Trade-off analysis of water conservation and water consumption of typical ecosystems at different climatic scales in the Dongjiang River basin, China

References

1. ↵
   1. Abbaspour, K.C.

   2007. User Manual for SWAT-CUP, SWAT Calibration and Uncertainty Analysis Programs Swiss Federal Institute of Aquatic Science and Technology. Duebendorf, Switzerland: Eawag: Swiss Federal Institute of Aquatic Science and Technology.
2. ↵
   1. Abeysingha, N.S.,
   2. M. Singh,
   3. V.K. Sehgal,
   4. M. Khanna,
   5. H. Pathak,
   6. P. Jayakody, and
   7. R. Srinivasan

   . 2015. Assessment of water yield and evapotranspiration over 1985 to 2010 in the Gomti River basin in India using the SWAT model. Current Science 108(12):2202-2212.

   OpenUrl
3. ↵
   1. Acharya, B.S.,
   2. E. Stebler, and
   3. C.B. Zou

   . 2017. Monitoring litter interception of rainfall using leaf wetness sensor under controlled and field conditions. Hydrological Processes 31(1):240-249. https://doi.org/10.1002/hyp.11047.

   OpenUrl
4. ↵
   1. Aldaz-Lusarreta, A.,
   2. R. Giménez,
   3. M.A. Campo-Bescós,
   4. L.M. Arregui, and
   5. I. Virto

   . 2022. Effects of innovative long-term soil and crop management on topsoil properties of a Mediterranean soil based on detailed water retention curves. Soil 8(2):655-671. https://doi.org/10.5194/SOIL-8-655-2022.

   OpenUrl
5. ↵
   1. Almeida, R.A.,
   2. S.B. Pereira, and
   3. D.B. Pinto

   . 2018. Calibration and validation of the SWAT hydrological model for the Mucuri River basin. Engenharia Agrícola 38:55-63.

   OpenUrl
6. ↵
   1. Arnold, J.G.,
   2. R. Srinivasan,
   3. R.S. Muttiah, and
   4. J.R. Williams

   . 1998. Large area hydrologic modeling and assessment part I: Model development 1. JAWRA Journal of the American Water Resources Association 34(1):73-89.

   OpenUrl
7. ↵
   1. Cheng, X.,
   2. Y. Bai,
   3. J. Zhu, and
   4. H. Han

   . 2020. Effects of forest thinning on interception and surface runoff in Larix principis-rupprechtii plantation during the growing season. Journal of Arid Environments 181:104222. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jaridenv.2020.104222.

   OpenUrl
8. ↵
   1. Douville, H.,
   2. A. Ribes,
   3. B. Decharme,
   4. R. Alkama, and
   5. J. Sheffield

   . 2013. Anthropogenic influence on multidecadal changes in reconstructed global evapotranspiration. Nature Climate Change 3(1):59-62. https://doi.org/10.1038/nclimate1632.

   OpenUrl
9. ↵
   1. Fang, D.,
   2. L. Hao,
   3. Z. Cao,
   4. X. Huang,
   5. M. Qin,
   6. J. Hu,
   7. Y. Liu, and
   8. G. Sun

   . 2020. Combined effects of urbanization and climate change on watershed evapotranspiration at multiple spatial scales. Journal of Hydrology 587:124869. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jhydrol.2020.124869.

   OpenUrl
10. ↵
    1. Gash, J.H.,
    2. C.R. Lloyd, and
    3. G. Lachaud

    . 1995. Estimating sparse forest rainfall interception with an analytical model. Journal of Hydrology 170(1-4):79-86. https://doi.org/10.1016/0022-1694(95)02697-N.

    OpenUrlCrossRefGeoRefWeb of Science
11. ↵
    1. Gong, S.,
    2. Y. Xiao,
    3. Y. Xiao,
    4. L. Zhang, and
    5. Z. Ouyang

    . 2017a. Driving forces and their effects on water conservation services in forest ecosystems in China. Chinese Geographical Science 27(2):216-228. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11769-017-0860-3.

    OpenUrl
12. ↵
    1. Gong, S.,
    2. Y. Xiao,
    3. H. Zheng,
    4. Y. Xiao, and
    5. Z. Ouyang

    . 2017b. Spatial patterns of ecosystem water conservation in China and its impact factors analysis. Acta Ecologica Sinica 37(7):2455-2462.

    OpenUrl
13. ↵
    1. Hu, W.,
    2. G. Li,
    3. Z. Gao,
    4. G. Jia,
    5. Z. Wang, and
    6. Y. Li

    . 2020. Assessment of the impact of the Poplar Ecological Retreat Project on water conservation in the Dongting Lake wetland region using the InVEST model. Science of the Total Environment 733:139423. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scitotenv.2020.139423.

    OpenUrl
14. ↵
    1. Kar, S.K.,
    2. A.K. Nema,
    3. A. Singh,
    4. B.L. Sinha, and
    5. C.D. Mishra

    . 2016. Comparative study of reference evapotranspiration estimation methods including Artificial Neural Network for dry sub-humid agro-ecological region. Journal of Soil and Water Conservation 15(3):233-241. doi:10.5958/2455-7145.2016.00007.2.

    OpenUrlCrossRef
15. ↵
    1. Korkmaz, M.

    2019. A study over the formulation of the parameters 5 or less independent variables of multiple linear regression. Journal of Function Spaces 2019. https://doi.org/10.1155/2019/1526920.
16. ↵
    1. Lei, H.,
    2. T. Gong,
    3. Y. Zhang, and
    4. D. Yang

    . 2018. Biological factors dominate the interannual variability of evapotranspiration in an irrigated cropland in the North China Plain. Agricultural and Forest Meteorology 250:262-276. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.agrformet.2018.01.007.

    OpenUrl
17. ↵
    1. Li, M.,
    2. D. Liang,
    3. J. Xia,
    4. J. Song,
    5. D. Cheng,
    6. J. Wu,
    7. Y. Cao,
    8. H. Sun, and
    9. Q. Li

    . 2021. Evaluation of water conservation function of Danjiang River basin in Qinling Mountains, China based on InVEST model. Journal of Environmental Management 286:112212. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jenvman.2021.112212.

    OpenUrl
18. ↵
    1. Liu, J.,
    2. X. Zheng,
    3. J. Fan, and
    4. L. Zhao

    . 2021. Evaluation of the value of water retention service in the middle and upper reaches of Hunhe River based on SWAT Model. Chinese Journal of Applied Ecology 32(11):3905-3912. https://doi.org/10.13287/j.1001-9332.202111.007.

    OpenUrl
19. ↵
    1. Lu, X.,
    2. C. Zang, and
    3. T. Burenina

    . 2020. Study on the variation in evapotranspiration in different period of the Genhe River basin in China. Physics and Chemistry of the Earth 120:102902. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pce.2020.102902.

    OpenUrl
20. ↵
    1. McKee, T.B.,
    2. N.J. Doesken, and
    3. J. Kleist

    . 1995. Drought monitoring with multiple timescales. In Preprints, 9th Conference on Applied Climatology, January 15–20, Dallas, Texas, 233–236.
21. ↵
    1. Mekonnen, K.,
    2. A.M. Melesse, and
    3. T.A. Woldesenbet

    . 2022. How suitable are satellite rainfall estimates in simulating high flows and actual evapotranspiration in MelkaKunitre catchment, Upper Awash Basin, Ethiopia? Science of the Total Environment 806(P1):150443. https://doi.org/10.1016/J.SCITOTENV.2021.150443.

    OpenUrl
22. ↵
    1. Na, L.,
    2. Y. Zhao, and
    3. L. Guo

    . 2022. Coupling coordination analysis of ecosystem services and urbanization in Inner Mongolia, China. Land 11(10):1870. https://doi.org/10.3390/LAND11101870.

    OpenUrl
23. ↵
    1. Nash, J.E., and
    2. J.V. Sutcliffe

    . 1970. River flow forecasting through conceptual models. Part I: A discussion of principles. Journal of Hydrology 10(3):282-290.

    OpenUrlCrossRefGeoRef
24. ↵
    1. Norvanchig, J., and
    2. T.O. Randhir

    . 2021. Simulation of ecohydrological processes influencing water supplies in the Tuul River watershed of Mongolia. Journal of Hydroinformatics 23(5):1130-1145. https://doi.org/10.2166/HYDRO.2021.056.

    OpenUrl
25. ↵
    1. Pan, T.,
    2. L. Zuo,
    3. Z. Zhang,
    4. X. Zhao,
    5. F. Sun,
    6. Z. Zhu, and
    7. Y. Liu

    . 2020. Impact of land use change on water conservation: A case study of Zhangjiakou in Yongding River. Sustainability 13(1):22. https://doi.org/10.3390/SU13010022.

    OpenUrl
26. ↵
    1. Puangkaew, N., and
    2. S. Ongsomwang

    . 2021. Remote sensing and geospatial models to simulate land use and land cover and estimate water supply and demand for water balancing in Phuket Island, Thailand. Applied Sciences 11(22):10553. https://doi.org/10.3390/APP112210553.

    OpenUrl
27. ↵
    1. Seiler, R.A.,
    2. M. Hayes, and
    3. L. Bressan

    . 2002. Using the standardized precipitation index for flood risk monitoring. International Journal of Climatology: A Journal of the Royal Meteorological Society 22(11):1365-1376. https://doi.org/10.1002/joc.799.

    OpenUrl
28. ↵
    1. Shadmani, M.,
    2. S. Marofi, and
    3. M. Roknian

    . 2012. Trend analysis in reference evapotranspiration using Mann-Kendall and Spearman’s Rho tests in arid regions of Iran. Water resources management 26(1):211-224.

    OpenUrlCrossRef
29. ↵
    1. Su, T.,
    2. S. Sun,
    3. S. Wang,
    4. D. Xie,
    5. S. Li,
    6. B. Huang, and
    7. T. Feng

    . 2022. Spatiotemporal variation of actual evapotranspiration and its relationship with precipitation in northern China under global warming. Remote Sensing 14(18):4554. https://doi.org/10.3390/RS14184554.

    OpenUrl
30. ↵
    1. Sun, R.,
    2. Q. Duan, and
    3. J. Wang

    . 2021. Understanding the spatial patterns of evapotranspiration estimates from land surface models over China. Journal of Hydrology 595:126021. https://doi.org/10.1016/J.JHYDROL.2021.126021.

    OpenUrl
31. ↵
    1. Tang, Y.,
    2. Q. Tang,
    3. Z. Wang,
    4. F.H. Chiew,
    5. X. Zhang, and
    6. H. Xiao

    . 2019. Different precipitation elasticity of runoff for precipitation increase and decrease at watershed scale. Journal of Geophysical Research: Atmospheres 124(22):11932-11943. https://doi.org/10.1029/2018JD030129.

    OpenUrl
32. ↵
    1. Valipour, M.

    2017. Calibration of mass transfer-based models to predict reference crop evapotranspiration. Applied Water Science 7(2):625-635. https://doi.org/10.1007/s13201-015-0274-2.

    OpenUrl
33. ↵
    1. Walsh, R.P.D., and
    2. P.J. Voigt

    . 1977. Vegetation litter: An underestimated variable in hydrology and geomorphology. Journal of Biogeography 4(3):253-274.

    OpenUrl
34. ↵
    1. Wang, Z., and
    2. J. Cao

    . 2021. Spatial-temporal pattern study on water conservation function using the SWAT model. Water Supply 21(7):3629-3642. https://doi.org/10.2166/WS.2021.127.

    OpenUrl
35. ↵
    1. Wang, K., and
    2. R.E. Dickinson

    . 2012. A review of global terrestrial evapotranspiration: Observation, modeling, climatology, and climatic variability. Reviews of Geophysics 50(2). https://doi.org/10.1029/2011RG000373.
36. ↵
    1. Wang, Y.,
    2. Y. Liu, and
    3. J. Jin

    . 2018. Contrast effects of vegetation cover change on evapotranspiration during a revegetation period in the Poyang Lake Basin, China. Forests 9(4):217. https://doi.org/10.3390/f9040217.

    OpenUrl
37. ↵
    1. Wang, Y.,
    2. W. Xiong,
    3. P. Yu,
    4. Z. Shen,
    5. M. Guo,
    6. W. Guan,
    7. C. Ma,
    8. B. Ye, and
    9. H. Guo

    . 2006. Study on the evapotranspiration of forest and vegetation in dryland. Science of Soil and Water Conservation 4(4):19-25+32. https://doi.org/10.16843/j.sswc.2006.04.004.

    OpenUrl
38. ↵
    1. Wu, J.,
    2. X. Chen,
    3. Z. Yu,
    4. H. Yao,
    5. W. Li, and
    6. D. Zhang

    . 2019. Assessing the impact of human regulations on hydrological drought development and recovery based on a ‘simulated-observed’ comparison of the SWAT model. Journal of Hydrology 577(October):123990.

    OpenUrl
39. ↵
    1. Xie, J.,
    2. L. Liu,
    3. Y. Wang,
    4. Y.P. Xu, and
    5. H. Chen

    . 2022. Changes in actual evapotranspiration and its dominant drivers across the Three-River Source Region of China during 1982-2014. Hydrology Research 53(2):297-313. https://doi.org/10.2166/NH.2022.076.

    OpenUrl
40. ↵
    1. Xu, F.,
    2. L. Zhao,
    3. Y. Jia,
    4. C. Niu,
    5. X. Liu, and
    6. H. Liu

    . 2022a. Evaluation of water conservation function of Beijiang River basin in Nanling Mountains, China, based on WEP-L model. Ecological Indicators 134:108383. https://doi.org/10.1016/J.ECOLIND.2021.108383.

    OpenUrl
41. ↵
    1. Xu, H.,
    2. C. Zhao,
    3. X. Wang,
    4. S. Chen,
    5. S. Shan,
    6. T. Chen, and
    7. X. Qi

    . 2022b. Spatial differentiation of determinants for water conservation dynamics in a dryland mountain. Journal of Cleaner Production 362(August):132574. https://doi.org/10.1016/J.JCLEPRO.2022.132574.

    OpenUrl
42. ↵
    1. Yang, D.,
    2. C. Li, and
    3. G. Ni

    . 2004. Application of a distributed hydrological model to the Yellow River basin. Acta Geographica Sinica 59(01):143-154.

    OpenUrl
43. ↵
    1. Yang, Z.,
    2. Q. Zhang,
    3. Y. Yang,
    4. X. Hao, and
    5. H. Zhang

    . 2016. Evaluation of evapotranspiration models over semi-arid and semi-humid areas of China. Hydrological Processes 30(23):4292-4313.

    OpenUrl
44. ↵
    1. Zang, C.

    2017. Spatial and temporal variability of blue/green water flows in typical meteorological years in an inland river basin in China. Journal of Water and Climate Change 8(1):165-176. https://doi.org/10.2166/wcc.2016.036.

    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
45. ↵
    1. Zang, C.,
    2. J. Liu,
    3. M. Van Der Velde, and
    4. F. Kraxner

    . 2012. Assessment of spatial and temporal patterns of green and blue water flows under natural conditions in inland river basins in Northwest China. Hydrology and Earth System Sciences 16(8):2859-2870. https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-16-2859-2012.

    OpenUrl
46. ↵
    1. Zhang, H., and
    2. S. Yuan

    . 2016. Evaluation of the spatial patterns of the water retention function of the forest ecosystem in the Dongjiang River watershed. Acta Ecologica Sinica 36(24):8120-8127. https://doi.org/10.5846/stxb201504280881.

    OpenUrl
47. ↵
    1. Zhang, X.,
    2. P. Chen,
    3. S. Dai, and
    4. Y. Han

    . 2022. Assessment of the value of regional water conservation services based on SWAT model. Environmental Monitoring and Assessment 194(8):559. https://doi.org/10.1007/S10661-022-10247-W.

    OpenUrl
48. ↵
    1. Zhou, G.,
    2. X. Wei,
    3. X. Chen,
    4. P. Zhou,
    5. X. Liu,
    6. Y. Xiao,
    7. G. Sun,
    8. D.F. Scott,
    9. S. Zhou,
    10. L. Han, and
    11. Y. Su

    . 2015. Global pattern for the effect of climate and land cover on water yield. Nature Communications 6(1):1-9. https://doi.org/10.1038/ncomms6918.

    OpenUrl
49. ↵
    1. Zhou, G.,
    2. X. Wei,
    3. Y. Wu,
    4. S. Liu,
    5. Y. Huang,
    6. J. Yan,
    7. D. Zhang,
    8. Q. Zhang,
    9. J. Liu,
    10. Z. Meng,
    11. C. Wang,
    12. G. Chu,
    13. S. Liu,
    14. X. Tang, and
    15. X. Liu

    . 2011. Quantifying the hydrological responses to climate change in an intact forested small watershed in Southern China. Global Change Biology 17(12):3736-3746. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2486.2011.02499.x.

    OpenUrl