Skip to main content

Main menu

  • Home
  • Content
    • Current Issue
    • Early Online
    • Archive
    • Subject Collections
  • Info For
    • Authors
    • Reviewers
    • Subscribers
    • Advertisers
  • About
    • About JSWC
    • Editorial Board
    • Permissions
    • Alerts
    • RSS Feeds
    • Contact Us

User menu

  • Register
  • Subscribe
  • My alerts
  • Log in
  • My Cart

Search

  • Advanced search
Journal of Soil and Water Conservation

  • Register
  • Subscribe
  • My alerts
  • Log in
  • My Cart
Journal of Soil and Water Conservation

Advanced Search

  • Home
  • Content
    • Current Issue
    • Early Online
    • Archive
    • Subject Collections
  • Info For
    • Authors
    • Reviewers
    • Subscribers
    • Advertisers
  • About
    • About JSWC
    • Editorial Board
    • Permissions
    • Alerts
    • RSS Feeds
    • Contact Us
  • Follow SWCS on Twitter
  • Visit SWCS on Facebook
Research ArticleResearch Section

Is surfacing a good choice for trail management? Evidence from four high-use hiking trails in Hong Kong

S.L. Ng
Journal of Soil and Water Conservation November 2022, 77 (6) 600-608; DOI: https://doi.org/10.2489/jswc.2022.00143
S.L. Ng
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • Article
  • Figures & Data
  • References
  • Info & Metrics
  • PDF
Loading

References

  1. ↵
    1. AFCD (Agriculture, Fisheries and Conservation Department)
    . 2020. Useful Statistics. Hong Kong: AFCD. https://www.afcd.gov.hk/english/country/cou_lea/cou_lea_use/cou_lea_use.html.
  2. ↵
    1. Aust, M.W.,
    2. J.M. Marion, and
    3. K. Kyle
    . 2005. Research for the Development of Best Management Practices to Minimize Horse Trail Impacts on the Hoosier National Forest. Blacksburg, VA: Virginia Tech.
  3. ↵
    1. Ballantyne, M., and
    2. C. Pickering
    . 2015. The impacts of trail infrastructure on vegetation and soils: Current literature and future directions. Journal of Environmental Management 164:53-64.
    OpenUrl
  4. ↵
    1. Bolander, S.
    1999. Laboratory testing of nontraditional additives for stabilization of roads and trail surfaces. Transportation Research Record: Journal of the Transportation Research Board 1652(1):24-31.
    OpenUrl
  5. ↵
    1. Chowdhury, R.H., and
    2. S. Azam
    . 2016. Unsaturated shear strength properties of a compacted expansive soil from Regina, Canada. Innovative Infrastructure Solutions 1:47.
    OpenUrl
  6. ↵
    1. Clius, M.,
    2. A. Teleucă,
    3. D. David, and
    4. A. Morosanu
    . 2012. Trail accessibility as a tool for sustainable management of protected areas: Case study Ceahlău National Park, Romania. Procedia Environmental Sciences 14:267-278.
    OpenUrl
  7. ↵
    1. Cole, D.
    1983. Assessing and Monitoring Backcountry Trail Conditions. Odgen, UT: USDA Forest Service, Intermountain Forest and Range Experiment Station.
  8. ↵
    1. D. Smith and
    2. P. Hellmund
    1. Cole, D.
    1993. Minimizing conflict between recreation and nature conservation. In Ecology of Greenways: Design and Function of Linear Conservation Areas, ed. D. Smith and P. Hellmund, 105-122. Minneapolis, MN: University of Minnesota.
  9. ↵
    1. Dorwart, C.,
    2. R. Moore, and
    3. Y. Leung
    . 2009. Visitors’ perceptions of a trail environment and effects on experiences: A model for nature-based recreation experiences. Leisure Sciences 32(1):33-54.
    OpenUrl
  10. ↵
    1. Farrell, T., and
    2. J. Marion
    . 2002. Trail impacts and trail impact management related to visitation at Torres del Paine National Park, Chile. Leisure/Loisir 26:31–59.
    OpenUrl
  11. ↵
    1. Fox, D., and
    2. R. Bryan
    . 2000. The relationship of soil loss by interrill erosion to slope gradient. Catena 38:211–222.
    OpenUrlCrossRefGeoRef
  12. ↵
    1. Giles, A.
    2002. Exploring the Social, Environmental and Economic Aspects of Trail Surfacing Decisions. Master’s thesis, University of Waterloo.
  13. ↵
    1. Hesselbarth, W.,
    2. B. Vachowski, and
    3. M. Davies
    . 2007. Trail Construction and Maintenance Notebook, 2007 edition. Missoula, MT: US Forest Service, Missoula Technology and Development Center.
  14. ↵
    1. Hockett, K.,
    2. J. Marion, and
    3. Y. Leung
    . 2017. The efficacy of combined educational and site management actions in reducing off-trail hiking in an urban-proximate protected area. Journal of Environmental Management 203:17-28.
    OpenUrl
  15. ↵
    1. Hooper, L.
    1988. National Park Service Trails Management Handbook. Denver, CO: USDI National Park Service, Denver Service Center.
  16. ↵
    1. Information Services Department
    . 2021. Hong Kong 2020. Hong Kong: Information Services Department, Hong Kong SAR Government.
  17. ↵
    1. Ke, J.
    2018. Reviewing studies on recreational trails: A theoretical basis for China’s relevant research. Geographical Studies 93(2):16-23.
    OpenUrl
  18. ↵
    1. Kil, N.,
    2. T. Stein, and
    3. S. Holland
    . 2014. Influences of wildland–urban interface and wildland hiking areas on experiential recreation outcomes and environmental setting preferences. Landscape and Urban Planning 127:1-12.
    OpenUrl
  19. ↵
    1. Kim, M., and
    2. B. Thapa
    . 2018. Factors that influence residents’ support for environmental development along the Haeparang Trail, South Korea. Journal of Park and Recreation Administration 36:166-175.
    OpenUrl
  20. ↵
    1. Ko, F.W.Y., and
    2. F.L.C. Lo
    . 2016. Rainfall-based landslide susceptibility analysis for natural terrain in Hong Kong—A direct stock-taking approach. Engineering Geology 215:95-107.
    OpenUrl
  21. ↵
    1. Leung, Y., and
    2. J. Marion
    . 1996. Trail degradation as influenced by environmental factors: A state-of-knowledge review. Journal of Soil and Water Conservation 51(2):130-136.
    OpenUrlFREE Full Text
  22. ↵
    1. Leung, Y., and
    2. J. Marion
    . 1999. Assessing trail conditions in protected areas: Application of a problem assessment method in Great Smoky Mountains National Park, USA. Environmental Conservation 26(4):270-279.
    OpenUrl
  23. ↵
    1. Li, W.,
    2. X. Ge, and
    3. C. Liu
    . 2005. Hiking trails and tourism impact assessment in protected area: Jiuzhaigou Biosphere Reserve, China. Environmental Monitoring and Assessment 108:279-293.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  24. ↵
    1. Lin, H.,
    2. Y. Leung,
    3. S. Hsu, and
    4. J. She
    . 2009. A study in Yangmingshan National Park: Factors influencing the effectiveness of trail surfacing to minimize recreational impact. Journal of National Parks 19(4):65-79.
    OpenUrl
  25. ↵
    1. Littlefair, C., and
    2. R. Buckley
    . 2008. Interpretation Reduces Ecological Impacts of Visitors to World Heritage Site. AMBIO: A Journal of the Human Environment 37(5):338-341.
    OpenUrlCrossRef
  26. ↵
    1. Lucas-Borja, M.,
    2. F. Bastida,
    3. J. Moreno, and
    4. C. Nicolás
    . 2011. The effects of human trampling on the microbiological properties of soil and vegetation in mediterranean mountain areas. Land Degradation and Development 22:383-394.
    OpenUrl
  27. ↵
    1. Lynn, N., and
    2. R. Brown
    . 2003. Effects of recreational use impacts on hiking experiences in natural areas. Landscape and Urban Planning 64:77–87.
    OpenUrl
  28. ↵
    1. Marion, J., and
    2. Y. Leung
    . 2011. Indicators and protocols for monitoring impacts of formal and informal trails in protected areas. Journal of Tourism and Leisure Studies 17(2):215-236.
    OpenUrl
  29. ↵
    1. Marion, J., and
    2. J. Wimpey
    . 2017. Assessing the influence of sustainable trail design and maintenance on soil loss. Journal of Environmental Management 189:46-57.
    OpenUrl
    1. Marion, J.L.,
    2. J. Wimpey, and
    3. L. Park
    . 2011. Informal and Formal Trail Monitoring Protocols and Baseline Conditions: Acadia National Park, Final report, US Geological Survey. Blacksburg, VA: Virginia Tech College of Natural Resources and Environment.
  30. ↵
    1. McCay, R.
    1978. Hiker Preferences for Trail Features and Maps. Forest Service Research Note NE-262. Broomall, PA: US Forest Service.
  31. ↵
    1. McClelland, L.
    1993. Presenting Nature: The Historic Landscape Design of the National Park Service 1916 to 1942. Washington, DC: National Park Service.
  32. ↵
    1. Meadema, F.,
    2. J.L. Marion,
    3. J. Arredondo, and
    4. J. Wimpey
    . 2020. The influence of layout on Appalachian Trail soil loss, widening, and muddiness: Implications for sustainable trail design and management. Journal of Environmental Management 257:109986.
    OpenUrl
  33. ↵
    1. Mende, P., and
    2. D. Newsome
    . 2006. The assessment, monitoring and management of hiking trails: A case study from the Stirling Range National Park, Western Australia. Conservation Science Western Australia Journal 5(3):285-295.
    OpenUrl
  34. ↵
    1. Minnesota Department of Natural Resources
    . 2007. Trail Planning, Design and Development Guidelines. St Paul, MN: MNDNR, Division of trails and waterways.
  35. ↵
    1. Mok, D.
    2016. Hong Kong’s MacLehose Trail named one of the best hikes in the world. Hong Kong: South China Morning Post. https://www.scmp.com/news/hong-kong/education-community/article/1941022/hong-kongs-maclehose-trail-named-one-best-hikes.
  36. ↵
    1. Motavalli, P.,
    2. S. Anderson,
    3. P. Pengthamkeerati, and
    4. C. Gantzer
    . 2003. Use of soil cone penetrometers to detect the effects of compaction and organic amendments in claypan soils. Soil and Tillage Research 74:103-114.
    OpenUrl
  37. ↵
    1. Nepal, S.
    2003. Trail impacts in Sagarmatha (Mt. Everest) National park, Nepal: A logistic regression analysis. Environmental Management 32:312–321.
    OpenUrlPubMed
  38. ↵
    1. National Park Service
    . 2007. Guide to Sustainable Mountain Trails: Trail Assessment, Planning, and Design Sketchbook. Denver, CO: US Department of the Interior National Park Service, Denver Service Center.
  39. ↵
    1. National Park Service
    . 2020. Trails and Hiking. Washington, DC: National Park Service. https://www.nps.gov/subjects/trails/creation-of-trails.htm.
  40. ↵
    1. Ng, S.L., and
    2. S.L. Lam
    . 2002. Rain erosion: Piping, rilling and gullying. Kong Kong Geologist 8:42-44.
    OpenUrl
  41. ↵
    1. Ng, S.,
    2. Y. Leung,
    3. S. Cheung, and
    4. W. Fang
    . 2018. Land degradation effects initiated by trail running events in an urban protected area of Hong Kong. Land Degradation and Development 29(3):422-432.
    OpenUrl
  42. ↵
    1. Olive, N., and
    2. J. Marion
    . 2009. The influence of use-related, environmental, and managerial factors on soil loss from recreational trails. Journal of Environmental Management 90:483-493.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  43. ↵
    1. Pickering, C., and
    2. P. Norman
    . 2017. Comparing impacts between formal and informal recreational trails. Journal of Environmental Management 193:270-279.
    OpenUrl
  44. ↵
    1. Rowe, H.,
    2. M. Tluczek,
    3. J. Broatch,
    4. D. Gruber,
    5. S. Jones,
    6. D. Langenfeld,
    7. P. McNamara, and
    8. L. Weinstein
    . 2018. Comparison of trailside degradation across a gradient of trail use in the Sonoran Desert. Journal of Environmental Management 207:292-302.
    OpenUrl
  45. ↵
    1. Schaller, H.
    2014. The footprint of tourism: Ecological sensitivity andhiking trail assessment at selected protected areas in Iceland and Hokkaido. Hokkaido: Icelandic Tourism Research Centre.
  46. ↵
    1. Sheridan, G., and
    2. P. Noske
    . 2007. A quanitative study of sediment delivery and stream pollution from different forest road types. Hydrological Processes 21:387-398.
    OpenUrlGeoRef
  47. ↵
    1. Sutherland, R.A.,
    2. J.O. Bussen,
    3. D.L. Plondke,
    4. B.M. Evans, and
    5. A.D. Ziegler
    . 2001. Hydrophysical degradation associated with hiking-trail use: A case study of Hawai'iloa Ridge Trail, O'ahu, Hawai'i. Land Degradation & Development 12:71-86.
    OpenUrl
  48. ↵
    1. Svajda, J.,
    2. S. Korony,
    3. I. Brighton,
    4. S. Esser, and
    5. S. Ciapala
    . 2016. Trail impact monitoring in Rocky Mountain National Park, USA. Solid Earth 7:115–128.
    OpenUrl
  49. ↵
    1. Tabachnick, G., and
    2. L. Fidell
    . 1989. Using Multivariate Statistics. New York: Harper Collins.
  50. ↵
    1. USFS (United States Forest Service)
    . 1915. Trail Construction on the National Forest. Washington, DC: Government Printing Office.
  51. ↵
    1. Wang, J.
    2016. Hong Kong runners and hikers hit out at the growing concreting of trails. Hong Kong: South China Morning Post. https://www.scmp.com/lifestyle/travel-leisure/article/1927011/hong-kong-runners-and-hikers-hit-out-growing-concreting.
  52. ↵
    1. Wang, G.,
    2. Q. Fang,
    3. B. Wu,
    4. H. Yang, and
    5. Z. Xu
    . 2015. Relationship between soil erodibility and modeled infiltration rate in different soils. Journal of Hydrology 528:408-418.
    OpenUrlGeoRef
  53. ↵
    1. White, D.,
    2. M. Waskey,
    3. G. Brodehl, and
    4. P. Foti
    . 2006. A comparative study of impacts to mountain bike trails in five common ecological regions of the southwestern U.S. Journal of Park and Recreation Administration 24(2):21-41.
    OpenUrl
  54. ↵
    1. Yuen, C.
    2016. Rubber mats on concrete trails? Hikers complain against excessive measures on mountain paths. Hong Kong: Hong Kong Free Press. https://hongkongfp.com/2016/07/05/rubber-mats-on-concrete-trails-hikers-complain-against-excessive-measures-on-mountain-paths/.
  55. ↵
    1. Zhu, H., and
    2. L. Zhang
    . 2016. Field investigation of erosion resistance of common grass species for soil bioengineering in Hong Kong. Acta Geotechnica 11:1047–1059.
    OpenUrl
PreviousNext
Back to top

In this issue

Journal of Soil and Water Conservation: 77 (6)
Journal of Soil and Water Conservation
Vol. 77, Issue 6
November/December 2022
  • Table of Contents
  • Table of Contents (PDF)
  • About the Cover
  • Index by author
  • Front Matter (PDF)
Print
Download PDF
Article Alerts
Sign In to Email Alerts with your Email Address
Email Article

Thank you for your interest in spreading the word on Journal of Soil and Water Conservation.

NOTE: We only request your email address so that the person you are recommending the page to knows that you wanted them to see it, and that it is not junk mail. We do not capture any email address.

Enter multiple addresses on separate lines or separate them with commas.
Is surfacing a good choice for trail management? Evidence from four high-use hiking trails in Hong Kong
(Your Name) has sent you a message from Journal of Soil and Water Conservation
(Your Name) thought you would like to see the Journal of Soil and Water Conservation web site.
CAPTCHA
This question is for testing whether or not you are a human visitor and to prevent automated spam submissions.
6 + 7 =
Solve this simple math problem and enter the result. E.g. for 1+3, enter 4.
Citation Tools
Is surfacing a good choice for trail management? Evidence from four high-use hiking trails in Hong Kong
S.L. Ng
Journal of Soil and Water Conservation Nov 2022, 77 (6) 600-608; DOI: 10.2489/jswc.2022.00143

Citation Manager Formats

  • BibTeX
  • Bookends
  • EasyBib
  • EndNote (tagged)
  • EndNote 8 (xml)
  • Medlars
  • Mendeley
  • Papers
  • RefWorks Tagged
  • Ref Manager
  • RIS
  • Zotero
Request Permissions
Share
Is surfacing a good choice for trail management? Evidence from four high-use hiking trails in Hong Kong
S.L. Ng
Journal of Soil and Water Conservation Nov 2022, 77 (6) 600-608; DOI: 10.2489/jswc.2022.00143
Reddit logo Twitter logo Facebook logo Mendeley logo
  • Tweet Widget
  • Facebook Like
  • Google Plus One

Jump to section

  • Article
    • Abstract
    • Introduction
    • Methods and Materials
    • Results and Discussion
    • Summary and Conclusions
    • Acknowledgements
    • References
  • Figures & Data
  • Info & Metrics
  • References
  • PDF

Related Articles

  • No related articles found.
  • Google Scholar

Cited By...

  • No citing articles found.
  • Google Scholar

More in this TOC Section

  • Effects of economic and climatic factors on agricultural water use in arid regions
  • Sediment delivery ratios from forest road networks and harvesting operational features by physiographic region in the southeastern United States
  • Gully erosion susceptibility prediction in Mollisols using machine learning models
Show more Research Section

Similar Articles

Keywords

  • protected area
  • surfacing
  • trail condition
  • trail gradient
  • trail management

Content

  • Current Issue
  • Early Online
  • Archive
  • Subject Collections

Info For

  • Authors
  • Reviewers
  • Subscribers
  • Advertisers

Customer Service

  • Subscriptions
  • Permissions and Reprints
  • Terms of Use
  • Privacy

SWCS

  • Membership
  • Publications
  • Meetings and Events
  • Conservation Career Center

© 2023 Soil and Water Conservation Society