A new paradigm for valuing non-market goods using referendum data: Maximum likelihood estimation by censored logistic regression☆
References (16)
- et al.
Specification of the logit model: The case of valuation of nonmarket goods
J. Environ. Econom. Management
(1986) - et al.
Demographic effects in demand analysis: Estimation of the quadratic expenditure system using microdata
Rev. Econom. Statist.
(1984) - et al.
Measuring values of extramarket goods: Are indirect measures biased?
Amer. J. Agr. Econom.
(1979) - et al.
Contingent valuation of environmental assets: Comparisons with a simulated market
Natur. Resour. J.
(1983) - N. E. Bockstael, W. M. Hanemann, and I. E. Strand, Jr., Measuring the benefits of water quality improvements using...
- et al.
The Determinants of Value for a Recreational Fishing Day: Estimates from a Contingent Valuation Survey
- et al.
Efficient estimation methods for use with “closed-ended” contingent valuation survey data
Rev. Econom. Statist.
(1987) - et al.
Estimating Willingness-to-Pay from Survey Data: An Alternative Pre-test Market Evaluation Procedure
J. Marketing Res.
(1987)
There are more references available in the full text version of this article.
Cited by (542)
Estimating willingness-to-pay from discrete choice models: Setting the record straight
2023, Transportation Research Part A: Policy and PracticeEstimating environmental and cultural/heritage damages of a tailings dam failure: The case of the Fundão dam in Brazil
2023, Journal of Environmental Economics and ManagementEstimating willingness to pay and costs associated with hurricane evacuation
2023, Transportation Research Part D: Transport and EnvironmentInstability in mixed logit demand models
2022, Journal of Choice Modelling
- ☆
The data used in this study were collected under a project sponsored by the Department of Fisheries and Oceans, Vancouver, Canada, supervised by Michelle D. James, my coauthor on earlier related papers. John Stoll and Michael Hanemann pointed out minor errors, Ted McConnell and E. Jane Murdoch have offered helpful suggestions, and the comments of three anonymous referees have made the arguments presented here more lucid (and slightly more pugnacious).
Copyright © 1988 Published by Elsevier Inc.