Conversion of Conservation Reserve Program land back to cropland: Changes in soil carbon and nitrogen dynamics during the first five years

References

1. ↵
   1. Acosta-Martinez, V.,
   2. G. Burow,
   3. T.M. Zobeck, and
   4. V.G. Allen

   . 2010. Soil microbial communities and function in alternative systems to continuous cotton. Soil Science Society of America Journal 74(4):1181–1192.

   OpenUrlCrossRefWeb of Science
2. 1. Acosta-Martínez, V.,
   2. S. Klose, and
   3. T.M. Zobeck

   . 2003. Enzyme activities in semiarid soils under conservation reserve program, native rangeland, and cropland. Journal of Plant Nutrition and Soil Science 166(6):699–707.

   OpenUrl
3. ↵
   1. Bastida, F.,
   2. C. García,
   3. N. Fierer,
   4. D.J. Eldridge,
   5. M.A. Bowker,
   6. S. Abades,
   7. F.D. Alfaro

   , et al. 2019. Global ecological predictors of the soil priming effect. Nature Communications 10(1):1–9.

   OpenUrl
4. ↵
   1. Bigelow, D.,
   2. R. Claassen,
   3. D. Hellersteon,
   4. V. Breneman,
   5. R. Williams, and
   6. C. You

   . 2020. The fate of land in expiring conservation reserve program contracts, 2013-2016. EIB-215. Washington, DC: USDA Economic Research Service.
5. ↵
   1. Blagodatskaya, E., and
   2. Y. Kuzyakov

   . 2008. Mechanisms of real and apparent priming effects and their dependence on soil microbial biomass and community structure: Critical review. Biology and Fertility of Soils 45(2):115–131.

   OpenUrl
6. ↵
   1. Blagodatsky, S.,
   2. E. Blagodatskaya,
   3. T. Yuyukina, and
   4. Y. Kuzyakov

   . 2010. Model of apparent and real priming effects: Linking microbial activity with soil organic matter decomposition. Soil Biology and Biochemistry 42(8):1275–1283.

   OpenUrl
7. ↵
   1. Blair, G.J.,
   2. R.D. Lefroy, and
   3. L. Lisle

   . 1995. Soil carbon fractions based on their degree of oxidation, and the development of a carbon management index for agricultural systems. Australian Journal of Agricultural Research 46(7):1459–1466.

   OpenUrlCrossRefWeb of Science
8. ↵
   1. Bongiorno, G.,
   2. E.K. Bünemann,
   3. C.U. Oguejiofor,
   4. J. Meier,
   5. G. Gort,
   6. R. Comans,
   7. P. Mäder,
   8. L. Brussaard, and
   9. R. de Goede

   . 2019. Sensitivity of labile carbon fractions to tillage and organic matter management and their potential as comprehensive soil quality indicators across pedoclimatic conditions in Europe. Ecological Indicators 99:38–50.

   OpenUrl
9. ↵
   1. Bradford, M.A.,
   2. A.D. Keiser,
   3. C.A. Davies,
   4. C.A. Mersmann, and
   5. M.S. Strickland

   . 2013. Empirical evidence that soil carbon formation from plant inputs is positively related to microbial growth. Biogeochemistry 113(1):271–281.

   OpenUrl
10. ↵
    1. Brookes, P.C.,
    2. A. Landman,
    3. G. Pruden, and
    4. D.S. Jenkinson

    . 1985. Chloroform fumigation and the release of soil nitrogen: A rapid direct extraction method to measure microbial biomass nitrogen in soil. Soil Biology and Biochemistry 17(6):837–842.

    OpenUrl
11. ↵
    1. Bugge, A.

    2013. Shifts in plant community composition across a Conservation Reserve Program chronosequence and associated soil chemical properties of Amarillo loamy sand in the Texas High Plains. Master’s thesis, Texas Tech University.
12. ↵
    1. Cotrufo, M.F.,
    2. M.D. Wallenstein,
    3. C.M. Boot,
    4. K. Denef, and
    5. E. Paul

    . 2013. The Microbial Efficiency-Matrix Stabilization (MEMS) framework integrates plant litter decomposition with soil organic matter stabilization: do labile plant inputs form stable soil organic matter? Global Change Biology 19(4):988–995.

    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
13. 1. Cotton, J., and
    2. V. Acosta-Martínez

    . 2018. Intensive tillage converting grassland to cropland immediately reduces soil microbial community size and organic carbon. Agricultural and Environmental Letters 3(1):1–4.

    OpenUrl
14. ↵
    1. Crow, S.E.,
    2. T.R. Filley,
    3. M. McCormick,
    4. K. Szlávecz,
    5. D.E. Stott,
    6. D. Gamblin, and
    7. G. Conyers

    . 2009. Earthworms, stand age, and species composition interact to influence particulate organic matter chemistry during forest succession. Biogeochemistry 92(1):61–82.

    OpenUrl
15. ↵
    1. Cullum, R.F.,
    2. M.A. Locke, and
    3. S.S. Knight

    . 2010. Effects of conservation reserve program on runoff and lake water quality in an oxbow lake watershed. Journal of International Environmental Application and Science 5(3):318–328.

    OpenUrl
16. ↵
    1. Dao, T.H.,
    2. J.H. Stiegler,
    3. J.C. Banks,
    4. L. Bogle-Boerngen, and
    5. B. Adams

    . 2000. Post-contract grassland management and winter wheat production on former CRP fields in the Southern Great Plains. Agronomy Journal 92(6):1109–1117.

    OpenUrlWeb of Science
17. ↵
    1. R. Lal

    1. Follett, R.F.,
    2. S.E. Samson-Liebig,
    3. J.M. Kimble,
    4. E.G. Pruessner, and
    5. S.W. Waltman

    . 2001. Carbon sequestration under the Conservation Reserve Program in the historic grassland soils of the United States of America. In Soil Carbon Sequestration and the Greenhouse Effect, ed. R. Lal, 27–40. Soil Science Society of America Special Publication 57. Madison, WI: Soil Science Society of America.
18. ↵
    1. Fontaine, S.,
    2. S. Barot,
    3. P. Barré,
    4. N. Bdioui,
    5. B. Mary, and
    6. C. Rumpel

    . 2007. Stability of organic carbon in deep soil layers controlled by fresh carbon supply. Nature 450(7167):277–280.

    OpenUrlCrossRefGeoRefPubMedWeb of Science
19. ↵
    1. Franzluebbers, A.J.

    2002. Soil organic matter stratification ratio as an indicator of soil quality. Soil Tillage Research 66(2):95–106.

    OpenUrl
20. ↵
    1. Gebhart, D.L.,
    2. H.B. Johnson,
    3. H.S. Mayeux, and
    4. H.W. Polley

    . 1994. The CRP increases soil organic-carbon. Journal of Soil and Water Conservation 49(5):488–492.

    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
21. ↵
    1. A. Klute

    1. Gee, G.W., and
    2. J.W. Bauder

    . 1986. Particle-size analysis, In Methods of Soil Analysis. Part 1—Physical and mineralogical methods, 2nd ed, ed. A. Klute, 383–411. Madison, WI: Soil Science Society of America.
22. ↵
    1. Gewin, V.L.,
    2. A.C. Kennedy,
    3. R. Veseth, and
    4. B.C. Miller

    . 1999. Soil quality changes in eastern Washington with Conservation Reserve Program (CRP) take-out. Journal of Soil and Water Conservation 54(1):432–438.

    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
23. ↵
    1. Gill, R.,
    2. I.C. Burke,
    3. D.G. Milchunas, and
    4. W.K. Lauenroth

    . 1999. Relationship between root biomass and soil organic matter pools in the shortgrass steppe of eastern Colorado. Ecosystems 2(3):226–236.

    OpenUrlCrossRef
24. ↵
    1. Gilley, J.E., and
    2. J.W. Doran

    . 1997. Tillage effects on soil erosion potential and soil quality of a former Conservation Reserve Program site. Journal of Soil and Water Conservation 52(3):184–188.

    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
25. ↵
    1. Gilley, J.E.,
    2. J.W. Doran, and
    3. B. Eghball

    . 2001. Tillage and fallow effects on selected soil quality characteristics of former conservation reserve program sites. Journal of Soil and Water Conservation 56(2):126–132.

    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
26. ↵
    1. Gilley, J.E.,
    2. J.W. Doran,
    3. D.L. Karlen, and
    4. T.C. Kaspar

    . 1997. Runoff, erosion, and soil quality characteristics of a former Conservation Reserve Program site. Journal of Soil and Water Conservation 52(3):189–193.

    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
27. ↵
    1. Harris, D.,
    2. W.R. Horwáth, and
    3. C. Van Kessel

    . 2001. Acid fumigation of soils to remove carbonates prior to total organic carbon or carbon-13 isotopic analysis. Soil Science Society of America Journal 65(6):1853–1856.

    OpenUrlCrossRefGeoRefWeb of Science
28. ↵
    1. Hellerstein, D.M.

    2017. The US Conservation Reserve Program: The evolution of an enrollment mechanism. Land Use Policy 63:601–10.

    OpenUrl
29. 1. Kallenbach, C.M.,
    2. S.D. Frey, and
    3. A.S. Grandy

    . 2016. Direct evidence for microbial-derived soil organic matter formation and its ecophysiological controls. Nature Communications 7(1):1–10.

    OpenUrlCrossRef
30. ↵
    1. Kallenbach, C.M.,
    2. A.S. Grandy,
    3. S.D. Frey, and
    4. A.F. Diefendorf

    . 2015. Microbial physiology and necromass regulate agricultural soil carbon accumulation. Soil Biology and Biochemistry 91:279–290.

    OpenUrl
31. ↵
    1. Kay, B.D., and
    2. A.J. VandenBygaart

    . 2002. Conservation tillage and depth stratification of porosity and soil organic matter. Soil and Tillage Research 66(2):107–118.

    OpenUrl
32. ↵
    1. Kuzyakov, Y.

    2010. Priming effects: Interactions between living and dead organic matter. Soil Biology and Biochemistry 42(9):1363–1371.

    OpenUrl
33. ↵
    1. Lee, Z.M., and
    2. T.M. Schmidt

    . 2014. Bacterial growth efficiency varies in soils under different land management practices. Soil Biology and Biochemistry 69:282–290.

    OpenUrl
34. ↵
    1. Lehman, R.M.,
    2. C.A. Cambardella,
    3. D.E. Stott,
    4. V. Acosta-Martinez,
    5. D.K. Manter,
    6. J.S. Buyer,
    7. J.E. Maul

    , et al. 2015. Understanding and enhancing soil biological health: The solution for reversing soil degradation. Sustainability 7(1):988–1027.

    OpenUrl
35. ↵
    1. Lehmann, J., and
    2. M. Kleber

    . 2015. The contentious nature of soil organic matter. Nature 528(7580):60.

    OpenUrlCrossRef
36. ↵
    1. Lenth, R.V.

    2021. emmeans: Estimated Marginal Means, aka Least-Squares Means. R package version 1.7.1-1. https://CRAN.R-project.org/package=emmeans.
37. ↵
    1. Li, C.,
    2. L.M. Fultz,
    3. J. Moore-Kucera,
    4. V. Acosta-Martínez,
    5. J. Horita,
    6. R. Strauss,
    7. F. Calderón, and
    8. D. Weindorf

    . 2017. Soil carbon sequestration potential in semi-arid grasslands in the Conservation Reserve Program. Geoderma 297:80–90.

    OpenUrl
38. ↵
    1. Li, C.,
    2. L.M. Fultz,
    3. J. Moore-Kucera,
    4. V. Acosta-Martínez,
    5. M. Kakarla, and
    6. D. Weindorf

    . 2018. Soil health restoration in Conservation Reserve Program semi-arid grasslands. Soil Biology and Biochemistry 118:166–177.

    OpenUrl
39. ↵
    1. Liang, C.,
    2. G. Cheng,
    3. D.L. Wixon, and
    4. T.C. Balser

    . 2011. An Absorbing Markov Chain approach to understanding the microbial role in soil carbon stabilization. Biogeochemistry 106(3):303–309.

    OpenUrl
40. ↵
    1. Loginow, W.,
    2. W. Wisniewski,
    3. S.S. Gonet, and
    4. B. Ciescinska

    . 1987. Fractionation of organic carbon based on susceptibility to oxidation. Polish Journal of Soil Science 20:47–52.

    OpenUrl
41. ↵
    1. López-Fando, C., and
    2. M.T. Pardo

    . 2011. Soil carbon storage and stratification under different tillage systems in a semi-arid region. Soil and Tillage Research 111(2):224–230.

    OpenUrl
42. ↵
    1. Marshall D.W.,
    2. A.H. Fayram,
    3. J.C. Panuska,
    4. J. Baumann, and
    5. J. Hennessy

    . 2008. Positive effects of agricultural land use changes on coldwater fish communities in southwest Wisconsin streams. North America Journal of Fisheries Management 28:944–53.

    OpenUrl
43. ↵
    1. Moore-Kucera, J.,
    2. A.N. Azarenko,
    3. L. Brutcher,
    4. A. Chozinski,
    5. D.D. Myrold, and
    6. R. Ingham

    . 2008. In search of key soil functions to assess soil community management for sustainable sweet cherry orchards. HortScience 43(1):38–44. https://doi.org/10.21273/hortsci.43.1.38.

    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
44. ↵
    1. Moreno, F.,
    2. J.M. Murillo,
    3. F. Pelegrín, and
    4. I.F. Girón

    . 2006. Long-term impact of conservation tillage on stratification ratio of soil organic carbon and loss of total and active CaCO₃. Soil and Tillage Research 85(1-2):86–93.

    OpenUrl
45. ↵
    1. Pérez-Guzmán, L.,
    2. V. Acosta-Martínez,
    3. L.A. Phillips, and
    4. S.A. Mauget

    . 2020. Resilience of the microbial communities of semiarid agricultural soils during natural climatic variability events. Applied Soil Ecology 149:103487.

    OpenUrl
46. ↵
    1. Piñeiro, G.,
    2. E.G. Jobbágy,
    3. J. Baker,
    4. B.C. Murray, and
    5. R.B. Jackson

    . 2009. Set-asides can be better climate investment than corn ethanol. Ecology Application 19:277–282.

    OpenUrl
47. ↵
    1. Pinheiro J.,
    2. D. Bates,
    3. S. DebRoy,
    4. D. Sarkar, and R Core Team

    . 2018. nlme: Linear and Nonlinear Mixed Effects Models. R package version 3.1-137. https://CRAN.R-project.org/package=nlme.
48. ↵
    1. Post, W.M., and
    2. K.C. Kwon

    . 2000. Soil carbon sequestration and land-use change: Processes and potential. Global Change Biology 6:317–327.

    OpenUrlCrossRefWeb of Science
49. ↵
    1. R Core Team

    . 2021. R: A language and environment for statistical computing. Vienna, Austria: R Foundation for Statistical Computing. http://www.R-project.org/.
50. ↵
    1. Schimel, J.P., and
    2. M.N. Weintraub

    . 2003. The implications of exoenzyme activity on microbial carbon and nitrogen limitation in soil: a theoretical model. Soil Biology and Biochemistry 35(4):549–563.

    OpenUrl
51. ↵
    1. Schmidt, M.W.,
    2. M.S. Torn,
    3. S. Abiven,
    4. T. Dittmar,
    5. G. Guggenberger,
    6. I.A. Janssens,
    7. M. Kleber

    , et al. 2011. Persistence of soil organic matter as an ecosystem property. Nature 478(7367):49.

    OpenUrlCrossRefGeoRefPubMedWeb of Science
52. ↵
    1. A. Joern, and
    2. K.K. Keeler

    1. Seastedt, T.R.

    1995. Soil systems and nutrient cycles of the North American prairie. In The Changing Prairie, eds. A. Joern, and K.K. Keeler. New York: Oxford University Press.
53. ↵
    1. P. Sharpe

    1. Sharpe, P., and
    2. E.B. Rayburn

    . 2019. Climate, weather, and plant hardiness. In Horse Pasture Management, ed. P. Sharpe. San Diego, CA: Academic Press. https://doi.org/10.1016/B978-0-12-812919-7.00012-3.
54. ↵
    1. Sinsabaugh, R.L.,
    2. S. Manzoni,
    3. D.L. Moorhead, and
    4. A. Richter

    . 2013. Carbon use efficiency of microbial communities: Stoichiometry, methodology and modelling. Ecology Letters 16(7):930–939.

    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
55. ↵
    1. Soil Series Extent Explorer

    . 2022. California Soil Resource Lab, SoilWeb Apps. David, CA: University of California, Davis. https://casoilresource.lawr.ucdavis.edu/see/.
56. ↵
    1. Soil Survey Staff

    . 2022. Web Soil Survey. Washington, DC: USDA Natural Resources Conservation Service. http://websoilsurvey.sc.egov.usda.gov/.
57. ↵
    1. Soil Survey Staff

    . 1999. Soil taxonomy: A basic system of soil classification for making and interpreting soil surveys, Department of Agriculture Handbook 436. 2nd ed. Washington, DC: USDA Natural Resources Conservation Service.
58. 1. USDA FSA (Farm Service Agency)

    . 2016. CRP Contract Expirations by County, 2016-2030 (xls). Washington, DC: USDA Farm Service Agency. https://www.fsa.usda.gov/programs-and-services/conservation-programs/reports-and-statistics/conservation-reserve-program-statistics/index.
59. ↵
    1. USDA FSA

    . 2019. USDA Conservation Reserve Program, monthly summary-September 2019. Washington, DC: USDA Farm Service Agency. https://www.fsa.usda.gov/Assets/USDA-FSA-Public/usdafiles/Conservation/PDF/Sep%202019%20Summary.pdf.
60. ↵
    1. USDA FSA

    . 2020. USDA Conservation Reserve Program, monthly summary-January 2020. Washington, DC: USDA Farm Service Agency. https://www.fsa.usda.gov/Assets/USDA-FSA-Public/usdafiles/Conservation/PDF/Summary%20JAN%202020.pdf.
61. 1. USDA NRCS (USDA Natural Resources Conservation Service)

    . 2006. Land Resource Regions and Major Land Resource Areas of the United States, the Caribbean, and the Pacific Basin. USDA Handbook 296. Washington, DC: USDA NRCS.
62. ↵
    1. Vance, E.D.,
    2. P.C. Brookes, and
    3. D.S. Jenkinson

    . 1987. An extraction method for measuring soil microbial biomass C. Soil Biology and Biochemistry 19:703–707.

    OpenUrl
63. ↵
    1. Wade, J., M.A.,
    2. Beetstra, M.L.,
    3. Hamilton, S.,
    4. Culman, A.J.,
    5. Margenot

    . 2021. Soil health conceptualization differs across key stakeholder groups in the Midwest. Journal of Soil and Water Conservation 76(6):527–533. https://doi.org/10.2489/jswc.2021.02158.

    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
64. ↵
    1. F. Magdoff and
    2. R.R. Weil

    1. Wander, M.

    2004. Soil organic matter fractions and their relevance to soil function. Soil organic matter in sustainable agriculture. In Soil Organic Matter in Sustainable Agriculture, eds. F. Magdoff and R.R. Weil, 67–102. Boca Raton, FL: CRC Press.
65. ↵
    1. Warrick, B.E.,
    2. C. Sansone, and
    3. J. Johnson

    . 2002. Cotton production in West Central Texas. San Angelo,TX: Texas AgriLife Extension Service. https://sanangelo.tamu.edu/extension/agronomy/agronomy-publications/cotton-production-in-west-central-texas/#planting.
66. ↵
    1. Weil, R.,
    2. K.R. Islam,
    3. M.A. Stine,
    4. J.B. Gruver, and
    5. S.E. Samson-Liebig

    . 2003. Estimating active carbon for soil quality assessment: A simple method for laboratory and field use. American Journal of Alternative Agriculture 18:3–17.

    OpenUrl
67. ↵
    1. Yang, M.,
    2. G. Yu,
    3. N. He,
    4. J. Grace,
    5. Q. Wang, and
    6. Y. Zhou

    . 2019. A method for estimating annual cumulative soil/ecosystem respiration and CH₄ flux from sporadic data collected using the chamber method. Atmosphere 10(10):623. https://doi.org/10.3390/atmos10100623.

    OpenUrl
68. ↵
    1. Yin, D.,
    2. L. Wang,
    3. Z. Zhu,
    4. S.S. Clark,
    5. Y. Cao,
    6. J. Besek, and
    7. N. Dai

    . 2021. Water quality related to Conservation Reserve Program (CRP) and cropland areas: Evidence from multi-temporal remote sensing. International Journal of Applied Earth Observation and Geoinformation 96:102272. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jag.2020.102272.

    OpenUrl
69. ↵
    1. Zheng, Q.Y.,
    2. Hu,
    3. S. Zhang,
    4. L. Noll,
    5. T. Böckle,
    6. A. Richter, and
    7. W. Wanek

    . 2019. Growth explains microbial carbon use efficiency across soils differing in land use and geology. Soil Biology and Biochemistry 128:45–55.

    OpenUrl