Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

The multi-dimensional nature of environmental attitudes among farmers in Indiana: implications for conservation adoption

  • Published:
Agriculture and Human Values Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Attempts to understand farmer conservation behavior based on quantitative socio-demographic, attitude, and awareness variables have been largely inconclusive. In order to understand fully how farmers are making conservation decisions, 32 in-depth interviews were conducted in the Eagle Creek watershed in central Indiana. Coding for environmental attitudes and practice adoption revealed several dominant themes, representing multi-dimensional aspects of environmental attitudes. Farmers who were motivated by off-farm environmental benefits and those who identified responsibilities to others (stewardship) were most likely to adopt conservation practices. Those farmers who focused on the farm as business and were most concerned about profitability were less likely to adopt practices. The notion of environmental stewardship in particular was found to be much more complex than the way it is traditionally measured in quantitative studies. The interplay between on-farm and off-farm benefits to practice adoption is an issue that quantitative studies largely do not address. This study seeks to increase understanding of farmers’ environmental attitudes and the connections to conservation behavior.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Fig. 1

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Ahnström, J., J. Höckert, H.L. Bergeå, C.A. Francis, P. Skelton, and L. Hallgren. 2008. Farmers and nature conservation: What is known about attitudes, context factors, and actions affecting conservation? Renewable Agriculture and Food Systems 24(1): 38–47.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ajzen, I. 1985. From intentions to actions: A theory of planned behavior. In Action control: From cognition to behavior, eds. J. Kuhl, and J. Beckmann, 11–39. Berlin: Springer.

    Google Scholar 

  • Baumgart-Getz, A. 2010. Why do farmers maintain best management practices? PhD dissertation, Purdue University, Indiana, USA.

  • Beedell, J.D.C., and T. Rehman. 1999. Explaining farmers’ conservation behavior: Why do farmers behave the way they do? Journal of Environmental Management 57: 165–176.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bohnet, I., C. Potter, and E. Simmons. 2003. Landscape change in the multi-functional countryside: A biographical analysis of farmer decision-making in the English High Weald. Landscape Research 28(4): 349–364.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Burton, R.J.F. 2004. Reconceptualising the “behavioral approach” in agricultural studies: A socio-psychological perspective. Journal of Rural Studies 20: 359–371.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Burton, R.J.F., and G.A. Wilson. 2006. Injecting social psychology theory into conceptualizations of agricultural agency: Towards a post-productivist farmer self-identity? Journal of Rural Studies 22(1): 95–115.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cohen, J. 1960. A coefficient of agreement for nominal scales. Educational and Psychological Measurement 20: 37–46.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Davies, B.B., and I.D. Hodge. 2006. Farmers’ preferences for new environmental policy instruments: Determining the acceptability of cross compliance for biodiversity benefits. Journal of Agricultural Economics 57(3): 393–414.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Duram, L. 1999. Factors in organic farmers’ decision making: Diversity, challenge, and obstacles. American Journal of Alternative Agriculture 14: 2–10.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • ECWMP (Eagle Creek Watershed Management Plan). 2005. http://www.cees.iupui.edu/research/Water_Resources/Eagle_Creek_Watershed_Alliance/Reports/ecw_management_plan.htm. Accessed 29 April 2008.

  • Fairweather, J.R., and H.R. Campbell. 2003. Environmental beliefs and farm practices of New Zealand farmers: Contrasting pathways to sustainability. Agriculture and Human Values 20: 287–300.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Fulkerson, G. 2006. Reality and representations: How Americans think about agriculture. PhD dissertation, North Carolina State University.

  • Greiner, R., and D. Gregg. 2011. Farmers’ intrinsic motivations, barriers to the adoption of conservation practices and effectiveness of policy instruments: Empirical evidence from northern Australia. Land Use Policy 28(1): 257–265.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hruschka, D.J., D. Schwartz, D.C. St John, E. Picone-Decaro, R.A. Jenkins, and J.W. Carey. 2004. Reliability in coding open-ended data: Lessons learned from HIV behavioral research. Field Methods 16(3): 307–331.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kaiser, F.G., S. Wölfing, and U. Fuhrer. 1999. Environmental attitude and ecological behavior. Journal of Environmental Psychology 19: 1–19.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Knowler, D., and B. Bradshaw. 2007. Farmers’ adoption of conservation agriculture: A review and synthesis of recent research. Food Policy 32: 25–48.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Landis, J.R., and G.G. Koch. 1977. The measurement of observer agreement for categorical data. Biometrics 33: 159–174.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lockeretz, W. 1990. What have we learned about who conserves soil? Journal of Soil and Water Conservation 45: 517–523.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lynne, G.D., J.S. Shonkwiler, and R.R. Leandor. 1988. Attitudes and farmer conservation behavior. American Journal of Agricultural Economics 70(1): 12–19.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Maybery, D., L. Crase, and C. Gullifer. 2005. Categorizing farming values as economic, conservation, and lifestyle. Journal of Economic Psychology 26: 59–72.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • McCann, E., S. Sullivan, D. Erickson, and R. De Young. 1997. Environmental awareness, economic orientation, and farming practices: A comparison of organic and conventional farmers. Environmental Management 21(5): 747–758.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Morris, C., and C. Potter. 1995. Recruiting the new conservationists: Farmers’ adoption of agri-environmental schemes in the UK. Journal of Rural Studies 11(1): 51–63.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Napier, T.L. 2001. Soil and water conservation behaviors in the upper Mississippi River Basin. Journal of Soil and Water Conservation 56(4): 279–285.

    Google Scholar 

  • Nowak, P., S. Bowen, and P.E. Cabot. 2006. Disproportionality as a framework for linking social and biophysical systems. Society and Natural Resources 19: 153–173.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Prokopy, L.S., K. Floress, D. Klotthor-Weinkauf, and A. Baumgart-Getz. 2008. Determinants of agricultural BMP adoption: Evidence from the literature. Journal of Soil and Water Conservation 63(5): 300–311.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ragin, C.C. 1994. Constructing social research. California: Pine Forge Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Schneider, M.L., and C.A. Francis. 2006. Ethics of land use in Nebraska: Farmer and consumer opinions in Washington County. Journal of Sustainable Agriculture 28(4): 81–104.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Stemler, S. 2001. An overview of content analysis. Practical Assessment, Research & Evaluation 7(71). http://PAREonline.net/getvn.asp?v=7&n=17.

  • Sullivan, S., E. McCann, R. De Young, and D. Erickson. 1996. Farmers’ attitudes about farming and the environment: A survey of conventional and organic farmers. Journal of Agricultural and Environmental Ethics 9(2): 123–143.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Traore, N., R. Landry, and N. Amara. 1998. On-farm adoption of conservation practices: The role of farm and farmer characteristics, perceptions, and health hazards. Land Economics 74(1): 114–127.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Vandermeer, John. 1995. The ecological basis of alternative agriculture. Annual Review of Ecological Systems 26: 201–224.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wegener, D.T., and L.R. Fabrigar. 2004. Constructing and evaluating quantitative measures for social psychological research: Conceptual challenges and methodological solutions. In The SAGE handbook of methods in social psychology, eds. C. Sansone, C.C.C. Morf, and A.T. Panter, 145–172. New York: Sage.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Adam P. Reimer.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Reimer, A.P., Thompson, A.W. & Prokopy, L.S. The multi-dimensional nature of environmental attitudes among farmers in Indiana: implications for conservation adoption. Agric Hum Values 29, 29–40 (2012). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10460-011-9308-z

Download citation

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10460-011-9308-z

Keywords

Navigation