Skip to main content

Main menu

  • Home
  • Content
    • Current Issue
    • Early Online
    • Archive
    • Subject Collections
  • Info For
    • Authors
    • Reviewers
    • Subscribers
    • Advertisers
  • About
    • About JSWC
    • Editorial Board
    • Permissions
    • Alerts
    • RSS Feeds
    • Contact Us

User menu

  • Register
  • Subscribe
  • My alerts
  • Log in
  • My Cart

Search

  • Advanced search
Journal of Soil and Water Conservation

  • Register
  • Subscribe
  • My alerts
  • Log in
  • My Cart
Journal of Soil and Water Conservation

Advanced Search

  • Home
  • Content
    • Current Issue
    • Early Online
    • Archive
    • Subject Collections
  • Info For
    • Authors
    • Reviewers
    • Subscribers
    • Advertisers
  • About
    • About JSWC
    • Editorial Board
    • Permissions
    • Alerts
    • RSS Feeds
    • Contact Us
  • Follow SWCS on Twitter
  • Visit SWCS on Facebook
Research ArticleResearch Section

Audit procedures and implementation rates for forest water quality Best Management Practices in the 13 southeastern states

B.S. Hawks, W.M. Aust, M.C. Bolding, S.M. Barrett and E.B. Schilling
Journal of Soil and Water Conservation September 2022, 77 (5) 501-515; DOI: https://doi.org/10.2489/jswc.2022.00082
B.S. Hawks
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
W.M. Aust
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
M.C. Bolding
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
S.M. Barrett
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
E.B. Schilling
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • Article
  • Figures & Data
  • References
  • Info & Metrics
  • PDF
Loading

Abstract

Forestry Best Management Practices (BMPs) were established to protect water quality by minimizing nonpoint source pollutants associated with forest operations. Research has shown that appropriate application of BMPs provides effective mitigation of erosion and sedimentation. State forestry agencies are primarily responsible for recommending which BMPs to implement and monitoring their use. Few studies have compared BMP programs, audits, and prescriptions among states and physiographic regions. To address these questions, audit questionnaires were obtained from the 13 member states of the Southern Group of State Foresters to evaluate six forest operational categories: stream crossings, decks, skid trails, haul roads, harvest areas, and overall implementation. These audits were used to assess BMP implementation at 116 harvest sites across 12 states (excluding Kentucky) and three physiographic regions (Mountains, Piedmont, and Coastal Plain) in the southeastern United States. Overall implementation was highest in the Coastal Plain, followed by the Piedmont, and lastly the Mountains. We found that skid trail implementation in the Mountains (76.1%) was significantly lower than in both the Piedmont (86.0%) (p-value = 0.0028) and Coastal Plain (85.2%) (p-value = 0.0065) regions. Mountain stream crossing implementation (83.9%) was also significantly lower (p-value = 0.0459) than in the Coastal Plain (92.3%). Findings suggest that additional BMP focus in the Mountain region is needed for constructing and closing out skid trails and stream crossings to enhance water quality protection efforts. The mean overall BMP implementation rate was approximately 90.1% for the southeastern region. The regional BMP implementation rates were also calculated for each feature as follows: decks (92.7%), harvest areas (95.6%), haul roads (91.9%), skid trails (82.9%), and stream crossings (88.2%). Mean BMP implementation rates using each of the 13 state audits were compared. Florida (93.5%) and Kentucky (92.9%) audits produced the highest overall scores, while Virginia (88.3%), Alabama (88.3%), and Tennessee (87.8%) audits provided more stringent evaluations. Implementation rates for the 13 state audits were highly variable for both the stream crossings and skid trails, indicating substantial differences in assessments of these categories. Results from this study (1) provide insight into the current state of BMPs, (2) identify areas where BMPs have the most potential to improve, and (3) demonstrate that BMPs are being implemented at relatively high rates in the southeast. A combined audit among individual states with similar physiographic provinces, operating systems and conditions, and topography could be created so that stronger inferences can be made concerning BMP implementation among states.

Key words
  • forest operations
  • harvesting BMPs
  • physiographic regions
  • reduced-impact harvesting
  • southeastern region
  • sustainability
  • © 2022 by the Soil and Water Conservation Society
View Full Text

This article requires a subscription to view the full text. If you have a subscription you may use the login form below to view the article. Access to this article can also be purchased.

Log in using your username and password

Forgot your user name or password?

Purchase access

You may purchase access to this article. This will require you to create an account if you don't already have one.
PreviousNext
Back to top

In this issue

Journal of Soil and Water Conservation: 77 (5)
Journal of Soil and Water Conservation
Vol. 77, Issue 5
September/October 2022
  • Table of Contents
  • Table of Contents (PDF)
  • About the Cover
  • Index by author
  • Front Matter (PDF)
Print
Download PDF
Article Alerts
Sign In to Email Alerts with your Email Address
Email Article

Thank you for your interest in spreading the word on Journal of Soil and Water Conservation.

NOTE: We only request your email address so that the person you are recommending the page to knows that you wanted them to see it, and that it is not junk mail. We do not capture any email address.

Enter multiple addresses on separate lines or separate them with commas.
Audit procedures and implementation rates for forest water quality Best Management Practices in the 13 southeastern states
(Your Name) has sent you a message from Journal of Soil and Water Conservation
(Your Name) thought you would like to see the Journal of Soil and Water Conservation web site.
CAPTCHA
This question is for testing whether or not you are a human visitor and to prevent automated spam submissions.
2 + 0 =
Solve this simple math problem and enter the result. E.g. for 1+3, enter 4.
Citation Tools
Audit procedures and implementation rates for forest water quality Best Management Practices in the 13 southeastern states
B.S. Hawks, W.M. Aust, M.C. Bolding, S.M. Barrett, E.B. Schilling
Journal of Soil and Water Conservation Sep 2022, 77 (5) 501-515; DOI: 10.2489/jswc.2022.00082

Citation Manager Formats

  • BibTeX
  • Bookends
  • EasyBib
  • EndNote (tagged)
  • EndNote 8 (xml)
  • Medlars
  • Mendeley
  • Papers
  • RefWorks Tagged
  • Ref Manager
  • RIS
  • Zotero
Request Permissions
Share
Audit procedures and implementation rates for forest water quality Best Management Practices in the 13 southeastern states
B.S. Hawks, W.M. Aust, M.C. Bolding, S.M. Barrett, E.B. Schilling
Journal of Soil and Water Conservation Sep 2022, 77 (5) 501-515; DOI: 10.2489/jswc.2022.00082
del.icio.us logo Digg logo Reddit logo Twitter logo Facebook logo Google logo Mendeley logo
  • Tweet Widget
  • Facebook Like
  • Google Plus One

Jump to section

  • Article
    • Abstract
    • Introduction
    • Materials and Methods
    • Results and Discussion
    • Summary and Conclusions
    • Acknowledgements
    • References
  • Figures & Data
  • Info & Metrics
  • References
  • PDF

Related Articles

  • No related articles found.
  • Google Scholar

Cited By...

  • No citing articles found.
  • Google Scholar

More in this TOC Section

  • Soil health through farmers’ eyes: Toward a better understanding of how farmers view, value, and manage for healthier soils
  • Policy process and problem framing for state Nutrient Reduction Strategies in the US Upper Mississippi River Basin
  • Smart control of agricultural water wells in western Iran: Application of the Q-methodology
Show more Research Section

Similar Articles

Keywords

  • forest operations
  • harvesting BMPs
  • physiographic regions
  • reduced-impact harvesting
  • southeastern region
  • sustainability

Content

  • Current Issue
  • Early Online
  • Archive
  • Subject Collections

Info For

  • Authors
  • Reviewers
  • Subscribers
  • Advertisers

Customer Service

  • Subscriptions
  • Permissions and Reprints
  • Terms of Use
  • Privacy

SWCS

  • Membership
  • Publications
  • Meetings and Events
  • Conservation Career Center

© 2023 Soil and Water Conservation Society