Waterborne nutrient budgets for the riparian zone of an agricultural watershed

https://doi.org/10.1016/0167-8809(83)90088-9Get rights and content

Abstract

Agroecosystems in the southeastern United States Coastal Plain typically have uplands in agriculture with mixed hardwood forests along the stream channels. This study determined the inputs and outputs of waterborne nutrients for the riparian forest ecosystem of an agricultural watershed. Quantities of phreatic groundwater and precipitation nutrient inputs and phreatic and surface nutrient outputs were determined during 1979. Based on input/output budgets, these streamside forests were shown to be effective in retaining N, P, Ca, and Mg. Partial conversion of the riparian forest to cropland was projected to increase NO3-N and NH4-N loads by up to 800%. Total replacement of riparian forest with crops would increase loads of all nutrients studied except organic N, DMRP, and total P. Land managers can maintain the nutrient filtering capacity of the streamside forest by selective harvesting of hardwoods and by maintaining the present hydrologic regime.

References (26)

  • L.E. Asmussen et al.

    Interflow or shallow phreatic flow in the Coastal Plain of Georgia

    J. Hydrol.

    (1969)
  • M.S. Selim et al.

    Seepage through soil bedding on a hillslope due to a steady rainfall: I. Soil surface of constant slope

  • APHA

    Standard methods for the examination of water and wastewater

    (1976)
  • L.E. Asmussen et al.

    Nutrient movement in streamflow from agricultural watersheds in the Georgia Coastal Plain

    Trans. Am. Soc. Agric. Eng.

    (1979)
    L.E. Asmussen et al.

    Nutrient movement in streamflow from agricultural watersheds in the Georgia Coastal Plain

    Trans. Am. Soc. Agric. Eng.

    (1979)
  • G.R. Benoit

    Effect of agricultural management of wet sloping soil on nitrate and phosphorus in surface and subsurface water

    Water Resour. Res.

    (1973)
  • H. Bouwer et al.

    A slug test for determining hydraulic conductivity of unconfined aquifers with completely or partially penetrating wells

    Water Resour. Res.

    (1976)
  • E.I. Cleaves et al.

    Geochemical balance of a small watershed and its geomorphic implications

    Geol. Soc. Am. Bull.

    (1970)
  • K.W. Cummins et al.

    Stream ecosystems

    Water Spectrum

    (1978)
  • A.M. Duda

    Municipal point source and agricultural nonpoint source contributions to coastal eutrophication

    Water Resour. Bull.

    (1982)
  • K.L. Ewel

    Riparian ecosystems: conservation of their unique characteristics

  • R.P. Gambrell et al.

    Denitrification in subsoils of the North Carolina Coastal Plain as affected by soil drainage

    J. Environ. Qual.

    (1975)
  • W.A. Jackson et al.

    Nitrate in surface and subsurface flow from a small agricultural watershed

    J. Environ. Qual.

    (1973)
  • L.R. Jahn

    Values of riparian habitats to natural ecosystems

  • Cited by (99)

    • Nematode food webs associated with native perennial plant species and soil nutrient pools in California riparian oak woodlands

      2014, Geoderma
      Citation Excerpt :

      Soil hydrologic processes in riparian corridors include water infiltration, as well as nutrient storage and redistribution and evapotranspiration by plants (Cooper et al., 1987; Gumiero et al., 2011; Hoffmann et al., 2012; Lowrance et al., 1983).

    • Dynamics of gaseous nitrogen and carbon fluxes in riparian alder forests

      2011, Ecological Engineering
      Citation Excerpt :

      Riparian buffer zones, as the interface between terrestrial and aquatic components of the landscape, are important ecotechnological measures to control water quality in agricultural catchments (Kuusemets and Mander, 1999) and provide other landscape-ecological functions (Mander et al., 2005a). The water purification effect of riparian ecosystems has been thoroughly studied (Lowrance et al., 1983; Peterjohn and Correll, 1984; Haycock and Pinay, 1993; Vought et al., 1994; Mander et al., 1995, 1997a), yet their role as greenhouse gas (GHG) sources needs to be better understood (Groffman et al., 1991; Teiter and Mander, 2005; Mander et al., 2008). According to certain studies, water purification efficiency may be less favorable in riparian zones, which function as hotspots of greenhouse gas emissions with high global warming potential (GWP; Groffman et al., 2000).

    • Landscape management practices for maintenance and enhancement of ecosystem services in a countryside

      2010, Ecohydrology and Hydrobiology
      Citation Excerpt :

      But in the late 1980s, it was recognized that the problem of water pollution cannot be effectively solved unless non-point (diffused) sources of pollution are concerned (OECD 1986; Halberg 1989; Kauppi 1990; Muscutt et al. 1993; Haycock et al. 1997). The purifying effect of vegetation on subsurface and surface chemicals' fluxes was initially demonstrated on riparian vegetation (Lowrance et al. 1983; Peterjohn and Correll 1997; Muscutt et al. 1993; Haycock et al. 1997). In the 1990s there was no doubt that surface water pollution is directly related to leaching of various chemical compounds, particularly nitrates, from the fields into the ground.

    View all citing articles on Scopus

    Present address: Southeast Watershed Research Laboratory, USDA-ARS, Tufton, GA 31793, U.S.A.

    View full text