Skip to main content
Log in

Accuracy and precision in sediment chronology

  • Published:
Hydrobiologia Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Several complications are encountered in radiocarbon dating of limnological samples. The contamination problem is obvious. Since lake sediments are usually composed of both allochthonous and autochthonous material the origin must be considered. The organic content may give some guidance. Graphite in the catchment area and a low organic content indicate a potential risk of major errors in the dates. Organic material from the surroundings may be displaced into a lake by creeks, snowslides and wind. Such material may be older than, or contemporaneous with the sediment deposited at the same time. Water-level changes and wave action may cause erosion and thus admixture of old material. Such contamination can sometimes be traced via different fractions extracted mechanically or chemically. The accelerator technique has made it possible to date small samples and thus macrofossils can be selected as the material to be used for dating far more frequently than is possible with the conventional technique for activity measurement.

Another problem is the reservoir effect — thus the lower 14C activity of the dissolved bicarbonate and carbon dioxide than of the atmosphere. There may be several reasons besides dissolved carbonates in hard-water lakes. Some plants even use carbon dioxide in the sediment. It is thus to be expected that submerged plants will be dated too old. Selection of plant remains for dating is thus no guarantee of an accurate date. The material to be preferred is terrestrial, such as tree leaves or remains of emergent plants.

Bioturbation must not be forgotten since this means that old material may be found too high in a sediment, and young material can be brought downwards in the sediment. A single date may be very misleading. Under rather stable conditions the sediment accumulation rate can be roughly estimated and acceptable dates obtained despite the complications.

It may be worth sieving gyttja samples to remove roots and rootlets. Roots in peat should also be removed. Diagrams are available of the errors due to certain degrees of contamination by younger or older material.

The 13C content must be measured to allow a normalisation. The present knowledge of the secular variations of the 14C activity allows calibration of dates made on wood etc. The same curves cannot be used for submerged material because of the lower 14C activity. Sudden changes of the atmospheric 14C activity are smoothed. Certain age ranges give better resolution than others. Recent curves indicate that strange results are to be expected for Holecene samples with a real age of 7000 years or older. Finally bacterial influence during storage may influence the isotopic composition.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Bartlett, H. H., 1951. Radiocarbon datability of peat, marl, caliche, and archaeological materials. Science 114: 55–56.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bucha, V., 1970. Influence of the Earth's magnetic field on radiocarbon dating. In: Radiocarbon Variations and Absolute Chronology. Twelfth Nobel Symposium I. U. Olsson (ed.): 501–510.

  • Cato, I., 1985. The definitive connection of the Swedish geochronological time scale with the present, and the new date of the zero year in Döviken, northern Sweden. Boreas 14: 117–122.

    Google Scholar 

  • Craig, H., 1954. Carbon 13 in plants and the relationships between carbon 13 and carbon 14 variations in nature. J. Geol. 62: 115–149.

    Google Scholar 

  • Craig, H., 1957. Isotopical standards for carbon and oxygen and correction factors for mass-spectrometric analysis of carbon dioxide. Geochim. Cosmochim. Acta 3: 53–92.

    Google Scholar 

  • Deevey, E. S., M. S. Gross, G. E. Huthinson & H. L. Kraybill, 1954. The natural 14C content of materials from hardwater lakes. Proc. Nat. Acad. Sci. U.S. 40: 285–288.

    Google Scholar 

  • Grant-Taylor, T. L., 1973. The extraction and use of plant lipids as a material for radiocarbon dating. In: Proc. 8th Int. Conf. Radiocarbon Dating. Lower Hutt. 18–25 Oct. 1972, Royal Soc. of New Zealand, Wellington: 439–448.

    Google Scholar 

  • Håkansson, S., 1983. A reservoir age for the coastal waters of Iceland. Geol. Fören. Stockh. Förh. 105: 64–67.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hörnsten, Å. & I. U. Olsson, 1964. En 14C-datering av glaciallera från Lugnvik, Ångermanland. Geol. Fören. Stockh. Förh. 86: 206–210.

    Google Scholar 

  • Libby, W. F., 1955. Radiocarbon Dating. Univ. Chicago Press.

  • Münnich, K. O., 1957. Heidelberg Natural radiocarbon measurements. Science 126: 194–199.

    Google Scholar 

  • Oana, S. & E. S. Deevey, 1960. Carbon 13 in lake waters and its possible bearing on paleolimnology. Am. J. Sci. 258 A: 253–272.

    Google Scholar 

  • Olsson, I. U. (ed.), 1970. Radiocarbon Variations and Absolute Chronology. Twelfth Nobel Symposium, Uppsala, 11–15 Aug. 1969.

  • Olsson, I. U., 1979a. A warning against radiocarbon dating of samples containing little carbon. Boreas 8: 203–207.

    Google Scholar 

  • Olsson, I. U., 1979b. The importance of the pretreatment of wood and charcoal samples. In: Proc. 9th Int. Conf. Los Angeles and La Jolla, 1976: Radiocarbon Dating Berger, R. & H. E. Suess (eds.): 613–618.

  • Olsson, I. U., 1980a. Content of 14C in marine mammals from northern Europe. Radiocarbon 22: 662–675.

    Google Scholar 

  • Olsson, I. U., 1980b. 14C in extractives from wood. Radiocarbon 22: 515–524.

    Google Scholar 

  • Olsson, I. U., 1983. Dating non-terrestrial materials. In 14C and archaeology. Symp. Groningen, The Netherlands Hackens, T., Mook, W. G. & Waterbolk H. T. (eds.) PACT 8: 277–293.

  • Olsson, I. U., 1985. Radiometric dating. In: Handbook of Holocene Palaeoecology and Palaeohydrology B. Berglund (ed.): 273–312. John Wiley & Sons.

  • Olsson, I. U., 1986. A study of errors in 14C dates of peat and sediment. Radiocarbon 28: 429–435.

    Google Scholar 

  • Olsson, I. U. & W. Blake, Jr., 1961–62. Problems of radiocarbon dating of raised beaches, based on experience in Spitsbergen. Norsk Geog. Tidsskr. 18: 47–64.

    Google Scholar 

  • Olsson, I. U., F. El-Daoushy & Y. Vasari, 1983. Säynäjälampi and the difficulties inherent in the dating of sediments in a hard-water lake. Hydrobiologia 103: 5–14.

    Google Scholar 

  • Olsson, I. U., Y. Göksu & A. Stenberg, 1968. Further investigations of storing and treatment of Foraminifera and molluscs for 14C dating. Geol. Fören. Stockh. Förh. 90: 417–426.

    Google Scholar 

  • Stuiver, M., 1978. Radiocarbon timescale tested against magnetic and other dating methods. Nature 274: 271–273.

    Google Scholar 

  • Stuiver, M., G. W. Pearson & Y. Braziunas, 1986. Radiocarbon age calibration of marine samples back to 9000 cal yr BP. Radiocarbon 28, No. 2B: 980–1021.

    Google Scholar 

  • Suess, H. E., 1953. Natural radiocarbon and the rate of exchange of carbon dioxide between the atmosphere and the sea. Proc. Conf. on Nuclear Processes in Geologic Settings, Williams Bay 1953: 52–56.

  • Suess, H. E., 1955. Radiocarbon concentration in modern wood. Science 122: 415–417.

    Google Scholar 

  • de Vries, Hl., 1958. Variation in concentration of radiocarbon with time and location on earth. Koninkl. Nederl. Akademie van Wetenschappen, Amsterdam, Proc. Ser B. 61: 94–102.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Olsson, I.U. Accuracy and precision in sediment chronology. Hydrobiologia 214, 25–34 (1991). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00050928

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00050928

Keywords

Navigation