Field evaluation of sediment perimeter barrier products under sheet flow conditions

References

1. ↵
   1. American Excelsior

   . 2019. Curlex sediment log. Arlington, TX: American Excelsior Company. http://americanexcelsior.com/wp-content/uploads/2019/07/Curlex-Sediment-Logs-Bio-PD.pdf.
2. ↵
   1. ASCE and WEF (American Society of Civil Engineers and Water Environmental Federation)

   . 1992. Design and Construction of Urban Stormwater Management Systems. WEF Manual of Practice FD-20. Reston, VA: American Society of Civil Engineers. https://ascelibrary.org/doi/book/10.1061/9780872628557.
3. ↵
   1. ASTM (American Society for Testing and Materials)

   . 2007. Standard Test Methods for Laboratory Compaction Characteristics of Soil Using Standard Effort (12,400 ft-lbf/ft³ (600 kN-m/m³)). ASTM D698-07. West Conshohocken, PA: ASTM International. https://www.resolutionmineeis.us/sites/default/files/references/astm-D698.pdf.
4. ↵
   1. ASTM

   . 2013. Standard Test Method for Determination of Sediment Retention Device Effectiveness in Sheet Flow Applications. ASTM D7351-13. West Conshohocken, PA: ASTM International.
5. ↵
   1. ASTM

   . 2019. Standard Test Methods for Determining Sediment Concentration in Water Samples. ASTM D3977-97(2019). West Conshohocken, PA: ASTM International.
6. ↵
   1. Barrett, M.E.,
   2. J.E. Kearney,
   3. T.G. McCoy,
   4. J.F. Malina, and
   5. R.J. Charbeneau

   . 1995. An evaluation of the use and effectiveness of temporary sediment controls. Report No. FHWA/TX-96/1943-2. Austin, TX: Texas Department of Transportation. https://library.ctr.utexas.edu/digitized/texasarchive/phase2/1943-2.pdf.
7. ↵
   1. Barrett, M.E.,
   2. J.F. Malina, and
   3. R.J. Charbeneau

   . 1998. An evaluation of geotextiles for temporary sediment control. Water Environment Research 70(3):283–290. https://doi.org/10.2175/106143098x124902.

   OpenUrlCrossRefWeb of Science
8. ↵
   1. Beighley, R.E., and
   2. J.R. Valdes

   . 2009. Slope interrupter best management practice experiments on a tilting soil bed with simulated rainfall. Journal of Irrigation and Drainage Engineering 135(4):480–486.

   OpenUrl
9. ↵
   1. Bhattarai, R.,
   2. P. Kalita,
   3. C.B. Garcia,
   4. J. Monical, and
   5. P. Schumacher

   . 2016. Evaluation of ditch checks for sediment retention. Research Report No. FHWA-ICT-16-002. Rantoul, IL: Illinois Center for Transportation. https://apps.ict.illinois.edu/projects/getfile.asp?id=4730.
10. ↵
    1. Bugg, R.A.,
    2. W.N. Donald,
    3. W.C. Zech, and
    4. M.A. Perez

    . 2017a. Improvements in standardized testing for evaluating sediment barrier performance: Design of a full-scale testing apparatus. Journal of Irrigation and Drainage Engineering 143(8):04017029. https://doi.org/10.1061/(asce)ir.1943-4774.0001194.

    OpenUrl
11. ↵
    1. Bugg, R.A.,
    2. W.N. Donald,
    3. W.C. Zech, and
    4. M.A. Perez

    . 2017b. Performance evaluations of three silt fence practices using a full-scale testing apparatus. Water 9(7):502. https://doi.org/10.3390/w9070502.

    OpenUrl
12. ↵
    1. Demissie, M.,
    2. E. Getahun, and
    3. L. Keefer

    . 2016. The sediment budget of the Illinois river: 1981-2015. Champaign, IL: University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign. https://www.isws.illinois.edu/pubdoc/RI/ISWSRI-122.pdf.
13. ↵
    1. ERTEC ProWattle

    . 2019. ProWattle—Perimeter control. McClellan Park, CA: ERTEC Environmental Systems. https://ertecsystems.com/products/perimeter-sediment-control-four-types/prowattle-perimeter-control/.
14. ↵
    1. Faucette, L.,
    2. F. Cardoso-Gendreau,
    3. E. Codling,
    4. A. Sadeghi,
    5. Y. Pachepsky, and
    6. D. Shelton

    . 2009. Storm water pollutant removal performance of compost filter socks. Journal of Environmental Quality 38(3):1233–1239. https://doi.org/10.2134/jeq2008.0306.

    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
15. ↵
    1. Filtrexx Silsoxx

    . 2020. Filtrexx Siltsoxx Compost Filter Sock/Silt Sock. Dover, OH: Filtrexx International. https://www.filtrexx.com/en/products/siltsoxx.
16. ↵
    1. García, C.B.,
    2. J. Monical,
    3. R. Bhattarai, and
    4. P.K. Kalita

    . 2015. Field evaluation of sediment retention devices under concentrated flow conditions. Journal of Soils and Sediments 15(9):2022–2031. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11368-015-1167-6.

    OpenUrl
17. ↵
    1. A. Klute

    1. Gee, G.W., and
    2. J.W. Bauder

    . 1986. Particle-size analysis. In Methods of Soil Analysis, Part 1, Physical and Mineralogical Methods, 2nd edition, ed. A. Klute, 383–411. Madison, WI: American Society of Agronomy.
18. ↵
    1. IEPA (Illinois Environmental Protection Agency)

    . 2018. Illinois integrated water quality report and section 303(d) List, 2018: Water resource assessment information and list of impaired waters. Draft (11/14/2018). Springfield, IL: IEPA. https://www2.illinois.gov/epa/topics/water-quality/watershed-management/tmdls/Documents/2018_Cycle_Integrated%20Report_FINAL_20210201.pdf.
19. ↵
    1. Keener, H.M.,
    2. B. Faucette, and
    3. M.H. Klingman

    . 2007. Flow-through rates and evaluation of solids separation of compost filter socks versus silt fence in sediment control applications. Journal of Environmental Quality 36(3):742. https://doi.org/10.2134/jeq2006.0359.

    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
20. ↵
    1. Kouwen, N.

    1990. Silt Fences to Control Sediment Movement on Construction Sites. Report MAT-90-03. Downsview, Ontario: Research and Development Branch, Ontario Ministry of Transportation.
21. ↵
    1. Marlin, J.C., and
    2. R.G. Darmody

    . 2005. Returning the soil to the land: The mud to parks project. Illinois Steward 14(1):11-18. https://www.istc.illinois.edu/UserFiles/Servers/Server_427403/File/IL-Steward.pdf.

    OpenUrl
22. ↵
    1. Rabalais, N.N.,
    2. R.E. Turner, and
    3. W.J. Wiseman Jr..

    2002. Gulf of Mexico hypoxia, A.K.A. “The dead zone”. Annual Review of Ecology and Systematics 33(1):235-263. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev.ecolsys.33.010802.150513.

    OpenUrlCrossRefWeb of Science
23. ↵
    1. Stevens, E.,
    2. S. Yeri,
    3. B. Barfield,
    4. J. Arjunan, and
    5. A. Selvakumar

    . 2005. A design aid for conventional silt fence technology. In Impacts of Global Climate Change, Proceedings of the World Water and Environmental Resources Congress. Anchorage, AK: American Society of Civil Engineers. https://ascelibrary.org/doi/10.1061/40792%28173%29171.
24. 1. Troxel, C.F.

    2013. Life cycle analysis of sediment control devices. Master’s thesis, Georgia Institute of Technology, School of Civil Engineering, Atlanta, Georgia.
25. ↵
    1. USEPA (Environmental Protection Agency)

    . 2008. EPA’s Report on the Environment (Roe) (2008 Final Report). EPA/600/R-07/045F (NTIS PB2008-112484). Washington, DC: USEPA.
26. ↵
    1. USEPA

    . 2012. Stormwater best management best practices: Silt fences. EPA 833-F-11-008. Washington, DC: USEPA.
27. ↵
    1. USEPA

    . 2018. Stormwater phase II final rule: Construction site runoff control minimum control measure. Factsheet 2.6, EPA 833-F-00-008. Washington DC: USEPA.
28. ↵
    1. Welch, B.L.

    1947. The generalization of ‘student’s’ problem when several different population variances are involved. Biometrika 34(1-2):28-35. https://doi.org/10.1093/biomet/34.1-2.28.

    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
29. ↵
    1. Whitman, J.B.,
    2. W.C. Zech,
    3. W.N. Donald, and
    4. J.J. LaMondia

    . 2018. Full-scale performance evaluations of various wire backed nonwoven silt fence installation configurations. Transportation Research Record: Journal of the Transportation Research Board 2672(39):68–78. https://doi.org/10.1177/0361198118758029.

    OpenUrl