Cropland water erosion estimates simulated by RUSLE2 and WEPP: Results from two initial studies

References

1. ↵
   1. Alewell, C.,
   2. P. Borrelli,
   3. K. Meusburger, and
   4. P. Panagos

   . 2019. Using the USLE: Chances, challenges, and limitations of soil erosion modeling. International Soil and Water Conservation Research 7:203-225. https://doi.org/10.16/j.iswcr.2019.05.004.

   OpenUrl
2. ↵
   1. Borrelli, P.,
   2. C. Alewell,
   3. P. Alvarez, et al.

   2021. Soil erosion modeling: A global review and statistical analysis. Science of the Total Environment 780:146494. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scitotenv.2021.146494.

   OpenUrl
3. ↵
   1. Cochrane, T.A.,
   2. D.C. Yoder,
   3. D.C. Flanagan, and
   4. S.M. Dabney

   . 2019. Quantifying and modeling sediment yields from interrill erosion under armouring. Soil and Tillage Research 195:104375. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.still.2019.104375.

   OpenUrl
4. ↵
   1. Dabney, S.M,
   2. D.A.N. Vieira,
   3. D.C. Yoder,
   4. E.J. Langendoen,
   5. R.R. Wells, and
   6. M.E. Ursic

   . 2015. Spatially distributed sheet, rill, and ephemeral gully erosion. Journal of Hydrologic Engineering 20(6):C4014009.

   OpenUrl
5. ↵
   1. Dabney, S.M., and
   2. D.C. Yoder

   . 2012. Improved descriptions of herbaceous perennial growth and residue creation for RUSLE2. Agronomy Journal 104(3):771-784.

   OpenUrlCrossRef
6. ↵
   1. Dabney, S.M.,
   2. D.C. Yoder, and
   3. G.G. Ferruzzi

   . 2014. Forage harvest representation in RUSLE2. Agronomy Journal 106(1):151-167.

   OpenUrl
7. ↵
   1. Eekhout, P.C., and
   2. J. de Vente

   . 2022. Global impact of climate change on soil erosion and potential for adaptation through soil conservation. Earth-Science Reviews 226:103921. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.earscirev.2022.103921.

   OpenUrl
8. ↵
   1. Ellison, W.D.

   1948. Soil erosion. Soil Science Society of America Journal 12(C):479-484. https://doi.org/10.2136/sssaj1948.036159950012000C0107x.

   OpenUrlGeoRef
9. ↵
   1. R.S. Harmon and
   2. W.W. Doe

   1. Flanagan, D.C.,
   2. J.C. Ascough,
   3. M.A. Nearing, and
   4. J.M. Laflen

   . 2001. Chapter 7. The Water Erosion Prediction Project (WEPP) model. In Landscape Erosion and Evolution Modelling, ed. R.S. Harmon and W.W. Doe, 145e199. New York: Kluwer Academics/Plenum.
10. ↵
    1. Flanagan, D.C.,
    2. J.E. Gilley, and
    3. T.G. Franti

    . 2007. Water Erosion Prediction Project (WEPP): Development history, model capabilities, and future enhancements. Transactions of the ASABE 50(5):1603-1612.

    OpenUrlCrossRefWeb of Science
11. ↵
    1. Flanagan, D.C.,
    2. R.P. McGehee, and
    3. A. Srivastava

    . 2020. Evaluation of different precipitation inputs to WEPP. Paper No. 2000740. St. Joseph, MI: American Society of Agricultural and Biological Engineers. https://doi.org/10.13031/aim.202000740.
12. ↵
    1. Flanagan, D.C., and
    2. M.A. Nearing

    (eds.). 1995. USDA-Water Erosion Prediction Project (WEPP) Hillslope Profile and Watershed Model Documentation. NSERL Report No. 10. West Lafayette, IN: National Soil Erosion Research Laboratory, USDA Agricultural Research Service.
13. ↵
    1. Foster, G.R.

    2008. Science Documentation: Revised Universal Soil Loss Equation, Version 2 (RUSLE2). Report submitted to the USDA Agricultural Research Service (available from the USDA National Sedimentation Laboratory, Oxford, MS). Washington, DC: USDA ARS.
14. ↵
    1. García-Ruiz, J.M.,
    2. S. Begueróa,
    3. E. Nadal-Romero,
    4. J.C. González-Hidalgo,
    5. N. Luna-Renault, and
    6. Y. Sanjuán

    . 2015. A meta-analysis of soil erosion rates across the world. Geomorphology 239:160-173. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.geomorph.2015.03.008.

    OpenUrlCrossRef
15. ↵
    1. Gupta, H.V.,
    2. S. Sorooshian, and
    3. P.O. Yapo

    . 1999. Status of automatic calibration for hydrologic models: Comparison with multilevel expert calibration. Journal of Hydrologic Engineering 4(2):135-143.

    OpenUrlCrossRef
16. ↵
    1. Hellerstein, D.,
    2. D. Vilorio, and
    3. M. Ribaudo

    (eds). 2019. Agricultural resources and environmental indicators, 2019. EIB-208. Economic Information Bulletin Number 208, May 2019. Washington, DC: USDA Economic Research Service.
17. ↵
    1. Hollinger, S.E.,
    2. J.R. Angel, and
    3. M.A. Palecki

    . 2002. Spatial distribution, variation, and trends in storm precipitation characteristics associated with soil erosion in the United States. Contract report CR 2002-08. Champaign, IL: Illinois Department of Natural Resources. http://www.isws.illinois.edu/pubdoc/CR/ISWSCR2002-08.pdf.
18. ↵
    1. Kinnell, P.I.A.

    2017. A comparison of the abilities of USLE-M, RUSLE2, and WEPP to model event erosion from bare fallow areas. Science of the Total Environment 596-597:32-42. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scitotenv.2017.04.046.

    OpenUrl
19. ↵
    1. McGehee, R.P., and
    2. P. Srivastava

    . 2018. Benchmarking reliable erosion indices from quarter-hour station data for climate studies in the southeastern United States. Journal of Soil and Water Conservation 73(4):363-376. https://doi.org/10.2489/jswc.73.4.363.

    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
20. 1. McGehee, R.P.,
    2. D.C. Flanagan, and
    3. P. Srivastava

    . 2020. WEPPCLIFF: A command-line tool to process climate inputs for soil loss models. Journal of Open Source Software 5(49):2029. https://doi.org/10.21105/joss.02029.

    OpenUrl
21. ↵
    1. McGehee, R.P.,
    2. D.C. Flanagan,
    3. P. Srivastava,
    4. B.A. Engel,
    5. C. Huang, and
    6. M.A. Nearing

    . 2022. An updated isoerodent map of the conterminous United States. International Soil and Water Conservation Research 10(1):1-16. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.iswcr.2021.06.004.

    OpenUrl
22. ↵
    1. McGehee, R.P.,
    2. D.C. Flanagan,
    3. P. Srivastava, and
    4. M.A. Nearing

    . 2021. Chapter 16. Rainfall erosivity: Essential historical, conceptual, and practical perspectives for continued application. In Precipitation, 373-394. Amsterdam: Elsevier. https://doi.org/10.1016/B978-0-12-822699-5.00014-8.
23. ↵
    1. Moriasi, D.N.,
    2. J.G. Arnold,
    3. M.W. Van Liew,
    4. R.L. Bingner,
    5. R.D. Harmen, and
    6. T.L. Veith

    . 2007. Model evaluation guidelines for systematic quantification of accuracy in watershed simulations. Transactions of the ASABE 50(3):885-900.

    OpenUrlCrossRefWeb of Science
24. ↵
    1. Moriasi, D.N.,
    2. M.W. Gitau,
    3. N. Pai, and
    4. P. Daggupati

    . 2015. Hydrologic and water quality models: Performance measures and evaluation criteria. Transactions of the ASABE 58(6):1763-1785. https://doi.org/10.13031/trans.58.10715.

    OpenUrl
25. ↵
    1. Nash, J.E., and
    2. J.V. Sutcliffe

    . 1970. River flow forecasting through conceptual model. Part 1—A discussion of principles. Journal of Hydrology 10:282-290.

    OpenUrlCrossRefGeoRef
26. ↵
    1. D.C. Flanagan and
    2. M.A. Nearing

    1. Nicks, A.D.,
    2. L.J. Lane, and
    3. G.A. Gander

    . 1995. Chapter 2. Weather generator. In USDA Water Erosion Prediction Project: Hillslope Profile and Watershed Model Documentation, NSERL Report No. 10, ed. D.C. Flanagan and M.A. Nearing. West Lafayette, IN: USDA ARS National Soil Erosion Research Laboratory.
27. ↵
    1. Renard, K.G.,
    2. G.R. Foster,
    3. G.A. Weesies,
    4. D.K. McCool, and
    5. D.C. Yoder

    . 1997. Predicting Soil Erosion by Water: A Guide to Conservation Planning with the Revised Universal Soil Loss Equation (RUSLE). USDA, Agriculture Handbook No. 703. Washington, DC: USDA ARS.
28. ↵
    1. Sartori, M.,
    2. E. Ferrari,
    3. R. M’Barek,
    4. G. Philippidid,
    5. K. Boysen-Urban,
    6. P. Borrelli,
    7. L. Montanarella, and
    8. P. Panagos

    . 2024. Remaining loyal to our soil: A prospective integrated assessment of soil erosion on global food security. Ecological Economics 219:108103. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecolecon.2023.108103.

    OpenUrl
29. ↵
    1. Srivastava, A.,
    2. D.C. Flanagan,
    3. J.R. Frankenberger, and
    4. B.A. Engel

    . 2019. Updated climate database and impacts on WEPP model predictions. Journal of Soil and Water Conservation 74(4):334-349. https://doi.org/10.2489/jswc.74.4.334.

    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
30. ↵
    1. Stolpe, M.B.

    2005. A comparison of the RUSLE, EPIC, and WEPP erosion models as calibrated to climate and soil of south-central Chile. Acta Agriculturae Scandinavica, Section B – Soil & Plant Science 55(1):2-8. https://doi.org/10.1080/09064710510008568.

    OpenUrl
31. ↵
    1. US Congress

    . 1972. Federal Water Pollution Control Act Amendments of 1972. Public Law 92-500. https://www.govinfo.gov/content/pkg/STATUTE-86/pdf/STATUTE-86-Pg816.pdf.
32. ↵
    1. USDA ARS (Agricultural Research Service)

    . 2013. Science Documentation, Revised Universal Soil Loss Equation, Version 2 (RUSLE2). Washington, DC: USDA ARS.
33. ↵
    1. USDA NRCS (Natural Resources Conservation Service)

    . 2023. Conservation Planning. Washington, DC: USDA NRCS. https://www.nrcs.usda.gov/getting-assistance/conservation-technical-assistance/conservation-planning.
34. ↵
    1. Wade, C.R.,
    2. M.C. Bolding,
    3. W.M. Aust,
    4. W.A. Lakel III., and
    5. E.B. Schilling

    . 2012. Comparing sediment trap data with the USLE-Forest, RUSLE2, and WEPP-Road erosion models for evaluation of bladed skid trail BMPs. Transactions of the ASABE 55(2):403-414. https://doi.org/10.13031/2013.41381.

    OpenUrl
35. ↵
    1. Wang, S.,
    2. R.P. McGehee,
    3. T. Guo,
    4. D.C. Flanagan, and
    5. B.A. Engel

    . 2023. Calibration, validation, and evaluation of the Water Erosion Prediction Project (WEPP) model for hillslopes with natural runoff plot data. International Soil and Water Conservation Research 11(4):669-687. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.iswcr.2022.10.004.

    OpenUrl
36. ↵
    1. Wischmeier, W.H.

    1959. A rainfall erosion index for a universal soil-loss equation. Soil Science Society of America Journal 23(3):246-249.

    OpenUrlCrossRef
37. ↵
    1. Wischmeier, W.H., and
    2. D.D. Smith

    . 1958. Rainfall energy and its relationship to soil loss. Transactions of the American Geophysical Union 39:285-291.

    OpenUrl
38. ↵
    1. Wischmeier, W.H., and
    2. D.D. Smith

    . 1965. Predicting rainfall erosion losses from cropland east of the Rocky Mountains. USDA Agriculture Handbook no. 282. Washington, DC: USDA ARS.
39. ↵
    1. Wischmeier, W.H., and
    2. D.D. Smith

    . 1978. Predicting Rainfall Erosion Losses—A Guide to Conservation Planning. Agriculture Handbook No. 537. Washington, DC: USDA ARS.