Tax credits and conservation outcomes
Excerpt
The use of tax policy to encourage conservation of agricultural and environmental resources is not a new idea but gained increased attention in the recently concluded farm bill debate. A new tax deduction is established for taxpayers who take voluntary measures to aid in the recovery of species that are either listed as threatened or endangered under the Endangered Species Act (ESA) or deemed by the Secretary of Interior or Commerce to be in need of protection under the ESA (“qualified species”). The farm bill also exempts retired and disabled individuals from self-employment taxes (the employer and employee shares of Social Security and Medicare taxes) on Conservation Reserve Program (CRP) payments. In addition, it extended for two years the special rule encouraging contributions of conservation easements. The Congressional Joint Tax Committee estimates that these three provisions, collectively, will reduce tax revenues by $1.366 billion over 2008 to 2017.
Conservation tax credits were also part of the 2007/2008 farm bill debate but are not part of the final legislation. If they had survived the final farm bill negotiations, the tax credits would have had a far larger effect on federal revenues and conservation policy. The farm bill initially proposed by the…
Footnotes
Cynthia Nickerson, Roger Claassen, Ron Durst, LeRoy Hansen, and Daniel Hellerstein are economists at the USDA Economic Research Service.
- © 2009 by the Soil and Water Conservation Society
This article requires a subscription to view the full text. If you have a subscription you may use the login form below to view the article. Access to this article can also be purchased.