PT - JOURNAL ARTICLE AU - A. Malapati AU - K.F. Bronson AU - J.D. Booker AU - W.H. Hudnall AU - A.M. Schubert TI - Soil profile sulfate in irrigated southern high plains cotton fields and Ogallala groundwater AID - 10.2489/jswc.66.5.287 DP - 2011 Sep 01 TA - Journal of Soil and Water Conservation PG - 287--294 VI - 66 IP - 5 4099 - http://www.jswconline.org/content/66/5/287.short 4100 - http://www.jswconline.org/content/66/5/287.full AB - Sulfate (SO4) is one of the most important anions in soils and groundwater in semiarid regions, including west Texas. Crops' sulfur (S) requirement is about 10% to 20% of the nitrogen requirements. However, there is far less information on soil test SO4-S (S in the SO4 form [sulfate-S]) for the western United States, compared to the humid eastern United States. The deposition of S from the atmosphere has declined nationwide, as coal-fired power plants have been scrubbing their emissions of S. This, combined with greater cotton yields and the lack of S fertilization on the Texas Southern High Plains (SHP) point to the need for a soil profile SO4-S assessment. The first objective of this study was to assess residual soil profile SO4-S content in irrigated cotton (Gossypium hirsutum) fields across a range of soil types and counties of the Texas SHP. The second objective was to compile regional SO4-S concentration data from the Texas Water Development Board irrigation well water quality database and analyze Ogallala groundwater SO4-S levels by county, soil map unit, and well depth. Soil profile (0 to 0.9 m [0 to 36 in]) SO4-S content ranged from 120 to 475 kg ha−1 (107 to 424 lb ac−1) among seven center-pivot fields sampled. About half of this S was in the 0.6 to 0.9 m (24 to 36 in) soil layer, which typically was sandy clay loam or clay loam in texture. Well water SO4-S concentration ranged from 9 to 220 mg L−1 (ppm) in clayey soils with deep groundwater to sandy soils with shallow groundwater, respectively. Groundwater SO4-S concentration was greater than the USEPA drinking water standard of 83 mg L−1 in 32% of the wells, especially in the southeastern corner of the study area. There was no consistent relationship between soil map unit and SO4-S content in the soil profile (0 to 0.9 m). A significant negative relationship between well depth and well water SO4-S concentration was observed in all the eleven-county study area of the SHP of West Texas. In conclusion, soil profile SO4 content to 0.9 m is high in SHP irrigated cotton fields and in most cases should be adequate for crop S nutritional requirements.