Skip to main content
Log in

Statistical Problems Encountered in Trapping Studies of Scolytids and Associated Insects

  • Published:
Journal of Chemical Ecology Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Traps baited with semiochemicals are often used to investigate the chemical ecology of scolytids and associated insects. One statistical problem frequently encountered in these studies are treatments that catch no insects and, thus, have zero mean and variance, such as blank or control traps. A second problem is the use of multiple comparison procedures that do not control the experimentwise error rate. We conducted a literature survey to determine the frequency of these two statistical problems in Journal of Chemical Ecology for 1990–2002. Simulations were then used to examine the effects of these problems on the validity of multiple comparison procedures. Our results indicate that both statistical problems are common in the literature, and when combined can significantly inflate both the experimentwise and per comparison error rate for multiple comparison procedures. A possible solution to this problem is presented that involves confidence intervals for the treatment means. Options to increase the statistical power of trapping studies are also discussed.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

REFERENCES

  • Borden, J. H. 1982. Aggregation pheromones, pp. 74-139, in J. B. Mitton and K. B. Sturgeon (eds.). Bark Beetles in North American Conifers: A System for the Study of Evolutionary Biology. University of Texas Press, Austin, TX.

    Google Scholar 

  • Borden, J. H. 1997. Disruption of semiochemical-mediated aggregation in bark beetles, pp. 421-438, in R. T. Carde and A. K. Minks (eds.). Insect Pheromone Research, New Directions. Kluwer Academic, Boston, MA.

    Google Scholar 

  • Carmer, S.G. and Swanson, M. R. 1973. An evaluation of ten pairwise multiple comparison procedures by Monte Carlo methods. J. Am. Stat. Assoc. 68:66-74.

    Google Scholar 

  • Carmer, S.G. and Walker, W. M. 1982. Baby bear's dilemma: A statistical tale. Agron. J. 74:122-124.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cohen, J. 1988. Statistical Power Analysis for the Behavioral Sciences. Erlbaum, Mahwah, NJ.

    Google Scholar 

  • Day, R.W. and Quinn, G. P. 1989. Comparisons of treatments after an analysis of variance in ecology. Ecol. Monogr. 59:433-463.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hayter, A. J. 1986. The maximum familywise error rate of Fisher's least significant difference test. J. Am. Stat. Assoc. 81:1000-1004.

    Google Scholar 

  • Herms, D.A., Haack, R. A., and Ayres, B. D. 1991. Variation in semiochemical-mediated prey-predator interaction: Ips pini (Scolytidae) and Thanasimus dubius (Cleridae). J. Chem. Ecol. 17:1705-1714.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hsu, J. C. 1996. Multiple Comparisons: Theory and Methods. Chapman & Hall/CRC, Boca Raton, Florida.

    Google Scholar 

  • Littell, R.C., Milliken, G. A., Stroup, W.W., and Wolfinger, R. D. 1996. SAS System for Mixed Models. SAS Institute, Cary, NC.

    Google Scholar 

  • McCulloch, C.E. and Searle, S. R. 2001. Generalized, Linear, and Mixed Models. Wiley, New York, NY.

    Google Scholar 

  • Miller, D.R., Gibson, K.E., Raffa, K.F., Seybold, S.J., Teale, S. A., and Wood, D. L. 1997. Geographic variation in response of pine engraver, Ips pini, and associated species to pheromone, lanierone. J. Chem. Ecol. 23:2013-2031.

    Google Scholar 

  • Raffa, K. F. 2001. Mixed messages across multiple trophic levels: The ecology of bark beetle chemical communication systems. Chemoecology 11:49-65.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rothman, K. J. 1990. No adjustments are needed for multiple comparisons. Epidemiology 1:43-46.

    Google Scholar 

  • SAS Institute INC. 2001. The SAS System for Windows, Version 8. SAS Institute, Cary, NC.

    Google Scholar 

  • Saville, D. J. 1990. Multiple comparison procedures: The practical solution. Am. Stat. 44:174-180.

    Google Scholar 

  • Smith, M.T., Salom, S.M., and Payne, T. L. 1993. The Southern Pine Bark Beetle Guild: An Historical Review of the Research on the Semiochemical-Based Communication System of the Five Principle Species. Virginia Polytechnic Institute and State University, Blacksburg, VA.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sokal, R.R. and Rohlf, F. J. 1995. Biometry: The Principles and Practices of Statistics in Biological Research. W. H. Freeman, New York, NY.

    Google Scholar 

  • Stewart-Oaten, A. 1995. Rules and judgements in statistics: Three examples. Ecology 76:2001-2009.

    Google Scholar 

  • The R Core Development Team. 2003. R 1.7.0—A Language and Environment. http://www.r-project.org/

  • Toothaker, L. E. 1993. Multiple comparison procedures. Sage, Newbury Park, CA.

    Google Scholar 

  • Westfall, P. H., Tobias, R.D., Rom, D., Wolfinger, R. D., and Hochberg, Y. 1999. Multiple Comparisons and Multiple Tests Using the SAS System. SAS Institute, Cary, NC.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wood, D. L. 1982. The role of pheromones, kairomones, and allomones in the host selection and colonization behavior of bark beetles. Ann. Rev. Entomol. 27:411-446.

    Google Scholar 

  • Zhou, J., Ross, D.W.,and Niwa, C. G. 2001. Kairomonal response of Thanasimus undatulus, Enoclerus sphegeus (Coleoptera: Cleridae), and Temnochila chlorodia (Coleoptera: Trogositidae) to bark beetle semiochemicals in Eastern Oregon. Environ. Entomol. 30:993-998.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Reeve, J.D., Strom, B.L. Statistical Problems Encountered in Trapping Studies of Scolytids and Associated Insects. J Chem Ecol 30, 1575–1590 (2004). https://doi.org/10.1023/B:JOEC.0000042069.17533.3c

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1023/B:JOEC.0000042069.17533.3c

Navigation