Skip to main content
Log in

Nutrient and sediment removal by switchgrass and cool-season grass filter strips in Central Iowa, USA

  • Published:
Agroforestry Systems Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Simulated rainfall and runoff were used to compare the effectiveness of 6 m and 3 m wide filter strips of switchgrass (Panicum virgatum) and cool-season filter strips consisting of bromegrass (Bromus inermis), timothy (Phleum pratense) and fescue (Festuca spp.) in reducing sediment, nitrogen and phosphorus in surface runoff from adjacent crop fields. The 6 m and 3 m wide strips represented 20:1 and 40:1 area ratios, respectively. Twelve plots, six each, in the switchgrass and cool-season grass strips, were laid out on Coland soil, having an average slope of 3%. Plots received simulated rainfall of 5.1 cm hr1 intensity and simulated runoff containing known quantities of sediment and nutrients. Three runon samples, each integrated over 15 minutes, and nine runoff samples, each integrated over five minutes, were collected from each plot and analyzed for sediment, total-N, \({\text{NO}}_{\text{3}}^{\text{ - }} \)-N, total-P and \({\text{PO}}_{\text{4}}^{\text{ - }} \)P. The 6 m wide filter strips removed 77% while the 3 m removed 66% of the incoming sediment from surface runoff. The 6 m filter strips removed 46% of total-N, 42% of \({\text{NO}}_{\text{3}}^{\text{ - }} \)-N, 52% of total-P, and 43% of \({\text{PO}}_{\text{4}}^{\text{ - }} \)-P; and the 3 m filter strips removed 28% of total-N, 25% of \({\text{NO}}_{\text{3}}^{\text{ - }} \)-N, 37% of total-P and 34% of \({\text{PO}}_{\text{4}}^{\text{ - }} \)-P. Differences between 6 m and 3 m filter strips were significant (P < 0.05) for sediment and nutrient removal. Switchgrass filter strips removed significantly more total-N, \({\text{NO}}_{\text{3}}^{\text{ - }} \)-N, total-P and \({\text{PO}}_{\text{4}}^{\text{ - }} \)-P than cool-season grass filter strips (P < 0.05).

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Clinnick PF (1985) Buffer strip management in forest operations: a review. Australian Forestry 48: 34–45

    Google Scholar 

  • Cooper JR, Gilliam JW and Jacobs TC (1986) Riparian areas as a control of nonpoint pollutants. In: Correll DL (ed) Watershed Research Perspectives, pp 166–192. Smithsonian Press, Washington, DC

    Google Scholar 

  • Correll DL (1997) Buffer zones and water quality protection, General principles. In: Haycock NE, Burt TP, Goulding KWT and Pinay G (eds) Buffer Zones: Their Processes and Potential in Water Protection, pp 7–20. Quest Environmental

  • Dabney SM, Dunn GH, Krishnegowda KT and Alonso CV (1993a) Stage-discharge relationships of narrow grass barriers. Agron Abst: 312–313

  • Dabney SM, McGregor KC, Meyer LD, Grissinger EH and Foster GR (1993b) Vegetative barriers for runoff and sediment control. In: Proceedings, Integrated Resource Management and Landscape Modification for Environmental Protection, pp 60–70. ASAE, St. Joseph, MI

    Google Scholar 

  • DeWitt TA (1984) Soil Survey of Story County, Iowa. USDA Soil Conc Serv, Washington, DC

    Google Scholar 

  • Dillaha TA, Reneau RB, Mostaghimi S and Lee D (1989) Vegetative filter strips for agricultural nonpoint source pollution control. Trans ASAE 32: 513–519

    Google Scholar 

  • Dillaha TA, Sherrard JH, Lee D, Mostaghimi S and Shanholtz VO (1988) Evaluation of vegetative filter strips as a best management practice for feed lots. Journal of the Water Pollution Control Federation 60: 1231–1238

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Isenhart TM, Schultz RC and Colletti JP (1997) Watershed restoration and agricultural practices in the midwest: Bear Creek, Iowa, Chapter 19. In: Williams JE, Dombeck MP and Woods CA (eds) Watershed Restoration: Principles and Practice. American Fisheries Society, Beltsville, MD

    Google Scholar 

  • Jordan TE, Correll DL and Weller DE (1993) Nutrient interception by a riparian forest receiving inputs from adjacent cropland. J Environ Qual 22: 467–473

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lowrance RR, Leonard R and Sheridan J (1985) Managing riparian ecosystems to control nonpoint pollution. J Soil and Water Cons 40: 87–91

    Google Scholar 

  • Lowrance RR, Todd R and Asmussen LE (1983) Waterborne nutrient budgets for the riparian zone of an agricultural watershed. Agr Ecosyst and Environ 10: 371–384

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Magette WL, Brinsfield RB, Palmer RE and Wood JD (1989) Nutrient and Sediment Removal by vegetated filter strips. Trans ASAE 32: 663–667

    Google Scholar 

  • Mickelson SK and Baker JL (1993) Buffer strips for controlling herbicide runoff losses. ASAE Paper No. 93-2084. St. Joseph, MI

  • Misra AK, Baker JL, Mickelson SK and Shang H (1996) Contributing area and concentration effects on herbicide removal by vegetative buffer strips. Trans ASAE 39: 2105–2111

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Osborne LL and Kovacic DA (1993) Riparian vegetated buffer strips in water-quality restoration and stream management. Freshwater Biology 29: 243–258

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Parsons JE, Daniels RD, Gilliam JW and Dillaha TA (1991) The effect of vegetation filter strips on sediment and nutrient removal from agricultural runoff. In: Proceedings, Environmentally Sound Agriculture Conference, April, Orlando, FL

  • Peterjohn WT and Correll DL (1984) Nutrient dynamics in an agricultural watershed: observations on the role of a riparian forest. Ecology 65: 1466–1475

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Phillips JD (1989) An evaluation of the factors determining the effectiveness of water quality buffer zones. J Hydrology 107: 133–145

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • SAS Institute, Inc. (1983) SAS/STAT User’s Guide, Rel. 6.03 Ed. Cary,NC: SAS Institute, Inc

    Google Scholar 

  • Schultz RC, Colletti JP, Isenhart TM, Simpkins WW, Mize CW and Thompson ML (1995) Design and placement of a multi-species riparian buffer strip system. Agrofor Syst 29: 201–226

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Standard Methods (1989) For the Examination of Water and Wastewater. APHA-AWWA WPCF (17th edition)

  • USDA-Natural Resources Conservation Service (1997) Riparian Forest Buffer. Conservation Practice Standard, Code 392. Iowa NRCS

  • Uusi-Kämppä J, Turtola E, Hartikainen H and Yläranta T (1997) The interactions of buffer zones and phosphorus runoff. In: Haycock NE, Burt TP, Goulding KWT and Pinay G (eds) Buffer Zones: Their Processes and Potential in Water Protection, pp 43–53. Quest Environmental

  • Vought LB-M, Dahl J, Pedersen CL and Lacoursière JO (1994) Nutrient retention in riparian ecotones. Ambio 23: 342–348

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Lee, KH., Isenhart, T.M., Schultz, R.C. et al. Nutrient and sediment removal by switchgrass and cool-season grass filter strips in Central Iowa, USA. Agroforestry Systems 44, 121–132 (1998). https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1006201302242

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1006201302242

Navigation