LandPKS Toolbox: Open-source mobile app tools for sustainable land management

REFERENCES

1. ↵
   1. Baumann, K.,
   2. I. Schöning,
   3. M. Schrumpf,
   4. R.H. Ellerbrock, and
   5. P. Leinweber

   . 2016. Rapid assessment of soil organic matter: Soil color analysis and Fourier transform infrared spectroscopy. Geoderma 278:49–57, doi:10.1016/j.geoderma.2016.05.012.

   OpenUrlCrossRef
2. ↵
   1. Brevik, E.C.,
   2. M. Krzic,
   3. C. Muggler,
   4. D. Field,
   5. J. Hannam, and
   6. Y. Uchida

   . 2022. Soil science education – A multi-national look at current perspectives. Natural Science Education 51(1): e20077, doi:10.1002/nse2.20077.

   OpenUrlCrossRef
3. ↵
   1. Fan, Z.,
   2. J.E. Herrick,
   3. R. Saltzman,
   4. C. Matteis,
   5. A. Yudina,
   6. N. Nocella,
   7. E. Crawford,
   8. R. Parker, and
   9. J. Van Zee

   . 2017. Measurement of soil color: A comparison between smartphone camera and the Munsell color charts, Soil Science Society of America Journal 81(5):1139, doi:10.2136/sssaj2017.01.0009.

   OpenUrlCrossRef
4. ↵
   1. Fan, Z.,
   2. S.A. Wills,
   3. J.E. Herrick,
   4. T.W. Nauman,
   5. C.W. Brungard,
   6. D.E. Beaudette,
   7. M.R. Levi, and
   8. A.T. O’Geen

   . 2018. Approaches for improving field soil identification, Soil Science Society of America Journal 82(4):871–877, doi:10.2136/sssaj2017.09.0337.

   OpenUrlCrossRef
5. ↵
   1. FAO (Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations)

   . 2022. Sustainable resources planning and management. In The State of the World’s Land and Water Resources for Food and Agriculture – Systems at breaking point. Main report. Rome: FAO. https://doi.org/10.4060/cb9910en.
6. ↵
   1. Gee, G.W.,
   2. J.W. Bauder, and
   3. A. Klute

   . 1986. Particle-size analysis. In Methods of Soil Analysis, Part 1. Physical and Mineralogical Methods. Madison, WI: Soil Since Society of America.
7. ↵
   1. Gómez-Robledo, L.,
   2. N. López-Ruiz,
   3. M. Melgosa,
   4. A.J. Palma,
   5. L.F. Capitán-Vallvey, and
   6. M. Sánchez-Marañón

   . 2013. Using the mobile phone as Munsell soil-colour sensor: An experiment under controlled illumination conditions, Computers and Electronics in Agriculture 99:200–208, doi:10.1016/j.compag.2013.10.002.

   OpenUrlCrossRef
8. ↵
   1. Han, P.,
   2. D. Dong,
   3. X. Zhao,
   4. L. Jiao, and
   5. Y. Lang

   . 2016. A smartphone-based soil color sensor: For soil type classification, Computers and Electronics in Agriculture 123:232–241, doi:10.1016/j.compag.2016.02.024.

   OpenUrlCrossRef
9. ↵
   1. Herrick, J.E.,
   2. A. Beh,
   3. E. Barrios,
   4. I. Bouvier,
   5. M. Coetzee,
   6. D. Dent,
   7. E. Elias, et al.

   2016. The Land-Potential Knowledge System (LandPKS): Mobile apps and collaboration for optimizing climate change investments. Ecosystem Health and Sustainability 2(3):e01209, doi:10.1002/ehs2.1209.

   OpenUrlCrossRef
10. ↵
    1. Herrick, J.E.,
    2. K.C. Urama,
    3. J.W. Karl,
    4. J. Boos,
    5. M.-V.V. Johnson,
    6. K.D. Shepherd,
    7. J. Hempel, et al.

    2013. The global Land-Potential Knowledge System (LandPKS): Supporting evidence-based, site-specific land use and management through cloud computing, mobile applications, and crowdsourcing. Journal of Soil and Water Conservation 68(1):5A-12A, doi:10.2489/jswc.68.1.5A.

    OpenUrlFREE Full Text
11. ↵
    1. Kachergis, E.,
    2. S.W. Miller,
    3. S.E. McCord,
    4. M. Dickard,
    5. S. Savage,
    6. L.V. Reynolds,
    7. N. Lepak, et al.

    2022. Adaptive monitoring for multiscale land management: Lessons learned from the Assessment, Inventory, and Monitoring (AIM) principles, Rangelands 44(1):50–63, doi:10.1016/j.rala.2021.08.006.

    OpenUrlCrossRef
12. ↵
    1. Karlen, D.L.,
    2. D.E. Stott, and
    3. M.M. Mikha

    . 2021. Approaches to Soil Health Analysis, Soil Health Series: Volume 1. Madison, WI: Soil Science Society of America.
13. ↵
    1. Minasny, B.,
    2. A.B. Mcbratney, and
    3. K.L. Bristow

    . 1999. Comparison of different approaches to the development of pedotransfer functions for water-retention curves. Geoderma 93:225–253.

    OpenUrlCrossRefGeoRefWeb of Science
14. ↵
    1. Moonrungsee, N.,
    2. S. Pencharee, and
    3. J. Jakmunee

    . 2015. Colorimetric analyzer based on mobile phone camera for determination of available phosphorus in soil. Talanta 136:204–209, doi:10.1016/j.talanta.2015.01.024.

    OpenUrlCrossRef
15. ↵
    1. O’Geen, A.,
    2. M. Walkinshaw, and
    3. D. Beaudette

    . 2017. SoilWeb: A multifaceted interface to soil survey information, Soil Science Society of America Journal 81(4):853–862, doi:10.2136/sssaj2016.11.0386n.

    OpenUrlCrossRef
16. ↵
    1. Pellant, M.,
    2. P. Shaver,
    3. D.A. Pyke, and
    4. J.E. Herrick

    . 2005. Interpreting indicators of rangeland health, version 4. Technical Reference 1734-6, Version 4. Denver, CO: US Department of the Interior, Bureau of Land Management, National Science and Technology Center.
17. ↵
    1. Poggio, L.,
    2. L.M. De Sousa,
    3. N.H. Batjes,
    4. G.B.M. Heuvelink,
    5. B. Kempen,
    6. E. Ribeiro, and
    7. D. Rossiter

    . 2021. SoilGrids 2.0: Producing soil information for the globe with quantified spatial uncertainty, Soil 7(1):217–240, doi:10.5194/soil-7-217-2021.

    OpenUrlCrossRef
18. ↵
    1. Quandt, A.
    2. J.E. Herrick,
    3. G. Peacock,
    4. S. Salley,
    5. A. Buni,
    6. C.C. Mkalawa, and
    7. J. Neff

    . 2020. A standardized land capability classification system for land evaluation using mobile phone technology. Journal of Soil and Water Conservation 75(5):579-589. https://doi.org/10.2489/jswc.2020.00023.

    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
19. ↵
    1. Rowell, D.L.

    2014. Soil Science: Methods and Applications. London: Routledge.
20. ↵
    1. Salley, S.W.,
    2. J.E. Herrick,
    3. C.V. Holmes,
    4. J.W. Karl,
    5. M.R. Levi,
    6. S.E. McCord,
    7. C. Van Der Waal, and
    8. J.W. Van Zee

    . 2018. A comparison of soil texture-by-feel estimates: Implications for the citizen soil scientist. Soil Science Society of America Journal 82(6):1526–1537, doi:10.2136/sssaj2018.04.0137.

    OpenUrlCrossRef
21. ↵
    1. Sarrantonio, M.,
    2. J.W. Doran,
    3. M.A. Liebig, and
    4. J.J. Halvorson

    . 2015. On-farm assessment of soil quality and health. In Methods of Assessment of Soil Quality, 83–105, doi:10.2136/sssaspecpub49.c5. Madison, WI: Soil Science Society of America.

    OpenUrlCrossRef
22. ↵
    1. Saxton, K.E. and
    2. W.J. Rawls

    . 2006. Soil water characteristic estimates by texture and organic matter for hydrologic solutions. Soil Science Society of America Journal 70(5):1569, doi:10.2136/sssaj2005.0117.

    OpenUrlCrossRefWeb of Science
23. ↵
    1. Stiglitz, R.,
    2. E. Mikhailova,
    3. C. Post,
    4. M. Schlautman, and
    5. J. Sharp

    . 2016. Evaluation of an inexpensive sensor to measure soil color, Computers and Electronics in Agriculture 121:141–148, doi:10.1016/j.compag.2015.11.014.

    OpenUrlCrossRef
24. ↵
    1. Thien, S.J.

    1979. A flow diagram for teaching texture-by-feel analysis. Journal of Agronomic Education 8(1):54–55.

    OpenUrl
25. ↵
    1. Thompson, J.A.,
    2. A.R. Pollio, and
    3. P.J. Turk

    . 2013. Comparison of Munsell soil color charts and the GLOBE soil color book. Soil Science Society of America Journal 77(6):2089–2093, doi:10.2136/sssaj2013.03.0117n.

    OpenUrlCrossRefGeoRef
26. ↵
    1. United Nations Environment Programme and International Resource Panel

    . 2016. Unlocking the Sustainable Potential of Land Resources: Evaluating Systems, Strategies and Tools. https://wedocs.unep.org/20.500.11822/7710.
27. ↵
    1. USDA NRCS (Natural Resources Conservation Service)

    . 2021. Cropland In-Field Soil Health Assessment Guide. Soil Health Technical Note No. 450-06. Washington, DC: USDA Natural Resources Conservation Service.
28. ↵
    1. Van Looy, K.,
    2. J. Bouma,
    3. M. Herbst,
    4. J. Koestel,
    5. B. Minasny,
    6. U. Mishra,
    7. C. Montzka, et al.

    2017. Pedotransfer functions in earth system science: Challenges and perspectives. Review of Geophysics 55(4):1199–1256, doi:10.1002/2017RG000581.

    OpenUrlCrossRef
29. ↵
    1. Vos, C.,
    2. A. Don,
    3. R. Prietz,
    4. A. Heidkamp, and
    5. A. Freibauer

    . 2016. Field-based soil-texture estimates could replace laboratory analysis. Geoderma 267:215–219, doi:10.1016/j.geoderma.2015.12.022.

    OpenUrlCrossRefGeoRef
30. ↵
    1. Yang, J.,
    2. F. Shen,
    3. T. Wang,
    4. M. Luo,
    5. N. Li, and
    6. S. Que

    . 2021. Effect of smart phone cameras on color-based prediction of soil organic matter content. Geoderma 402(April):115365, doi:10.1016/j.geoderma.2021.115365.

    OpenUrlCrossRef
31. ↵
    1. Ziadat, F.,
    2. E. De Pauw,
    3. F. Nachtergaele, and
    4. T. Fetsi

    . 2021. A Land Resources Planning Toolbox to promote sustainable land management, Sustainable Agriculture Research 10(1):73, doi:10.5539/sar.v10n1p73.

    OpenUrlCrossRef
32. ↵
    1. Zobeck, T.M.

    2004. Rapid soil particle size analyses using laser diffraction, Applied Engineering in Agriculture 20(5):633–640.

    OpenUrlWeb of Science