RT Journal Article
SR Electronic
T1 Long-term measurements and model simulations of phosphorus leaching from a manured sandy soil
JF Journal of Soil and Water Conservation
FD Soil and Water Conservation Society
SP 101
OP 110
DO 10.2489/jswc.67.2.101
VO 67
IS 2
A1 J. Liu
A1 H. Aronsson
A1 K. Blombäck
A1 K. Persson
A1 L. Bergström
YR 2012
UL http://www.jswconline.org/content/67/2/101.abstract
AB Cropping systems with high phosphorus (P) inputs may constitute a risk of P leaching, which contributes to eutrophication. The main objective of this study was to identify P leaching risks associated with three long-term fertilization regimes in separately tile-drained plots on a sandy soil in southwest Sweden. The three regimes resulted in different annual P surpluses of, on average, 16 kg P ha−1 (14 lb P ac−1) in mineral form and 18 kg P ha−1 (16 lb P ac−1) and 37 kg P ha−1 (33 lb P ac−1) as pig slurry. The importance of different soil characteristics (soil P, iron, aluminum, and calcium content, and degree of P saturation [DPS]) and processes (water flow and P sorption/desorption) was examined using 15 years (1989 to 2003) of P leaching measurements and simulations with the ICECREAM model. Measurements of high soil P content and DPS values in the topsoil, in combination with high precipitation and rapid water flow, indicated a high potential for P losses, which was confirmed by the model simulations. However, the model considerably overestimated total P leaching by a factor of 5 to 9 since measured P leaching was small for all treatments. Measured mean annual total P leaching and total P concentration ranged respectively from 0.14 kg ha−1 (0.12 lb ac−1) and 0.06 mg L−1 (3.75 × 10−6 lb ft−3) at a high rate of slurry application to 0.20 kg ha−1 (0.18 lb ac−1) and 0.08 mg L−1 (4.99 × 10−6 lb ft−3) in the mineral P treatment. The differences in concentration were statistically significant (p < 0.001). A main conclusion from this 15-year study was that annual pig slurry application rates of 37 to 58 kg P ha−1 (33 to 52 lb P ac−1) did not increase P leaching. High sorption capacity of the subsoil, caused by Fe, Al, and Ca, was obviously very important for controlling P losses. Thus, information on soil P content and fertilization must be supplemented with estimates of soil P sorption capacity when evaluating the risk of P leaching for different soils. This must also be considered in models used for assessment of P leaching from arable land. The current ICECREAM model does not include appropriate functions for describing P sorption/desorption processes in this type of soil and needs further development.