Skip to main content

Advertisement

SpringerLink
Log in

Designing relevant biochars as soil amendments using lignocellulosic-based and manure-based feedstocks

  • IHSS 16: FUNCTIONS OF NATURAL ORGANIC MATTER IN CHANGING ENVIRONMENT
  • Published:
Journal of Soils and Sediments Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Purpose

Biochars are a by-product of the biofuel processing of lignocellulosic and manure feedstocks. Because biochars contain an assemblage of organic and inorganic compounds, they can be used as an amendment for C sequestration and soil quality improvement. However, not all biochars are viable soil amendments; this is because their physical and chemical properties vary due to feedstock elemental composition, biofuel processing, and particle size differences. Biochar could deliver a more effective service as a soil amendment if its chemistry was designed ex ante with characteristics that target specific soil quality issues. In this study, we demonstrate how biochars can be designed with relevant properties as successful soil amendments through feedstock selection, pyrolysis conditions, and particle size choices.

Materials and methods

Biochars were produced by pyrolysis of parent lignocellulosic feedstock sources—peanut hull (PH; Archis hypogaea), pecan shell (PS; Carya illinoensis), switchgrass (SG; Panicum virgatum), pine chips (PC; Pinus taeda), hardwood wastes (wood), and poultry litter manure (PL; Gallus domesticus), as well as blends of these feedstocks at temperatures ranging from 250 to 700 °C. Additionally, blended feedstocks were made into pellets (>2 mm) prior to pyrolysis at 350 °C. Dust-sized (<0.42 mm) biochar was obtained through grinding of pelletized biochars. After chemical characterization, the biochars were evaluated as fertility amendments in a Norfolk soil (fine-loamy, kaolinitic, thermic, Typic Kandiudult) during two different pot incubation experiments.

Results and discussion

PL biochars were alkaline and enriched in N and P, whereas biochar from lignocellulosic feedstocks exhibited mixed pH and nutrient contents. Blending PL with PC resulted in lower biochar pH values and nutrient contents. In pot experiment 1, most biochars significantly (P < 0.05) raised soil pH, soil organic carbon, cation exchange capacity, and Mehlich 1 extractable P and K. PL biochar added at 20 g kg−1 resulted in excessive soil P concentrations (393 to 714 mg kg−1) and leachate enriched with dissolved phosphorus (DP, 22 to 70 mg L−1). In pot experiment 2, blended and pelletized PL with PC feedstock reduced soil pH and extractable soil P and K concentrations compared to pot experiment 1. Water leachate DP concentrations were significantly (P < 0.05) reduced by pelletized biochar blends.

Conclusions

Short-term laboratory pot experiments revealed that biochars can have different impacts at modifying soil quality characteristics. Keying on these results allowed for creating designer biochars to address specific soil quality limitations. In the process of manufacturing designer biochars, first, it is important to know what soil quality characteristics are in need of change. Second, choices between feedstocks, blends of these feedstocks, and their accompanying particle sizes can be made prior to pyrolysis to create biochars tailored for addressing specific soil quality improvements. Utilization of these principles should allow for effective service of the designed biochar as a soil amendment while minimizing unwanted ex facto soil quality changes and environmental effects.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Antal MJ, Grønli M (2003) The art, science, and technology of charcoal production. Ind Eng Chem Res 49:1619–1640

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Atkinson C, Fitzgerald J, Hipps N (2010) Potential mechanisms for achieving agricultural benefits from biochar application to temperate soils: a review. Plant Soil 337:1–18

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • ASTM (American Society for Testing and Materials) (2002) Standard test method for ash in biomass. ASTM International, West Conshohocken

    Google Scholar 

  • ASTM (American Society for Testing and Materials) (2006) Petroleum products, lubricants and fossil fuels; coal and coke. ASTM International, West Conshohocken

    Google Scholar 

  • Brewer CE, Unger R, Schmidt-Rohr K, Brown RC (2011) Criteria to select biochars for field studies based on biochar chemical properties. Bioenergy Res 4:312–323

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bridgewater AV, Meier D, Peacock C, Czernik S, Piskorz J, Oasmaa A (1999) Handbook on fast pyrolysis of biomass. CPL, Newbury

    Google Scholar 

  • Brock EH, Kettering QM, Kleinman PJ (2007) Phosphorus leaching through intact soil cores as influenced by type and duration of manure application. Nutr Cycl Agroecosyst 77:269–281

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cantrell KB, Martin JH (2012) Stochastic state–space temperature regulation of biochar production. J Sci Food Agric 92:481–489

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Cantrell KB, Hunt PG, Uchimiya M, Novak JM, Ro KS (2012) Impact of pyrolysis temperature and manure source on physicochemical characteristics of biochar. Biores Technol 107:419–428

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Chan KY, Van Zwieten L, Meszaros IA, Downie A, Joseph S (2007) Agronomic values of green waste as a soil amendment. Aust J Soil Res 45:629–634

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Chan KY, Van Zwieten L, Meszaros IA, Downie A, Joseph S (2008) Using poultry litter biochars as soil amendments. Aust J Soil Res 46:437–444

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Day D, Evans RJ, Lee JW, Reicosky D (2005) Economical CO2, SOx and NOx capture from fossil-fuel utilization with combined renewable hydrogen production and large-scale carbon sequestration. Energy 30:2558–2579

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Deenik JL, Diarra A, Uehara G, Campbell S, Sumiyoshi Y, Antal MJ (2011) Charcoal ash and volatile matter effects on soil properties and plant growth in an acid Ultisol. Soil Sci 176:336–345

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Dumroese RK, Heiskenen J, Englund K, Tervahauta A (2011) Pelleted biochar: chemical and physical properties show potential use as a substrate in container nurseries. Biomass Bioenergy 35:2018–2027

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Gaskin JW, Steiner C, Harris K, Das KC, Bibens B (2008) Effect of low-temperature pyrolysis conditions on biochar for agricultural use. Trans ASABE 51:2061–2069

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Glaser B, Lehmann J, Zech W (2002) Ameliorating physical and chemical properties of highly weathered soils in the tropics with charcoal—a review. Biol Fertil Soils 35:219–230

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Grundale M, DeLuca T (2007) Charcoal effects on soil solution chemistry and growth of Koeleria macrantha in the Ponderosa pine/Douglas-fir ecosystem. Biol Fertil Soils 43:303–311

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ippolito JA, Laird DA, Busscher WJ (2012) Environmental benefits of biochar. J Environ Qual 41:967–972

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Jeffrey S, Verheijen FA, van der Velde M, Bastos AC (2011) A quantitative review of the effects of biochar application to soils on crop productivity using meta-analyses. Agric Ecosyst Environ 144:175–187

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Jones DL, Rousk J, Edwards-Jones G, DeLuca TH, Murphy DV (2012) Biochar-mediated changes in soil quality and plant growth in a three year field trial. Soil Biol Biochem 45:113–124

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Keiluweit M, Nico PS, Johnson MG, Kleber M (2010) Dynamic molecular structure of plant biomass-derived black carbon (biochar). Environ Sci Technol 44:1247–1253

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Kim S, Agblevor FA, Lim J (2009) Fast pyrolysis of chicken litter and turkey litter in a fluidized bed reactor. J Ind Eng Chem 15:247–252

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Koutcheiko S, Monreal CM, Kodama H, McCracken T, Kotlyar L (2007) Preparation and characterization of activated carbon derived from the thermo-chemical conversion of chicken manure. Bioresour Technol 98:2459–2464

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Laird DA (2008) The charcoal vision: a win–win–win scenario for simultaneously producing bioenergy, permanently sequestering carbon, while improving soil and water quality. Agron J 100:178–181

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Laird DA, Brown RC, Amonette JE, Lehmann J (2009) Review of the pyrolysis platform for coproducing bio-oil and biochar. Biofuels Bioprod Bioref 3:547–562

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Lentz RD, Ippolito JA (2012) Biochar and manure affect calcareous soil and corn silage nutrient concentrations and uptake. J Environ Qual 41:1033–1043

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Lehmann J (2007) Bio-energy in the black. Front Ecol Environ 5:381–387

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lehmann J, da Silva JP, Steiner C, Nehls T, Zech W, Glaser B (2003) Nutrient availability and leaching in an archaeological Anthrosol and a Ferralsol of the central Amazon basin: fertilizer, manure and charcoal amendments. Plant Soil 249:343–357

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Lehmann J, Rillig M, Theis J, Masiello CA, Hockaday WC, Crowley D (2011) Biochar effects on soil biota: a review. Soil Biol Biochem 43:1812–1836

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Libra JA, Ro KS, Kammann C, Funke A, Berge NB, Neubauer Y, Titirici M-M, Fuhner C, Bens O, Kern J, Emmerich K-H (2011) Hydrothermal carbonization of biomass residuals: a comparative review of the chemistry, processes, and applications of wet and dry pyrolysis. Biofuels 2:89–124

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Liu J, Schulz H, Brandl S, Miehtke H, Huwe B, Glaser B (2012) Short-term effect of biochar and compost on soil fertility and water status of a Dystric Cambisol in NE Germany under field conditions. J Plant Nutr Soil Sci. doi:10.1002/jpln.200100172

  • McHenry M (2009) Agricultural bio-char production, renewable energy generation and farm carbon sequestration in Western Australia: certainty, uncertainty and risk. Agric Ecosyst Environ 129:1–7

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • North Carolina State University (1994) North Carolina agricultural chemical manual. The College of Agriculture and Life Sciences, North Carolina State University, Raleigh

    Google Scholar 

  • Novak JM, Watts DW, Hunt PG, Stone KC (2000) Phosphorus movement through a coastal plain soil after a decade of intensive swine manure application. J Environ Qual 29:1310–1315

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Novak JM, Busscher WJ, Watts DW, Laird DA, Niandou MAS, Ahmedna MA (2008a) Influence of pecan-derived biochar on chemical properties of a Norfolk loamy sand soil. American Society of Agronomy–Crop Science Society of America–Soil Science Society of America Annual Meeting, Houston, 5–9 Oct. 2009. Available at http://www.biochar-international.org/. Accessed 27 September 2012

  • Novak JM, Busscher WJ, Ahmedna M (2008b) Development of designer biochar to remediate degraded coastal plain soils. Abstract for a non-funded cooperative agreement project number 6657-12000-005-03. Available at http://www.ars.usda.gov/research/projects/projects/htm?ACCN_NO=414939. Accessed 26 September 2012

  • Novak JM, Busscher WJ, Laird DL, Ahmedna M, Watts DW, Niandou MAS (2009) Impact of biochar amendment on fertility of a southeastern coastal plain soil. Soil Sci 174:105–112

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Novak JM, Busscher WJ (2012) Selection and use of designer biochars to improve characteristics of southeastern USA coastal plain degraded soils. In: Lee JW et al (eds) Advanced biofuels and bioproducts. Springer, Berlin, pp 69–96. doi:10.1007/978-1-4614-3348-4_7

  • Novak JM, Busscher WJ, Watts DW et al (2012a) Biochars impact on soil-moisture storage in an Ultisol and two Aridisols. Soil Sci 177:310–320

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Novak JM, Cantrell KB, Watts DW (2012b) Compositional and thermal evaluations of lignocellulosic and poultry litter chars via high and low temperature pyrolysis. Bioenerg Res. doi:10.1007/s12155-012-9228-9

  • Reddy KR, Overcash MR, Khaleel R, Westerman PW (1980) Phosphorus adsorption–desorption of two soils utilized for disposal of animal wastes. J Environ Qual 9:86–92

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Revell KT, Maguire RO, Agblevor FA (2012) Influence of poultry litter biochar on soil properties and plant growth. Soil Sci 177:402–408

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Silber A, Levkovitch I, Graber ER (2010) pH-dependent mineral release and surface properties of cornstraw biochar: agronomic implications. Environ Sci Technol 44:9318–9323

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Sims JT (1998) Phosphorus soil testing: innovations for water quality protection. Commun Soil Sci Plant Anal 29:1471–1489

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Sims JT, Maguire RO, Leytem AB, Gartley KL, Paulter MC (2002) Evaluation of Mehlich 3 as an agri-environmental soil phosphorus test for the Mid-Atlantic United States of America. Soil Sci Soc Am J 66:2016–2032

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Singh B, Singh BP, Cowie AL (2010) Characterization and evaluation of biochars for their application as a soil amendment. Aust J Soil Res 48:516–525

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Sohi S, Lopez-Capel E, Krull E, Bol R (2009) Biochar, climate change and soil: a review to guide future research. CSIRO, Glen Osmond, Australia. Available at http://www.csiro.au/files/files/poei.pdf. Accessed 21 August 2012

  • Spokas KA, Cantrell KB, Novak JM, Archer DW, Ippolito JA, Collins HP, Boateng AA, Lima AA, Lamb MC, McAloon AJ, Lentz RD, Nichols KA (2012) Biochar: a synthesis of its agronomic impact beyond carbon sequestration. J Environ Qual 41:973–989

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Steinbeiss S, Gleixner G, Antonietti M (2009) Effect of biochar amendment on soil carbon balance and soil microbial activity. Soil Biol Biochem 41:1301–1310

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Steiner C, Das KC, Garcia B, Förster ZW (2008) Charcoal and smoke extract stimulate the soil microbial community in a highly weathered Xanthic Ferralsol. Pedobiologia 51:359–366

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sun H, Hockaday WC, Masiello CA, Zygourakis K (2012) Multiple controls on the chemical and physical structures of biochars. Ind Eng Chem Res 51:3587–3597

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Troeh FR, Thompson LM (2005) Soils and soil fertility, 6th edn. Blackwell, Ames

    Google Scholar 

  • US EPA United States Environmental Protection Agency (1996) Microwave assisted acid digestion of siliceous and organically based matrices. In: Test methods for evaluating solid waste, physical/chemical methods. SW-846, US EPA, Washington. Available at http://www.epa.gov/osw/hazard/testmethods/sw846/pdfs/3052.pdf. Accessed 18 September 2012

  • Van Zwieten L, Kimber S, Morris S, Chan KY, Downie A, Rust J, Joseph S, Cowie A (2010) Effects of biochar from slow pyrolysis of paper mill waste on agronomic performance and soil fertility. Plant Soil 327:235–246

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Yuan J-H, Xu R-K, Zhang H (2011) The forms of alkalis in the biochar produced from crop residues at different temperatures. Biores Tech 102:3488–3497

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgments

The information in this article has been funded through an Interagency Agreement between the US Department of Agriculture—Agricultural Research Service (60-6657-1-204) and the US Environmental Protection Agency (EPA; DE-12-92342301-1). It has been subject to review by scientists of the USDA-ARS Coastal Plain Research Laboratory and by the National Health and Environment Effects Research Laboratory’s Western Ecology Division and approved for journal submission. Approval does not signify that the contents reflect the views of the US EPA, nor does mention of trade names or commercial products constitute endorsement or recommendation for use. We thank Ms. Sheeneka Green, Brittany Wallace, Cierra Buckman, Takeyah Powell, and Mr. Jerry Martin II for the laboratory assistance. We also thank Drs. Kurt Spokas, Jim Ippolito, and Saran Sohi for the lively conversation and for the scientific refinement of the designer biochar concept.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Coastal Plains, Soil, Water, and Plant Research Center, US Department of Agriculture, Agricultural Research Service, 2611 West Lucas Street, Florence, SC, 29501, USA

    Jeffrey M. Novak, Keri B. Cantrell, Donald W. Watts & Warren J. Busscher

  2. Western Ecology Division, National Health and Environmental Effects Research Laboratory, US Environmental Protection Agency, 200 Southwest 35th Street, Corvallis, OR, 97333, USA

    Mark G. Johnson

Authors
  1. Jeffrey M. Novak
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Keri B. Cantrell
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. Donald W. Watts
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  4. Warren J. Busscher
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  5. Mark G. Johnson
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Jeffrey M. Novak.

Additional information

Responsible editor: Caixian Tang

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Novak, J.M., Cantrell, K.B., Watts, D.W. et al. Designing relevant biochars as soil amendments using lignocellulosic-based and manure-based feedstocks. J Soils Sediments 14, 330–343 (2014). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11368-013-0680-8

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11368-013-0680-8

Keywords

Search

Navigation