Adoption of cover crops in Pennsylvania’s Chesapeake Bay watershed

References

1. ↵
   1. CBC (Chesapeake Bay Commission)

   . 2004. Cost-effective strategies for the Bay: 6 smart investments for nutrient and sediment reduction. Anapolis, MD: CBC.
2. ↵
   1. CBC

   . 2020. The Chesapeake Bay and its Watershed. Annapolis, MD: CBC.
3. ↵
   1. CBP (Chesapeake Bay Program)

   . 2017. Cover Crops Practices For Use in Phase 6.0 of the Chesapeake Bay Program Watershed Model. Annapolis, MD: CBP.
4. ↵
   1. CBP

   . 2018. Chesapeake Bay Program Quick Reference Guide for Best Management Practices (BMPs): Nonpoint Source BMPs to Reduce Nitrogen, Phosphorus and Sediment Loads to the Chesapeake Bay and its Local Waters. Annapolis, MD: CBP.
5. ↵
   2. Cook, A. ,
   3. M. Royer ,
   4. S. Richards ,
   5. T. Tesler , and
   6. M.P. Dubin

   . 2022. Method to Inform Cover Crop Transect Data with Management Actions from Voluntary Producer Survey Data for Annual Cover Crop Implementation Reporting. University Park, PA: Pennsylvania State University Agricultural Sciences Center.
6. ↵
   2. Fleming, P.

   2017. Agricultural cost sharing and water quality in the Chesapeake Bay: Estimating indirect effects of environmental payments. American Journal of Agricultural Economics 99(5):1208-1227.

   OpenUrl
7. ↵
   2. Kaspar, T.C. ,
   3. D.B. Jaynes ,
   4. T.B. Parkin ,
   5. T.B. Moorman , and
   6. J.W. Singer

   . 2012. Effectiveness of oat and rye cover crops in reducing nitrate losses in drainage water. Agricultural Water Management 110:25-33.

   OpenUrlCrossRefWeb of Science
8. ↵
   2. Kaufman, Z. ,
   3. D. Abler ,
   4. J. Shortle ,
   5. J. Harper ,
   6. J. Hamlett , and
   7. P. Feather

   . 2014. Agricultural costs of the Chesapeake Bay total maximum daily load. Environmental Science and Technology 48(24):14131-14138.

   OpenUrl
9. ↵
   2. Kladivko, E.J. ,
   3. T.C. Kaspar ,
   4. D.B. Jaynes ,
   5. R.W. Malone ,
   6. J. Singer ,
   7. X.K. Morin , and
   8. T. Searchinger

   . 2014. Cover crops in the upper midwestern United States: Potential adoption and reduction of nitrate leaching in the Mississippi River basin. Journal of Soil and Water Conservation 69(4):279-291. https://doi.org/10.2489/jswc.69.4.279.

   OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
10. ↵
    1. Pennsylvania DEP (Department of Environmental Protection)

    . 2022. Draft PA Phase 3 WIP 2021 progress and 2022-2023 Planning Milestone Reporting. Harrisburg, PA: Pennsylvania DEP. https://files.dep.state.pa.us/water/ChesapeakeBayOffice/TrackProgress/DRAFT_PA_Phase_3_WIP_2021_Progress_and_2022-2023_Planning_Milestone_Reporting.pdf.
11. ↵
    2. Ruffatti, M.D. ,
    3. R.T. Roth ,
    4. C.G. Lacey , and
    5. S.D. Armstrong

    . 2019. Impacts of nitrogen application timing and cover crop inclusion on subsurface drainage water quality. Agricultural Water Management 211:81-88.

    OpenUrl
12. ↵
    2. Shah, S. ,
    3. S. Hookway ,
    4. H. Pullen ,
    5. T. Clarke ,
    6. S. Wilkinson ,
    7. V. Reeve , and
    8. J.M. Fletcher

    . 2017. The role of cover crops in reducing nitrate leaching and increasing soil organic matter. Aspects of Applied Biology 134:243-251.

    OpenUrl
13. ↵
    2. Singer, J.W. ,
    3. R.W. Malone ,
    4. D.B. Jaynes , and
    5. L. Ma

    . 2011. Cover crop effects on nitrogen load in tile drainage from Walnut Creek Iowa using root zone water quality (RZWQ) model. Agricultural Water Management 98(10):1622-1628.

    OpenUrlCrossRef
14. ↵
    1. USDA NASS (National Agricultural Statistics Service)

    . 2017. 2017 Census of Agriculture – State Data. Washington, DC: USDA NASS.
15. ↵
    1. USDA NRCS (Natural Resources Conservation Service)

    . 2014a. NRCS Cover Crop Termination Guidelines. Washington, DC: USDA NRCS.
16. ↵
    1. USDA NRCS

    . 2014b. Revised Cover Crop Termination Guidelines. NRCS National Bulletin NB 450-15-1 TCH. Washington, DC: USDA NRCS.
17. ↵
    2. Wallander, S. ,
    3. D. Smith ,
    4. M. Bowman , and
    5. R. Claassen

    . 2021. Cover crop trends, programs, and practices in the United States. Economic Information Bulletin 31. Washington, DC: USDA Economic Research Service.
18. ↵
    2. Wieland, R. ,
    3. D. Parker ,
    4. W. Gans , and
    5. A. Martin

    . 2009. Costs and cost efficiencies for some nutrient reduction practices in Maryland. Washington, DC: National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration.
19. ↵
    2. Yeo, I.Y. ,
    3. S. Lee ,
    4. A.M. Sadeghi ,
    5. P.C. Beeson ,
    6. W.D. Hively ,
    7. G.W. McCarty , and
    8. M.W. Lang

    . 2014. Assessing winter cover crop nutrient uptake efficiency using a water quality simulation model. Hydrology and Earth System Sciences 18(12):5239-5253.

    OpenUrl