Increasing agricultural conservation outreach through social science

REFERENCES

1. ↵
   1. Ajzen, I.

   1991. The Theory of Planned Behavior. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes 50(2):179–211.

   OpenUrlCrossRefWeb of Science
2. ↵
   1. Batie, S.S.

   2009. Green payments and the US Farm Bill: Information and policy challenges. Frontiers in Ecology and the Environment 7(7):380–388.

   OpenUrlCrossRef
3. ↵
   1. Borges, J.A.R.,
   2. L. Foletto, and
   3. V.T. Xavier

   . 2015. An interdisciplinary framework to study farmers decisions on adoption of innovation: Insights from Expected Utility Theory and Theory of Planned Behavior. African Journal of Agricultural Research 10(29):2814–2825.

   OpenUrl
4. ↵
   1. Chavas, J.P., and
   2. C. Nauges

   . 2020. Uncertainty, learning, and technology adoption in agriculture. Applied Economic Perspectives and Policy 42(1):42–53.

   OpenUrl
5. ↵
   1. Claassen, R.,
   2. E. Duquette, and
   3. J. Horowitz

   . 2013. Additionality in agricultural conservation payment programs. Journal of Soil and Water Conservation 68(3):74A–78A. https://doi.org/10.2489/jswc.68.3.74A.

   OpenUrlFREE Full Text
6. ↵
   1. Davidson, E.A.,
   2. E.C. Suddick,
   3. C.W. Rice, and
   4. L.S. Prokopy

   . 2015. More food, low pollution (Mo Fo Lo Po): A grand challenge for the 21st century. Journal of Environmental Quality 44(2):305–311.

   OpenUrl
7. 1. EWG (Environmental Working Group)

   . 2015. Environmental Working Group’s Agriculture Conservation Database. Washington, DC: EWG.
8. ↵
   1. Fishbein, M.

   1979. A Theory of Reasoned Action: Some applications and implications. Nebraska Symposium on Motivation 27:65–116.

   OpenUrl
9. ↵
   1. Fishbein, M., and
   2. I. Ajzen

   . 2011. Predicting and Changing Behavior: The Reasoned Action Approach. New York: Taylor & Francis.
10. ↵
    1. Genskow, K., and
    2. L.S. Prokopy

    . 2009. Lessons learned in developing social indicators for regional water quality management. Society and Natural Resources 23:83–91.

    OpenUrl
11. ↵
    1. Lal, R.

    2015. A system approach to conservation agriculture. Journal of Soil and Water Conservation 70(4):82A–88A. https://doi.org/10.2489/jswc.70.4.82A.

    OpenUrlFREE Full Text
12. ↵
    1. MacGowen, B.J.,
    2. A.S. Singh,
    3. B. Overstreet,
    4. M. O’Donnell,
    5. H. Klotz, and
    6. L.S. Prokopy

    . 2018. Producers’ opinions on what makes demonstrations effective. Journal of Extension 56(2):Article 9.

    OpenUrl
13. ↵
    1. Norton, G.W., and
    2. J. Alwang

    . 2020. Changes in agricultural extension and implications for farmer adoption of new practices. Applied Economic Perspectives and Policy 42(1):8–20.

    OpenUrl
14. ↵
    1. Osmond, D.L.,
    2. D.L. Hoag,
    3. A.E. Luloff,
    4. D.W. Meals, and
    5. K. Neas

    . 2015. Farmers’ use of nutrient management: Lessons from watershed case studies. Journal of Environmental Quality 44(2):382–390.

    OpenUrl
15. ↵
    1. Paarlberg, R., and
    2. D. Paarlberg

    . 2000. Agricultural policy in the twentieth century. Agricultural History 74(2):136–161.

    OpenUrl
16. ↵
    1. Pape, A., and
    2. L. Prokopy

    . 2017. Delivering on the potential of formal farmer networks: Insights from Indiana. Journal of Soil and Water Conservation 72(5):463–470. https://doi.org/10.2489/jswc.72.5.463.

    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
17. ↵
    1. Prokopy, L.S.,
    2. K. Floress,
    3. J.G. Arbuckle,
    4. S.P. Church,
    5. F. Eanes,
    6. Y. Gao,
    7. B.M. Gramig,
    8. P. Ranjan,
    9. A.S. Singh

    . 2019. Adoption of agricultural conservation practices in the United States: Evidence from 35 years of quantitative literature. Journal of Soil and Water Conservation 74(5):520–534. https://doi.org/10.2489/jswc.74.5.520.

    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
18. ↵
    1. Prokopy, L.S., and
    2. R. Power

    . 2015. Envisioning new roles for land-grant university extension: Lessons learned from climate change outreach in the Midwest. Journal of Extension 53(6).
19. ↵
    1. Rabalais, N.N., and
    2. R.E. Turner

    . 2019. Gulf of Mexico hypoxia: Past, present, and future. Limnology and Oceanography Bulletin 28(4):117–124.

    OpenUrl
20. ↵
    1. Ranjan, P.,
    2. S.P. Church,
    3. K. Floress, and
    4. L.S. Prokopy

    . 2019. Synthesizing conservation motivations and barriers: What have we learned from qualitative studies of farmers’ behaviors in the United States? Society & Natural Resources 32(11):1171–1199.

    OpenUrlCrossRef
21. ↵
    1. Reimer, A.P.

    2015. Ecological modernization in US agri-environmental programs: Trends in the 2014 Farm Bill. Land Use Policy 47:209–217.

    OpenUrlCrossRef
22. ↵
    1. Reimer, A.P.,
    2. D.K. Weinkauf, and
    3. L.S. Prokopy

    . 2012. The influence of perceptions of practice characteristics: An examination of agricultural best management practice adoption in two Indiana watersheds. Journal of Rural Studies 28(1):118–128.

    OpenUrl
23. ↵
    1. Roesch-McNally, G.,
    2. J.G. Arbuckle, and
    3. J.C. Tyndall

    . 2018. Soil as social-ecological feedback: Examining the “ethic” of soil stewardship among Corn Belt farmers. Rural Sociology 83(1):145–173.

    OpenUrl
24. ↵
    1. Rogers, E.

    2003. Diffusion of Innovations. Delran, NJ: Simon & Schuster.
25. ↵
    1. Sattler, C., and
    2. U.J. Nagel

    . 2010. Factors affecting farmers’ acceptance of conservation measures— A case study from north-eastern Germany. Land Use Policy 27(1):70–77.

    OpenUrlCrossRef
26. 1. Schneider, L.

    1971. Dialectic in sociology. American Sociological Review 36:667678.

    OpenUrl
27. ↵
    1. Stuart, D.,
    2. R.C. Denny,
    3. M. Houser,
    4. A.P. Reimer, and
    5. S. Marquart-Pyatt

    . 2018. Farmer selection of sources of information for nitrogen management in the US Midwest: Implications for environmental programs. Land Use Policy 70:289–297.

    OpenUrl
28. ↵
    1. Swinton, S.M.,
    2. F. Lupi,
    3. G.P. Robertson, and
    4. S.K. Hamilton

    . 2007. Ecosystem services and agriculture: Cultivating agricultural ecosystems for diverse benefits. Elsevier.
29. ↵
    1. USDA

    . 2019. US Census of Agriculture Data 2017. https://www.nass.usda.gov/Publications/AgCensus/2017/index.php.