Skip to main content

Main menu

  • Home
  • Content
    • Current Issue
    • Early Online
    • Archive
    • Subject Collections
  • Info For
    • Authors
    • Reviewers
    • Subscribers
    • Advertisers
  • About
    • About JSWC
    • Editorial Board
    • Permissions
    • Alerts
    • RSS Feeds
    • Contact Us

User menu

  • Register
  • Subscribe
  • My alerts
  • Log in
  • My Cart

Search

  • Advanced search
Journal of Soil and Water Conservation

  • Register
  • Subscribe
  • My alerts
  • Log in
  • My Cart
Journal of Soil and Water Conservation

Advanced Search

  • Home
  • Content
    • Current Issue
    • Early Online
    • Archive
    • Subject Collections
  • Info For
    • Authors
    • Reviewers
    • Subscribers
    • Advertisers
  • About
    • About JSWC
    • Editorial Board
    • Permissions
    • Alerts
    • RSS Feeds
    • Contact Us
  • Follow SWCS on Twitter
  • Visit SWCS on Facebook
Research ArticleResearch Section

Conversion of Conservation Reserve Program land back to cropland: Changes in soil carbon and nitrogen dynamics during the first five years

C. Li, J.M. Moore, V. Acosta-Martínez, L.M. Fultz and M. Kakarla
Journal of Soil and Water Conservation July 2022, 77 (4) 333-346; DOI: https://doi.org/10.2489/jswc.2022.00141
C. Li
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
J.M. Moore
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
V. Acosta-Martínez
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
L.M. Fultz
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
M. Kakarla
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • Article
  • Figures & Data
  • Supplemental
  • References
  • Info & Metrics
  • PDF
Loading

Article Figures & Data

Figures

  • Tables
  • Additional Files
  • Figure 1
    • Download figure
    • Open in new tab
    • Download powerpoint
    Figure 1

    Map showing location of sampling sites within the three counties in the Southern High Plains of Texas. Within each county, one long-term (>23 years) Conservation Reserve Program site (CRP; blue points) and one dryland cropland converted from a similar long-term CRP site (C-CRP; green points) were sampled for a total of six sites (note that all points on map not visible due to scaling). Map on the left is an example of one of the counties showing the location of one CRP (green) and one C-CRP (blue) site. Within each site, three 100 m transects (white lines) were placed within the same soil series (e.g., within red outline of the Arvana soil series) and five soil cores were collected approximately every 20 m, split into three depths as shown, and homogenized. Thus, for each site, nine soil samples (three subreplicates from each of the transects × three depths) were collected and analyzed during each of the four sampling years (2012 to 2015).

  • Figure 2
    • Download figure
    • Open in new tab
    • Download powerpoint
    Figure 2

    Estimated marginal means for the Conservation Reserve Program system (CRP; blue triangles) and the converted CRP to annual cropped system (C-CRP; red circles) for (a to c) soil organic carbon (SOC), (d to f) total nitrogen (TN), (g to i) particulate organic carbon (POM-C), and (j to l) particulate organic matter nitrogen (POM-N) at soil depth profiles of (a, d, g, and j) 0 to 10 cm, (b, e, h, and k) 0 to 30 cm, and (c, f, i, and l) 0 to 50 cm from 2012 to 2015. Different capital letters indicate a significant difference between systems within the same sampling year. Different lowercase letters indicate a significant difference between sampling years within each system. Letters are only shown when there was a significant system by year interaction (α = 0.1). P-values from ANCOVA for main effect of system, year, and their interaction (Int.) are provided (n = 72 for each soil depth profile).

  • Figure 3
    • Download figure
    • Open in new tab
    • Download powerpoint
    Figure 3

    Estimated marginal means for the Conservation Reserve Program system (CRP; blue triangles) and the converted CRP to annual cropped system (C-CRP; red circles) for (a to c) permanganate oxidizable carbon (POXC), (d to f) microbial biomass carbon (MBC), and (g to i) microbial biomass nitrogen (MBN) at soil depth profiles of (a, d, and g) 0 to 10 cm, (b, e, and h) 0 to 30 cm, and (c, f, and i) 0 to 50 cm from 2012 to 2015. Different capital letters indicate a significant difference (α = 0.1) between systems within the same sampling year. Different lowercase letters indicate a significant difference between sampling years within each system. P-values from ANCOVA for main effect of system, year, and their interaction (Int.) are provided (n = 72 for each soil depth profile).

  • Figure 4
    • Download figure
    • Open in new tab
    • Download powerpoint
    Figure 4

    Average weather conditions of the research sites from 2011 to 2015 from nearby weather stations. (a) Monthly precipitation, (b) average daily soil temperature, and (c) soil diurnal temperature range (DTR) under bare soil (proxy of C-CRP; red symbols) and vegetated soil (proxy of CRP; blue symbols) at 0 to 10 and 10 to 30 cm. In (a), the numbers before the slash represent the precipitation during the growing season from May to October of each year and the numbers after the slash represent the precipitation of the entire year.

  • Figure 5
    • Download figure
    • Open in new tab
    • Download powerpoint
    Figure 5

    (a) Average monthly soil carbon dioxide (CO2) efflux rate, (b) cumulative CO2 efflux, and (c) soil volumetric water content (n = 18 replicates for each system and year) for converted Conservation Reserve Program (C-CRP) and CRP. Different capital letters indicate a significant difference between systems within the same sampling month in plots A and B. Letters are only shown when there was a significant system and sampling year/month interaction (α = 0.1).

  • Figure 6
    • Download figure
    • Open in new tab
    • Download powerpoint
    Figure 6

    Estimated marginal means of soil microbial metabolic quotient (qCO2) in the converted Conservation Reserve Program (C-CRP) and CRP systems. The capital letters indicate the difference between systems (CRP and C-CRP) within the same sampling year. The lowercase letters indicate the difference among different sampling years within each system (n = 72).

Tables

  • Figures
  • Additional Files
    • View popup
    • Download powerpoint
    Table 1

    Management history and soil information for each of the six sampling sites (Conservation Reserve Program [CRP] and converted CRP) across the three counties in the Southern High Plains.

    Table 1
    • View popup
    • Download powerpoint
    Table 2 The average estimated marginal means of the soil carbon and nitrogen stocks in the Conservation Reserve Program (CRP) and converted CRP (C-CRP) systems from 2012 to 2015 at 0 to 10 cm, 0 to 30 cm, and 0 to 50 cm (n = 72 observations for each depth profile).
    Table 2

Additional Files

  • Figures
  • Tables
  • 2022.00141 Supplementary File

    Files in this Data Supplement:

    • Supplementary File
PreviousNext
Back to top

In this issue

Journal of Soil and Water Conservation: 77 (4)
Journal of Soil and Water Conservation
Vol. 77, Issue 4
July/August 2022
  • Table of Contents
  • Table of Contents (PDF)
  • About the Cover
  • Index by author
  • Front Matter (PDF)
Print
Download PDF
Article Alerts
Sign In to Email Alerts with your Email Address
Email Article

Thank you for your interest in spreading the word on Journal of Soil and Water Conservation.

NOTE: We only request your email address so that the person you are recommending the page to knows that you wanted them to see it, and that it is not junk mail. We do not capture any email address.

Enter multiple addresses on separate lines or separate them with commas.
Conversion of Conservation Reserve Program land back to cropland: Changes in soil carbon and nitrogen dynamics during the first five years
(Your Name) has sent you a message from Journal of Soil and Water Conservation
(Your Name) thought you would like to see the Journal of Soil and Water Conservation web site.
CAPTCHA
This question is for testing whether or not you are a human visitor and to prevent automated spam submissions.
1 + 2 =
Solve this simple math problem and enter the result. E.g. for 1+3, enter 4.
Citation Tools
Conversion of Conservation Reserve Program land back to cropland: Changes in soil carbon and nitrogen dynamics during the first five years
C. Li, J.M. Moore, V. Acosta-Martínez, L.M. Fultz, M. Kakarla
Journal of Soil and Water Conservation Jul 2022, 77 (4) 333-346; DOI: 10.2489/jswc.2022.00141

Citation Manager Formats

  • BibTeX
  • Bookends
  • EasyBib
  • EndNote (tagged)
  • EndNote 8 (xml)
  • Medlars
  • Mendeley
  • Papers
  • RefWorks Tagged
  • Ref Manager
  • RIS
  • Zotero
Request Permissions
Share
Conversion of Conservation Reserve Program land back to cropland: Changes in soil carbon and nitrogen dynamics during the first five years
C. Li, J.M. Moore, V. Acosta-Martínez, L.M. Fultz, M. Kakarla
Journal of Soil and Water Conservation Jul 2022, 77 (4) 333-346; DOI: 10.2489/jswc.2022.00141
del.icio.us logo Digg logo Reddit logo Twitter logo Facebook logo Google logo Mendeley logo
  • Tweet Widget
  • Facebook Like
  • Google Plus One

Jump to section

  • Article
    • Abstract
    • Introduction
    • Materials and Methods
    • Results and Discussion
    • Summary and Conclusions
    • Supplemental Material
    • Acknowledgements
    • Footnotes
    • References
  • Figures & Data
  • Supplemental
  • Info & Metrics
  • References
  • PDF

Related Articles

  • Google Scholar

Cited By...

  • No citing articles found.
  • Google Scholar

More in this TOC Section

  • Smart control of agricultural water wells in western Iran: Application of the Q-methodology
  • Soil health through farmers’ eyes: Toward a better understanding of how farmers view, value, and manage for healthier soils
  • Policy process and problem framing for state Nutrient Reduction Strategies in the US Upper Mississippi River Basin
Show more Research Section

Similar Articles

Keywords

  • Conservation Reserve Program
  • labile soil carbon and nitrogen stocks
  • metabolic quotient
  • microbial biomass
  • soil carbon dynamics and sequestration

Content

  • Current Issue
  • Early Online
  • Archive
  • Subject Collections

Info For

  • Authors
  • Reviewers
  • Subscribers
  • Advertisers

Customer Service

  • Subscriptions
  • Permissions and Reprints
  • Terms of Use
  • Privacy

SWCS

  • Membership
  • Publications
  • Meetings and Events
  • Conservation Career Center

© 2023 Soil and Water Conservation Society