Reflections for enhancing participatory research and outreach from a multistakeholder soil health program

REFERENCES

1. ↵
   1. Angers, D.A., and
   2. N.S. Eriksen-Hamel

   . 2008. Full-inversion tillage and organic carbon distribution in soil profiles: A meta-analysis. Soil Science Society of America Journal 72(5):1370-1374. https://doi.org/10.2136/sssaj2007.0342.

   OpenUrlCrossRefWeb of Science
2. ↵
   1. Arbuckle, J.G.,
   2. L.W. Morton, and
   3. J. Hobbs

   . 2015. Understanding farmer perspectives on climate change adaptation and mitigation: The roles of trust in sources of climate information, climate change beliefs, and perceived risk. Environment and Behavior 47(2):205-234. https://doi.org/10.1177/0013916513503832.

   OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
3. ↵
   1. Baumgart-Getz, A.,
   2. L.S. Prokopy, and
   3. K. Floress

   . 2012. Why farmers adopt best management practice in the United States: A meta-analysis of the adoption literature. Journal of Environmental Management 96(1):17–25. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jenvman.2011.10.006.

   OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
4. ↵
   1. Bell, M.M.

   2004. Farming for us all: Practical agriculture and the cultivation of sustainability. University Park, PA: Pennsylvania State University Press.
5. ↵
   1. Dayer, A.A.,
   2. S.H. Lutter,
   3. K.A. Sesser,
   4. C.M. Hickey, and
   5. T. Gardali

   . 2018. Private landowner conservation behavior following participation in voluntary incentive programs: Recommendations to facilitate behavioral persistence. Conservation Letters 11(2):e12394. https://doi.org/10.1111/conl.12394.

   OpenUrl
6. ↵
   1. Eanes, F.R.,
   2. A.S. Singh,
   3. B.R. Bulla,
   4. P. Ranjan,
   5. M. Fales,
   6. B. Wickerham,
   7. P.J. Doran, and
   8. L.S. Prokopy

   . 2019. Crop advisers as conservation intermediaries: Perceptions and policy implications for relying on nontraditional partners to increase US farmers’ adoption of soil and water conservation practices. Land Use Policy 81:360-370. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.landusepol.2018.10.054.

   OpenUrl
7. ↵
   1. Giannini, V.,
   2. G. Raimondi,
   3. A. Toffanin,
   4. C. Maucieri, and
   5. M. Borin

   . 2023. Agronomic management strategies to increase soil organic carbon in the short-term: Evidence from on-farm experimentation in the Veneto region. Plant and Soil 1-14. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11104-023-06135-y.
8. ↵
   1. Hardie Hale, E.,
   2. C.C. Jadallah, and
   3. H.L. Ballard

   . 2022. Collaborative research as boundary work: Learning between rice growers and conservation professionals to support habitat conservation on private lands. Agriculture and Human Values 39(2):715-731. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10460-021-10283-1.

   OpenUrl
9. ↵
   1. Kladivko, E.J.,
   2. L. Holscher,
   3. J. Boyle-Warner,
   4. B. Fisher,
   5. J.D. Rorick, and
   6. S.M. Zuber

   . 2019. State-wide soil health programs for education and on-farm assessment: Lessons learned. Journal of Soil and Water Conservation 74(1):12A-17A. https://doi.org/10.2489/jswc.74.1.12A.

   OpenUrlFREE Full Text
10. ↵
    1. Knowler, D., and
    2. B. Bradshaw

    . 2007. Farmers’ adoption of conservation agriculture: A review and synthesis of recent research. Food Policy 32(1):25–48. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.foodpol.2006.01.003.

    OpenUrlCrossRefWeb of Science
11. ↵
    1. Krupek, F.S.,
    2. A. Basche,
    3. D. Redfearn, and
    4. L. Thompson

    . 2019a. Farmers Find Solutions Through Nebraska Soil Health Initiative. CropWatch article. https://cropwatch.unl.edu/2019/farmers-find-solutions-through-nebraska-soil-health-initiative.
12. ↵
    1. Krupek, F.S.,
    2. A. Basche,
    3. D. Redfearn, and
    4. L. Thompson

    . 2019b. Why Growers are Adopting Practices to Build Soil Health. CropWatch article. https://cropwatch.unl.edu/2019/farmers-on-soil-health-practices.
13. ↵
    1. Lehmann, J.,
    2. D.A. Bossio,
    3. I. Kögel-Knabner, and
    4. M.C. Rillig

    . 2020. The concept and future prospects of soil health. Nature Reviews Earth and Environment 1(10):544-553. https://doi.org/10.1038/s43017-020-0080-8.

    OpenUrl
14. ↵
    1. Nebraska Extension On-Farm Research

    . 2021. Cover crop studies. In On-Farm Research Results, 142-182. Lincoln, NE: University of Nebraska–Lincoln Institute of Agriculture and Natural Resources. https://on-farm-research.unl.edu/pdfs/research/result-publications/2021research-results.pdf.
15. ↵
    1. Oliveira, M.C.,
    2. L. Butts, and
    3. R. Werle

    . 2019. Assessment of cover crop management strategies in Nebraska, US. Agriculture 9(6):124. https://doi.org/10.3390/agriculture9060124.

    OpenUrl
16. ↵
    1. Oreszczyn, S.,
    2. A. Lane, and
    3. S. Carr

    . 2010. The role of networks of practice and webs of influencers on farmers’ engagement with and learning about agricultural innovations. Journal of Rural Studies 26(4):404-417. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jrurstud.2010.03.003.

    OpenUrlCrossRef
17. ↵
    1. Parks, M.

    2022. Exploring the influence of social and informational networks on small farmers’ responses to climate change in Oregon. Agriculture and Human Values 39(4):1407-1419. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10460-022-10331-4.

    OpenUrl
18. ↵
    1. Practical Farmers of Iowa

    . 2019. Winter Cereal Rye Cover Crop Effect of Cash Crop Yield – Year 10. Ames, IA: Practical Farmers of Iowa. https://practicalfarmers.b-cdn.net/wp-content/uploads/2019/01/18.FC_.CC.Winter_Rye_Effect_on_Yield_Year_10.pdf.
19. ↵
    1. Prokopy, L.S.,
    2. J.G. Arbuckle,
    3. A.P. Barnes,
    4. V.R. Haden,
    5. A. Hogan,
    6. M.T. Niles, and
    7. J. Tyndall

    . 2015. Farmers and climate change: A cross-national comparison of beliefs and risk perceptions in high-income countries. Environmental Management 56:492-504. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00267-015-0504-2.

    OpenUrl
20. ↵
    1. Prokopy, L.S.,
    2. K. Floress,
    3. J.G. Arbuckle,
    4. S.P. Church,
    5. F.R. Eanes,
    6. Y. Gao,
    7. P. Ranjan, and
    8. A.S. Singh

    . 2019. Adoption of agricultural conservation practices in the United States: Evidence from 35 years of quantitative literature. Journal of Soil and Water Conservation 74(5):520-534. doi.org/10.2489/jswc.74.5.520.

    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
21. ↵
    1. Ranjan, P.,
    2. L.F. Duriancik,
    3. D.N. Moriasi,
    4. D. Carlson,
    5. K. Anderson, and
    6. L.S. Prokopy

    . 2020. Understanding the use of decision support tools by conservation professionals and their education and training needs: An application of the Reasoned Action Approach. Journal of Soil and Water Conservation 75(3):387-399. https://doi.org/10.2489/jswc.75.3.387.

    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
22. ↵
    1. Roesch-McNally, G.E.,
    2. A.D. Basche,
    3. J.G. Arbuckle,
    4. J.C. Tyndall,
    5. F.E. Miguez,
    6. T. Bowman, and
    7. R. Clay

    . 2018. The trouble with cover crops: Farmers’ experiences with overcoming barriers to adoption. Renewable Agriculture and Food Systems 33(4):322-333. https://doi.org/10.1017/S1742170517000096.

    OpenUrlCrossRef
23. ↵
    1. Stewart, R.D.,
    2. J. Jian,
    3. A.J. Gyawali,
    4. W.E. Thomason,
    5. B.D. Badgley,
    6. M.S. Reiter, and
    7. M.S. Strickland

    . 2018. What we talk about when we talk about soil health. Agricultural & Environmental Letters 3(1):180033. https://doi.org/10.2134/ael2018.06.0033.

    OpenUrl
24. ↵
    1. UNL (University of Nebraska–Lincoln)

    . 2023a. NE Soil Health Initiative. Lincoln, NE: UNL Institute of Agriculture and Natural Resources, Cropwatch. https://cropwatch.unl.edu/nesoilhealth-initiative.
25. ↵
    1. UNL

    . 2023b. Nebraska Urban Soil Initiative. Lincoln, NE: UNL Department of Agronomy and Horticulture. https://agronomy.unl.edu/nebraska-urban-soil-health-initiative.
26. ↵
    1. UNL

    . 2023c. Soil Health Initiative On-Farm Research Reports. Lincoln, NE: UNL Institute of Agriculture and Natural Resources, Cropwatch. https://crop-watch.unl.edu/nesoilhealth-initiative/reports.
27. ↵
    1. USDA NASS (National Agricultural Statistics Service)

    . 2019. Farm producers. 2017 Census of Agriculture Highlights. Washington, DC: USDA NASS. https://www.nass.usda.gov/Publications/Highlights/2019/2017Census_Farm_Producers.pdf.
28. ↵
    1. Wade, J.,
    2. M.A. Beetstra,
    3. M.L. Hamilton,
    4. S.W. Culman, and
    5. A.J. Margenot

    . 2021. Soil health conceptualization differs across key stakeholder groups in the Midwest. Journal of Soil and Water Conservation 76(6):527-533. https://doi.org/10.2489/jswc.2021.02158.

    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
29. ↵
    1. Wood, B.A.,
    2. H.T. Blair,
    3. D.I. Gray,
    4. P.D. Kemp,
    5. P.R. Kenyon,
    6. S.T. Morris, and
    7. A.M. Sewell

    . 2014. Agricultural science in the wild: A social network analysis of farmer knowledge exchange. PloS ONE 9(8). https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0105203.
30. ↵
    1. Wood, S.A., and
    2. M. Bowman

    . 2021. Large-scale farmer-led experiment demonstrates positive impact of cover crops on multiple soil health indicators. Nature Food 2(2):97-103. https://doi.org/10.1038/s43016-021-00222-y.

    OpenUrl