Abstract
Agroforestry buffers in riparian zones can improve stream water quality, provided they intercept and remove contaminants from surface runoff and/or shallow groundwater. Soils, topography, surficial geology, and hydrology determine the capability of forest buffers to intercept and treat these flows. This paper describes two landscape analysis techniques for identifying and mapping locations where agroforestry buffers can effectively improve water quality. One technique employs soil survey information to rank soil map units for how effectively a buffer, when sited on them, would trap sediment from adjacent cropped fields. Results allow soil map units to be compared for relative effectiveness of buffers for improving water quality and, thereby, to prioritize locations for buffer establishment. A second technique uses topographic and streamflow information to help identify locations where buffers are most likely to intercept water moving towards streams. For example, the topographic wetness index, an indicator of potential soil saturation on given terrain, identifies where buffers can readily intercept surface runoff and/or shallow groundwater flows. Maps based on this index can be useful for site-specific buffer placement at farm and small-watershed scales. A case study utilizing this technique shows that riparian forests likely have the greatest potential to improve water quality along first-order streams, rather than larger streams. The two methods are complementary and could be combined, pending the outcome of future research. Both approaches also use data that are publicly available in the US. The information can guide projects and programs at scales ranging from farm-scale planning to regional policy implementation.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Abu-Zreig M, Rudra RP, Whiteley HR (2001) Validation of a vegetated filter strip model (VFSMOD). Hydrolog Process 15:729–742
Bren LJ (1998) The geometry of a constant-loading design method for humid watersheds. For Ecol Manage 110:113–125
Burkart MR, James DE, Tomer MD (2004) Hydrologic and terrain variables to aid strategic location of riparian buffers. J Soil Water Conserv 59(5):216–223
Dosskey MG (2001) Toward quantifying water pollution abatement in response to installing buffers on crop land. Environ Manage 28:577–598
Dosskey MG, Helmers MJ, Eisenhauer DE (2006) An approach for using soil surveys to guide the placement of water quality buffers. J Soil Water Conserv 61:344–354
Fennessy MS, Cronk JK (1997) The effectiveness and restoration potential of riparian ecotones for the management of nonpoint source pollution, particularly nitrate. Crit Rev Environ Sci Technol 27:285–317
Harper DM, Ebrahimnezhad M, Taylor E, Dickinson S, Decamp O, Verniers G, Balbi T (1999) A catchment-scale approach to the physical restoration of lowland UK rivers. Aquatic Conserv: Mar Freshw Ecosyst 9:141–157
Haycock NE, Pinay G (1993) Groundwater nitrate dynamics in grass and poplar vegetated riparian buffer strips during the winter. J Environ Qual 22:273–278
Helmers MJ, Eisenhauer DE, Dosskey MG, Franti TG (2002) Modeling vegetative filter performance. Paper no. MC 02-308. Am Soc Agric Eng, St. Joseph, MI
Hubbard RK, Lowrance R (1997) Assessment of forest management effects on nitrate removal by riparian buffer systems. Trans Am Soc Agric Eng 40:383–391
Johansson RC, Randall J (2003) Watershed abatement costs for agricultural phosphorus. Water Resour Res 39(4):np
Komor SC, Magner JA (1996) Nitrate in groundwater and water sources used by riparian trees in an agricultural watershed: a chemical and isotopic investigation in southern Minnesota. Water Resour Res 32:1039–1050
Lee K, Isenhart TM, Schultz RC, Mickelson SK (2000) Multispecies riparian buffers trap sediment and nutrients during rainfall simulations. J Environ Qual 29:1200–1205
Liquori MK (2006) Post-harvest riparian buffer response: implications for wood recruitment modeling and buffer design. J Am Water Resour Assoc 42:177–189
Lyons J, Trimble SW, Paine LK (2000) Grass versus trees: managing riparian areas to benefit streams of central North America. J Am Water Resour Assoc 36:919–930
Maas RP, Smolen MD, Dressing SA (1985) Selecting critical areas for nonpoint source pollution control. J Soil Water Conserv 40:68–71
Mausbach MJ, Dedrick AR (2004) The length we go: measuring environmental benefits of conservation practices. J Soil Water Conserv 59(5):96A–103A
Moore ID, Grayson RB, Larson AR (1991) Digital terrain modeling: a review of hydrological, geomorphological, and biological applications. Hydrol Process 5:3–30
Muñoz-Carpena R, Parsons JE (2000) VFSMOD User’s Manual., vol 1.04. North Carolina State University, Raleigh, NC
Munoz Carpena R, Parsons JE, Gilliam JW (1999) Modeling hydrology and sediment transport in vegetative filter strips. J Hydrol 214:111–129
O’Loughlin EM (1981) Saturation regions in catchments and their relations to soil and topographic properties. J Hydrol 53:229–246
Renard KG, Foster GR, Weesies GA, McCool DK, Yoder DC (1997) Predicting soil erosion by water: a guide to conservation planning with the revised universal soil loss equation (RUSLE). Agriculture Handbook No 703. US Department of Agriculture, Washington, DC
Strahler AN (1969) Physical geography, 3rd edn. Wiley, New York
Tarboton DG (1997) A new method for the determination of flow directions and upslope areas in grid digital elevation models. Water Resour Res 33:309–319
Tomer MD, James DE (2004) Do soil surveys and terrain analyses identify similar priority sites for conservation? Soil Sci Soc Am J 68:1905–1915
Tomer MD, James DE, Isenhart TM (2003) Optimizing the placement of riparian practices in a watershed using terrain analysis. J Soil Water Conserv 58(4):198–206
USDA Natural Resources Conservation Service (1994) State soil geographic (STATSGO) data base: Data use information. Misc Pub No 1492. US Department of Agriculture, Washington DC
US Geological Survey (2004) National Elevation Data Set http://seamless.usgs.gov/ cited 30 April 2008
Wagner FH, Bretschko G (2003) Riparian trees and flow paths between hyporheic zone and groundwater in Oberer Seebach, Austria. Intl Rev Hydrobiol 88:129–138
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Tomer, M.D., Dosskey, M.G., Burkart, M.R. et al. Methods to prioritize placement of riparian buffers for improved water quality. Agroforest Syst 75, 17–25 (2009). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10457-008-9134-5
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10457-008-9134-5