Skip to main content

Main menu

  • Home
  • Content
    • Current Issue
    • Early Online
    • Archive
    • Subject Collections
  • Info For
    • Authors
    • Reviewers
    • Subscribers
    • Advertisers
  • About
    • About JSWC
    • Editorial Board
    • Permissions
    • Alerts
    • RSS Feeds
    • Contact Us

User menu

  • Register
  • Subscribe
  • My alerts
  • Log in
  • My Cart

Search

  • Advanced search
Journal of Soil and Water Conservation

  • Register
  • Subscribe
  • My alerts
  • Log in
  • My Cart
Journal of Soil and Water Conservation

Advanced Search

  • Home
  • Content
    • Current Issue
    • Early Online
    • Archive
    • Subject Collections
  • Info For
    • Authors
    • Reviewers
    • Subscribers
    • Advertisers
  • About
    • About JSWC
    • Editorial Board
    • Permissions
    • Alerts
    • RSS Feeds
    • Contact Us
  • Follow SWCS on Twitter
  • Visit SWCS on Facebook
Research ArticleResearch Section

Policy process and problem framing for state Nutrient Reduction Strategies in the US Upper Mississippi River Basin

C.B. Wardropper, K. Genskow, A. Lavoie, D. Franklin, E. Usher, A. Wilke, J. Arbuckle, D. Jackson-Smith, L. Prokopy and A. Rissman
Journal of Soil and Water Conservation January 2023, 78 (1) 70-81; DOI: https://doi.org/10.2489/jswc.2023.00025
C.B. Wardropper
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
K. Genskow
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
A. Lavoie
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
D. Franklin
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
E. Usher
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
A. Wilke
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
J. Arbuckle
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
D. Jackson-Smith
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
L. Prokopy
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
A. Rissman
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • Article
  • Figures & Data
  • Supplemental
  • References
  • Info & Metrics
  • PDF
Loading

References

  1. ↵
    1. Brown, D.M.
    2012. Comparative climate change policy and federalism: An overview. Review of Policy Research 29(3):322–333.
    OpenUrl
  2. ↵
    1. Cairney, P.
    2018. Three habits of successful policy entrepreneurs. Policy & Politics 46(2):199–215.
    OpenUrl
  3. ↵
    1. Campbell, T.A.,
    2. E.G. Booth,
    3. C. Gratton,
    4. R.D. Jackson, and
    5. C.J. Kucharik
    . 2021. Agricultural landscape transformation needed to meet water quality goals in the Yahara River watershed of southern Wisconsin. Ecosystems (2021):1–19.
  4. ↵
    1. Christianson, R.,
    2. L. Christianson,
    3. C. Wong,
    4. M. Helmers,
    5. G. McIsaac,
    6. D. Mulla, and
    7. M. McDonald
    . 2018. Beyond the nutrient strategies: Common ground to accelerate agricultural water quality improvement in the upper Midwest. Journal of environmental management 206(2018):1072–1080.
    OpenUrl
  5. ↵
    1. Church, S.P.,
    2. M. Dunn, and
    3. L.S. Prokopy
    . 2019. Benefits to qualitative data quality with multiple coders: Two case studies in multi-coder data analysis. Journal of Rural Social Sciences 34(1):2.
    OpenUrl
  6. ↵
    1. Church, S.P.,
    2. K.M. Floress,
    3. J.D. Ulrich-Schad,
    4. C.B. Wardropper,
    5. P. Ranjan,
    6. W.M. Eaton,
    7. S. Gasteyer, and
    8. A. Rissman
    . 2020. How water quality improvement efforts influence urban–agricultural relationships. Agriculture and Human Values (2020). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10460-020-10177-8.
  7. ↵
    1. Comito, J.,
    2. J. Wolseth, and
    3. L.W. Morton
    . 2012. Tillage practices, the language of blame, and responsibility for water quality impacts in row crop agriculture. Human Ecology Review (2012):146–158.
  8. ↵
    1. Donley, N.
    2019. The USA lags behind other agricultural nations in banning harmful pesticides. Environmental Health 18(1):44.
    OpenUrl
  9. ↵
    1. Harrison, K.
    2012. A tale of two taxes: The fate of environmental tax reform in Canada. Review of Policy Research 29(3):383–407.
    OpenUrlCrossRef
  10. ↵
    1. Head, B.W.
    2019. Forty years of wicked problems literature: Forging closer links to policy studies. Policy and Society 38(2):180–197.
    OpenUrl
  11. ↵
    1. I. Engeli and
    2. C. Allison
    1. Howlett, M., and
    2. B. Cashore
    . 2014. Conceptualizing Public Policy. In Comparative Policy Studies, ed. I. Engeli and C. Allison, 17–33. New York: Palgrave Macmillan.
  12. ↵
    1. Iowa Environmental Council
    . 2019. The slow reality of the Nutrient Reduction Strategy. Des Moines, IA: Iowa Environmental Council.
  13. ↵
    1. F. Fischer,
    2. G.J. Miller, and
    3. M.S. Sidney
    1. Jann, W., and
    2. K. Wegrich
    . 2007. Theories of the Policy Cycle. In Handbook of Public Policy Analysis, Theory, Politics, and Methods, ed. F. Fischer, G.J. Miller, and M.S. Sidney. Boca Raton, FL: CRC Press.
  14. ↵
    1. P.A. Sabatier and
    2. H.C. Jenkins-Smith
    1. Jenkins-Smith, H.C., and
    2. P.A. Sabatier
    . 1993. The study of public policy processes. In Policy Change and Learning: An Advocacy Coalition Approach, ed. P.A. Sabatier and H.C. Jenkins-Smith, 135–142. Boulder, CO: Westview Press.
  15. ↵
    1. Keller, A.C.
    2009. Science in Environmental Policy: The Politics of Objective Science. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
  16. ↵
    1. Kingdon, J.W.
    1984. Agendas, Alternatives, and Public Policies, 1st edition. Boston, MA: Little, Brown.
  17. ↵
    1. Mintrom, M., and
    2. J. Luetjens
    . 2017. Policy entrepreneurs and problem framing: The case of climate change. Environment and Planning C: Politics and Space 35(8):1362–1377.
    OpenUrl
  18. ↵
    1. Mississippi River/Gulf of Mexico Watershed Nutrient Task Force
    . 2008. Gulf Hypoxia Action Plan 2008 for Reducing, Mitigating, and Controlling Hypoxia in the Northern Gulf of Mexico and Improving Water Quality in the Mississippi River Basin. Washington, DC: Mississippi River/Gulf of Mexico Watershed Nutrient Task Force.
  19. ↵
    1. Nash, S.L., and
    2. R. Steurer
    . 2021. From symbolism to substance: What the renewal of the Danish climate change act tells us about the driving forces behind policy change. Environmental Politics (May 15, 2021):1–25.
  20. ↵
    1. Ostrom, E.
    2005. Understanding Institutional Diversity. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
  21. ↵
    1. Ostrom, E.
    2010. Polycentric systems for coping with collective action and global environmental change. Global Environmental Change 20(4):550–557.
    OpenUrlCrossRefWeb of Science
  22. ↵
    1. Perez, M.R.
    2015. Regulating farmer nutrient management: A three-state case study on the Delmarva Peninsula. Journal of Environmental Quality 44(2):402–414.
    OpenUrl
  23. ↵
    1. Peters, G.B.
    2005. The problem of policy problems. Journal of Comparative Policy Analysis: Research and Practice 7(4):349–370.
    OpenUrl
  24. ↵
    1. Pierson, P.
    2000. Increasing returns, path dependence, and the study of politics. American Political Science Review 94(2):251–267.
    OpenUrlCrossRefWeb of Science
  25. ↵
    1. Prokopy, L.,
    2. K. Genskow,
    3. J. Asher,
    4. A. Baumgart-Getz,
    5. J. Bonnell,
    6. S. Broussard,
    7. C. Curtis,
    8. K. Floress,
    9. K. McDermaid, and
    10. R. Power
    . 2009. Designing a regional system of social indicators to evaluate nonpoint source water projects. Journal of Extension 47(2).
  26. ↵
    1. Prokopy, L.S.,
    2. N. Mullendore,
    3. K. Brasier, and
    4. K. Floress
    . 2014. A typology of catalyst events for collaborative watershed management in the United States. Society & Natural Resources 27(11):1177–1191.
    OpenUrl
  27. ↵
    1. Rabalais, N.N., and
    2. R.E. Turner
    . 2019. Gulf of Mexico hypoxia: Past, present, and future. Limnology and Oceanography Bulletin 28(4):117–124.
    OpenUrl
  28. ↵
    1. Ribaudo, M.
    2015. The limits of voluntary conservation programs. Choices: The Magazine of Food, Farm, and Resources Issues 30(2):1–5.
    OpenUrl
  29. ↵
    1. Ribaudo, M., and
    2. J. Shortle
    . 2019. Reflections on 40 years of applied economics research on agriculture and water Quality. Agricultural and Resource Economics Review 48(3):519–530.
    OpenUrl
  30. ↵
    1. Rissman, A.R., and
    2. S. Carpenter
    . 2015. Progress on nonpoint pollution: Barriers and opportunities. Daedalus 144(3):35–47.
    OpenUrl
  31. ↵
    1. Robertson, D.M., and
    2. D.A. Saad
    . 2021. Nitrogen and phosphorus sources and delivery from the Mississippi/Atchafalaya River basin: An update using 2012 SPARROW models. JAWRA Journal of the American Water Resources Association 57(3):406–429.
    OpenUrl
  32. ↵
    1. Rosenbaum, W.A.
    2016. Environmental Politics and Policy, 10th edition. Washington, DC: CQ Press.
  33. ↵
    1. Salk, K.R.,
    2. R.C.H. Denny, and
    3. J. Greif
    . 2020. The role of policy in social–ecological interactions of nitrogen management in the Mississippi River basin. Journal of Environmental Quality 49(2):304-313.
    OpenUrl
  34. ↵
    1. Secchi, S., and
    2. M. McDonald
    . 2019. The state of water quality strategies in the Mississippi River Basin: Is cooperative federalism working? Science of the Total Environment 677(2019):241–249.
    OpenUrl
  35. ↵
    1. Segerson, K.
    2013. When is reliance on voluntary approaches in agriculture likely to be effective? Applied Economic Perspectives and Policy 35(4):565–592.
    OpenUrlCrossRef
  36. ↵
    1. Steffen, W.,
    2. K. Richardson,
    3. J. Rockstrom,
    4. S.E. Cornell,
    5. I. Fetzer,
    6. E.M. Bennett,
    7. R. Biggs,
    8. S.R. Carpenter,
    9. W. de Vries,
    10. C.A. de Wit,
    11. C. Folke,
    12. D. Gerten,
    13. J. Heinke,
    14. G.M. Mace,
    15. L.M. Persson,
    16. V. Ramanathan,
    17. B. Reyers, and
    18. S. Sorlin
    . 2015. Planetary boundaries: Guiding human development on a changing planet. Science 347(6223):1259855.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  37. ↵
    1. Stoner, N.
    2011. Working in Partnership with States to Address Phosphorus and Nitrogen Pollution through Use of a Framework for State Nutrient Reductions. Washington, DC: US Environmental Protection Agency.
  38. ↵
    1. Tracy, S.J.
    2019. Qualitative Research Methods: Collecting Evidence, Crafting Analysis, Communicating Impact, 2nd edition. Hoboken, NJ: John Wiley & Sons.
  39. ↵
    1. USDA ERS (Economic Research Service)
    . 2021. Corn, soybeans accounted for over 40 percent of all U.S. crop cash receipts in 2020. Washington, DC: USDA ERS.
  40. ↵
    1. USEPA (Environmental Protection Agency)
    . 2021a. Northern Gulf of Mexico Hypoxic Zone. Washington, DC: USEPA. https://www.epa.gov/ms-htf/northern-gulf-mexico-hypoxic-zone.
  41. ↵
    1. USEPA
    . 2021b. State Progress Toward Developing Numeric Nutrient Water Quality Criteria for Nitrogen and Phosphorus. Washington, DC: USEPA. https://www.epa.gov/nutrient-policy-data/state-progress-toward-developing-numeric-nutrient-water-quality-criteria#tb1.
  42. ↵
    1. Villarini, G.,
    2. J.A. Smith, and
    3. G.A. Vecchi
    . 2013. Changing frequency of heavy rainfall over the central United States. Journal of Climate 26(1):351-357.
    OpenUrl
  43. ↵
    1. Vos, N.
    2017. Agricultural drainage and the Des Moines Water Works lawsuit notes. Drake Journal of Agricultural Law 22(1):[i]-134.
    OpenUrl
  44. ↵
    1. Voß, J.-P., and
    2. B. Bornemann
    . 2011. The politics of reflexive governance: Challenges for designing adaptive management and transition management. Ecology and Society 16(2):9.
    OpenUrl
PreviousNext
Back to top

In this issue

Journal of Soil and Water Conservation: 78 (1)
Journal of Soil and Water Conservation
Vol. 78, Issue 1
January/February 2023
  • Table of Contents
  • Table of Contents (PDF)
  • About the Cover
  • Index by author
  • Front Matter (PDF)
Print
Download PDF
Article Alerts
Sign In to Email Alerts with your Email Address
Email Article

Thank you for your interest in spreading the word on Journal of Soil and Water Conservation.

NOTE: We only request your email address so that the person you are recommending the page to knows that you wanted them to see it, and that it is not junk mail. We do not capture any email address.

Enter multiple addresses on separate lines or separate them with commas.
Policy process and problem framing for state Nutrient Reduction Strategies in the US Upper Mississippi River Basin
(Your Name) has sent you a message from Journal of Soil and Water Conservation
(Your Name) thought you would like to see the Journal of Soil and Water Conservation web site.
CAPTCHA
This question is for testing whether or not you are a human visitor and to prevent automated spam submissions.
6 + 8 =
Solve this simple math problem and enter the result. E.g. for 1+3, enter 4.
Citation Tools
Policy process and problem framing for state Nutrient Reduction Strategies in the US Upper Mississippi River Basin
C.B. Wardropper, K. Genskow, A. Lavoie, D. Franklin, E. Usher, A. Wilke, J. Arbuckle, D. Jackson-Smith, L. Prokopy, A. Rissman
Journal of Soil and Water Conservation Jan 2023, 78 (1) 70-81; DOI: 10.2489/jswc.2023.00025

Citation Manager Formats

  • BibTeX
  • Bookends
  • EasyBib
  • EndNote (tagged)
  • EndNote 8 (xml)
  • Medlars
  • Mendeley
  • Papers
  • RefWorks Tagged
  • Ref Manager
  • RIS
  • Zotero
Request Permissions
Share
Policy process and problem framing for state Nutrient Reduction Strategies in the US Upper Mississippi River Basin
C.B. Wardropper, K. Genskow, A. Lavoie, D. Franklin, E. Usher, A. Wilke, J. Arbuckle, D. Jackson-Smith, L. Prokopy, A. Rissman
Journal of Soil and Water Conservation Jan 2023, 78 (1) 70-81; DOI: 10.2489/jswc.2023.00025
del.icio.us logo Digg logo Reddit logo Twitter logo Facebook logo Google logo Mendeley logo
  • Tweet Widget
  • Facebook Like
  • Google Plus One

Jump to section

  • Article
    • Abstract
    • Introduction
    • Materials and Methods
    • Results and Discussion
    • Summary and Conclusions
    • Supplemental Material
    • Acknowledgements
    • References
  • Figures & Data
  • Supplemental
  • Info & Metrics
  • References
  • PDF

Related Articles

  • Google Scholar

Cited By...

  • No citing articles found.
  • Google Scholar

More in this TOC Section

  • Soil health through farmers’ eyes: Toward a better understanding of how farmers view, value, and manage for healthier soils
  • Smart control of agricultural water wells in western Iran: Application of the Q-methodology
Show more Research Section

Similar Articles

Keywords

  • nonpoint source pollution
  • planning
  • policy
  • qualitative social science
  • water

Content

  • Current Issue
  • Early Online
  • Archive
  • Subject Collections

Info For

  • Authors
  • Reviewers
  • Subscribers
  • Advertisers

Customer Service

  • Subscriptions
  • Permissions and Reprints
  • Terms of Use
  • Privacy

SWCS

  • Membership
  • Publications
  • Meetings and Events
  • Conservation Career Center

© 2023 Soil and Water Conservation Society