Elsevier

Geoderma

Volume 128, Issues 1–2, September 2005, Pages 130-154
Geoderma

The role of plants and land management in sequestering soil carbon in temperate arable and grassland ecosystems

https://doi.org/10.1016/j.geoderma.2004.12.020Get rights and content

Abstract

Global climate change and concerns about soil quality have led to a widespread interest in the opportunities that are available to sequester carbon in soils. To achieve a better understanding of the changes in C storage, we need to be able to accurately measure and model inputs and losses of C from soils. This in turn requires a thorough understanding of the biological processes involved and the way in which they are influenced by the soil's physical and chemical environment. The amount of C present in a soil is determined by the difference between C addition and C loss. Because these fluxes are large relative to changes in C storage, net storage can be very difficult to measure, particularly in the short term. Carbon is added to soil from plant and animal materials deposited on the soil surface. It is known that approximately 50% of C assimilated by young plants can be transferred below ground; some is used for root construction and maintenance as well as root respiration; some organic C is lost to the soil through exudation and root turnover. A comparison of eight studies has shown that the input to the soil of root derived organic C during a growing season can range between 0.1 and 2.8 t C ha−1. Quantifying inputs from different processes has proved difficult and the relative importance of exudation and root death under field conditions remains uncertain. The chemical composition of substrates released by exudation and root death is known to be very different. Exudates contain high concentrations of soluble organic substrates and as a consequence are highly labile, whereas additions of C from root death have structural organic substrates with lower potential decomposition rates. Losses of C from soil occur as a consequence of plant and microbial respiration. However, identifying the source of evolved CO2, whether it be from root or microbial respiration, is much more difficult. Some new methods using isotopic labelling and pool dilution have been developed to separate plant and microbial respiration, and despite difficulties, these promise to provide valuable information on the processes of C input and loss from soils.

At a field scale measurements and models would suggest that soil and crop management can play a significant role in determining the extent of C sequestration by soils and the proportion of labile C present. A comparison of 11 field studies showed that soil respiration varies between 4 and 26 t C ha−1 year−1, with management such as tillage, drainage, grazing and manure application exerting a strong influence on the magnitude of fluxes. Net ecosystem exchange of C has been shown to be at least an order of magnitude lower than respiratory losses in comparable studies, but land management is important in determining the direction and magnitude of the C flux. Recent studies have suggested that although the overall quantity of C stored in European soils is increasing, this increase is confined largely to forested areas and that many cropped soils are losing soil organic matter. It is has been suggested that that the biological potential for C storage in European cropland lies between 9 and 120 Mt C year−1. In order to take advantage of this potential and to develop management systems that promote C storage we need to achieve a better understanding of the processes of C input and loss, and develop improved models using pools that coincide with measurable soil C fractions.

Introduction

There is an urgent requirement to improve our understanding of the processes contributing to C storage in soils. This has arisen because of the need to sequester C to overcome global climate change (Paustian et al., 1998a) and to improve soil quality, as we develop more sustainable and land management practices (Carter, 2002). Protecting and enhancing stocks of soil organic matter will remain a global challenge that needs to involve environmental scientists, socio-economists and policy makers for the next decade and beyond. This exercise will require an improved understanding of the mechanisms underlying C sequestration and involve a re-evaluation of modern and traditional farming practices, as the principles of environmental protection and sustainable management of non renewable resources gain a higher priority. Reflecting these concerns, the European Union's common agricultural policy will place increased importance on soil quality and land management, as financial support is shifted from production towards environmental protection (European Commission, 2002).

A range of new techniques has become available in recent years that have advanced our understanding of the processes underlying organic matter transformations in soil. Through the use of isotopic tracers we now have estimates of the quantities of plant derived C that are added to soil. Both continuous labelling and pulse labelling techniques have indicated that the soil environment is a major sink for C derived from exudation and root turnover (Meharg, 1994). This C contributes to root construction and maintenance, but is also added to the soil through plant respiration and rhizodeposition. The addition of C to soil stimulates microbial activity, which is the driving force behind transformations of organic matter. Molecular techniques are allowing us to examine the relationship between microbial activity, biodiversity and function in soils. It has become clear that the diversity of microbial communities is greater than had been previously thought (Tiedje et al., 2001), however, such diversity may not always be a pre-requisite for soils to undertake a wide range of functions. Many soil functions have been shown to be unaffected by experimentally manipulating the biodiversity of microbial communities (Griffiths et al., 2001), indicating that there is widespread functional redundancy within the system. Where soil functions can be linked to specific biological populations an opportunity exists to manipulate soil processes through alterations of the soil microbial community (Atkinson and Watson, 2000). Experimental techniques allowing physical and chemical characterisation of soils are becoming increasingly sophisticated and are allowing us to explore the relationships between living organisms and the environment within which they function. Young et al. (1998) emphasise the importance of the soil's structure in maintaining biological diversity through the provision of habitat and by influencing patterns of resource storage and transport. Modern tools in analytical chemistry are forcing us to re-examine long held theories of soil organic matter formation. For example Hatcher (2003) points to evidence from recent NMR studies that suggest that soil organic matter forms as a consequence of the transformation of biopolymers by microbial action and not as a result of random condensation reactions. The physical fractionation of soils is also helping us to understand how organic matter pools can become chemically and physically isolated. Hassink et al. (1997) have shown that the amount of organic matter that a soil can store is largely regulated by its silt and clay content although management can also influence storage, particularly of larger macro-organic matter fractions (Balesdent et al., 2000, Denef et al., 2001). Spatial variation of soil organic matter content particularly at national and regional scales are also strongly influenced by climate and land use (Joos et al., 2001, Paustian et al., 1998b).

The atmospheric concentration of CO2 is currently higher that it has been for at least 420 000 years, and may well double in this century. This is leading to a very complex series of interactions between the biosphere, hydrosphere and atmosphere as the equilibration between soils, plants and the atmosphere breaks down. Human activity has had a major impact on the C cycle. Pre-industrial concentrations of CO2 were below 300 μL L−1, but today's atmospheric CO2 concentrations are around 370 μL L−1 and rising. Measurements of the isotopic signature of CO2 in the atmosphere have established that fossil fuel consumption is principally responsible for the concentration rises (Quay et al., 2003). Land use change also contributes to an increase in atmospheric CO2 as a consequence of deforestation and cultivation of new arable land (Schimel et al., 2001). Most recent estimates suggest that during the period between 1989 and 1998 land use changes resulted in the addition of 1.6 Pg C per year to the atmosphere (Houghton, 2000). However, not all of the anthropogenically produced CO2 remains each year in the atmosphere. There is a significant removal of atmospheric C by the oceans (2.3 Pg C year−1) and an increasing sink within the terrestrial biosphere (Bremer et al., 1998). Studies of the C cycle during the 1990s suggest that as a consequence of both fossil fuel consumption and land use change the atmospheric pool of C is currently increasing by around 3.2 Pg per year (Frank et al., 2002). The regional distribution of sink strength in the terrestrial biosphere is more difficult to determine but it is suggested that the mid to high latitudes of the northern hemisphere are particularly important (Janssens et al., 2003). The Kyoto protocol commits signatories to reducing C emissions to 0.3 Pg below 1990 levels. Although this could be achieved partly by reduced dependence on reserves of fossil fuels, it is likely that land use change will play a vital role in contributing to atmospheric CO2 removal. It has been estimated that agricultural soils offer the potential to sequester between 0.4 and 0.9 Pg C year−1, through improved management of existing agricultural soils, restoration of degraded land, the more extensive use of setaside, and the restoration of wetlands (Paustian et al., 1998a). These opportunities to sequester C will probably only be available until the middle of the 21st century after which it is anticipated that soils may return to being net source, as a consequence of respiratory losses increasing more rapidly than inputs by photosynthesis (Prentice, 2001).

To understand why the soil has a particular organic matter content, it is necessary to quantify both inputs and outputs of C to the system. Unfortunately these are both difficult to measure and the difference between input and output is normally small, further complicating estimates of change in storage. To predict how the organic matter content responds to changing environmental and management pressures at local, regional and global scales, we need robust models that take account of the complex physical, chemical, and biological controls influencing organic matter turnover. Models of soil organic matter turnover allow us to encapsulate our understanding of the mechanisms regulating organic matter dynamics in soil and then to investigate the effects of environmental and management change on rates of turnover. Although short-term (less that 1 year) environmental and management changes remain difficult to predict, a number of models can successfully predict longer-term change in a range of diverse environments (Smith et al., 1997, Parton et al., 1998, Paustian et al., 1997b). The integration of soil organic matter models within whole ecosystem simulations allows a more holistic assessment of ecosystem responses to environmental change and is highlighting management strategies that can be used to optimise C sequestration through targeted management of soils and vegetation (Paustian et al., 2000, Eve et al., 2002). Models have also highlighted the complexity of interactions that exist within the soil environment, and have indicated areas where our understanding is still incomplete. This review aims to summarise our understanding of the mechanisms by which plants influence the quantity of C contained in soils, through both a consideration of the processes of C addition and loss. We then go on to discuss how land management can be used to influence that content in agro-ecosystems.

Section snippets

Carbon addition to soil

Most C additions to soils originate from plants. Plant C can be added to soil by deposition of leaf litter on the soil surface and incorporation of crop residues into the soil after harvest. Root systems also make a significant contribution to C inputs (Fig. 1). It has been widely reported that around 50% of the C fixed in net photosynthesis is transferred below ground and partitioned between root growth, rhizosphere (root plus microbial) respiration and addition to soil organic matter (Lynch

C loss from soil

Carbon can be lost from soils as a consequence of respiration, leaching and soil erosion (Lal, 2003). On a global basis respiration is thought to be more important than erosion, and leaching losses. There is however a difficulty in assigning losses to different processes. Ultimately all C fixed by photosynthesis will be oxidised and returned to the atmosphere, and erosion can be viewed a transport process that influences the location of the environment in which oxidation takes place (Gregorich

Land management and C storage

It is argued that land management can make a major contribution to C sequestration by the development of systems where biological inputs of C exceed losses (principally by respiration). Farming practice over many centuries has been used to achieve precisely this objective in building soil fertility, prior to the use of synthetic fertilisers. However, the new challenge of quantifying C flows in order to construct budgets of global C flows requires us to accurately quantify changes in C storage

Conclusions

The overall balance of terrestrial C in Europe presents a very diverse picture. Some of the most recent estimates (Janssens et al., 2003) suggest that although there is a modest increase in C storage within European soils (111 Tg C year−1) this is a consequence of a relatively large accumulation of C in forests (+377 Tg C year−1), accompanied by losses of C from agriculture (−199 Tg C year−1) and peatlands (−67 Tg C year−1). There are relatively few good experimental data that can be used to

Acknowledgements

The authors are grateful for the invitation to present this work to a conference on Mechanisms and regulation of organic matter stabilisation in soil held in Munich, in 2003. Research funding was received from the Scottish Executive Environment, and Rural Affairs Department.

References (193)

  • K. Coleman et al.

    Simulating trends in soil organic carbon in long-term experiments using RothC-26.3

    Geoderma

    (1997)
  • T.L. Crocker et al.

    Substituting root numbers for length: improving the use of minirhizotrons to study fine root dynamics

    Applied Soil Ecology

    (2003)
  • K. Denef et al.

    Importance of macroaggregate dynamics in controlling soil carbon stabilization: short-term effects of physical disturbance induced by dry–wet cycles

    Soil Biology & Biochemistry

    (2001)
  • S.W. Duiker et al.

    Crop residue and tillage effects on carbon sequestration in a Luvisol in central Ohio

    Soil and Tillage Research

    (1999)
  • W.E. Emmerich

    Carbon dioxide fluxes in a semiarid environment with high carbonate soils (vol 116, pg 91, 2003)

    Agricultural and Forest Meteorology

    (2004)
  • R.F. Follett

    Soil management concepts and carbon sequestration in cropland soils

    Soil and Tillage Research

    (2001)
  • A.B. Frank et al.

    Soil carbon dioxide fluxes in northern semiarid grasslands

    Soil Biology & Biochemistry

    (2002)
  • U. Franko et al.

    Simulation of temperature, water and nitrogen dynamics using the model CANDY

    Ecological Modelling

    (1995)
  • K. Grahammer et al.

    Day and night soil respiration from a grassland

    Soil Biology & Biochemistry

    (1991)
  • E.G. Gregorich et al.

    Carbon distribution and losses: erosion and deposition effects

    Soil and Tillage Research

    (1998)
  • B.S. Griffiths et al.

    An examination of the biodiversity–ecosystem function relationship in arable soil microbial communities

    Soil Biology & Biochemistry

    (2001)
  • J. Hassink et al.

    Size and density fractionation of soil organic matter and the physical capacity of soils to protect organic matter

    European Journal of Agronomy

    (1997)
  • A. Hodge et al.

    Characterisation and microbial utilisation of exudate material from the rhizosphere of Lolium perenne grown under CO2 enrichment

    Soil Biology & Biochemistry

    (1998)
  • O. Højberg et al.

    Potential rates of ammonium oxidation, nitrate oxidation, nitrate reduction and denitrification in the young barley rhizosphere

    Soil Biology & Biochemistry

    (1996)
  • P.A. Jacinthe et al.

    Carbon budget and seasonal carbon dioxide emission from a central Ohio Luvisol as influenced by wheat residue amendment

    Soil and Tillage Research

    (2002)
  • H. Keith et al.

    Input of carbon to soil from wheat plants

    Soil Biology & Biochemistry

    (1986)
  • Y. Kuzyakov

    Separating microbial respiration of exudates from root respiration in non-sterile soils: a comparison of four methods

    Soil Biology & Biochemistry

    (2002)
  • Y. Kuzyakov et al.

    Carbon partitioning and below-ground translocation by Lolium perenne

    Soil Biology & Biochemistry

    (2001)
  • O.O. Akinremi et al.

    Effects of soil temperature and moisture on soil respiration in barley and fallow plots

    Canadian Journal of Soil Science

    (1999)
  • R. Alvarez et al.

    Soil respiration and carbon inputs from crops in a wheat soybean rotation under different tillage systems

    Soil Use and Management

    (1995)
  • J. Balesdent et al.

    Effect of tillage on soil organic-carbon mineralization estimated from C-13 abundance in maize fields

    Journal of Soil Science

    (1990)
  • P. Barraclough et al.

    The growth and activity of winter-wheat roots in the field—the effect of sowing date and soil type on root-growth of high-yielding crops

    Journal of Agricultural Science

    (1984)
  • A.G. Bengough et al.

    Sloughing of root cap cells decreases the frictional resistance to maize (Zea mays L.) root growth

    Journal of Experimental Botany

    (1997)
  • I.J. Bingham et al.

    Activity and capacity of respiratory pathways in barley roots deprived of inorganic nutrients

    Plant Physiology and Biochemistry (Paris)

    (1989)
  • I.J. Bingham et al.

    Control of root-growth—effects of carbohydrates on the extension, branching and rate of respiration of different fractions of wheat roots

    Physiologia Plantarum

    (1993)
  • I.J. Bingham et al.

    Extension rate and respiratory activity in the growth zone of wheat roots: time-course for adjustments after defoliation

    Physiologia Plantarum

    (1996)
  • W. Böhm

    Methods of studying root systems

    (1979)
  • D.J. Bremer et al.

    Responses of soil respiration to clipping and grazing in a tallgrass prairie

    Journal of Environmental Quality

    (1998)
  • M.M. Caldwell

    Root structure: the considerable cost of belowground function

  • M.G.R. Cannell et al.

    N-poor ecosystems may respond more to elevated CO2 than N-rich ones in the long term. A model analysis of grassland

    Global Change Biology

    (1998)
  • M.R. Carter

    Soil quality for sustainable land management: organic matter and aggregation interactions that maintain soil functions

    Agronomy Journal

    (2002)
  • K.Y. Chan et al.

    Sequestration of carbon and changes in soil quality under conservation tillage on light-textured soils in Australia: a review

    Australian Journal of Experimental Agriculture

    (2003)
  • W. Cheng

    Rhizosphere feedbacks in elevated CO2

    Tree Physiology

    (1999)
  • W.X. Cheng et al.

    Elevated CO2, rhizosphere processes, and soil organic matter decomposition

    Plant and Soil

    (1998)
  • W. Cheng et al.

    In situ measurement of root respiration and soluble C concentrations in the rhizosphere

    Soil Biology & Biochemistry

    (1993)
  • W.X. Cheng et al.

    Rhizosphere effects on decomposition: controls of plant species, phenology, and fertilization

    Soil Science Society of America Journal

    (2003)
  • C.V. Cole et al.

    Agricultural sources and sinks of carbon

    Water, Air and Soil Pollution

    (1993)
  • C.V. Cole et al.

    Global estimates of potential mitigation of greenhouse gas emissions by agriculture

    Nutrient Cycling in Agroecosystems

    (1997)
  • L.H. Comas et al.

    Assessing root death and root system dynamics in a study of grape canopy pruning

    New Phytologist

    (2000)
  • R.T. Conant et al.

    Grassland management and conversion into grassland: effects on soil carbon

    Ecological Applications

    (2001)
  • Cited by (187)

    • Grazing management for soil carbon in Australia: A review

      2023, Journal of Environmental Management
    View all citing articles on Scopus
    View full text