Forest management and biochar for continued ecosystem services

REFERENCES

1. ↵
   1. Amonette, J.E.,
   2. H. Blanco-Canqui,
   3. C. Hassebrook,
   4. D.A. Laird,
   5. R. Lal,
   6. J. Lehmann and
   7. D.S. Page-Dumroese

   . 2021. Integrated biochar research: A roadmap. Journal of Soil and Water Conservation 76(1):24A–29A. https://doi.org/10.2489/jswc.2021.1115A.

   OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
2. ↵
   1. Atkinson, C.,
   2. J. Fitzgerald, and
   3. N. Hipps

   . 2010. Potential mechanisms for achieving agricultural benefits from biochar application to temperate soils: A review. Plant Soil 337:1–18.

   OpenUrlCrossRefWeb of Science
3. 1. Atkinson, J.C.

   2018. How good is the evidence that soil-applied biochar improves water-holding capacity? Soil Use and Management 34:177–186.

   OpenUrl
4. ↵
   1. Binder, S.,
   2. R.G. Haight,
   3. S. Polasky,
   4. T. Warziniack,
   5. M.H. Mockrin,
   6. R.L. Deal, and
   7. G. Arthaud

   . 2017. Assessment and valuation of forest ecosystem services: State of the science review. General Technical Report NRS-170. Newtown Square, PA: USDA Forest Service, Northern Research Station.
5. ↵
   1. Blanco-Canqui, H.

   2017. Biochar and soil physical properties. Soil Science Society of America Journal 81:687–711.

   OpenUrl
6. ↵
   1. Borrelli, P.,
   2. D.A. Robinson,
   3. L.R. Fleischer,
   4. E. Lugato,
   5. C. Ballabio,
   6. C. Alewell,
   7. K. Meusburger,
   8. S. Modugno,
   9. B. Schütt,
   10. V. Ferro, and
   11. V. Bagarello

   . 2017. An assessment of the global impact of 21st century land use change on soil erosion. Nature Communications 81:1–3.

   OpenUrl
7. ↵
   1. Buford, M.A., and
   2. D.G. Neary

   . 2010. Sustainable Biofuels from Forests: Meeting the Challenge. Biofuels and Sustainability Reports. Washington, DC: Ecological Society of America. http://esa.org/biofuelsreports.
8. ↵
   1. Carlson, J.,
   2. J. Saxena,
   3. N. Basta,
   4. L. Hundal,
   5. D. Busalacchi, and
   6. R.P. Dick

   . 2015. Application of organic amendments to restore degraded soil: Effects on soil microbial properties. Environmental Monitoring and Assessment 187:1–15.

   OpenUrlCrossRef
9. 1. Cowie, A.,
   2. D. Woolf,
   3. J. Gaunt,
   4. M. Brandão,
   5. R.A. Anaya de la Rosa, and
   6. A. Cowie

   . 2019. Biochar, carbon Accounting and climate change. In Biochar for Environmental Management Science, Technology and Implementation. Oxfordshire: Routledge.
10. ↵
    1. Daily, E.G.

    1997 Nature’s Services: Societal Dependence on Natural Ecosystems. Washington DC: Island Press.
11. ↵
    1. Duncker, P.S.,
    2. K. Raulund-Rasmussen,
    3. P. Gundersen,
    4. K. Katzensteiner,
    5. J. De Jong,
    6. H.P. Ravn,
    7. M. Smith,
    8. O. Eckmüllner, and
    9. H. Spiecker

    . 2012. How forest management affects ecosystem services, including timber production and economic return: Synergies and trade-offs. Ecology and Society 17(4):50. http://dx.doi.org/10.5751/ES-05066-170450.

    OpenUrl
12. ↵
    1. M. Marcus Selig,
    2. D. Vosick, and
    3. J. Seidenberg

    1. Ecological Restoration Institute

    . 2010. Four forest restoration initiative landscape strategy economics and utilization analysis, eds. M. Marcus Selig, D. Vosick, and J. Seidenberg. Flagstaff, AZ: Northern Arizona University.
13. ↵
    1. El-Naggar, A.,
    2. S.S. Lee,
    3. J. Rinklebe,
    4. M. Farooq,
    5. H. Song,
    6. A.K. Sarmah,
    7. A.R. Zimmerman,
    8. M. Ahmad,
    9. M. Sabry,
    10. S.M. Shaheen, and
    11. Y.S. Ok

    . 2019. Biochar application to low fertility soils: A review of current status, and future prospects. Geoderma 337:536–554.

    OpenUrl
14. 1. FAO (Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations)

    . 2019. Soil erosion: the greatest challenge to sustainable soil management. Rome: FAO.
15. ↵
    1. FAO

    . 2020. Global Forest Resources Assessment 2020: Main report. Rome: FAO.
16. 1. FAO and ITPS (Intergovernmental Technical Panel on Soils)

    . 2015. Status of the World’s Soil Resources (SWSR) — Main Report. Rome: FAO and ITPS.
17. 1. E. Fulajtar,
    2. L. Mabit,
    3. C.S. Renschler, and
    4. Y. Lee Zhi

    1. FAO and IAEA (International Atomic Energy Agency)

    . 2017. Use of ¹³⁷Cs for soil erosion assessment, eds. E. Fulajtar, L. Mabit, C.S. Renschler, and Y. Lee Zhi. Rome: Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations and International Atomic Energy Agency.
18. ↵
    1. Furniss, M.J.,
    2. B.P. Staab,
    3. S. Hazelhurst,
    4. C.F. Clifton,
    5. K.B. Roby,
    6. B.L. Ilhadrt,
    7. E.B. Larry
    8. A.H. Todd,
    9. L.M. Reid,
    10. S.J. Hines,
    11. K.A. Bennett,
    12. C.H. Luce, and
    13. P.J. Edwards

    . 2010. Water, climate change, and forests: Watershed stewardship for a changing climate. General Technical Report PNW-GTR-812. Portland, OR: USDA Forest Service, Pacific Northwest Research Station.
19. ↵
    1. Fuss, S.,
    2. W.F. Lamb,
    3. M.W. Callaghan,
    4. J. Hilaire,
    5. F. Creutzig,
    6. T. Amman,
    7. T. Beringer,
    8. G.W. de Oliveira,
    9. J. Hartmann,
    10. T. Khanna, and
    11. G. Luderer

    . 2018. Negative emissions—Part 2: Costs, potentials and side effects. Environmental Research Letters. 13:063002

    OpenUrl
20. ↵
    1. J.J. Manyà

    1. Greco, G.,
    2. B. Gonzalez, and
    3. J.J. Manya

    . 2019. Operating conditions affecting char yield and its potential stability during slow pyrolysis of biomass: A review. In Advanced Carbon Materials From Biomass: An Overview, ed. J.J. Manyà. GreenCarbon Project and Consortium.
21. ↵
    1. Gul, S.,
    2. K.J. Whalen,
    3. W.B. Thomas,
    4. V. Sachdeva, and
    5. H. Deng

    . 2015. Physico-chemical properties and microbial responses in biochar-amended soils: Mechanisms and future directions. Agriculture, Ecosystems & Environment 206:46–59. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.agee.2015.03.015.

    OpenUrl
22. ↵
    1. Hernandez-Soriano, M.C.,
    2. B. Kerré,
    3. P.M. Kopittke,
    4. B. Horemans, and
    5. E. Smolders

    . 2016. Biochar affects carbon composition and stability in soil: A combined spectroscopy-microscopy study. Scientific Report 6:25127. https://doi.org/10.1038%2Fsrep25127.

    OpenUrl
23. ↵
    1. Kang, M.W.,
    2. M. Yibeltal,
    3. Y.H. Kim,
    4. S.E. Oh,
    5. J.C. Lee,
    6. E.E. Kwon, and
    7. S.S. Lee

    . 2022 Enhancement of soil physical properties and soil water retention with biochar-based soil amendments. Science of the Total Environment 836:155746.

    OpenUrl
24. ↵
    1. Kimetu, J.M., and
    2. J. Lehmann

    . 2010. Stability and stabilisation of biochar and green manure in soil with different organic carbon contents. Australian Journal of Soil Research 48(7):577–585.

    OpenUrl
25. ↵
    1. Lal, R.

    2022. Nature-based solutions of soil management and agriculture. Journal of Soil and Water Conservation 77(2):23A–29A. https://doi.org/10.2489/jswc.2022.0204A.

    OpenUrlFREE Full Text
26. 1. Lehmann, J.,
    2. J. Gaunt, and
    3. M. Rondon

    . 2006. Biochar sequestration in terrestrial ecosystems: A review. Mitigation and Adaptation Strategies for Global Change 11:403–427.

    OpenUrl
27. ↵
    1. Lehmann, J., and
    2. S. Joseph

    . 2009. Biochar for Environmental Management: Science and Technology. London and Sterling: Earthscan.
28. 1. J. Lehmann, J., and
    2. S. Joseph

    1. Lehmann, J., and
    2. S. Joseph

    . 2015. Biochar for environmental management: An introduction. In Biochar for Environmental Management: Science, Technology and Implementation, 2nd ed., eds. J. Lehmann, J., and S. Joseph. London: Earthscan from Routledge.
29. ↵
    1. Liu, Y.,
    2. S.L. Goodrick, and
    3. J.A. Stanturf

    . 2013. Future U.S. wildfire potential trends projected using a dynamically downscaled climate change scenario. Forest Ecology and Management 294:120–135.

    OpenUrl
30. ↵
    1. Millennium Ecosystem Assessment

    . 2005. Ecosystems and Human Well-being: Synthesis. Washington, DC: Island Press. http://www.millenniumassessment.org/documents/document.356.aspx.pdf.
31. 1. NAS (National Academies of Sciences, Engineering, and Medicine)

    . 2018. Land Management Practices for Carbon Dioxide Removal and Reliable Sequestration: Proceedings of a Workshop—in Brief. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press.
32. ↵
    1. NAS

    . 2019. Negative Emissions Technologies and Reliable Sequestration: A Research Agenda. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press.
33. ↵
    1. Oliver, C., and
    2. F. Oliver

    . 2018. Global resources and the environment. Cambridge and New York: Cambridge University Press.
34. ↵
    1. Page-Dumroese, D.S.,
    2. M.D. Busse,
    3. J.G. Archuleta,
    4. D. McAvoy, and
    5. E. Roussel

    . 2017. Methods to reduce forest residue volume after timber harvesting and produce black carbon. Scientifica 2745764.
35. ↵
    1. Rasa, K.,
    2. J. Heikkinen,
    3. M. Hannula,
    4. K. Arstila,
    5. S. Kulju, and
    6. J. Hyväluoma

    . 2018. How and why does willow biochar increase a clay soil water retention capacity? Biomass and Bioenergy 119:346–353.

    OpenUrl
36. ↵
    1. Razzaghi F,
    2. P.B. Obour, and
    3. E. Arthur

    . 2020. Does biochar improve soil water retention? A systematic review and meta-analysis. Geoderma 361:114055

    OpenUrl
37. ↵
    1. Richter, D.

    2007. Humanity’s transformation of Earth’s soil: Pedology’s New Frontier. Soil Science 172:957–967.

    OpenUrlCrossRef
38. ↵
    1. Rodriguez, F.C., and
    2. J. Conje

    . 2022. The evolution of the dialogue and perspectives on sustainable forest management with special emphasis on the United States of America. Journal of Sustainable Forestry 29:1–45

    OpenUrl
39. ↵
    1. Rodriguez, F.C., and
    2. D.S. Page-Dumroese

    . 2021 Woody biochar potential for abandoned mine land restoration in the U.S.: A review. Biochar 3:7–22.

    OpenUrl
40. 1. Shaaban, M.,
    2. L. Van Zwieten,
    3. S. Bashir,
    4. A. Younas,
    5. A. Núñez-Delgado,
    6. M.A. Chhajro,
    7. K.A. Kubar,
    8. U. Ali,
    9. M. S. Rana,
    10. M.A. Mehmood, and
    11. R. Hu

    . 2018. A concise review of biochar application to agricultural soils to improve soil conditions and fight pollution. Journal of Environmental Management 228:429–440.

    OpenUrl
41. ↵
    1. Sheng, Y., and
    2. L. Zhu

    . 2018. Biochar alters microbial community and carbon sequestration potential across different soil pH. Science of the Total Environment 622-623:1391–1399.

    OpenUrl
42. ↵
    1. Smyth, B.P.

    2014. Application of an Ecosystem Services Framework for BLM Land Use Planning: Consistency with the Federal Land Policy Management Act and Other Applicable Law. In Federal Resource Management and Ecosystem Services Guidebook. Durham, NC: National Ecosystem Services Partnership. https://nicholasinstitute.duke.edu/content/application-ecosysem-services-framework-blm-land-use-planning-consistency-federal-land.
43. ↵
    1. Smith, D.

    1986. The Practice of Silviculture, 8th edition. New York: John Wiley and Sons, Inc.
44. ↵
    1. Spokas, K.A.,
    2. K.B. Cantrell,
    3. J.M. Novak,
    4. D.W. Archer,
    5. J.A. Ippolito,
    6. H.P. Collins,
    7. A.A. Boateng,
    8. I.M. Lima,
    9. M.C. Lamb,
    10. A.J. McAloon,
    11. R.D. Lentz, and
    12. K.A. Nichols

    . 2012. Biochar: A synthesis of its agronomic impact beyond carbon sequestration. Journal of Environmental Quality 41:973–989.

    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
45. ↵
    1. Tidwell, L.T.

    2016. Nexus between food, energy, water, and forest ecosystems in the USA. Journal of Environmental Studies 6:214–224.

    OpenUrl
46. 1. USDA NRCS (Natural Resource Conservation Service)

    . 2007. National soil erosion results tables 2007. National Resources Inventory. https://www.nrcs.usda.gov/wps/portal/nrcs/detail/national/technical/nra/nri/results/?cid=stelprdb1041678.
47. ↵
    1. US Department of Energy

    . 2016. Billion-Ton Report: Advancing Domestic Resources for a Thriving Bioeconomy, Volume 1: Economic Availability of Feedstocks, leads M. H. Langholtz, B.J. Stokes, and L. M. Eaton, ORNL/TM-2016/160. Oak Ridge, TN: Oak Ridge National Laboratory. https://info.ornl.gov/sites/publications/Files/Pub62368.pdf.
48. ↵
    1. Uzi, A.,
    2. Y. Shen,
    3. S. Kawi,
    4. A. Levy, and
    5. C. Wang

    . 2019. Permittivity and chemical characterization of woody biomass during pyrolysis and gasification. Chemical Engineering Journal 355:255–268.

    OpenUrl
49. ↵
    1. Xu, X.,
    2. Y. Zhao,
    3. J. Sima,
    4. L. Zhao,
    5. O. Mašek, and
    6. X. Cao

    . 2017. Indispensable role of biochar-inherent mineral constituents in its environmental applications: A review. Bioresource Technology 241: 887–899.

    OpenUrl
50. ↵
    1. Zhao, L.,
    2. X. Cao,
    3. O. Mašek, and
    4. A. Zimmerman

    . 2013. Heterogeneity of biochar properties as a function of feedstock sources and production temperatures. Journal of Hazardous Materials 256–257:1–9.

    OpenUrl