TY - JOUR T1 - New uses of old tools to conserve soil JF - Journal of Soil and Water Conservation SP - 60 LP - 61 VL - 36 IS - 2 AU - Steve J. Nacht Y1 - 1981/03/01 UR - http://www.jswconline.org/content/36/2/60.abstract N2 - HUGH Hammond Bennett first enunciated the noble goal of controlling soil erosion and sedimentation more than 50 years ago, but excessive soil erosion persists on valuable agricultural and urban land. Technical procedures for reducing erosion to manageable levels are well known. Many of these procedures have been available for years. In addition, the federal government has an extensive system to transfer technology and cost-share expensive structural conservation measures. Despite these programs, erosion is not being adequately controlled and may in fact be worse today than in the 1930s when that system for delivering soil conservation assistance was created. Why is this so, and what can be done to reduce losses from erosion and sedimentation? The problem appears to involve two important factors. First, current programs are voluntary; neither incentives nor penalties seem adequate to stimulate the proper actions. Second, faith in public education as a means of improving effectiveness in soil conservation is unjustified. Under current programs, a farmer is likely to rank soil conservation someplace in priority after high mortgage payments; higher tax bills caused by encroaching urban development, which raises the assessment; and rapidly rising production costs. The problem of erosion on urban construction sites is similar … ER -