Review paper
Unbiased plotting positions — A review

https://doi.org/10.1016/0022-1694(78)90017-3Get rights and content

Abstract

The existing attitude that the criterion for choice of plotting position is arbitrary is rebuked and it is shown that a worthwhile criterion can be based on desired statistical properties of the plot, rather than on comparison of plotting positions with estimates of probability for individual sample values. These properties are that any quantile estimate made from the plot should be unbiased and should have smallest mean square error among all such estimates. This leads to specification of plotting position initially in terms of reduced variate rather than probability value. The unbiased plotting position is E(y(i)), the mean of the ith order statistic in samples from the reduced variate population, which differs from one distribution to another. A good approximation for each distribution is available in the probability domain. These take the general form (i − α)(N + 1 − 2α) with α = 38 in the normal case and α = 0.44 in the extreme-value type-1 (EV1) and exponential cases. The Weibull formula, α = 0, is correct for the uniform distribution alone and is shown to be biased for other distributions. Hazen's formula α = 12 shows up much better in terms of bias than many would expect. If a single simple distribution free formula were required then α = 25 would be the best compromise. The plotting position postulates which have supported the Weibull formula for many years are examined and some are seen to be unreasonable in view of statistical facts.

References (37)

  • L.R. Beard

    Statistical analysis in hydrology

    Trans. Am. Soc. Civ. Eng.

    (1943)
  • A. Benard et al.

    The plotting of observations on probability paper

    Statistica

    (1953)
  • M.A. Benson

    Characteristics of frequency curves based on a theoretical 1000 year record

    U.S. Geol. Surv., Open File Rep. (Reproduced in U.S. Geol. Surv. Water Supply Pap.

    (1952)
  • M.A. Benson

    Plotting positions and economics of engineering planning

  • G. Blom

    Statistical Estimates and Transformed Beta Variables

    G. Blom
  • California Department of Public Works

    Flow in California streams

    Calif., Dep. Public Works, Div. Eng. Irrig., Bull. 5

    (1923)
  • H. Chernoff et al.

    Use of normal probability paper

    J. Am. Stat. Assoc.

    (1954)
  • H. Chernoff et al.

    The use of generalised probability paper for continuous distributions

    Ann. Math. Stat.

    (1956)
  • V.T. Chow

    Frequency analysis of hydrological data with special application to rainfall intensities

    Univ. Ill. Eng. Exp. Stn., Bull. Ser.

    (1953)
  • D.R. Cox et al.

    The Statistical Analysis of Series of Events

  • R.A. Fisher et al.

    Statistical Tables for Biological, Agricultural and Medical Research

  • I.I. Gringorten

    A plotting rule for extreme probability paper

    J. Geophys. Res.

    (1963)
  • E.J. Gumbel

    On the plotting of flood discharges

    Trans. Am. Geophys. Union

    (1943)
  • E.J. Gumbel

    Discussion on paper by L.R. Beard, 1943

    Trans. Am. Soc. Civ. Eng.

    (1943)
  • E.J. Gumbel

    Simplified plotting of statistical observations

    Trans. Am. Geophys. Union

    (1945)
  • E.J. Gumbel

    Discussion on paper by B.F. Kimball, 1946

    (q.v.) Trans. Am. Geophys. Union

    (1947)
  • E.J. Gumbel

    Statistics of Extremes

  • Cited by (538)

    View all citing articles on Scopus
    View full text