PT - JOURNAL ARTICLE AU - A. Fullhart AU - M. Nearing AU - M. Weltz TI - Temporally downscaling precipitation intensity factors for Köppen climate regions in the United States AID - 10.2489/jswc.2021.00156 DP - 2021 Jan 01 TA - Journal of Soil and Water Conservation PG - 39--51 VI - 76 IP - 1 4099 - http://www.jswconline.org/content/76/1/39.short 4100 - http://www.jswconline.org/content/76/1/39.full AB - Model inputs for prediction of runoff and soil erosion commonly require precipitation intensity information. Intensity is often estimated if precipitation data with high temporal resolution are unavailable. However, when intensity is time-averaged for fixed measurement intervals, estimates become increasingly underestimated with longer intervals due to the assumption that event durations begin and end at specified measurement intervals. In this study, adjustment factors were determined for downscaling the temporal resolution of intensity values derived from selected resolutions within the range of 10 to 1,440 min for Köppen-Geiger climate regions in the United States. In this case, monthly mean maximum 30 min intensity (MX.5P) was downscaled, which is a parameter used to generate stochastic meteorological inputs for models that include the Rangeland Hydrology and Erosion Model (RHEM) and the Water Erosion Prediction Project model (WEPP). The adjustment factors were given by regressions of reference MX.5P values derived from data with 5 min resolution against MX.5P values derived from data with lower temporal resolutions (≥10 min). In addition to using a slope coefficient for intensity in the regression equation, permutations of the equation included use of an elevation coefficient and constants, resulting in four total permutations. For the 143 stations and 17 climate regions analyzed, the four regression equations had roughly equal performance, and all gave statistically significant results. Regressions for adjusting hourly data using only an intensity coefficient in the equation had standard error of the estimate ranging from 1.01 to 2.96 mm h–1 with an average of 2.04 mm h–1. When downscaling daily values, the error range was 2.50 to 10.20 mm h–1 with an average of 5.63 mm h–1. Average time-to-peak intensity probability distributions for each climate region were also determined. Finally, a stochastic weather generator, CLIGEN, was used to test the effectiveness of applying the climate-based factors as an alternative to using subhourly data.