Elsevier

Water Research

Volume 32, Issue 12, December 1998, Pages 3731-3737
Water Research

Effects of water sample preservation and storage on nitrogen and phosphorus determinations: implications for the use of automated sampling equipment

https://doi.org/10.1016/S0043-1354(98)00145-6Get rights and content

Abstract

The effects of freezing, acidification, refrigeration and extended storage without refrigeration on measured concentrations of forms of nitrogen and phosphorus were assessed in water samples taken from polluted and unpolluted streams in dry and wet weather. Emphasis was placed on likely changes associated with the use of automatic samplers in field conditions. The response of measured nutrient concentrations to different preservation methods and to extended storage without preservation varied widely between samples. For polluted streams where nutrient concentrations were high (ammoniacal nitrogen >0.1 mg l−1; oxidised nitrogen, total Kjeldahl nitrogen, total and filterable phosphorus >1 mg l−1), there was generally little proportional change in nutrients other than ammoniacal nitrogen after up to 6 d of storage without preservation. Where nutrient concentrations were low, up to 90% of ammoniacal nitrogen, 50% of oxidised nitrogen, 84% of total Kjeldahl nitrogen and 67% of total phosphorus was lost after 6 d. If samples cannot be retrieved immediately, automatic samplers should be refrigerated where possible. Acidification is a suitable alternative for preservation of nitrogen. Samples for filterable phosphorus should be filtered as soon as possible after collection. In some circumstances, unpreserved samples may provide an acceptable level of accuracy for evaluation of broad temporal trends or estimation of nutrient loadings.

Introduction

Automatic samplers (portable pumping samplers) are increasingly being used for water quality monitoring of rivers and streams (Thomas and Eads, 1983; Ferguson, 1994). These devices allow a number of samples to be obtained at pre-set intervals, for example over 24 h, without the commitment of personnel required for frequent or extended manual sampling. In addition, they can be interfaced with flow-measuring devices to sample in response to discharge changes, such as sudden rises in flow following rainstorms. In these circumstances, prompt manual sampling can be logistically difficult. A potential disadvantage of automatic samplers is that for logistical reasons it may be some time before sites can be visited to retrieve samples and return them to the laboratory for analysis. During this interval, there is the potential for physical, chemical and biological processes to change the water quality characteristics of the sample (cf. Johnson et al., 1975; Klingaman and Nelson, 1976; Lambert et al., 1992).

In this study the effects of various techniques of preservation and storage on measured concentrations of forms of nitrogen and phosphorus in water samples were assessed. These water samples were taken from polluted and unpolluted streams in dry and wet weather. Emphasis was placed on likely changes associated with the use of automatic samplers in field conditions.

Section snippets

Materials and methods

Eight sites in western Sydney, New South Wales, Australia and the adjacent Blue Mountains were sampled between February and December 1991 (Table 1). The sites were chosen to cover catchments with a range of land uses. Three of the sites were downstream of secondary sewage treatment plants. Two sites in western Sydney were sampled after extremely heavy rain in the preceding 24 h, which produced large volumes of contaminated surface runoff from urban and industrial areas.

Prior to sampling, all

Results

For all variables, differences between samples and differences between treatments were highly significant (P<0.001). However, this was also true of the interactions between sample and treatment. Thus the effect of different methods of storage and preservation method depended on the sample characteristics.

For ammoniacal nitrogen, concentrations varied little according to treatment method where the initial concentration was low (<0.1 mg l−1), for example in Duck Creek and Leura Falls Creek at Cliff

Discussion

This study demonstrates that changes in concentrations of nitrogen and phosphorus species can be expected within the sampling bottles of automatic samplers if they are left without preservation for 2 d or more and particularly after 6 d. Such changes were generally losses and could have resulted from various processes such as volatilisation, nitrification, denitrification, microbial uptake, precipitation and absorption and adsorption onto bottle surfaces (Heron, 1962; Latterell et al., 1974; Parr

Conclusions

Some form of immediate preservation is essential if large absolute and proportional changes in nutrient concentrations in automatic samples are to be prevented. If samples cannot be retrieved at once, automatic samplers should be refrigerated where possible, but refrigeration alone will not prevent all changes. Acidification is suitable for the preservation of nitrogen forms but not for filterable phosphorus; samples to be analysed for the latter should be filtered as soon as possible after

Acknowledgements

We thank the staff of the Australian Water Technologies Laboratories for undertaking the sample analysis.

References (24)

  • A.H. Johnson et al.

    Some observations concerning preparation and storage of stream samples for dissolved inorganic phosphate analysis

    Water Resour. Res.

    (1975)
  • Kachka A. M., Mackay S. M. and Simeoni M. A. (1994) Sampling methodology for the assessment of nutrient and bacterial...
  • Cited by (0)

    View full text