyond carbon sequestration. Journal of Environmental Quality 41(4):973–989.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  42. ↵
    1. Stewart, J.,
    2. G.E. Allison, and
    3. A.J. Simpsons
    . 1996. Gliricidia sepium Genetic resources for farmers. Oxford: Parchment (Oxford) Ltd.
  43. ↵
    1. Szott, L.T.,
    2. C.A. Palm, and
    3. P.A. Sanchez
    . 1991. Agroforestry in acid soils of the humid tropics. Advances in Agronomy 45(C):275–301.
    OpenUrlCrossRef
    1. Terribile, F.,
    2. M. Iamarino,
    3. G. Langella,
    4. P. Manna,
    5. F. A. Mileti,
    6. S. Vingiani, and
    7. A. Basile
    . 2018. The hidden ecological resource of andic soils in mountain ecosystems: Evidence from Italy. Solid Earth 9(1):63–74.
    OpenUrl
  44. ↵
    1. Ulyett, J.,
    2. R. Sakrabani,
    3. M. Kibblewhite, and
    4. M. Hann
    . 2014. Impact of biochar addition on water retention, nitrification and carbon dioxide evolution from two sandy loam soils. European Journal of Soil Science 65(1):96–104.
    OpenUrl
    1. United Nations Convention to Combat Desertification
    . 2017. Global Land Outlook, first edition. Bonn, Germany: United Nations.
  45. ↵
    1. Wang, D.,
    2. C. Li,
    3. S.J. Parikh, and
    4. K. M. Scow
    . 2019. Impact of biochar on water retention of two agricultural soils – A multi-scale analysis. Geoderma 340:185–191.
    OpenUrl
  46. ↵
    1. Wortmann, C.S., and
    2. C.A. Shapiro
    . 2008. The effects of manure application on soil aggregation. Nutrient Cycling in Agroecosystems 80(2):173–180.
    OpenUrl
  47. ↵
    1. Wu, W.,
    2. M. Yang,
    3. Q. Feng,
    4. K. McGrouther,
    5. H. Wang,
    6. H. Lu, and
    7. Y. Chen
    . 2012. Chemical characterization of rice straw-derived biochar for soil amendment. Biomass and Bioenergy 47:268–276.
    OpenUrl
  48. ↵
    1. Yuan, J.H.,
    2. R.K. Xu, and
    3. H. Zhang
    . 2011. The forms of alkalis in the biochar produced from crop residues at different temperatures. Bioresource Technology 102(3):3488–3497.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  49. ↵
    1. Zhang, Y.,
    2. J. Wang, and
    3. Y. Feng
    . 2021. The effects of biochar addition on soil physicochemical properties: A review. Catena 202:105284.
    OpenUrl
  50. ↵
    1. van Zwieten, L.,
    2. S. Kimber,
    3. S. Morris,
    4. K.Y. Chan,
    5. A. Downie,
    6. J. Rust,
    7. S. Joseph, and
    8. A. Cowie
    . 2010. Effects of biochar from slow pyrolysis of papermill waste on agronomic performance and soil fertility. Plant and Soil 327(1–2):235–246.
    OpenUrlCrossRef
PreviousNext
Back to top

In this issue

Journal of Soil and Water Conservation: 77 (3)
Journal of Soil and Water Conservation
Vol. 77, Issue 3
May/June 2022
  • Table of Contents
  • Table of Contents (PDF)
  • About the Cover
  • Index by author
  • Front Matter (PDF)
Print
Download PDF
Article Alerts
Sign In to Email Alerts with your Email Address
Email Article

Thank you for your interest in spreading the word on Journal of Soil and Water Conservation.

NOTE: We only request your email address so that the person you are recommending the page to knows that you wanted them to see it, and that it is not junk mail. We do not capture any email address.

Enter multiple addresses on separate lines or separate them with commas.
Physicochemical properties of biochar derived from wood of Gliricidia sepium based on the pyrolysis temperature and its applications
(Your Name) has sent you a message from Journal of Soil and Water Conservation
(Your Name) thought you would like to see the Journal of Soil and Water Conservation web site.
CAPTCHA
This question is for testing whether or not you are a human visitor and to prevent automated spam submissions.
7 + 0 =
Solve this simple math problem and enter the result. E.g. for 1+3, enter 4.
Citation Tools
Physicochemical properties of biochar derived from wood of Gliricidia sepium based on the pyrolysis temperature and its applications
S. Wakamiya, Y. Kurimoto, H. Sugimoto, Y. Aoki, S. Kato, M. Ogasawara, N. Kanazawa, N. Hosokawa, A. Hayakawa, T. Takahashi, Y. Ishikawa
Journal of Soil and Water Conservation May 2022, 77 (3) 322-330; DOI: 10.2489/jswc.2022.00083

Citation Manager Formats

  • BibTeX
  • Bookends
  • EasyBib
  • EndNote (tagged)
  • EndNote 8 (xml)
  • Medlars
  • Mendeley
  • Papers
  • RefWorks Tagged
  • Ref Manager
  • RIS
  • Zotero
Request Permissions
Share
Physicochemical properties of biochar derived from wood of Gliricidia sepium based on the pyrolysis temperature and its applications
S. Wakamiya, Y. Kurimoto, H. Sugimoto, Y. Aoki, S. Kato, M. Ogasawara, N. Kanazawa, N. Hosokawa, A. Hayakawa, T. Takahashi, Y. Ishikawa
Journal of Soil and Water Conservation May 2022, 77 (3) 322-330; DOI: 10.2489/jswc.2022.00083
del.icio.us logo Digg logo Reddit logo Twitter logo Facebook logo Google logo Mendeley logo
  • Tweet Widget
  • Facebook Like
  • Google Plus One

Jump to section

  • Article
    • Abstract
    • Introduction
    • Materials and Methods
    • Results and Discussion
    • Summary and Conclusions
    • Acknowledgements
    • references
  • Figures & Data
  • Supplemental
  • Info & Metrics
  • References
  • PDF

Related Articles

  • Google Scholar

Cited By...

  • No citing articles found.
  • Google Scholar

More in this TOC Section

  • Assessing the Agricultural Conservation Planning Framework toolbox in a Southern Piedmont landscape of the United States
  • Soil erodibility after the removal of wood chip mulch: A wind tunnel experiment
  • Ecosystem services in Iowa agricultural catchments: Hypotheses for scenarios with water quality wetlands and improved tile drainage
Show more Research Section

Similar Articles

Keywords

  • biochar
  • Gliricidia sepium
  • physical and chemical properties
  • pyrolysis
  • temperature
  • water holding capacity

Content

  • Current Issue
  • Early Online
  • Archive
  • Subject Collections

Info For

  • Authors
  • Reviewers
  • Subscribers
  • Advertisers

Customer Service

  • Subscriptions
  • Permissions and Reprints
  • Terms of Use
  • Privacy

SWCS

  • Membership
  • Publications
  • Meetings and Events
  • Conservation Career Center

© 2022 Soil and Water Conservation Society